Biotechnology
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
IMRX vs IQV vs CRL vs ICLR vs MEDP vs JPM vs KO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
Banks - Diversified
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
IMRX vs IQV vs CRL vs ICLR vs MEDP vs JPM vs KO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Medical - Diagnostics & Research | Medical - Diagnostics & Research | Medical - Diagnostics & Research | Medical - Diagnostics & Research | Banks - Diversified | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic |
| Market Cap | $152M | $30.79B | $9.03B | $11.19B | $13.35B | $896.00B | $355.61B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $16.63B | $4.03B | $8.17B | $2.68B | $280.33B | $49.28B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-54M | $1.39B | $-185M | $489M | $460M | $57.05B | $13.70B |
| Gross Margin | — | 26.1% | 31.9% | 25.2% | 29.1% | 60.0% | 61.7% |
| Operating Margin | — | 13.9% | 11.8% | 11.0% | 21.0% | 25.9% | 29.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | 14.2x | 16.9x | 13.9x | 27.5x | 14.4x | 25.3x |
| Total Debt | $4M | $16.17B | $3.07B | $3.56B | $250M | $942.38B | $45.49B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $129M | $1.98B | $214M | $647M | $497M | $343.34B | $10.27B |
IMRX vs IQV vs CRL vs ICLR vs MEDP vs JPM vs KO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 21 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immuneering Corpora… (IMRX) | 100 | 23.8 | -76.2% |
| IQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV) | 100 | 73.3 | -26.7% |
| Charles River Labor… (CRL) | 100 | 46.1 | -53.9% |
| ICON Public Limited… (ICLR) | 100 | 60.1 | -39.9% |
| Medpace Holdings, I… (MEDP) | 100 | 265.6 | +165.6% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 211.3 | +111.3% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 144.9 | +44.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: IMRX vs IQV vs CRL vs ICLR vs MEDP vs JPM vs KO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
IMRX ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.33, Low D/E 1.8%, current ratio 17.50x
- +113.8% vs ICLR's -0.6%
IQV is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.35 vs KO's 2.26
- Lower P/E (14.2x vs 25.3x), PEG 0.35 vs 2.26
CRL doesn't hold a clear category lead here; it's more of a secondary option in this specific comparison.
In this particular matchup, ICLR is outpaced on most metrics by others in the set.
MEDP has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 20.0%, EPS growth 21.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 20.1%
- 15.8% 10Y total return vs JPM's 465.8%
- 20.0% revenue growth vs CRL's -0.9%
- 24.8% ROA vs CRL's -2.5%, ROIC 154.9% vs 6.3%
JPM is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.94, yield 1.9%
- Beta 0.94 vs ICLR's 1.59
KO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if defensive is your priority.
- Beta -0.20, yield 2.5%, current ratio 1.46x
- 27.8% margin vs CRL's -4.6%
- 2.5% yield, 56-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.9%, (5 stocks pay no dividend)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 20.0% revenue growth vs CRL's -0.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.2x vs 25.3x), PEG 0.35 vs 2.26 | |
| Quality / Margins | 27.8% margin vs CRL's -4.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.94 vs ICLR's 1.59 | |
| Dividends | 2.5% yield, 56-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.9%, (5 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +113.8% vs ICLR's -0.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 24.8% ROA vs CRL's -2.5%, ROIC 154.9% vs 6.3% |
IMRX vs IQV vs CRL vs ICLR vs MEDP vs JPM vs KO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
IMRX vs IQV vs CRL vs ICLR vs MEDP vs JPM vs KO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 7 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
KO leads in 3 of 6 categories
ICLR leads 1 • MEDP leads 1 • IMRX leads 0 • IQV leads 0 • CRL leads 0 • JPM leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM and IMRX operate at a comparable scale, with $280.3B and $0 in trailing revenue. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CRL's -4.6%. On growth, MEDP holds the edge at +26.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $16.6B | $4.0B | $8.2B | $2.7B | $280.3B | $49.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$58M | $3.5B | $824M | $1.5B | $577M | $81.4B | $15.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$54M | $1.4B | -$185M | $489M | $460M | $57.0B | $13.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$50M | $2.7B | $391M | $1.3B | $745M | $100.9B | $12.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +26.1% | +31.9% | +25.2% | +29.1% | +60.0% | +61.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +13.9% | +11.8% | +11.0% | +21.0% | +25.9% | +29.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +8.3% | -4.6% | +6.0% | +17.2% | +20.4% | +27.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +16.1% | +9.7% | +16.4% | +27.8% | +36.0% | +25.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +8.4% | +1.2% | +3.5% | +26.5% | — | +12.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +50.0% | +15.0% | -160.0% | -38.9% | +16.6% | +16.0% | +18.2% |
