Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
INBX vs ABBV vs PFE vs BMY vs REGN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Drug Manufacturers - General
Drug Manufacturers - General
Drug Manufacturers - General
Biotechnology
INBX vs ABBV vs PFE vs BMY vs REGN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Drug Manufacturers - General | Drug Manufacturers - General | Drug Manufacturers - General | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $1.82B | $358.42B | $150.63B | $114.85B | $73.68B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1M | $61.16B | $63.31B | $48.48B | $14.92B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-140M | $4.23B | $7.49B | $7.28B | $4.42B |
| Gross Margin | -47.6% | 70.2% | 69.3% | 68.7% | 84.5% |
| Operating Margin | -103.9% | 26.7% | 23.4% | 25.7% | 24.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | 14.3x | 8.9x | 8.9x | 15.3x |
| Total Debt | $107M | $69.07B | $67.42B | $47.14B | $2.71B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $124M | $5.23B | $1.14B | $10.21B | $3.12B |
INBX vs ABBV vs PFE vs BMY vs REGN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Aug 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Inhibrx Biosciences… (INBX) | 100 | 711.9 | +611.9% |
| AbbVie Inc. (ABBV) | 100 | 211.6 | +111.6% |
| Pfizer Inc. (PFE) | 100 | 73.9 | -26.1% |
| Bristol-Myers Squib… (BMY) | 100 | 90.4 | -9.6% |
| Regeneron Pharmaceu… (REGN) | 100 | 114.4 | +14.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: INBX vs ABBV vs PFE vs BMY vs REGN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
INBX has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in long-term compounding.
- 5.1% 10Y total return vs ABBV's 295.5%
- 5.5% revenue growth vs PFE's -1.6%
- +10.2% vs ABBV's +11.3%
ABBV ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 8.6%, EPS growth -0.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 1.8%
- Beta 0.34 vs INBX's 1.79
PFE is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.54, yield 6.5%
- 6.5% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs ABBV's 3.2%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
BMY is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 0.50, yield 4.4%, current ratio 1.26x
- Lower P/E (8.9x vs 15.3x)
REGN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.81, Low D/E 8.7%, current ratio 4.13x
- 29.6% margin vs INBX's -107.7%
- 11.1% ROA vs INBX's -71.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.5% revenue growth vs PFE's -1.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.9x vs 15.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 29.6% margin vs INBX's -107.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.34 vs INBX's 1.79 | |
| Dividends | 6.5% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs ABBV's 3.2%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +10.2% vs ABBV's +11.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.1% ROA vs INBX's -71.9% |
INBX vs ABBV vs PFE vs BMY vs REGN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
INBX vs ABBV vs PFE vs BMY vs REGN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BMY leads in 1 of 6 categories
REGN leads 1 • INBX leads 1 • PFE leads 1 • ABBV leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — ABBV and REGN each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PFE is the larger business by revenue, generating $63.3B annually — 48703.8x INBX's $1M. REGN is the more profitable business, keeping 29.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to INBX's -107.7%. On growth, REGN holds the edge at +19.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1M | $61.2B | $63.3B | $48.5B | $14.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$133M | $24.5B | $21.0B | $15.7B | $4.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$140M | $4.2B | $7.5B | $7.3B | $4.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$130M | $18.7B | $9.5B | $11.9B | $4.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -47.6% | +70.2% | +69.3% | +68.7% | +84.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -103.9% | +26.7% | +23.4% | +25.7% | +24.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -107.7% | +6.9% | +11.8% | +15.0% | +29.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -99.9% | +30.6% | +15.0% | +24.6% | +27.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.0% | +10.0% | +5.4% | +2.6% | +19.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +36.3% | +57.4% | -9.5% | +9.2% | -7.2% |
Valuation Metrics
BMY leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 16.3x trailing earnings, BMY trades at a 81% valuation discount to ABBV's 85.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, BMY's 9.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than REGN's 17.8x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.8B | $358.4B | $150.6B | $114.8B | $73.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.8B | $422.3B | $216.9B | $151.8B | $73.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -13.77x | 85.50x | 19.47x | 16.30x | 17.09x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 14.28x | 8.94x | 8.93x | 15.35x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 2.70x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 14.96x | 10.66x | 9.17x | 17.78x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1396.35x | 5.86x | 2.41x | 2.38x | 5.14x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 241.27x | — | 1.74x | 6.20x | 2.46x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 20.12x | 16.60x | 8.94x | 18.06x |
Profitability & Efficiency
REGN leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ABBV delivers a 62.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $62 in annual profit, vs $-3 for INBX. REGN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.09x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to INBX's 13.39x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BMY scores 8/9 vs INBX's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.7% | +62.1% | +8.3% | +39.0% | +14.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -71.9% | +3.1% | +3.6% | +7.9% | +11.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +23.9% | +7.5% | +16.9% | +8.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -106.9% | +21.5% | +9.0% | +18.7% | +10.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 13.39x | — | 0.78x | 2.55x | 0.09x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$17M | $63.8B | $66.3B | $36.9B | -$412M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $124M | $5.2B | $1.1B | $10.2B | $3.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $107M | $69.1B | $67.4B | $47.1B | $2.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 3.28x | 4.02x | 10.33x | 108.44x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
