Medical - Diagnostics & Research
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
INBS vs OPRX vs QDEL vs CUE vs SEER
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Healthcare Information Services
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
INBS vs OPRX vs QDEL vs CUE vs SEER — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Diagnostics & Research | Medical - Healthcare Information Services | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $3M | $124M | $733M | $94M | $105M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4M | $109M | $2.66B | $27M | $16M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-11M | $5M | $-1.21B | $-27M | $-79M |
| Gross Margin | 46.2% | 67.3% | 56.6% | 88.0% | 40.7% |
| Operating Margin | -315.3% | 10.7% | -37.0% | -96.6% | -5.2% |
| Forward P/E | — | 7.0x | 6.4x | — | — |
| Total Debt | $282K | $5M | $2.80B | $4M | $26M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1M | $23M | $170M | $27M | $41M |
INBS vs OPRX vs QDEL vs CUE vs SEER — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligent Bio Sol… (INBS) | 100 | 0.1 | -99.9% |
| OptimizeRx Corporat… (OPRX) | 100 | 21.3 | -78.7% |
| QuidelOrtho Corpora… (QDEL) | 100 | 6.0 | -94.0% |
| Cue Biopharma, Inc. (CUE) | 100 | 9.5 | -90.5% |
| Seer, Inc. (SEER) | 100 | 3.3 | -96.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: INBS vs OPRX vs QDEL vs CUE vs SEER
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
INBS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.
- +99.1% vs QDEL's -58.3%
OPRX has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 2.28
- 110.5% 10Y total return vs QDEL's -34.9%
- 4.7% margin vs SEER's -486.0%
- 3.0% ROA vs CUE's -77.8%, ROIC 7.1% vs -5.4%
QDEL ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.
- Better valuation composite
CUE is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 195.7%, EPS growth 61.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 180.5%
- 195.7% revenue growth vs SEER's -8.1%
SEER is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.84, Low D/E 7.9%, current ratio 16.53x
- Beta 0.84, current ratio 16.53x
- Beta 0.84 vs QDEL's 2.59, lower leverage
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 195.7% revenue growth vs SEER's -8.1% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 4.7% margin vs SEER's -486.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.84 vs QDEL's 2.59, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +99.1% vs QDEL's -58.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.0% ROA vs CUE's -77.8%, ROIC 7.1% vs -5.4% |
INBS vs OPRX vs QDEL vs CUE vs SEER — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
INBS vs OPRX vs QDEL vs CUE vs SEER — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
OPRX leads in 2 of 6 categories
QDEL leads 1 • INBS leads 0 • CUE leads 0 • SEER leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — OPRX and CUE each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
QDEL is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.7B annually — 742.0x INBS's $4M. OPRX is the more profitable business, keeping 4.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SEER's -4.9%. On growth, CUE holds the edge at +12.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4M | $109M | $2.7B | $27M | $16M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$11M | $16M | -$649M | -$23M | -$76M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$11M | $5M | -$1.2B | -$27M | -$79M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$10M | $12M | -$75M | -$22M | -$46M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +46.2% | +67.3% | +56.6% | +88.0% | +40.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -3.2% | +10.7% | -37.0% | -96.6% | -5.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -3.2% | +4.7% | -45.6% | -96.9% | -4.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.7% | +10.6% | -2.8% | -79.6% | -2.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +47.6% | -0.2% | -10.5% | +12.9% | +4.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +43.6% | — | -6.1% | +111.0% | +8.6% |
Valuation Metrics
QDEL leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3M | $124M | $733M | $94M | $105M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2M | $105M | $3.4B | $71M | $90M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.11x | 24.56x | -0.65x | -4.25x | -1.35x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 7.04x | 6.45x | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 6.55x | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.93x | 1.13x | 0.27x | 3.42x | 7.52x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.43x | 0.98x | 0.38x | 4.27x | 0.36x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 6.62x | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
OPRX leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
OPRX delivers a 4.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $4 in annual profit, vs $-165 for CUE. OPRX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to QDEL's 1.46x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), OPRX scores 8/9 vs INBS's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -103.7% | +4.2% | -56.3% | -165.2% | -29.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -64.0% | +3.0% | -20.7% | -77.8% | -25.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -3.1% | +7.1% | -13.6% | -5.4% | -21.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -189.6% | +7.6% | -18.0% | -112.5% | -25.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.10x | 0.04x | 1.46x | 0.16x | 0.08x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$738,104 | -$19M | $2.6B | -$23M | -$15M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1M | $23M | $170M | $27M | $41M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $281,805 | $5M | $2.8B | $4M | $26M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -174.82x | 1.26x | -5.18x | -74.29x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — OPRX and SEER each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in OPRX five years ago would be worth $1,266 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $23 for INBS. Over the past 12 months, INBS leads with a +99.1% total return vs QDEL's -58.