Valuation Metrics
ICLR leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 16.0x trailing earnings, JPM trades at a 68% valuation discount to ICLR's 50.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), IQV offers better value at 0.57x vs KO's 2.43x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $152M | $30.8B | $9.0B | $11.2B | $13.3B | $896.0B | $355.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $27M | $45.0B | $11.9B | $14.1B | $13.1B | $1.50T | $390.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -3.30x | 23.15x | -64.44x | 50.41x | 30.59x | 16.00x | 27.18x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 14.16x | 16.90x | 13.86x | 27.51x | 14.40x | 25.27x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.57x | — | — | 0.96x | 0.90x | 2.43x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 13.11x | 13.04x | 10.11x | 23.27x | 18.36x | 26.39x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 1.89x | 2.25x | 1.36x | 5.27x | 3.20x | 7.42x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.84x | 4.75x | 2.89x | 1.26x | 30.06x | 2.47x | 10.40x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 15.01x | 17.42x | 12.98x | 19.57x | 8.88x | 67.15x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MEDP leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MEDP delivers a 120.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $121 in annual profit, vs $-6 for CRL. IMRX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KO scores 7/9 vs CRL's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -0.1% | +22.1% | -5.7% | +5.2% | +120.9% | +15.9% | +41.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.1% | +4.7% | -2.5% | +3.0% | +24.8% | +1.3% | +13.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -86.4% | +8.7% | +6.3% | +6.2% | +154.9% | +4.5% | +15.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -44.5% | +11.0% | +8.1% | +7.5% | +65.7% | +8.9% | +17.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.02x | 2.44x | 0.95x | 0.39x | 0.55x | 2.60x | 1.33x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$125M | $14.2B | $2.9B | $2.9B | -$247M | $599.0B | $35.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $129M | $2.0B | $214M | $647M | $497M | $343.3B | $10.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4M | $16.2B | $3.1B | $3.6B | $250M | $942.4B | $45.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 3.10x | 4.29x | 3.83x | — | 0.74x | 10.70x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — MEDP and JPM each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MEDP five years ago would be worth $26,044 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,382 for IMRX. Over the past 12 months, IMRX leads with a +113.8% total return vs ICLR's -0.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.6% vs IMRX's -24.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -36.7% | -19.5% | -7.4% | -22.5% | -18.2% | -0.5% | +20.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +113.8% | +14.0% | +23.5% | -0.6% | +53.7% | +21.8% | +17.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -57.6% | -14.4% | -8.7% | -35.9% | +114.4% | +138.2% | +47.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -76.2% | -25.8% | -47.2% | -32.0% | +160.4% | +118.2% | +65.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -76.2% | +177.5% | +122.4% | +120.9% | +1581.7% | +465.8% | +121.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -24.9% | -5.0% | -3.0% | -13.8% | +28.9% | +33.6% | +13.7% |
Risk & Volatility
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ICLR's 1.59 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KO currently trades 98.3% from its 52-week high vs IMRX's 41.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.33x | 1.16x | 1.39x | 1.59x | 1.04x | 0.94x | -0.20x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $10.08 | $247.05 | $228.88 | $211.00 | $628.92 | $337.25 | $84.04 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.66 | $153.01 | $143.06 | $66.57 | $294.07 | $262.71 | $65.35 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +41.6% | +73.5% | +81.9% | +69.3% | +74.3% | +95.1% | +98.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 39.1 | 54.4 | 60.8 | 67.3 | 66.2 | 59.1 | 60.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.4M | 1.5M | 767K | 1.2M | 365K | 7.0M | 12.7M |
Analyst Outlook
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: IMRX as "Buy", IQV as "Buy", CRL as "Buy", ICLR as "Buy", MEDP as "Hold", JPM as "Buy", KO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 186.4% upside for IMRX (target: $12) vs -0.6% for ICLR (target: $145). For income investors, KO offers the higher dividend yield at 2.46% vs JPM's 1.86%.
