Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
IMMX logo
IMMX
ARQT logo
ARQT
IQV logo
IQV
CABA logo
CABA
CRL logo
CRL
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

IMMX vs ARQT vs IQV vs CABA vs CRL

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
IMMX
Immix Biopharma, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$460M
5Y Perf.+137.4%
ARQT
Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.05B
5Y Perf.+17.6%
IQV
IQVIA Holdings Inc.

Medical - Diagnostics & Research

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$30.79B
5Y Perf.-35.7%
CABA
Cabaletta Bio, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$491M
5Y Perf.-20.6%
CRL
Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.

Medical - Diagnostics & Research

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$9.03B
5Y Perf.-50.2%

IMMX vs ARQT vs IQV vs CABA vs CRL — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
IMMX logoIMMX
ARQT logoARQT
IQV logoIQV
CABA logoCABA
CRL logoCRL
IndustryBiotechnologyBiotechnologyMedical - Diagnostics & ResearchBiotechnologyMedical - Diagnostics & Research
Market Cap$460M$3.05B$30.79B$491M$9.03B
Revenue (TTM)$0.00$416M$16.63B$0.00$4.03B
Net Income (TTM)$-35M$-2M$1.39B$-175M$-185M
Gross Margin90.9%26.1%31.9%
Operating Margin0.8%13.9%11.8%
Forward P/E122.5x14.2x16.9x
Total Debt$1M$6M$16.17B$27M$3.07B
Cash & Equiv.$94M$43M$1.98B$83M$214M

IMMX vs ARQT vs IQV vs CABA vs CRLLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

IMMX
ARQT
IQV
CABA
CRL
StockDec 21Jun 26Return
Immix Biopharma, In… (IMMX)100237.4+137.4%
Arcutis Biotherapeu… (ARQT)100117.6+17.6%
IQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV)10064.3-35.7%
Cabaletta Bio, Inc. (CABA)10079.4-20.6%
Charles River Labor… (CRL)10049.8-50.2%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: IMMX vs ARQT vs IQV vs CABA vs CRL

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: IQV leads in 4 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Immix Biopharma, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for recent price momentum and sentiment. ARQT also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
🥇IQV emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
IMMX
Immix Biopharma, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

IMMX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.

  • 130.2% 10Y total return vs IQV's 177.5%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.72, Low D/E 1.1%, current ratio 10.01x
  • +239.4% vs IQV's +14.0%
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
ARQT
Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc.
The Growth Play

ARQT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and defensive.

  • Rev growth 91.3%, EPS growth 88.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 367.3%
  • Beta 1.45, current ratio 3.17x
  • 91.3% revenue growth vs IMMX's -66.7%
Best for: growth exposure and defensive
IQV
IQVIA Holdings Inc.
The Income Pick

IQV carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.16
  • Lower P/E (14.2x vs 16.9x)
  • 8.3% margin vs CRL's -4.6%
  • Beta 1.16 vs CABA's 2.02
Best for: income & stability
CABA
Cabaletta Bio, Inc.
The Healthcare Pick

CABA lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: healthcare exposure
CRL
Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.
The Healthcare Pick

Among these 5 stocks, CRL doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: healthcare exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthARQT logoARQT91.3% revenue growth vs IMMX's -66.7%
ValueIQV logoIQVLower P/E (14.2x vs 16.9x)
Quality / MarginsIQV logoIQV8.3% margin vs CRL's -4.6%
Stability / SafetyIQV logoIQVBeta 1.16 vs CABA's 2.02
DividendsTieNone of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)IMMX logoIMMX+239.4% vs IQV's +14.0%
Efficiency (ROA)IQV logoIQV4.7% ROA vs CABA's -96.5%, ROIC 8.7% vs -429.6%

IMMX vs ARQT vs IQV vs CABA vs CRL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

