Entertainment
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
IMAX vs DLX vs CNK vs QUAD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Advertising Agencies
Entertainment
Specialty Business Services
IMAX vs DLX vs CNK vs QUAD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Entertainment | Advertising Agencies | Entertainment | Specialty Business Services |
| Market Cap | $1.92B | $1.21B | $3.21B | $400M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $405M | $2.13B | $3.12B | $2.37B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $43M | $107M | $138M | $27M |
| Gross Margin | 58.1% | 52.9% | 40.7% | 18.5% |
| Operating Margin | 21.4% | 12.2% | 11.0% | 5.0% |
| Forward P/E | 21.1x | 6.6x | 13.0x | 6.3x |
| Total Debt | $297M | $1.55B | $3.78B | $444M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $151M | $311M | $344M | $63M |
IMAX vs DLX vs CNK vs QUAD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| IMAX Corporation (IMAX) | 100 | 282.6 | +182.6% |
| Deluxe Corporation (DLX) | 100 | 115.0 | +15.0% |
| Cinemark Holdings, … (CNK) | 100 | 182.8 | +82.8% |
| Quad/Graphics, Inc. (QUAD) | 100 | 268.8 | +168.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: IMAX vs DLX vs CNK vs QUAD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
IMAX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 16.5%, EPS growth 31.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 10.9%
- 8.9% 10Y total return vs QUAD's -23.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.43, Low D/E 69.5%, current ratio 1.67x
- 16.5% revenue growth vs QUAD's -9.4%
DLX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if defensive is your priority.
- Beta 1.09, yield 4.5%, current ratio 1.04x
- 4.5% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs QUAD's 3.8%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
- +83.0% vs CNK's -10.7%
CNK is the clearest fit if your priority is stability.
- Beta 0.22 vs DLX's 1.09
QUAD is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.03, yield 3.8%
- Lower P/E (6.3x vs 13.0x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 16.5% revenue growth vs QUAD's -9.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.3x vs 13.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 10.7% margin vs QUAD's 1.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.22 vs DLX's 1.09 | |
| Dividends | 4.5% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs QUAD's 3.8%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +83.0% vs CNK's -10.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.9% ROA vs QUAD's 2.2%, ROIC 12.7% vs 17.9% |
IMAX vs DLX vs CNK vs QUAD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
IMAX vs DLX vs CNK vs QUAD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
IMAX leads in 2 of 6 categories
QUAD leads 2 • DLX leads 0 • CNK leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IMAX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CNK is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.1B annually — 7.7x IMAX's $405M. IMAX is the more profitable business, keeping 10.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to QUAD's 1.2%. On growth, DLX holds the edge at +0.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $405M | $2.1B | $3.1B | $2.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $150M | $395M | $545M | $196M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $43M | $107M | $138M | $27M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $115M | $204M | $177M | $44M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +58.1% | +52.9% | +40.7% | +18.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +21.4% | +12.2% | +11.0% | +5.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +10.7% | +5.0% | +4.4% | +1.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +28.5% | +9.5% | +5.7% | +1.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -6.1% | +0.3% | -4.7% | -7.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +65.5% | +148.4% | -18.2% | +18.2% |
Valuation Metrics
QUAD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.2x trailing earnings, QUAD trades at a 75% valuation discount to IMAX's 56.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, QUAD's 4.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than IMAX's 13.1x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.9B | $1.2B | $3.2B | $400M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.1B | $2.4B | $6.6B | $781M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 56.56x | 14.91x | 26.42x | 14.19x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 21.15x | 6.60x | 12.97x | 6.30x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.28x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 13.10x | 6.19x | 12.23x | 3.96x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.69x | 0.57x | 1.03x | 0.17x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.63x | 1.79x | 8.92x | 2.97x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 16.18x | 6.90x | 18.11x | 7.90x |
Profitability & Efficiency
IMAX leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CNK delivers a 25.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $25 in annual profit, vs $11 for IMAX. IMAX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.70x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CNK's 9.14x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IMAX scores 7/9 vs CNK's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +10.8% | +16.0% | +25.4% | +25.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.9% | +4.1% | +3.0% | +2.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +12.7% | +9.6% | +7.5% | +17.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +14.5% | +11.8% | +9.3% | +19.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.70x | 2.26x | 9.14x | 3.45x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $146M | $1.2B | $3.4B | $381M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $151M | $311M | $344M | $63M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $297M | $1.5B | $3.8B | $444M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 21.15x | 3.09x | 1.89x | 2.11x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
