Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

IMKTA vs KR

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
IMKTA
Ingles Markets, Incorporated

Grocery Stores

Consumer DefensiveNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.68B
5Y Perf.+101.3%
KR
The Kroger Co.

Grocery Stores

Consumer DefensiveNYSE • US
Market Cap$41.77B
5Y Perf.+103.6%

IMKTA vs KR — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
IMKTA logoIMKTA
KR logoKR
IndustryGrocery StoresGrocery Stores
Market Cap$1.68B$41.77B
Revenue (TTM)$5.42B$147.64B
Net Income (TTM)$95M$1.02B
Gross Margin24.1%22.3%
Operating Margin2.5%1.3%
Forward P/E20.1x12.7x
Total Debt$544M$24.68B
Cash & Equiv.$366M$3.33B

IMKTA vs KRLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

IMKTA
KR
StockMay 20May 26Return
Ingles Markets, Inc… (IMKTA)100201.3+101.3%
The Kroger Co. (KR)100203.6+103.6%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: IMKTA vs KR

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: IMKTA leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. The Kroger Co. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
IMKTA
Ingles Markets, Incorporated
The Long-Run Compounder

IMKTA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.

  • 155.9% 10Y total return vs KR's 115.3%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.36, Low D/E 33.6%, current ratio 3.22x
  • Beta 0.36, yield 0.7%, current ratio 3.22x
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
KR
The Kroger Co.
The Income Pick

KR is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 21 yrs, beta -0.64, yield 2.0%
  • Rev growth 0.4%, EPS growth -58.0%, 3Y rev CAGR -0.1%
  • 0.4% revenue growth vs IMKTA's -5.4%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthKR logoKR0.4% revenue growth vs IMKTA's -5.4%
ValueKR logoKRLower P/E (12.7x vs 20.1x)
Quality / MarginsIMKTA logoIMKTA1.8% margin vs KR's 0.7%
Stability / SafetyIMKTA logoIMKTALower D/E ratio (33.6% vs 415.8%)
DividendsKR logoKR2.0% yield, 21-year raise streak, vs IMKTA's 0.7%
Momentum (1Y)IMKTA logoIMKTA+42.6% vs KR's -7.7%
Efficiency (ROA)IMKTA logoIMKTA3.7% ROA vs KR's 2.0%, ROIC 5.0% vs 5.0%

IMKTA vs KR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

IMKTAIngles Markets, Incorporated
FY 2025
Grocery
37.7%$1.9B
Perishables
27.4%$1.4B
Non Foods
22.8%$1.2B
Gasoline
12.1%$621M
KRThe Kroger Co.
FY 2024
Perishable
69.8%$36.3B
Pharmacy
30.2%$15.7B

IMKTA vs KR — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLIMKTALAGGINGKR

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

IMKTA leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

KR is the larger business by revenue, generating $147.6B annually — 27.2x IMKTA's $5.4B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 1.8% (IMKTA) to 0.7% (KR). On growth, IMKTA holds the edge at +6.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricIMKTA logoIMKTAIngles Markets, I…KR logoKRThe Kroger Co.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$5.4B$147.6B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$255M$5.5B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$95M$1.0B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$2.2B$3.5B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+24.1%+22.3%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+2.5%+1.3%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+1.8%+0.7%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+40.1%+2.4%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+6.6%+1.2%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+70.1%+50.0%
IMKTA leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

IMKTA leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

At 20.1x trailing earnings, IMKTA trades at a 53% valuation discount to KR's 42.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, IMKTA's 7.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than KR's 10.9x.

