Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
INCY vs DBVT vs ALKS vs HALO vs ABBV
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Drug Manufacturers - General
INCY vs DBVT vs ALKS vs HALO vs ABBV — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Drug Manufacturers - General |
| Market Cap | $19.53B | $1712.35T | $5.90B | $7.68B | $358.42B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $5.36B | $0.00 | $1.56B | $1.40B | $61.16B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.43B | $-168M | $153M | $317M | $4.23B |
| Gross Margin | 91.9% | — | 65.4% | 81.9% | 70.2% |
| Operating Margin | 26.8% | — | 12.3% | 58.4% | 26.7% |
| Forward P/E | 13.1x | — | 24.8x | 8.1x | 14.3x |
| Total Debt | $69M | $22M | $70M | $0.00 | $69.07B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3.10B | $194M | $1.12B | $134M | $5.23B |
INCY vs DBVT vs ALKS vs HALO vs ABBV — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Incyte Corporation (INCY) | 100 | 95.9 | -4.1% |
| DBV Technologies S.… (DBVT) | 100 | 41.2 | -58.8% |
| Alkermes plc (ALKS) | 100 | 216.4 | +116.4% |
| Halozyme Therapeuti… (HALO) | 100 | 268.6 | +168.6% |
| AbbVie Inc. (ABBV) | 100 | 218.7 | +118.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: INCY vs DBVT vs ALKS vs HALO vs ABBV
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
INCY has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.87, Low D/E 1.3%, current ratio 3.32x
- 26.7% margin vs DBVT's 0.3%
- 21.7% ROA vs DBVT's -89.0%
DBVT is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +110.4% vs HALO's -7.1%
Among these 5 stocks, ALKS doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
HALO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and defensive is your priority.
- Rev growth 37.6%, EPS growth -25.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 28.4%
- Beta 0.56, current ratio 4.66x
- 37.6% revenue growth vs DBVT's -100.0%
- Lower P/E (8.1x vs 14.3x)
ABBV ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 13 yrs, beta 0.34, yield 3.2%
- 295.5% 10Y total return vs HALO's 5.7%
- Beta 0.34 vs DBVT's 1.26
- 3.2% yield; 13-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 37.6% revenue growth vs DBVT's -100.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.1x vs 14.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 26.7% margin vs DBVT's 0.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.34 vs DBVT's 1.26 | |
| Dividends | 3.2% yield; 13-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +110.4% vs HALO's -7.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 21.7% ROA vs DBVT's -89.0% |
INCY vs DBVT vs ALKS vs HALO vs ABBV — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
INCY vs DBVT vs ALKS vs HALO vs ABBV — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HALO leads in 3 of 6 categories
INCY leads 1 • ABBV leads 1 • DBVT leads 0 • ALKS leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HALO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ABBV and DBVT operate at a comparable scale, with $61.2B and $0 in trailing revenue. INCY is the more profitable business, keeping 26.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ABBV's 6.9%. On growth, HALO holds the edge at +51.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $5.4B | $0 | $1.6B | $1.4B | $61.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.5B | -$112M | $212M | $945M | $24.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.4B | -$168M | $153M | $317M | $4.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.5B | -$151M | $392M | $645M | $18.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +91.9% | — | +65.4% | +81.9% | +70.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +26.8% | — | +12.3% | +58.4% | +26.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +26.7% | — | +9.8% | +22.7% | +6.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +27.1% | — | +25.1% | +46.2% | +30.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +20.9% | — | +28.2% | +51.6% | +10.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +83.8% | +91.5% | -4.1% | -2.1% | +57.4% |
Valuation Metrics
HALO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.3x trailing earnings, INCY trades at a 82% valuation discount to ABBV's 85.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, HALO's 8.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ALKS's 17.3x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $19.5B | $1712.35T | $5.9B | $7.7B | $358.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $16.5B | $1712.35T | $4.9B | $7.5B | $422.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 15.25x | -0.76x | 24.76x | 25.46x | 85.50x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 13.06x | — | — | 8.09x | 14.28x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 1.11x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.49x | — | 17.25x | 8.34x | 14.96x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.80x | — | 4.00x | 5.50x | 5.86x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.80x | 0.66x | 3.28x | 165.47x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 14.42x | — | 12.28x | 11.91x | 20.12x |
Profitability & Efficiency
INCY leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ABBV delivers a 62.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $62 in annual profit, vs $-130 for DBVT. INCY carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to DBVT's 0.13x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), INCY scores 7/9 vs DBVT's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +29.3% | -130.2% | +8.8% | +6.5% | +62.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +21.7% | -89.0% | +5.4% | +12.5% | +3.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +51.1% | — | +18.9% | +73.4% | +23.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +29.0% | -145.7% | +14.2% | +38.2% | +21.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 4 | 7 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 0.13x | 0.04x | — | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$3.0B | -$172M | -$1.0B | -$134M | $63.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3.1B | $194M | $1.1B | $134M | $5.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $69M | $22M | $70M | $0 | $69.