QUAD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in QUAD five years ago would be worth $25,813 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,039 for DLX. Over the past 12 months, DLX leads with a +83.0% total return vs CNK's -10.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors QUAD at 43.8% vs CNK's 19.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -1.1% | +22.3% | +17.2% | +33.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +38.9% | +83.0% | -10.7% | +44.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +79.5% | +106.9% | +71.0% | +197.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +70.3% | -29.6% | +29.3% | +158.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +8.9% | -38.8% | -6.6% | -23.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +21.5% | +27.4% | +19.6% | +43.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CNK and QUAD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CNK is the less volatile stock with a 0.22 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than DLX's 1.09 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. QUAD currently trades 88.7% from its 52-week high vs CNK's 80.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.43x | 1.09x | 0.22x | 1.03x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $43.16 | $32.07 | $34.01 | $8.64 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $24.20 | $13.61 | $21.60 | $5.01 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +82.6% | +83.7% | +80.8% | +88.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 42.4 | 33.0 | 43.7 | 50.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.1M | 368K | 2.1M | 231K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — DLX and QUAD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: IMAX as "Buy", DLX as "Buy", CNK as "Buy", QUAD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 20.7% upside for IMAX (target: $43) vs 0.6% for DLX (target: $27). For income investors, DLX offers the higher dividend yield at 4.52% vs CNK's 1.05%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $43.00 | $27.00 | $31.67 | $8.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 25 | 6 | 31 | 7 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +4.5% | +1.1% | +3.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.21 | $0.29 | $0.29 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | 0.0% | +8.6% | +2.0% |
IMAX leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). QUAD leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 2 tied.
IMAX vs DLX vs CNK vs QUAD: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is IMAX or DLX or CNK or QUAD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, IMAX Corporation (IMAX) is the stronger pick with 16.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 4% for Quad/Graphics, Inc. (QUAD). Quad/Graphics, Inc. (QUAD) offers the better valuation at 14. 2x trailing P/E (6. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate IMAX Corporation (IMAX) a "Buy" — based on 25 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — IMAX or DLX or CNK or QUAD?
On trailing P/E, Quad/Graphics, Inc.
(QUAD) is the cheapest at 14. 2x versus IMAX Corporation at 56. 6x. On forward P/E, Quad/Graphics, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 3x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — IMAX or DLX or CNK or QUAD?
Over the past 5 years, Quad/Graphics, Inc.
(QUAD) delivered a total return of +158. 1%, compared to -29. 6% for Deluxe Corporation (DLX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IMAX returned +8. 9% versus DLX's -38. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — IMAX or DLX or CNK or QUAD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Cinemark Holdings, Inc.
(CNK) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 22β versus Deluxe Corporation's 1. 09β — meaning DLX is approximately 398% more volatile than CNK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, IMAX Corporation (IMAX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 70% versus 9% for Cinemark Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — IMAX or DLX or CNK or QUAD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), IMAX Corporation (IMAX) is pulling ahead at 16.
5% versus -9. 4% for Quad/Graphics, Inc. (QUAD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Quad/Graphics, Inc. grew EPS 150. 5% year-over-year, compared to -49. 5% for Cinemark Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, IMAX leads at 10. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — IMAX or DLX or CNK or QUAD?
IMAX Corporation (IMAX) is the more profitable company, earning 8.
5% net margin versus 1. 1% for Quad/Graphics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 8. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IMAX leads at 23. 3% versus 4. 9% for QUAD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IMAX leads at 57. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is IMAX or DLX or CNK or QUAD more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Quad/Graphics, Inc.
(QUAD) trades at 6. 3x forward P/E versus 21. 1x for IMAX Corporation — 14. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IMAX: 20. 7% to $43. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — IMAX or DLX or CNK or QUAD?
In this comparison, DLX (4.
5% yield), QUAD (3. 8% yield), CNK (1. 1% yield) pay a dividend. IMAX does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is IMAX or DLX or CNK or QUAD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Cinemark Holdings, Inc.
(CNK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 22), 1. 1% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CNK: -6. 6%, DLX: -38. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between IMAX and DLX and CNK and QUAD?
These companies operate in different sectors (IMAX (Communication Services) and DLX (Communication Services) and CNK (Communication Services) and QUAD (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: IMAX is a small-cap high-growth stock; DLX is a small-cap deep-value stock; CNK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; QUAD is a small-cap deep-value stock. DLX, CNK, QUAD pay a dividend while IMAX does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Gross Margin > 24%
- Dividend Yield > 0.5%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.