INBX leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in INBX five years ago would be worth $79,398 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,674 for PFE. Over the past 12 months, INBX leads with a +1021.8% total return vs ABBV's +11.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors INBX at 68.0% vs PFE's -6.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +65.9% | -10.1% | +6.9% | +7.6% | -8.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +1021.8% | +11.3% | +23.7% | +23.4% | +27.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +374.0% | +50.4% | -18.4% | -7.1% | -5.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +694.0% | +101.3% | -13.3% | +5.2% | +43.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +507.7% | +295.5% | +29.6% | +6.7% | +90.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +68.0% | +14.6% | -6.6% | -2.4% | -1.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ABBV and PFE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ABBV is the less volatile stock with a 0.34 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than INBX's 1.79 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PFE currently trades 92.1% from its 52-week high vs INBX's 80.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.79x | 0.34x | 0.54x | 0.50x | 0.81x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $155.29 | $244.81 | $28.75 | $62.89 | $821.11 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $10.84 | $176.57 | $21.97 | $42.52 | $476.49 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +80.2% | +82.8% | +92.1% | +89.4% | +86.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 80.7 | 46.8 | 44.2 | 41.4 | 44.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 335K | 5.8M | 33.3M | 10.3M | 631K |
Analyst Outlook
PFE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: INBX as "Buy", ABBV as "Buy", PFE as "Hold", BMY as "Hold", REGN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 26.6% upside for ABBV (target: $257) vs 3.0% for PFE (target: $27). For income investors, PFE offers the higher dividend yield at 6.49% vs REGN's 0.48%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $256.64 | $27.27 | $62.00 | $865.68 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 41 | 39 | 41 | 48 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +3.2% | +6.5% | +4.4% | +0.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 13 | 15 | 6 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $6.57 | $1.72 | $2.47 | $3.41 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.3% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +5.4% |
BMY leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). REGN leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
INBX vs ABBV vs PFE vs BMY vs REGN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is INBX or ABBV or PFE or BMY or REGN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Inhibrx Biosciences, Inc.
(INBX) is the stronger pick with 550. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 6% for Pfizer Inc. (PFE). Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMY) offers the better valuation at 16. 3x trailing P/E (8. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Inhibrx Biosciences, Inc. (INBX) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — INBX or ABBV or PFE or BMY or REGN?
On trailing P/E, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMY) is the cheapest at 16.
3x versus AbbVie Inc. at 85. 5x. On forward P/E, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company is actually cheaper at 8. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — INBX or ABBV or PFE or BMY or REGN?
Over the past 5 years, Inhibrx Biosciences, Inc.
(INBX) delivered a total return of +694. 0%, compared to -13. 3% for Pfizer Inc. (PFE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: INBX returned +507. 7% versus BMY's +6. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — INBX or ABBV or PFE or BMY or REGN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), AbbVie Inc.
(ABBV) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 34β versus Inhibrx Biosciences, Inc. 's 1. 79β — meaning INBX is approximately 430% more volatile than ABBV relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (REGN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 9% versus 13% for Inhibrx Biosciences, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — INBX or ABBV or PFE or BMY or REGN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Inhibrx Biosciences, Inc.
(INBX) is pulling ahead at 550. 0% versus -1. 6% for Pfizer Inc. (PFE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Bristol-Myers Squibb Company grew EPS 178. 2% year-over-year, compared to -107. 8% for Inhibrx Biosciences, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, REGN leads at 5. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — INBX or ABBV or PFE or BMY or REGN?
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(REGN) is the more profitable company, earning 31. 4% net margin versus -107. 7% for Inhibrx Biosciences, Inc. — meaning it keeps 31. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ABBV leads at 32. 8% versus -103. 9% for INBX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — REGN leads at 85. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is INBX or ABBV or PFE or BMY or REGN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMY) trades at 8.
9x forward P/E versus 15. 3x for Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — 6. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ABBV: 26. 6% to $256. 64.
08Which pays a better dividend — INBX or ABBV or PFE or BMY or REGN?
In this comparison, PFE (6.
5% yield), BMY (4. 4% yield), ABBV (3. 2% yield), REGN (0. 5% yield) pay a dividend. INBX does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is INBX or ABBV or PFE or BMY or REGN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, AbbVie Inc.
(ABBV) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 34), 3. 2% yield, +295. 5% 10Y return). Inhibrx Biosciences, Inc. (INBX) carries a higher beta of 1. 79 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ABBV: +295. 5%, INBX: +507. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between INBX and ABBV and PFE and BMY and REGN?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: INBX is a small-cap high-growth stock; ABBV is a large-cap income-oriented stock; PFE is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; BMY is a mid-cap deep-value stock; REGN is a mid-cap deep-value stock. ABBV, PFE, BMY pay a dividend while INBX, REGN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.