Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
IMPP vs NVGS vs TNK vs STNG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Midstream
Oil & Gas Midstream
Oil & Gas Midstream
IMPP vs NVGS vs TNK vs STNG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Midstream | Oil & Gas Midstream | Oil & Gas Midstream |
| Market Cap | $167M | $1.49B | $2.83B | $4.38B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $136M | $576M | $952M | $1.04B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $39M | $109M | $351M | $502M |
| Gross Margin | 30.5% | 35.9% | 27.5% | 51.8% |
| Operating Margin | 23.0% | 25.1% | 27.5% | 38.8% |
| Forward P/E | 2.4x | 14.1x | 6.0x | 8.6x |
| Total Debt | $79K | $903M | $55M | $619M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $68M | $205M | $831M | $752M |
IMPP vs NVGS vs TNK vs STNG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Imperial Petroleum … (IMPP) | 100 | 15.3 | -84.7% |
| Navigator Holdings … (NVGS) | 100 | 257.8 | +157.8% |
| Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK) | 100 | 745.6 | +645.6% |
| Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG) | 100 | 661.1 | +561.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: IMPP vs NVGS vs TNK vs STNG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
IMPP is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (2.4x vs 6.0x)
NVGS is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and valuation efficiency.
- Rev growth 3.6%, EPS growth 23.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.4%
- PEG 0.09 vs STNG's 0.26
- 3.6% revenue growth vs STNG's -24.6%
TNK is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 187.7% 10Y total return vs STNG's 62.8%
- 2.4% yield, vs STNG's 2.0%
- 15.7% ROA vs NVGS's 4.7%, ROIC 12.5% vs 5.7%
STNG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.28, yield 2.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.28, Low D/E 19.4%, current ratio 9.33x
- Beta 0.28, yield 2.0%, current ratio 9.33x
- 48.4% margin vs NVGS's 18.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 3.6% revenue growth vs STNG's -24.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (2.4x vs 6.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 48.4% margin vs NVGS's 18.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.28 vs IMPP's 0.65 | |
| Dividends | 2.4% yield, vs STNG's 2.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +115.3% vs NVGS's +74.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 15.7% ROA vs NVGS's 4.7%, ROIC 12.5% vs 5.7% |
IMPP vs NVGS vs TNK vs STNG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
IMPP vs NVGS vs TNK vs STNG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TNK leads in 2 of 6 categories
STNG leads 1 • IMPP leads 1 • NVGS leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
STNG leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
STNG is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.0B annually — 7.6x IMPP's $136M. STNG is the more profitable business, keeping 48.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NVGS's 18.8%. On growth, STNG holds the edge at +46.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $136M | $576M | $952M | $1.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $54M | $271M | $348M | $580M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $39M | $109M | $351M | $502M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $65M | $141M | $113M | $389M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +30.5% | +35.9% | +27.5% | +51.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +23.0% | +25.1% | +27.5% | +38.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +28.6% | +18.8% | +36.9% | +48.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +47.9% | +24.4% | +11.8% | +37.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +25.4% | -7.1% | -26.4% | +46.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | 0.0% | +38.5% | +46.0% | +2.5% |
Valuation Metrics
IMPP leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 3.5x trailing earnings, IMPP trades at a 77% valuation discount to NVGS's 15.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NVGS offers better value at 0.10x vs STNG's 0.36x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $167M | $1.5B | $2.8B | $4.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $99M | $2.2B | $2.1B | $4.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 3.51x | 15.56x | 8.05x | 12.05x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 2.40x | 14.12x | 6.00x | 8.58x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.10x | 0.26x | 0.36x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 1.63x | 7.97x | 6.80x | 8.68x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.13x | 2.54x | 2.97x | 4.67x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.39x | 1.24x | 1.38x | 1.30x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 55.26x | 22.65x | 25.09x | 8.92x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TNK leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TNK delivers a 17.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $17 in annual profit, vs $8 for IMPP. IMPP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NVGS's 0.72x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NVGS scores 6/9 vs TNK's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.5% | +8.7% | +17.2% | +15.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +8.2% | +4.7% | +15.7% | +12.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +10.6% | +5.7% | +12.5% | +7.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +11.3% | +7.2% | +10.9% | +8.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 0.72x | 0.03x | 0.19x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$68M | $698M | -$776M | -$133M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $68M | $205M | $831M | $752M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $78,761 | $903M | $55M | $619M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 15.99x | 2.88x | 109.95x | 6.82x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TNK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TNK five years ago would be worth $61,384 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $436 for IMPP. Over the past 12 months, STNG leads with a +115.3% total return vs NVGS's +74.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TNK at 33.2% vs IMPP's 16.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +34.5% | +32.2% | +58.3% | +71.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +86.7% | +74.9% | +80.3% | +115.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +57.4% | +82.1% | +136.5% | +92.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -95.6% | +100.5% | +513.8% | +359.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -95.6% | +60.0% | +187.7% | +62.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +16.3% | +22.1% | +33.2% | +24.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NVGS and STNG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
