Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

IMPP vs NVGS

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
IMPP
Imperial Petroleum Inc.

Oil & Gas Exploration & Production

EnergyNASDAQ • GR
Market Cap$167M
5Y Perf.-84.7%
NVGS
Navigator Holdings Ltd.

Oil & Gas Midstream

EnergyNYSE • GB
Market Cap$1.49B
5Y Perf.+157.8%

IMPP vs NVGS — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
IMPP logoIMPP
NVGS logoNVGS
IndustryOil & Gas Exploration & ProductionOil & Gas Midstream
Market Cap$167M$1.49B
Revenue (TTM)$136M$576M
Net Income (TTM)$39M$109M
Gross Margin30.5%35.9%
Operating Margin23.0%25.1%
Forward P/E2.4x14.1x
Total Debt$79K$903M
Cash & Equiv.$68M$205M

IMPP vs NVGSLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

IMPP
NVGS
StockDec 21May 26Return
Imperial Petroleum … (IMPP)10015.3-84.7%
Navigator Holdings … (NVGS)100257.8+157.8%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: IMPP vs NVGS

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: IMPP leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Navigator Holdings Ltd. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and capital preservation and lower volatility. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
IMPP
Imperial Petroleum Inc.
The Defensive Pick

IMPP carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.65, Low D/E 0.0%, current ratio 7.92x
  • Beta 0.65, yield 1.1%, current ratio 7.92x
  • Lower P/E (2.4x vs 14.1x)
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
NVGS
Navigator Holdings Ltd.
The Income Pick

NVGS is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.63, yield 0.9%
  • Rev growth 3.6%, EPS growth 23.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.4%
  • 60.0% 10Y total return vs IMPP's -95.6%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthNVGS logoNVGS3.6% revenue growth vs IMPP's -19.7%
ValueIMPP logoIMPPLower P/E (2.4x vs 14.1x)
Quality / MarginsIMPP logoIMPP28.6% margin vs NVGS's 18.8%
Stability / SafetyNVGS logoNVGSBeta 0.63 vs IMPP's 0.65
DividendsIMPP logoIMPP1.1% yield, vs NVGS's 0.9%
Momentum (1Y)IMPP logoIMPP+86.7% vs NVGS's +74.9%
Efficiency (ROA)IMPP logoIMPP8.2% ROA vs NVGS's 4.7%, ROIC 10.6% vs 5.7%

IMPP vs NVGS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

IMPPImperial Petroleum Inc.
FY 2024
Voyage Charter Revenues
86.1%$125M
Time Charter Revenues
13.9%$20M
NVGSNavigator Holdings Ltd.
FY 2025
Time Charters
66.9%$360M
Voyage Charters
33.1%$178M

IMPP vs NVGS — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLIMPPLAGGINGNVGS

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — IMPP and NVGS each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

NVGS is the larger business by revenue, generating $576M annually — 4.2x IMPP's $136M. IMPP is the more profitable business, keeping 28.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NVGS's 18.8%. On growth, IMPP holds the edge at +25.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricIMPP logoIMPPImperial Petroleu…NVGS logoNVGSNavigator Holding…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$136M$576M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$54M$271M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$39M$109M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$65M$141M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+30.5%+35.9%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+23.0%+25.1%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+28.6%+18.8%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+47.9%+24.4%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+25.4%-7.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year0.0%+38.5%
Evenly matched — IMPP and NVGS each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

IMPP leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 3.5x trailing earnings, IMPP trades at a 77% valuation discount to NVGS's 15.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, IMPP's 1.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than NVGS's 8.0x.

MetricIMPP logoIMPPImperial Petroleu…NVGS logoNVGSNavigator Holding…
Market CapShares × price$167M$1.5B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$99M$2.2B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS3.51x15.56x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.2.40x14.12x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.10x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple1.63x7.97x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.13x2.54x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.39x1.24x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF55.26x22.65x
IMPP leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

IMPP leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

NVGS delivers a 8.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $8 for IMPP. IMPP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NVGS's 0.72x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NVGS scores 6/9 vs IMPP's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricIMPP logoIMPPImperial Petroleu…NVGS logoNVGSNavigator Holding…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+8.5%+8.7%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+8.2%+4.7%
ROICReturn on invested capital+10.6%+5.7%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+11.3%+7.2%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–946
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.00x0.72x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$68M$698M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$68M$205M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$78,761$903M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense15.99x2.88x
IMPP leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