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 759.79x | -189.82x | 32.30x | 46.08x | 3.28x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HALO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ABBV five years ago would be worth $20,131 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,090 for DBVT. Over the past 12 months, DBVT leads with a +110.4% total return vs HALO's -7.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HALO at 29.1% vs ALKS's 4.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -3.6% | +4.9% | +25.3% | -7.3% | -10.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +64.2% | +110.4% | +16.5% | -7.1% | +11.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +48.6% | +19.7% | +14.5% | +115.3% | +50.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +18.2% | -69.1% | +60.9% | +37.0% | +101.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +34.2% | -87.0% | -11.0% | +570.7% | +295.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +14.1% | +6.2% | +4.6% | +29.1% | +14.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ALKS and ABBV each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ABBV is the less volatile stock with a 0.34 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than DBVT's 1.26 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ALKS currently trades 96.7% from its 52-week high vs DBVT's 76.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.87x | 1.26x | 1.06x | 0.56x | 0.34x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $112.29 | $26.18 | $36.60 | $82.22 | $244.81 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $57.77 | $7.53 | $25.17 | $47.50 | $176.57 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +87.1% | +76.3% | +96.7% | +79.3% | +82.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 59.4 | 48.1 | 60.2 | 52.4 | 46.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.4M | 252K | 2.3M | 1.4M | 5.8M |
Analyst Outlook
ABBV leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: INCY as "Buy", DBVT as "Buy", ALKS as "Buy", HALO as "Buy", ABBV as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 131.8% upside for DBVT (target: $46) vs 12.0% for INCY (target: $110). ABBV is the only dividend payer here at 3.24% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $109.50 | $46.33 | $44.00 | $78.33 | $256.64 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 44 | 15 | 28 | 27 | 41 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | +3.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | 0 | — | 13 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | $6.57 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | 0.0% | +0.5% | +4.5% | +0.3% |
HALO leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). INCY leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
INCY vs DBVT vs ALKS vs HALO vs ABBV: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is INCY or DBVT or ALKS or HALO or ABBV a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.
(HALO) is the stronger pick with 37. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 2% for Alkermes plc (ALKS). Incyte Corporation (INCY) offers the better valuation at 15. 3x trailing P/E (13. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Incyte Corporation (INCY) a "Buy" — based on 44 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — INCY or DBVT or ALKS or HALO or ABBV?
On trailing P/E, Incyte Corporation (INCY) is the cheapest at 15.
3x versus AbbVie Inc. at 85. 5x. On forward P/E, Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — INCY or DBVT or ALKS or HALO or ABBV?
Over the past 5 years, AbbVie Inc.
(ABBV) delivered a total return of +101. 3%, compared to -69. 1% for DBV Technologies S. A. (DBVT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HALO returned +570. 7% versus DBVT's -87. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — INCY or DBVT or ALKS or HALO or ABBV?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), AbbVie Inc.
(ABBV) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 34β versus DBV Technologies S. A. 's 1. 26β — meaning DBVT is approximately 272% more volatile than ABBV relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Incyte Corporation (INCY) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 13% for DBV Technologies S. A. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — INCY or DBVT or ALKS or HALO or ABBV?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.
(HALO) is pulling ahead at 37. 6% versus -5. 2% for Alkermes plc (ALKS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Incyte Corporation grew EPS 41. 7% year-over-year, compared to -347. 5% for DBV Technologies S. A.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HALO leads at 28. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — INCY or DBVT or ALKS or HALO or ABBV?
Incyte Corporation (INCY) is the more profitable company, earning 25.
0% net margin versus 0. 0% for DBV Technologies S. A. — meaning it keeps 25. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HALO leads at 58. 4% versus 0. 0% for DBVT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — INCY leads at 91. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is INCY or DBVT or ALKS or HALO or ABBV more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.
(HALO) trades at 8. 1x forward P/E versus 14. 3x for AbbVie Inc. — 6. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DBVT: 131. 8% to $46. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — INCY or DBVT or ALKS or HALO or ABBV?
In this comparison, ABBV (3.
2% yield) pays a dividend. INCY, DBVT, ALKS, HALO do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is INCY or DBVT or ALKS or HALO or ABBV better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, AbbVie Inc.
(ABBV) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 34), 3. 2% yield, +295. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ABBV: +295. 5%, DBVT: -87. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between INCY and DBVT and ALKS and HALO and ABBV?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: INCY is a mid-cap high-growth stock; DBVT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; ALKS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HALO is a small-cap high-growth stock; ABBV is a large-cap income-oriented stock. ABBV pays a dividend while INCY, DBVT, ALKS, HALO do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.