Biotechnology
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
IMUX vs ARQT vs VNDA vs IQV vs PTCT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
Biotechnology
IMUX vs ARQT vs VNDA vs IQV vs PTCT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Medical - Diagnostics & Research | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $129M | $3.08B | $361M | $30.73B | $6.20B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $416M | $218M | $16.63B | $827M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-104M | $-2M | $-240M | $1.39B | $-187M |
| Gross Margin | — | 90.9% | 71.1% | 26.1% | 77.8% |
| Operating Margin | — | 0.8% | -73.6% | 13.9% | -8.2% |
| Forward P/E | — | 122.5x | — | 14.2x | 115.7x |
| Total Debt | $684K | $6M | $13M | $16.17B | $492M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $15M | $43M | $85M | $1.98B | $985M |
IMUX vs ARQT vs VNDA vs IQV vs PTCT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immunic, Inc. (IMUX) | 100 | 11.4 | -88.6% |
| Arcutis Biotherapeu… (ARQT) | 100 | 80.6 | -19.4% |
| Vanda Pharmaceutica… (VNDA) | 100 | 51.3 | -48.7% |
| IQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV) | 100 | 127.9 | +27.9% |
| PTC Therapeutics, I… (PTCT) | 100 | 148.1 | +48.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: IMUX vs ARQT vs VNDA vs IQV vs PTCT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
IMUX lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
ARQT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +79.1% vs IQV's +14.0%
VNDA is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.08, Low D/E 3.9%, current ratio 2.39x
IQV carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.22
- Better valuation composite
- 8.3% margin vs VNDA's -110.0%
- 4.7% ROA vs IMUX's -132.0%
PTCT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 114.5%, EPS growth 264.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 35.3%
- 9.9% 10Y total return vs IQV's 176.9%
- Beta 0.91, current ratio 2.35x
- 114.5% revenue growth vs IMUX's -8.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 114.5% revenue growth vs IMUX's -8.2% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 8.3% margin vs VNDA's -110.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.91 vs IMUX's 1.68 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +79.1% vs IQV's +14.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.7% ROA vs IMUX's -132.0% |
IMUX vs ARQT vs VNDA vs IQV vs PTCT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
IMUX vs ARQT vs VNDA vs IQV vs PTCT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
IQV leads in 3 of 6 categories
ARQT leads 1 • PTCT leads 1 • IMUX leads 0 • VNDA leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IQV leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IQV and IMUX operate at a comparable scale, with $16.6B and $0 in trailing revenue. IQV is the more profitable business, keeping 8.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to VNDA's -110.0%. On growth, ARQT holds the edge at +60.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $416M | $218M | $16.6B | $827M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$109M | $6M | -$150M | $3.5B | -$21M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$104M | -$2M | -$240M | $1.4B | -$187M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$81M | $27M | -$127M | $2.7B | -$229M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +90.9% | +71.1% | +26.1% | +77.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +0.8% | -73.6% | +13.9% | -8.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -0.6% | -110.0% | +8.3% | -22.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +6.5% | -58.5% | +16.1% | -27.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +60.1% | +3.4% | +8.4% | -76.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +56.8% | +55.0% | -64.0% | +15.0% | -100.3% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — VNDA and PTCT each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.6x trailing earnings, PTCT trades at a 58% valuation discount to IQV's 23.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PTCT's 6.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than IQV's 13.1x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $129M | $3.1B | $361M | $30.7B | $6.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $114M | $3.0B | $288M | $44.9B | $5.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.09x | -189.15x | -1.63x | 23.09x | 9.60x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 122.45x | — | 14.16x | 115.72x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 0.57x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | 13.09x | 6.37x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 8.18x | 1.67x | 1.88x | 3.58x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 16.51x | 1.10x | 4.74x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | 14.98x | 8.82x |
Profitability & Efficiency
IQV leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
IQV delivers a 22.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $22 in annual profit, vs $-2 for IMUX. ARQT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to IQV's 2.44x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PTCT scores 7/9 vs IMUX's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.2% | -1.4% | -61.4% | +22.1% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -132.0% | -0.6% | -44.6% | +4.7% | -6.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -5.2% | -32.2% | +8.7% | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -17.0% | -4.3% | -33.6% | +11.0% | +55.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.03x | 0.04x | 2.44x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$15M | -$37M | -$72M | $14.2B | -$492M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $15M | $43M | $85M | $2.0B | $985M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $684,000 | $6M | $13M | $16.2B | $492M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 2.08x | — | 3.10x | -1.00x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ARQT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PTCT five years ago would be worth $17,395 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $920 for IMUX. Over the past 12 months, ARQT leads with a +79.1% total return vs IQV's +14.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ARQT at 34.0% vs IMUX's -8.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +124.2% | -15.2% | -26.1% | -19.7% | -2.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +50.2% | +79.1% | +33.2% | +14.0% | +47.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -22.7% | +140.8% | -6.7% | -14.6% | +72.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -90.8% | -13.3% | -68.2% | -25.6% | +73.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.6% | +12.8% | -43.4% | +176.9% | +989.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -8.2% | +34.0% | -2.3% | -5.1% | +19.9% |
