Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
IMTE vs MAXN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Solar
IMTE vs MAXN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Solar |
| Market Cap | $2M | $8M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $616K | $176M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-21M | $-565M |
| Gross Margin | -391.5% | -137.2% |
| Operating Margin | -12.9% | -290.5% |
| Total Debt | $11M | $311M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $676K | $29M |
IMTE vs MAXN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Aug 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Integrated Media Te… (IMTE) | 100 | 1.5 | -98.5% |
| Maxeon Solar Techno… (MAXN) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: IMTE vs MAXN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
IMTE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.85
- Rev growth 2.5%, EPS growth -6.9%, 3Y rev CAGR -40.2%
- -99.1% 10Y total return vs MAXN's -100.0%
MAXN is the clearest fit if your priority is quality.
- -320.5% margin vs IMTE's -33.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 2.5% revenue growth vs MAXN's -54.7% | |
| Quality / Margins | -320.5% margin vs IMTE's -33.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.85 vs MAXN's 2.08 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | -55.5% vs MAXN's -83.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -43.7% ROA vs MAXN's -190.0%, ROIC -38.5% vs -351.1% |
IMTE vs MAXN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MAXN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MAXN is the larger business by revenue, generating $176M annually — 286.5x IMTE's $615,705. MAXN is the more profitable business, keeping -3.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to IMTE's -33.3%. On growth, IMTE holds the edge at -71.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $615,705 | $176M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$6M | -$488M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$21M | -$565M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $4M | -$186M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -3.9% | -137.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -12.9% | -2.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -33.3% | -3.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +6.0% | -105.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -71.0% | -89.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.7% | -2.1% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — IMTE and MAXN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2M | $8M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $12M | $291M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.07x | -0.01x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.89x | 0.02x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.05x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
IMTE leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IMTE scores 5/9 vs MAXN's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -61.1% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -43.7% | -190.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -38.5% | -3.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -58.9% | -189.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.46x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $10M | $283M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $675,781 | $29M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $11M | $311M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -22.47x | -13.64x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
IMTE leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IMTE five years ago would be worth $121 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3 for MAXN. Over the past 12 months, IMTE leads with a -55.5% total return vs MAXN's -83.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IMTE at -51.4% vs MAXN's -94.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -12.4% | -84.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -55.5% | -83.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -88.6% | -100.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.8% | -100.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.1% | -100.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -51.4% | -94.4% |
Risk & Volatility
IMTE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
IMTE is the less volatile stock with a 0.85 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MAXN's 2.08 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IMTE currently trades 34.4% from its 52-week high vs MAXN's 9.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.85x | 2.08x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.54 | $4.97 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.50 | $0.40 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +34.4% | +9.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 43.3 | 25.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 274K | 2.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
IMTE leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). MAXN leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
IMTE vs MAXN: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is IMTE or MAXN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Integrated Media Technology Limited (IMTE) is the stronger pick with 2.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -54. 7% for Maxeon Solar Technologies, Ltd. (MAXN). The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — IMTE or MAXN?
Over the past 5 years, Integrated Media Technology Limited (IMTE) delivered a total return of -98.
8%, compared to -100. 0% for Maxeon Solar Technologies, Ltd. (MAXN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IMTE returned -99. 1% versus MAXN's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — IMTE or MAXN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Integrated Media Technology Limited (IMTE) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
85β versus Maxeon Solar Technologies, Ltd. 's 2. 08β — meaning MAXN is approximately 145% more volatile than IMTE relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — IMTE or MAXN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Integrated Media Technology Limited (IMTE) is pulling ahead at 2.
5% versus -54. 7% for Maxeon Solar Technologies, Ltd. (MAXN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Integrated Media Technology Limited grew EPS -691. 6% year-over-year, compared to -1276. 5% for Maxeon Solar Technologies, Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MAXN leads at -13. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — IMTE or MAXN?
Maxeon Solar Technologies, Ltd.
(MAXN) is the more profitable company, earning -120. 7% net margin versus -44. 8% for Integrated Media Technology Limited — meaning it keeps -120. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MAXN leads at -113. 3% versus -58. 5% for IMTE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IMTE leads at 30. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — IMTE or MAXN?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is IMTE or MAXN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Integrated Media Technology Limited (IMTE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
85)). Maxeon Solar Technologies, Ltd. (MAXN) carries a higher beta of 2. 08 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (IMTE: -99. 1%, MAXN: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between IMTE and MAXN?
These companies operate in different sectors (IMTE (Technology) and MAXN (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.