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SEER at -19.2% vs INBS's -58.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -71.0% | -46.6% | -62.6% | +253.1% | +3.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +99.1% | -30.1% | -58.3% | +55.0% | +1.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -92.8% | -54.4% | -87.8% | -75.7% | -47.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.8% | -87.3% | -91.1% | -89.4% | -95.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.9% | +110.5% | -34.9% | -89.8% | -96.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -58.4% | -23.0% | -50.4% | -37.6% | -19.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CUE and SEER each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SEER is the less volatile stock with a 0.84 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than QDEL's 2.59 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CUE currently trades 86.3% from its 52-week high vs INBS's 9.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.91x | 2.28x | 2.59x | 2.34x | 0.84x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $24.90 | $22.25 | $38.99 | $41.42 | $2.41 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.54 | $5.54 | $10.22 | $0.35 | $1.65 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +9.2% | +29.8% | +27.6% | +86.3% | +78.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 36.1 | 46.9 | 35.2 | 70.8 | 49.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 86K | 476K | 2.2M | 903K | 401K |
Analyst Outlook
OPRX leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: OPRX as "Buy", QDEL as "Buy", SEER as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 156.4% upside for OPRX (target: $17) vs 57.8% for QDEL (target: $17).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $17.00 | $17.00 | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 15 | 15 | — | 4 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +11.3% |
OPRX leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Analyst Outlook). QDEL leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
INBS vs OPRX vs QDEL vs CUE vs SEER: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is INBS or OPRX or QDEL or CUE or SEER a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Cue Biopharma, Inc.
(CUE) is the stronger pick with 195. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -8. 1% for Seer, Inc. (SEER). OptimizeRx Corporation (OPRX) offers the better valuation at 24. 6x trailing P/E (7. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate OptimizeRx Corporation (OPRX) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — INBS or OPRX or QDEL or CUE or SEER?
On forward P/E, QuidelOrtho Corporation is actually cheaper at 6.
4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — INBS or OPRX or QDEL or CUE or SEER?
Over the past 5 years, OptimizeRx Corporation (OPRX) delivered a total return of -87.
3%, compared to -99. 8% for Intelligent Bio Solutions Inc. (INBS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: OPRX returned +110. 5% versus INBS's -99. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — INBS or OPRX or QDEL or CUE or SEER?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Seer, Inc.
(SEER) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 84β versus QuidelOrtho Corporation's 2. 59β — meaning QDEL is approximately 208% more volatile than SEER relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, OptimizeRx Corporation (OPRX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 146% for QuidelOrtho Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — INBS or OPRX or QDEL or CUE or SEER?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Cue Biopharma, Inc.
(CUE) is pulling ahead at 195. 7% versus -8. 1% for Seer, Inc. (SEER). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: OptimizeRx Corporation grew EPS 124. 5% year-over-year, compared to -3. 0% for Seer, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CUE leads at 180. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — INBS or OPRX or QDEL or CUE or SEER?
OptimizeRx Corporation (OPRX) is the more profitable company, earning 4.
7% net margin versus -620. 9% for Seer, Inc. — meaning it keeps 4. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: OPRX leads at 10. 7% versus -717. 7% for SEER. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CUE leads at 87. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is INBS or OPRX or QDEL or CUE or SEER more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, QuidelOrtho Corporation (QDEL) trades at 6.
4x forward P/E versus 7. 0x for OptimizeRx Corporation — 0. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for OPRX: 156. 4% to $17. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — INBS or OPRX or QDEL or CUE or SEER?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is INBS or OPRX or QDEL or CUE or SEER better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Seer, Inc.
(SEER) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 84)). Cue Biopharma, Inc. (CUE) carries a higher beta of 2. 34 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SEER: -96. 7%, CUE: -89. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between INBS and OPRX and QDEL and CUE and SEER?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: INBS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; OPRX is a small-cap high-growth stock; QDEL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CUE is a small-cap high-growth stock; SEER is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.