Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
INBK vs NBTB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
INBK vs NBTB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $222M | $2.35B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $323M | $867M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-35M | $169M |
| Gross Margin | 13.7% | 72.1% |
| Operating Margin | -15.8% | 25.3% |
| Forward P/E | 11.4x | 10.8x |
| Total Debt | $355M | $327M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $457M | $185M |
INBK vs NBTB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| First Internet Banc… (INBK) | 100 | 158.7 | +58.7% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 143.9 | +43.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: INBK vs NBTB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
INBK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.
- Better valuation composite
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs NBTB's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
- +18.3% vs NBTB's +9.0%
NBTB is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.89, yield 3.2%
- Rev growth 10.4%, EPS growth 12.5%
- 102.2% 10Y total return vs INBK's 15.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.4% NII/revenue growth vs INBK's -3.2% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs NBTB's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.89 vs INBK's 1.01, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.2% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs INBK's 0.9% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +18.3% vs NBTB's +9.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs NBTB's 0.5% |
INBK vs NBTB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
INBK vs NBTB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NBTB leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NBTB is the larger business by revenue, generating $867M annually — 2.7x INBK's $323M. NBTB is the more profitable business, keeping 19.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to INBK's -10.9%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $323M | $867M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$46M | $241M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$35M | $169M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$10M | $225M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +13.7% | +72.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -15.8% | +25.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -10.9% | +19.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +11.9% | +25.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -27.7% | +39.5% |
Valuation Metrics
INBK leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $222M | $2.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $121M | $2.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -6.33x | 13.53x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 11.38x | 10.80x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.92x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 10.35x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.69x | 2.71x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.62x | 1.21x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 5.81x | 10.75x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NBTB leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NBTB delivers a 9.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $-9 for INBK. NBTB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to INBK's 0.99x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NBTB scores 7/9 vs INBK's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -9.4% | +9.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.6% | +1.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -5.1% | +7.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -6.6% | +2.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.99x | 0.17x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$102M | $142M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $457M | $185M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $355M | $327M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.25x | 1.05x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
INBK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NBTB five years ago would be worth $12,989 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,745 for INBK. Over the past 12 months, INBK leads with a +18.3% total return vs NBTB's +9.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors INBK at 33.9% vs NBTB's 15.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +25.2% | +9.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +18.3% | +9.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +139.9% | +54.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -22.6% | +29.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +15.5% | +102.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +33.9% | +15.5% |
Risk & Volatility
NBTB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NBTB is the less volatile stock with a 0.89 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than INBK's 1.01 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NBTB currently trades 96.1% from its 52-week high vs INBK's 89.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.01x | 0.89x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $28.51 | $46.92 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $17.05 | $39.20 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +89.5% | +96.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 68.8 | 57.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 59K | 236K |
Analyst Outlook
NBTB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates INBK as "Hold" and NBTB as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 3.8% upside for INBK (target: $27) vs 2.1% for NBTB (target: $46). For income investors, NBTB offers the higher dividend yield at 3.17% vs INBK's 0.94%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $26.50 | $46.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 10 | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.9% | +3.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 12 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.24 | $1.43 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.2% | +0.4% |
NBTB leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). INBK leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns).
INBK vs NBTB: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is INBK or NBTB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the stronger pick with 10. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 2% for First Internet Bancorp (INBK). NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) offers the better valuation at 13. 5x trailing P/E (10. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate First Internet Bancorp (INBK) a "Hold" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — INBK or NBTB?
On forward P/E, NBT Bancorp Inc.
is actually cheaper at 10. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — INBK or NBTB?
Over the past 5 years, NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) delivered a total return of +29. 9%, compared to -22. 6% for First Internet Bancorp (INBK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NBTB returned +102. 2% versus INBK's +15. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — INBK or NBTB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 89β versus First Internet Bancorp's 1. 01β — meaning INBK is approximately 14% more volatile than NBTB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 99% for First Internet Bancorp — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — INBK or NBTB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is pulling ahead at 10. 4% versus -3. 2% for First Internet Bancorp (INBK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: NBT Bancorp Inc. grew EPS 12. 5% year-over-year, compared to -239. 9% for First Internet Bancorp. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — INBK or NBTB?
NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the more profitable company, earning 19. 5% net margin versus -10. 9% for First Internet Bancorp — meaning it keeps 19. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NBTB leads at 25. 3% versus -15. 8% for INBK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NBTB leads at 72. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is INBK or NBTB more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) trades at 10. 8x forward P/E versus 11. 4x for First Internet Bancorp — 0. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for INBK: 3. 8% to $26. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — INBK or NBTB?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) offers the highest yield at 3. 2%, versus 0. 9% for First Internet Bancorp (INBK).
09Is INBK or NBTB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 89), 3. 2% yield, +102. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NBTB: +102. 2%, INBK: +15. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between INBK and NBTB?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: INBK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.
Compare NBTB vs CNOB
CNOB is one of the most direct listed alternatives to NBTB.
Compare INBK vs SOFI
SOFI overlaps with INBK in an adjacent operating segment worth comparing.
Expand With FIS + FISV
FIS and FISV are the strongest missing peers across the current compare set.