Grocery Stores
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
IMKTA vs VLGEA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Grocery Stores
IMKTA vs VLGEA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Grocery Stores | Grocery Stores |
| Market Cap | $1.68B | $640M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $5.42B | $2.39B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $95M | $57M |
| Gross Margin | 24.1% | 28.0% |
| Operating Margin | 2.5% | 3.0% |
| Forward P/E | 20.1x | 11.4x |
| Total Debt | $544M | $341M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $366M | $111M |
IMKTA vs VLGEA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ingles Markets, Inc… (IMKTA) | 100 | 207.5 | +107.5% |
| Village Super Marke… (VLGEA) | 100 | 181.2 | +81.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: IMKTA vs VLGEA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
IMKTA is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 155.9% 10Y total return vs VLGEA's 116.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.36, Low D/E 33.6%, current ratio 3.22x
- 0.7% yield, 11-year raise streak, vs VLGEA's 2.1%
VLGEA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.07, yield 2.1%
- Rev growth 3.8%, EPS growth 12.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.0%
- Beta 0.07, yield 2.1%, current ratio 1.13x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 3.8% revenue growth vs IMKTA's -5.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.4x vs 20.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 2.4% margin vs IMKTA's 1.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.07 vs IMKTA's 0.36 | |
| Dividends | 0.7% yield, 11-year raise streak, vs VLGEA's 2.1% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +42.6% vs VLGEA's +19.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.6% ROA vs IMKTA's 3.7%, ROIC 7.6% vs 5.0% |
IMKTA vs VLGEA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
IMKTA vs VLGEA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
VLGEA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IMKTA is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.4B annually — 2.3x VLGEA's $2.4B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 2.4% (VLGEA) to 1.8% (IMKTA).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $5.4B | $2.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $255M | $108M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $95M | $57M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $2.2B | $62M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +24.1% | +28.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +2.5% | +3.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.8% | +2.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +40.1% | +2.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.6% | +6.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +70.1% | +6.1% |
Valuation Metrics
VLGEA leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.4x trailing earnings, VLGEA trades at a 43% valuation discount to IMKTA's 20.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, IMKTA's 7.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than VLGEA's 8.0x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.7B | $640M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.9B | $870M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 20.09x | 11.35x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.66x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.72x | 8.00x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.31x | 0.28x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.04x | 1.30x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 42.40x | 18.57x |
Profitability & Efficiency
VLGEA leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
VLGEA delivers a 11.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $6 for IMKTA. IMKTA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.34x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to VLGEA's 0.69x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IMKTA scores 7/9 vs VLGEA's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.8% | +11.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.7% | +5.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.0% | +7.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.3% | +8.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.34x | 0.69x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $177M | $230M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $366M | $111M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $544M | $341M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 7.50x | 15.89x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — IMKTA and VLGEA each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in VLGEA five years ago would be worth $19,088 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,902 for IMKTA. Over the past 12 months, IMKTA leads with a +42.6% total return vs VLGEA's +19.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors VLGEA at 30.0% vs IMKTA's 3.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +27.4% | +25.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +42.6% | +19.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +10.8% | +119.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +39.0% | +90.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +155.9% | +116.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +3.5% | +30.0% |
Risk & Volatility
VLGEA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
VLGEA is the less volatile stock with a 0.07 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than IMKTA's 0.36 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. VLGEA currently trades 96.1% from its 52-week high vs IMKTA's 92.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.36x | 0.07x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $95.62 | $45.12 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $59.09 | $30.08 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +92.4% | +96.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.4 | 57.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 127K | 49K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — IMKTA and VLGEA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
For income investors, VLGEA offers the higher dividend yield at 2.08% vs IMKTA's 0.73%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.7% | +2.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 11 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.65 | $0.90 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
VLGEA leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 2 categories are tied.
IMKTA vs VLGEA: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is IMKTA or VLGEA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Village Super Market, Inc.
(VLGEA) is the stronger pick with 3. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 4% for Ingles Markets, Incorporated (IMKTA). Village Super Market, Inc. (VLGEA) offers the better valuation at 11. 4x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — IMKTA or VLGEA?
On trailing P/E, Village Super Market, Inc.
(VLGEA) is the cheapest at 11. 4x versus Ingles Markets, Incorporated at 20. 1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — IMKTA or VLGEA?
Over the past 5 years, Village Super Market, Inc.
(VLGEA) delivered a total return of +90. 9%, compared to +39. 0% for Ingles Markets, Incorporated (IMKTA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IMKTA returned +155. 9% versus VLGEA's +116. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — IMKTA or VLGEA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Village Super Market, Inc.
(VLGEA) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 07β versus Ingles Markets, Incorporated's 0. 36β — meaning IMKTA is approximately 445% more volatile than VLGEA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Ingles Markets, Incorporated (IMKTA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 34% versus 69% for Village Super Market, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — IMKTA or VLGEA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Village Super Market, Inc.
(VLGEA) is pulling ahead at 3. 8% versus -5. 4% for Ingles Markets, Incorporated (IMKTA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Village Super Market, Inc. grew EPS 12. 4% year-over-year, compared to -20. 9% for Ingles Markets, Incorporated. Over a 3-year CAGR, VLGEA leads at 4. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — IMKTA or VLGEA?
Village Super Market, Inc.
(VLGEA) is the more profitable company, earning 2. 4% net margin versus 1. 6% for Ingles Markets, Incorporated — meaning it keeps 2. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: VLGEA leads at 3. 1% versus 2. 2% for IMKTA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — VLGEA leads at 28. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — IMKTA or VLGEA?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Village Super Market, Inc. (VLGEA) offers the highest yield at 2. 1%, versus 0. 7% for Ingles Markets, Incorporated (IMKTA).
08Is IMKTA or VLGEA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Village Super Market, Inc.
(VLGEA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 07), 2. 1% yield, +116. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (VLGEA: +116. 2%, IMKTA: +155. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between IMKTA and VLGEA?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: IMKTA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; VLGEA is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.
Compare IMKTA vs CASY
CASY is one of the most direct listed alternatives to IMKTA.
Compare VLGEA vs CASY
CASY is one of the most direct listed alternatives to VLGEA.
Expand With CASY + PTLO
CASY and PTLO are the strongest missing peers across the current compare set.