IMMXImmix Biopharma, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

ARQTArcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc.
FY 2023
Other Revenue
51.0%$30M
Product
49.0%$29M
IQVIQVIA Holdings Inc.
FY 2025
Research And Development Solutions
54.5%$8.9B
Technology And Analytics Solutions
40.6%$6.6B
Contract Sales And Medical Solutions
4.8%$788M
CABACabaletta Bio, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

CRLCharles River Laboratories International, Inc.
FY 2025
Discovery and Safety Assessment
59.8%$2.4B
Research Models and Services
21.1%$846M
Manufacturing Support
19.1%$766M

IMMX vs ARQT vs IQV vs CABA vs CRL — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLIQVLAGGINGCRL

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — ARQT and IQV each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

IQV and CABA operate at a comparable scale, with $16.6B and $0 in trailing revenue. IQV is the more profitable business, keeping 8.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CRL's -4.6%. On growth, ARQT holds the edge at +60.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricIMMX logoIMMXImmix Biopharma, …ARQT logoARQTArcutis Biotherap…IQV logoIQVIQVIA Holdings In…CABA logoCABACabaletta Bio, In…CRL logoCRLCharles River Lab…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$0$416M$16.6B$0$4.0B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$36M$6M$3.5B-$178M$824M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$35M-$2M$1.4B-$175M-$185M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$33M$27M$2.7B-$143M$391M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+90.9%+26.1%+31.9%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+0.8%+13.9%+11.8%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-0.6%+8.3%-4.6%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+6.5%+16.1%+9.7%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+60.1%+8.4%+1.2%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-20.0%+55.0%+15.0%+46.6%-160.0%
Evenly matched — ARQT and IQV each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

IQV leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

On an enterprise value basis, CRL's 13.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than IQV's 13.1x.

MetricIMMX logoIMMXImmix Biopharma, …ARQT logoARQTArcutis Biotherap…IQV logoIQVIQVIA Holdings In…CABA logoCABACabaletta Bio, In…CRL logoCRLCharles River Lab…
Market CapShares × price$460M$3.0B$30.8B$491M$9.0B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$367M$3.0B$45.0B$435M$11.9B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-9.49x-187.54x23.15x-1.84x-64.44x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.122.45x14.16x16.90x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.57x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple13.11x13.04x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue8.11x1.89x2.25x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share2.97x16.37x4.75x2.75x2.89x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF15.01x17.42x
IQV leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

IQV leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

IQV delivers a 22.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $22 in annual profit, vs $-132 for CABA. IMMX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to IQV's 2.44x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IMMX scores 4/9 vs CABA's 1/9, reflecting mixed financial health.

MetricIMMX logoIMMXImmix Biopharma, …ARQT logoARQTArcutis Biotherap…IQV logoIQVIQVIA Holdings In…CABA logoCABACabaletta Bio, In…CRL logoCRLCharles River Lab…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-73.2%-1.4%+22.1%-131.6%-5.7%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-59.2%-0.6%+4.7%-96.5%-2.5%
ROICReturn on invested capital-21.7%-5.2%+8.7%-4.3%+6.3%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-49.9%-4.3%+11.0%-126.2%+8.1%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–944414
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.01x0.03x2.44x0.24x0.95x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$93M-$37M$14.2B-$56M$2.9B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$94M$43M$2.0B$83M$214M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$1M$6M$16.2B$27M$3.1B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense2.08x3.10x-73.78x4.29x
IQV leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

IMMX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in IMMX five years ago would be worth $23,025 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,583 for CABA. Over the past 12 months, IMMX leads with a +239.4% total return vs IQV's +14.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IMMX at 61.4% vs CABA's -37.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricIMMX logoIMMXImmix Biopharma, …ARQT logoARQTArcutis Biotherap…IQV logoIQVIQVIA Holdings In…CABA logoCABACabaletta Bio, In…CRL logoCRLCharles River Lab…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+55.6%-15.9%-19.5%+36.2%-7.4%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+239.4%+80.6%+14.0%+67.2%+23.5%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+320.4%+138.8%-14.4%-75.6%-8.7%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+130.2%-16.2%-25.8%-64.2%-47.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+130.2%+11.8%+177.5%-69.9%+122.4%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+61.4%+33.7%-5.0%-37.5%-3.0%
IMMX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — IQV and CRL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