Risk & Volatility
PTCT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PTCT is the less volatile stock with a 0.91 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than IMUX's 1.68 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PTCT currently trades 85.4% from its 52-week high vs VNDA's 61.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.80x | 1.45x | 1.01x | 1.16x | 0.89x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $15.77 | $31.77 | $9.94 | $247.05 | $87.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.67 | $12.72 | $4.14 | $153.01 | $43.18 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +82.9% | +77.4% | +61.4% | +73.3% | +85.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 43.3 | 59.9 | 41.1 | 55.8 | 56.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 289K | 1.5M | 1.0M | 1.5M | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
IQV leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: IMUX as "Buy", ARQT as "Buy", VNDA as "Buy", IQV as "Buy", PTCT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 133.6% upside for VNDA (target: $14) vs 10.9% for IMUX (target: $15).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $14.50 | $34.00 | $14.25 | $222.22 | $95.83 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 12 | 19 | 44 | 26 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — | — | 2 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +4.0% | 0.0% |
IQV leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ARQT leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
IMUX vs ARQT vs VNDA vs IQV vs PTCT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is IMUX or ARQT or VNDA or IQV or PTCT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, PTC Therapeutics, Inc.
(PTCT) is the stronger pick with 114. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 9% for IQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV). PTC Therapeutics, Inc. (PTCT) offers the better valuation at 9. 6x trailing P/E (115. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Immunic, Inc. (IMUX) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — IMUX or ARQT or VNDA or IQV or PTCT?
On trailing P/E, PTC Therapeutics, Inc.
(PTCT) is the cheapest at 9. 6x versus IQVIA Holdings Inc. at 23. 1x. On forward P/E, IQVIA Holdings Inc. is actually cheaper at 14. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — IMUX or ARQT or VNDA or IQV or PTCT?
Over the past 5 years, PTC Therapeutics, Inc.
(PTCT) delivered a total return of +73. 9%, compared to -90. 8% for Immunic, Inc. (IMUX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PTCT returned +995. 3% versus IMUX's -99. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — IMUX or ARQT or VNDA or IQV or PTCT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), PTC Therapeutics, Inc.
(PTCT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 89β versus Immunic, Inc. 's 1. 80β — meaning IMUX is approximately 102% more volatile than PTCT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc. (ARQT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 2% for IQVIA Holdings Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — IMUX or ARQT or VNDA or IQV or PTCT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), PTC Therapeutics, Inc.
(PTCT) is pulling ahead at 114. 5% versus 5. 9% for IQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: PTC Therapeutics, Inc. grew EPS 264. 5% year-over-year, compared to -1068. 8% for Vanda Pharmaceuticals Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ARQT leads at 367. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — IMUX or ARQT or VNDA or IQV or PTCT?
PTC Therapeutics, Inc.
(PTCT) is the more profitable company, earning 39. 4% net margin versus -102. 0% for Vanda Pharmaceuticals Inc. — meaning it keeps 39. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PTCT leads at 49. 5% versus -70. 0% for VNDA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PTCT leads at 95. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is IMUX or ARQT or VNDA or IQV or PTCT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, IQVIA Holdings Inc.
(IQV) trades at 14. 2x forward P/E versus 122. 5x for Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc. — 108. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for VNDA: 133. 6% to $14. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — IMUX or ARQT or VNDA or IQV or PTCT?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is IMUX or ARQT or VNDA or IQV or PTCT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, PTC Therapeutics, Inc.
(PTCT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 89), +995. 3% 10Y return). Immunic, Inc. (IMUX) carries a higher beta of 1. 80 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PTCT: +995. 3%, IMUX: -99. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between IMUX and ARQT and VNDA and IQV and PTCT?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: IMUX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ARQT is a small-cap high-growth stock; VNDA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IQV is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; PTCT is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.