| Metric | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $12.00 | $222.22 | $213.17 | $145.36 | $498.86 | $339.75 | $86.13 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 11 | 44 | 37 | 30 | 19 | 61 | 48 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — | +1.9% | +2.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 2 | 1 | 0 | — | 15 | 56 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — | $5.95 | $2.04 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +4.0% | +4.0% | +6.7% | +6.9% | +3.9% | +0.2% |
KO leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Risk & Volatility). ICLR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
IMRX vs IQV vs CRL vs ICLR vs MEDP vs JPM vs KO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is IMRX or IQV or CRL or ICLR or MEDP or JPM or KO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Medpace Holdings, Inc.
(MEDP) is the stronger pick with 20. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 9% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. (CRL). JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) offers the better valuation at 16. 0x trailing P/E (14. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Immuneering Corporation (IMRX) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — IMRX or IQV or CRL or ICLR or MEDP or JPM or KO?
On trailing P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the cheapest at 16. 0x versus ICON Public Limited Company at 50. 4x. On forward P/E, ICON Public Limited Company is actually cheaper at 13. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: IQVIA Holdings Inc. wins at 0. 35x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 26x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — IMRX or IQV or CRL or ICLR or MEDP or JPM or KO?
Over the past 5 years, Medpace Holdings, Inc.
(MEDP) delivered a total return of +160. 4%, compared to -76. 2% for Immuneering Corporation (IMRX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MEDP returned +1582% versus IMRX's -76. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — IMRX or IQV or CRL or ICLR or MEDP or JPM or KO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
20β versus ICON Public Limited Company's 1. 59β — meaning ICLR is approximately -896% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Immuneering Corporation (IMRX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — IMRX or IQV or CRL or ICLR or MEDP or JPM or KO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Medpace Holdings, Inc.
(MEDP) is pulling ahead at 20. 0% versus -0. 9% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. (CRL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Immuneering Corporation grew EPS 37. 7% year-over-year, compared to -1555. 0% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MEDP leads at 20. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — IMRX or IQV or CRL or ICLR or MEDP or JPM or KO?
The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.
3% net margin versus -3. 6% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KO leads at 28. 7% versus 0. 0% for IMRX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KO leads at 61. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is IMRX or IQV or CRL or ICLR or MEDP or JPM or KO more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, IQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 35x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 26x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, ICON Public Limited Company (ICLR) trades at 13. 9x forward P/E versus 27. 5x for Medpace Holdings, Inc. — 13. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IMRX: 186. 4% to $12. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — IMRX or IQV or CRL or ICLR or MEDP or JPM or KO?
In this comparison, KO (2.
5% yield), JPM (1. 9% yield) pay a dividend. IMRX, IQV, CRL, ICLR, MEDP do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is IMRX or IQV or CRL or ICLR or MEDP or JPM or KO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). ICON Public Limited Company (ICLR) carries a higher beta of 1. 59 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, ICLR: +120. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between IMRX and IQV and CRL and ICLR and MEDP and JPM and KO?
These companies operate in different sectors (IMRX (Healthcare) and IQV (Healthcare) and CRL (Healthcare) and ICLR (Healthcare) and MEDP (Healthcare) and JPM (Financial Services) and KO (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: IMRX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IQV is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; CRL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ICLR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; MEDP is a mid-cap high-growth stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock. JPM, KO pay a dividend while IMRX, IQV, CRL, ICLR, MEDP do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.