IQV is the less volatile stock with a 1.16 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CABA's 2.02 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CRL currently trades 81.9% from its 52-week high vs CABA's 71.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricIMMX logoIMMXImmix Biopharma, …ARQT logoARQTArcutis Biotherap…IQV logoIQVIQVIA Holdings In…CABA logoCABACabaletta Bio, In…CRL logoCRLCharles River Lab…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.72x1.45x1.16x2.02x1.39x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$11.61$31.77$247.05$4.23$228.88
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$1.94$12.72$153.01$1.26$143.06
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+72.8%+76.7%+73.5%+71.2%+81.9%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10039.766.454.435.960.8
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded954K1.5M1.5M3.6M767K
Evenly matched — IQV and CRL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

IQV leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: IMMX as "Buy", ARQT as "Buy", IQV as "Buy", CABA as "Buy", CRL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 442.5% upside for CABA (target: $16) vs 13.7% for CRL (target: $213).

MetricIMMX logoIMMXImmix Biopharma, …ARQT logoARQTArcutis Biotherap…IQV logoIQVIQVIA Holdings In…CABA logoCABACabaletta Bio, In…CRL logoCRLCharles River Lab…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$17.00$34.00$222.22$16.33$213.17
# AnalystsCovering analysts412441237
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises211
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+4.0%0.0%+4.0%
IQV leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

IQV leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). IMMX leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.

Best OverallIQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

IMMX vs ARQT vs IQV vs CABA vs CRL: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is IMMX or ARQT or IQV or CABA or CRL a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc.

(ARQT) is the stronger pick with 91. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 9% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. (CRL). IQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV) offers the better valuation at 23. 1x trailing P/E (14. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Immix Biopharma, Inc. (IMMX) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — IMMX or ARQT or IQV or CABA or CRL?

On forward P/E, IQVIA Holdings Inc.

is actually cheaper at 14. 2x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — IMMX or ARQT or IQV or CABA or CRL?

Over the past 5 years, Immix Biopharma, Inc.

(IMMX) delivered a total return of +130. 2%, compared to -64. 2% for Cabaletta Bio, Inc. (CABA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IQV returned +177. 5% versus CABA's -69. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — IMMX or ARQT or IQV or CABA or CRL?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), IQVIA Holdings Inc.

(IQV) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 16β versus Cabaletta Bio, Inc. 's 2. 02β — meaning CABA is approximately 73% more volatile than IQV relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Immix Biopharma, Inc. (IMMX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 2% for IQVIA Holdings Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — IMMX or ARQT or IQV or CABA or CRL?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc.

(ARQT) is pulling ahead at 91. 3% versus -0. 9% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. (CRL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc. grew EPS 88. 8% year-over-year, compared to -1555. 0% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ARQT leads at 367. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — IMMX or ARQT or IQV or CABA or CRL?

IQVIA Holdings Inc.

(IQV) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 3% net margin versus -4. 3% for Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 8. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IQV leads at 14. 0% versus -3. 3% for ARQT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ARQT leads at 90. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is IMMX or ARQT or IQV or CABA or CRL more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, IQVIA Holdings Inc.

(IQV) trades at 14. 2x forward P/E versus 122. 5x for Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc. — 108. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CABA: 442. 5% to $16. 33.

08

Which pays a better dividend — IMMX or ARQT or IQV or CABA or CRL?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is IMMX or ARQT or IQV or CABA or CRL better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, IQVIA Holdings Inc.

(IQV) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 16), +177. 5% 10Y return). Cabaletta Bio, Inc. (CABA) carries a higher beta of 2. 02 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (IQV: +177. 5%, CABA: -69. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between IMMX and ARQT and IQV and CABA and CRL?

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: IMMX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ARQT is a small-cap high-growth stock; IQV is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; CABA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CRL is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.