MetricIMKTA logoIMKTAIngles Markets, I…KR logoKRThe Kroger Co.
Market CapShares × price$1.7B$41.8B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$1.9B$63.1B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS20.09x42.86x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.12.68x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple7.72x10.86x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.31x0.28x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.04x7.28x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF42.40x12.47x
IMKTA leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

IMKTA leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

KR delivers a 13.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $6 for IMKTA. IMKTA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.34x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KR's 4.16x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IMKTA scores 7/9 vs KR's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricIMKTA logoIMKTAIngles Markets, I…KR logoKRThe Kroger Co.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+5.8%+13.0%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+3.7%+2.0%
ROICReturn on invested capital+5.0%+5.0%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+5.3%+5.5%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–975
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.34x4.16x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$177M$21.3B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$366M$3.3B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$544M$24.7B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense7.50x2.59x
IMKTA leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — IMKTA and KR each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in KR five years ago would be worth $18,986 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,902 for IMKTA. Over the past 12 months, IMKTA leads with a +42.6% total return vs KR's -7.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KR at 12.4% vs IMKTA's 3.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricIMKTA logoIMKTAIngles Markets, I…KR logoKRThe Kroger Co.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+27.4%+5.4%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+42.6%-7.7%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+10.8%+41.9%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+39.0%+89.9%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+155.9%+115.3%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+3.5%+12.4%
Evenly matched — IMKTA and KR each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — IMKTA and KR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

KR is the less volatile stock with a -0.64 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than IMKTA's 0.36 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IMKTA currently trades 92.4% from its 52-week high vs KR's 86.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricIMKTA logoIMKTAIngles Markets, I…KR logoKRThe Kroger Co.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.36x-0.64x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$95.62$76.58
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$59.09$58.60
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+92.4%+86.2%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10049.442.4
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded127K5.6M
Evenly matched — IMKTA and KR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

KR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

For income investors, KR offers the higher dividend yield at 2.05% vs IMKTA's 0.73%.

MetricIMKTA logoIMKTAIngles Markets, I…KR logoKRThe Kroger Co.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$74.75
# AnalystsCovering analysts44
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.7%+2.0%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises1121
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.65$1.35
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+6.5%
KR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

IMKTA leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). KR leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 2 tied.

Best OverallIngles Markets, Incorporated (IMKTA)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

IMKTA vs KR: Frequently Asked Questions

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is IMKTA or KR a better buy right now?

For growth investors, The Kroger Co.

(KR) is the stronger pick with 0. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 4% for Ingles Markets, Incorporated (IMKTA). Ingles Markets, Incorporated (IMKTA) offers the better valuation at 20. 1x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Kroger Co. (KR) a "Buy" — based on 44 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — IMKTA or KR?

On trailing P/E, Ingles Markets, Incorporated (IMKTA) is the cheapest at 20.

1x versus The Kroger Co. at 42. 9x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — IMKTA or KR?

Over the past 5 years, The Kroger Co.

(KR) delivered a total return of +89. 9%, compared to +39. 0% for Ingles Markets, Incorporated (IMKTA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IMKTA returned +125. 9% versus KR's +108. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — IMKTA or KR?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Kroger Co.

(KR) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 64β versus Ingles Markets, Incorporated's 0. 36β — meaning IMKTA is approximately -156% more volatile than KR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Ingles Markets, Incorporated (IMKTA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 34% versus 4% for The Kroger Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — IMKTA or KR?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), The Kroger Co.

(KR) is pulling ahead at 0. 4% versus -5. 4% for Ingles Markets, Incorporated (IMKTA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Ingles Markets, Incorporated grew EPS -20. 9% year-over-year, compared to -58. 0% for The Kroger Co.. Over a 3-year CAGR, KR leads at -0. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — IMKTA or KR?

Ingles Markets, Incorporated (IMKTA) is the more profitable company, earning 1.

6% net margin versus 0. 7% for The Kroger Co. — meaning it keeps 1. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IMKTA leads at 2. 2% versus 1. 3% for KR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IMKTA leads at 23. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Which pays a better dividend — IMKTA or KR?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

The Kroger Co. (KR) offers the highest yield at 2. 0%, versus 0. 7% for Ingles Markets, Incorporated (IMKTA).

08

Is IMKTA or KR better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, The Kroger Co.

(KR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 64), 2. 0% yield, +108. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KR: +108. 7%, IMKTA: +125. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between IMKTA and KR?

Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

IMKTA

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Consumer Defensive
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 14%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

KR

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Consumer Defensive
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 13%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.8%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform IMKTA and KR on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(IMKTA: 6.6% · KR: 1.2%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(IMKTA: 20.1x · KR: 42.9x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.