STNG is the less volatile stock with a 0.28 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than IMPP's 0.65 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NVGS currently trades 98.5% from its 52-week high vs IMPP's 74.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.65x | 0.63x | 0.35x | 0.28x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.57 | $23.22 | $83.54 | $87.39 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.45 | $12.91 | $41.05 | $37.96 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +74.7% | +98.5% | +97.3% | +96.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 56.0 | 75.0 | 57.9 | 60.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 747K | 452K | 542K | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — TNK and STNG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: IMPP as "Hold", NVGS as "Buy", TNK as "Buy", STNG as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 22.2% upside for IMPP (target: $6) vs 0.6% for NVGS (target: $23). For income investors, TNK offers the higher dividend yield at 2.44% vs NVGS's 0.95%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $6.00 | $23.00 | $90.00 | $85.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 10 | 23 | 31 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.1% | +0.9% | +2.4% | +2.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.05 | $0.22 | $1.98 | $1.69 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.5% | +4.2% | 0.0% | +0.0% |
TNK leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). STNG leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
IMPP vs NVGS vs TNK vs STNG: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is IMPP or NVGS or TNK or STNG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Navigator Holdings Ltd.
(NVGS) is the stronger pick with 3. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -24. 6% for Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG). Imperial Petroleum Inc. (IMPP) offers the better valuation at 3. 5x trailing P/E (2. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Navigator Holdings Ltd. (NVGS) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — IMPP or NVGS or TNK or STNG?
On trailing P/E, Imperial Petroleum Inc.
(IMPP) is the cheapest at 3. 5x versus Navigator Holdings Ltd. at 15. 6x. On forward P/E, Imperial Petroleum Inc. is actually cheaper at 2. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Navigator Holdings Ltd. wins at 0. 09x versus Scorpio Tankers Inc. 's 0. 26x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — IMPP or NVGS or TNK or STNG?
Over the past 5 years, Teekay Tankers Ltd.
(TNK) delivered a total return of +513. 8%, compared to -95. 6% for Imperial Petroleum Inc. (IMPP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TNK returned +187. 7% versus IMPP's -95. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — IMPP or NVGS or TNK or STNG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Scorpio Tankers Inc.
(STNG) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 28β versus Imperial Petroleum Inc. 's 0. 65β — meaning IMPP is approximately 133% more volatile than STNG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Imperial Petroleum Inc. (IMPP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 72% for Navigator Holdings Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — IMPP or NVGS or TNK or STNG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Navigator Holdings Ltd.
(NVGS) is pulling ahead at 3. 6% versus -24. 6% for Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Navigator Holdings Ltd. grew EPS 23. 5% year-over-year, compared to -52. 2% for Imperial Petroleum Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, IMPP leads at 104. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — IMPP or NVGS or TNK or STNG?
Teekay Tankers Ltd.
(TNK) is the more profitable company, earning 36. 9% net margin versus 17. 1% for Navigator Holdings Ltd. — meaning it keeps 36. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: STNG leads at 33. 0% versus 22. 6% for TNK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — STNG leads at 46. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is IMPP or NVGS or TNK or STNG more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Navigator Holdings Ltd. (NVGS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 09x versus Scorpio Tankers Inc. 's 0. 26x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Imperial Petroleum Inc. (IMPP) trades at 2. 4x forward P/E versus 14. 1x for Navigator Holdings Ltd. — 11. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IMPP: 22. 2% to $6. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — IMPP or NVGS or TNK or STNG?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK) offers the highest yield at 2. 4%, versus 0. 9% for Navigator Holdings Ltd. (NVGS).
09Is IMPP or NVGS or TNK or STNG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Teekay Tankers Ltd.
(TNK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 35), 2. 4% yield, +187. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TNK: +187. 7%, IMPP: -95. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between IMPP and NVGS and TNK and STNG?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.