Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
INDB vs WSFS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
INDB vs WSFS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $3.91B | $3.80B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $974M | $1.36B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $180M | $287M |
| Gross Margin | 66.4% | 74.7% |
| Operating Margin | 25.4% | 28.0% |
| Forward P/E | 10.8x | 11.8x |
| Total Debt | $701M | $303M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $220M | $1.33B |
INDB vs WSFS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Independent Bank Co… (INDB) | 100 | 113.2 | +13.2% |
| WSFS Financial Corp… (WSFS) | 100 | 260.6 | +160.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: INDB vs WSFS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
INDB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 1.11, yield 2.9%
- Rev growth 6.9%, EPS growth -16.6%
- 6.9% NII/revenue growth vs WSFS's -3.1%
WSFS is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 128.7% 10Y total return vs INDB's 109.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.89, Low D/E 11.1%, current ratio 0.08x
- Beta 0.89, yield 0.9%, current ratio 0.08x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 6.9% NII/revenue growth vs WSFS's -3.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.8x vs 11.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs WSFS's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.89 vs INDB's 1.11, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.9% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs WSFS's 0.9% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +37.4% vs INDB's +32.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs WSFS's 0.5% |
INDB vs WSFS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
INDB vs WSFS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WSFS leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WSFS and INDB operate at a comparable scale, with $1.4B and $974M in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 21.1% (WSFS) to 19.7% (INDB).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $974M | $1.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $272M | $408M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $180M | $287M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $209M | $214M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +66.4% | +74.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +25.4% | +28.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +19.7% | +21.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +21.5% | +15.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -31.7% | +22.9% |
Valuation Metrics
WSFS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.2x trailing earnings, WSFS trades at a 19% valuation discount to INDB's 17.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, WSFS's 6.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than INDB's 15.3x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.9B | $3.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.4B | $2.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 17.39x | 14.17x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.79x | 11.80x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.81x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 15.26x | 6.81x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.02x | 2.80x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.12x | 1.44x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 18.69x | 17.80x |
Profitability & Efficiency
WSFS leads this category, winning 8 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WSFS delivers a 10.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $5 for INDB. WSFS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.11x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to INDB's 0.23x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.1% | +10.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.7% | +1.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.7% | +9.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.8% | +10.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.23x | 0.11x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $481M | -$1.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $220M | $1.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $701M | $303M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.77x | 1.30x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WSFS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WSFS five years ago would be worth $14,308 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,969 for INDB. Over the past 12 months, WSFS leads with a +37.4% total return vs INDB's +32.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WSFS at 33.0% vs INDB's 21.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +8.3% | +31.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +32.3% | +37.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +78.5% | +135.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +9.7% | +43.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +109.1% | +128.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +21.3% | +33.0% |
Risk & Volatility
WSFS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WSFS is the less volatile stock with a 0.89 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than INDB's 1.11 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WSFS currently trades 98.5% from its 52-week high vs INDB's 90.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.11x | 0.89x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $87.00 | $73.22 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $57.01 | $49.92 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +90.4% | +98.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.1 | 63.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 322K | 385K |
Analyst Outlook
INDB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates INDB as "Hold" and WSFS as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 12.3% upside for INDB (target: $88) vs 3.6% for WSFS (target: $75). For income investors, INDB offers the higher dividend yield at 2.88% vs WSFS's 0.95%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $88.33 | $74.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 15 | 13 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.9% | +0.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.26 | $0.68 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.8% | +7.6% |
WSFS leads in 5 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). INDB leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook).
INDB vs WSFS: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is INDB or WSFS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Independent Bank Corp.
(INDB) is the stronger pick with 6. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 1% for WSFS Financial Corporation (WSFS). WSFS Financial Corporation (WSFS) offers the better valuation at 14. 2x trailing P/E (11. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Independent Bank Corp. (INDB) a "Hold" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — INDB or WSFS?
On trailing P/E, WSFS Financial Corporation (WSFS) is the cheapest at 14.
2x versus Independent Bank Corp. at 17. 4x. On forward P/E, Independent Bank Corp. is actually cheaper at 10. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — INDB or WSFS?
Over the past 5 years, WSFS Financial Corporation (WSFS) delivered a total return of +43.
1%, compared to +9. 7% for Independent Bank Corp. (INDB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WSFS returned +128. 7% versus INDB's +109. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — INDB or WSFS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), WSFS Financial Corporation (WSFS) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
89β versus Independent Bank Corp. 's 1. 11β — meaning INDB is approximately 25% more volatile than WSFS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, WSFS Financial Corporation (WSFS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 11% versus 23% for Independent Bank Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — INDB or WSFS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Independent Bank Corp.
(INDB) is pulling ahead at 6. 9% versus -3. 1% for WSFS Financial Corporation (WSFS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: WSFS Financial Corporation grew EPS 15. 4% year-over-year, compared to -16. 6% for Independent Bank Corp.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — INDB or WSFS?
WSFS Financial Corporation (WSFS) is the more profitable company, earning 21.
1% net margin versus 19. 7% for Independent Bank Corp. — meaning it keeps 21. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WSFS leads at 28. 0% versus 25. 4% for INDB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WSFS leads at 74. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is INDB or WSFS more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Independent Bank Corp.
(INDB) trades at 10. 8x forward P/E versus 11. 8x for WSFS Financial Corporation — 1. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for INDB: 12. 3% to $88. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — INDB or WSFS?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Independent Bank Corp. (INDB) offers the highest yield at 2. 9%, versus 0. 9% for WSFS Financial Corporation (WSFS).
09Is INDB or WSFS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, WSFS Financial Corporation (WSFS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
89), 0. 9% yield, +128. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WSFS: +128. 7%, INDB: +109. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between INDB and WSFS?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.