NVGS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in NVGS five years ago would be worth $20,051 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $436 for IMPP. Over the past 12 months, IMPP leads with a +86.7% total return vs NVGS's +74.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NVGS at 22.1% vs IMPP's 16.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricIMPP logoIMPPImperial Petroleu…NVGS logoNVGSNavigator Holding…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+34.5%+32.2%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+86.7%+74.9%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+57.4%+82.1%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-95.6%+100.5%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-95.6%+60.0%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+16.3%+22.1%
NVGS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

NVGS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

NVGS is the less volatile stock with a 0.63 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than IMPP's 0.65 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NVGS currently trades 98.5% from its 52-week high vs IMPP's 74.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricIMPP logoIMPPImperial Petroleu…NVGS logoNVGSNavigator Holding…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.65x0.63x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$6.57$23.22
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$2.45$12.91
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+74.7%+98.5%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10056.075.0
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded747K452K
NVGS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — IMPP and NVGS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Wall Street rates IMPP as "Hold" and NVGS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 22.2% upside for IMPP (target: $6) vs 0.6% for NVGS (target: $23). For income investors, IMPP offers the higher dividend yield at 1.07% vs NVGS's 0.95%.

MetricIMPP logoIMPPImperial Petroleu…NVGS logoNVGSNavigator Holding…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$6.00$23.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts110
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.1%+0.9%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises02
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.05$0.22
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+1.5%+4.2%
Evenly matched — IMPP and NVGS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

IMPP leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). NVGS leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). 2 tied.

Best OverallImperial Petroleum Inc. (IMPP)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

IMPP vs NVGS: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is IMPP or NVGS a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Navigator Holdings Ltd.

(NVGS) is the stronger pick with 3. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -19. 7% for Imperial Petroleum Inc. (IMPP). Imperial Petroleum Inc. (IMPP) offers the better valuation at 3. 5x trailing P/E (2. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Navigator Holdings Ltd. (NVGS) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — IMPP or NVGS?

On trailing P/E, Imperial Petroleum Inc.

(IMPP) is the cheapest at 3. 5x versus Navigator Holdings Ltd. at 15. 6x. On forward P/E, Imperial Petroleum Inc. is actually cheaper at 2. 4x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — IMPP or NVGS?

Over the past 5 years, Navigator Holdings Ltd.

(NVGS) delivered a total return of +100. 5%, compared to -95. 6% for Imperial Petroleum Inc. (IMPP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NVGS returned +60. 0% versus IMPP's -95. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — IMPP or NVGS?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Navigator Holdings Ltd.

(NVGS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 63β versus Imperial Petroleum Inc. 's 0. 65β — meaning IMPP is approximately 3% more volatile than NVGS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Imperial Petroleum Inc. (IMPP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 72% for Navigator Holdings Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — IMPP or NVGS?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Navigator Holdings Ltd.

(NVGS) is pulling ahead at 3. 6% versus -19. 7% for Imperial Petroleum Inc. (IMPP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Navigator Holdings Ltd. grew EPS 23. 5% year-over-year, compared to -52. 2% for Imperial Petroleum Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, IMPP leads at 104. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — IMPP or NVGS?

Imperial Petroleum Inc.

(IMPP) is the more profitable company, earning 34. 0% net margin versus 17. 1% for Navigator Holdings Ltd. — meaning it keeps 34. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IMPP leads at 29. 9% versus 23. 9% for NVGS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IMPP leads at 34. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is IMPP or NVGS more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Imperial Petroleum Inc.

(IMPP) trades at 2. 4x forward P/E versus 14. 1x for Navigator Holdings Ltd. — 11. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IMPP: 22. 2% to $6. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — IMPP or NVGS?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Imperial Petroleum Inc. (IMPP) offers the highest yield at 1. 1%, versus 0. 9% for Navigator Holdings Ltd. (NVGS).

09

Is IMPP or NVGS better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Navigator Holdings Ltd.

(NVGS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 63), 0. 9% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NVGS: +60. 0%, IMPP: -95. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between IMPP and NVGS?

Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

IMPP

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 12%
  • Net Margin > 17%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NVGS

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 11%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform IMPP and NVGS on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(IMPP: 25.4% · NVGS: -7.1%)
Net Margin>
%
(IMPP: 28.6% · NVGS: 18.8%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(IMPP: 3.5x · NVGS: 15.6x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.