Grocery Stores
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
IMKTA vs KR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Grocery Stores
IMKTA vs KR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Grocery Stores | Grocery Stores |
| Market Cap | $1.68B | $41.77B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $5.42B | $147.64B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $95M | $1.02B |
| Gross Margin | 24.1% | 22.3% |
| Operating Margin | 2.5% | 1.3% |
| Forward P/E | 20.1x | 12.7x |
| Total Debt | $544M | $24.68B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $366M | $3.33B |
IMKTA vs KR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ingles Markets, Inc… (IMKTA) | 100 | 201.3 | +101.3% |
| The Kroger Co. (KR) | 100 | 203.6 | +103.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: IMKTA vs KR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
IMKTA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 155.9% 10Y total return vs KR's 115.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.36, Low D/E 33.6%, current ratio 3.22x
- Beta 0.36, yield 0.7%, current ratio 3.22x
KR is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 21 yrs, beta -0.64, yield 2.0%
- Rev growth 0.4%, EPS growth -58.0%, 3Y rev CAGR -0.1%
- 0.4% revenue growth vs IMKTA's -5.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 0.4% revenue growth vs IMKTA's -5.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (12.7x vs 20.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 1.8% margin vs KR's 0.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Lower D/E ratio (33.6% vs 415.8%) | |
| Dividends | 2.0% yield, 21-year raise streak, vs IMKTA's 0.7% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +42.6% vs KR's -7.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.7% ROA vs KR's 2.0%, ROIC 5.0% vs 5.0% |
IMKTA vs KR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
IMKTA vs KR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IMKTA leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KR is the larger business by revenue, generating $147.6B annually — 27.2x IMKTA's $5.4B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 1.8% (IMKTA) to 0.7% (KR). On growth, IMKTA holds the edge at +6.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $5.4B | $147.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $255M | $5.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $95M | $1.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $2.2B | $3.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +24.1% | +22.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +2.5% | +1.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.8% | +0.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +40.1% | +2.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.6% | +1.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +70.1% | +50.0% |
Valuation Metrics
IMKTA leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 20.1x trailing earnings, IMKTA trades at a 53% valuation discount to KR's 42.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, IMKTA's 7.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than KR's 10.9x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.7B | $41.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.9B | $63.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 20.09x | 42.86x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 12.68x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.72x | 10.86x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.31x | 0.28x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.04x | 7.28x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 42.40x | 12.47x |
Profitability & Efficiency
IMKTA leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KR delivers a 13.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $6 for IMKTA. IMKTA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.34x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KR's 4.16x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IMKTA scores 7/9 vs KR's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.8% | +13.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.7% | +2.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.0% | +5.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.3% | +5.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.34x | 4.16x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $177M | $21.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $366M | $3.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $544M | $24.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 7.50x | 2.59x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — IMKTA and KR each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in KR five years ago would be worth $18,986 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,902 for IMKTA. Over the past 12 months, IMKTA leads with a +42.6% total return vs KR's -7.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KR at 12.4% vs IMKTA's 3.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +27.4% | +5.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +42.6% | -7.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +10.8% | +41.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +39.0% | +89.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +155.9% | +115.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +3.5% | +12.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — IMKTA and KR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KR is the less volatile stock with a -0.64 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than IMKTA's 0.36 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IMKTA currently trades 92.4% from its 52-week high vs KR's 86.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.36x | -0.64x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $95.62 | $76.58 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $59.09 | $58.60 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +92.4% | +86.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.4 | 42.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 127K | 5.6M |
Analyst Outlook
KR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
For income investors, KR offers the higher dividend yield at 2.05% vs IMKTA's 0.73%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $74.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 44 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.7% | +2.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 11 | 21 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.65 | $1.35 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +6.5% |
IMKTA leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). KR leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 2 tied.
IMKTA vs KR: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is IMKTA or KR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, The Kroger Co.
(KR) is the stronger pick with 0. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 4% for Ingles Markets, Incorporated (IMKTA). Ingles Markets, Incorporated (IMKTA) offers the better valuation at 20. 1x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Kroger Co. (KR) a "Buy" — based on 44 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — IMKTA or KR?
On trailing P/E, Ingles Markets, Incorporated (IMKTA) is the cheapest at 20.
1x versus The Kroger Co. at 42. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — IMKTA or KR?
Over the past 5 years, The Kroger Co.
(KR) delivered a total return of +89. 9%, compared to +39. 0% for Ingles Markets, Incorporated (IMKTA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IMKTA returned +125. 9% versus KR's +108. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — IMKTA or KR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Kroger Co.
(KR) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 64β versus Ingles Markets, Incorporated's 0. 36β — meaning IMKTA is approximately -156% more volatile than KR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Ingles Markets, Incorporated (IMKTA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 34% versus 4% for The Kroger Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — IMKTA or KR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), The Kroger Co.
(KR) is pulling ahead at 0. 4% versus -5. 4% for Ingles Markets, Incorporated (IMKTA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Ingles Markets, Incorporated grew EPS -20. 9% year-over-year, compared to -58. 0% for The Kroger Co.. Over a 3-year CAGR, KR leads at -0. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — IMKTA or KR?
Ingles Markets, Incorporated (IMKTA) is the more profitable company, earning 1.
6% net margin versus 0. 7% for The Kroger Co. — meaning it keeps 1. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IMKTA leads at 2. 2% versus 1. 3% for KR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IMKTA leads at 23. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — IMKTA or KR?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
The Kroger Co. (KR) offers the highest yield at 2. 0%, versus 0. 7% for Ingles Markets, Incorporated (IMKTA).
08Is IMKTA or KR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Kroger Co.
(KR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 64), 2. 0% yield, +108. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KR: +108. 7%, IMKTA: +125. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between IMKTA and KR?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.