Semiconductors
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
INDI vs SITM vs MPWR vs ALGM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
INDI vs SITM vs MPWR vs ALGM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $946M | $21.05B | $77.41B | $8.88B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $217M | $380M | $2.79B | $840M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-144M | $-24M | $616M | $-13M |
| Gross Margin | 22.6% | 55.7% | 55.2% | 45.0% |
| Operating Margin | -70.3% | -12.7% | 26.1% | -0.0% |
| Forward P/E | — | 155.1x | 73.1x | 90.2x |
| Total Debt | $379M | $5M | $24M | $368M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $156M | $17M | $1.10B | $121M |
INDI vs SITM vs MPWR vs ALGM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| indie Semiconductor… (INDI) | 100 | 44.5 | -55.5% |
| SiTime Corporation (SITM) | 100 | 955.0 | +855.0% |
| Monolithic Power Sy… (MPWR) | 100 | 493.1 | +393.1% |
| Allegro MicroSystem… (ALGM) | 100 | 261.9 | +161.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: INDI vs SITM vs MPWR vs ALGM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
INDI plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
SITM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 61.2%, EPS growth 57.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.8%
- 60.3% 10Y total return vs MPWR's 24.9%
- 61.2% revenue growth vs ALGM's -30.9%
- +379.7% vs INDI's +109.8%
MPWR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 8 yrs, beta 2.28, yield 0.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 2.28, Low D/E 0.7%, current ratio 5.91x
- Beta 2.28, yield 0.4%, current ratio 5.91x
- Lower P/E (73.1x vs 90.2x)
ALGM lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 61.2% revenue growth vs ALGM's -30.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (73.1x vs 90.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 22.1% margin vs INDI's -66.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 2.28 vs INDI's 2.71, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.4% yield; 8-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +379.7% vs INDI's +109.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 15.2% ROA vs INDI's -16.6%, ROIC 22.2% vs -18.4% |
INDI vs SITM vs MPWR vs ALGM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
INDI vs SITM vs MPWR vs ALGM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MPWR leads in 5 of 6 categories
SITM leads 1 • INDI leads 0 • ALGM leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MPWR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MPWR is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.8B annually — 12.8x INDI's $217M. MPWR is the more profitable business, keeping 22.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to INDI's -66.2%. On growth, SITM holds the edge at +88.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $217M | $380M | $2.8B | $840M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$111M | -$24M | $781M | $66M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$144M | -$24M | $616M | -$13M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$73M | $54M | $664M | $121M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +22.6% | +55.7% | +55.2% | +45.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -70.3% | -12.7% | +26.1% | -0.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -66.2% | -6.4% | +22.1% | -1.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -33.6% | +14.3% | +23.8% | +14.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -0.0% | +88.3% | +20.8% | +28.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.1% | +80.2% | -88.4% | +2.2% |
Valuation Metrics
MPWR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, MPWR's 97.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ALGM's 204.2x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $946M | $21.0B | $77.4B | $8.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.2B | $21.0B | $76.3B | $9.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -6.24x | -463.55x | 123.60x | -122.90x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 155.06x | 73.12x | 90.21x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 4.19x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 97.90x | 204.21x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.35x | 64.43x | 27.74x | 12.25x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.34x | 17.22x | 21.56x | 9.66x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 599.17x | 116.20x | 404.45x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MPWR leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MPWR delivers a 17.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $-35 for INDI. SITM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to INDI's 0.99x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SITM scores 7/9 vs INDI's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -35.5% | -2.1% | +17.9% | -1.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -16.6% | -1.9% | +15.2% | -0.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -18.4% | -4.9% | +22.2% | -1.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -17.8% | -6.1% | +20.4% | -1.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 7 | 6 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.99x | 0.00x | 0.01x | 0.40x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $224M | -$12M | -$1.1B | $247M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $156M | $17M | $1.1B | $121M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $379M | $5M | $24M | $368M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -7.77x | — | — | -0.24x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SITM leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SITM five years ago would be worth $87,974 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,468 for INDI. Over the past 12 months, SITM leads with a +379.7% total return vs INDI's +109.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SITM at 110.7% vs INDI's -17.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +21.4% | +115.5% | +68.5% | +78.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +109.8% | +379.7% | +148.6% | +156.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -44.3% | +836.0% | +280.3% | +27.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -55.3% | +779.7% | +366.2% | +93.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -54.2% | +6033.2% | +2494.7% | +170.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -17.7% | +110.7% | +56.1% | +8.4% |
Risk & Volatility
MPWR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MPWR is the less volatile stock with a 2.28 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than INDI's 2.71 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MPWR currently trades 94.8% from its 52-week high vs INDI's 74.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.71x | 2.56x | 2.28x | 2.43x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.05 | $845.00 | $1662.00 | $51.40 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.03 | $158.63 | $613.00 | $18.17 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +74.2% | +94.4% | +94.8% | +93.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 76.6 | 76.9 | 71.0 | 78.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 5.3M | 427K | 577K | 1.9M |
Analyst Outlook
MPWR leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: INDI as "Buy", SITM as "Buy", MPWR as "Buy", ALGM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 2.5% upside for MPWR (target: $1615) vs -45.3% for SITM (target: $436). MPWR is the only dividend payer here at 0.37% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $4.25 | $436.43 | $1615.00 | $44.83 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 9 | 25 | 13 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.4% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 8 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $5.90 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.0% | +9.6% |
MPWR leads in 5 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). SITM leads in 1 (Total Returns).
INDI vs SITM vs MPWR vs ALGM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is INDI or SITM or MPWR or ALGM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, SiTime Corporation (SITM) is the stronger pick with 61.
2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -30. 9% for Allegro MicroSystems, Inc. (ALGM). Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (MPWR) offers the better valuation at 123. 6x trailing P/E (73. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate indie Semiconductor, Inc. (INDI) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — INDI or SITM or MPWR or ALGM?
On forward P/E, Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 73. 1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — INDI or SITM or MPWR or ALGM?
Over the past 5 years, SiTime Corporation (SITM) delivered a total return of +779.
7%, compared to -55. 3% for indie Semiconductor, Inc. (INDI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SITM returned +60. 3% versus INDI's -54. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — INDI or SITM or MPWR or ALGM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
(MPWR) is the lower-risk stock at 2. 28β versus indie Semiconductor, Inc. 's 2. 71β — meaning INDI is approximately 19% more volatile than MPWR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, SiTime Corporation (SITM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 99% for indie Semiconductor, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — INDI or SITM or MPWR or ALGM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), SiTime Corporation (SITM) is pulling ahead at 61.
2% versus -30. 9% for Allegro MicroSystems, Inc. (ALGM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: SiTime Corporation grew EPS 57. 5% year-over-year, compared to -150. 0% for Allegro MicroSystems, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, INDI leads at 25. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — INDI or SITM or MPWR or ALGM?
Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
(MPWR) is the more profitable company, earning 22. 1% net margin versus -66. 2% for indie Semiconductor, Inc. — meaning it keeps 22. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MPWR leads at 26. 1% versus -66. 3% for INDI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MPWR leads at 55. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is INDI or SITM or MPWR or ALGM more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
(MPWR) trades at 73. 1x forward P/E versus 155. 1x for SiTime Corporation — 81. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MPWR: 2. 5% to $1615. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — INDI or SITM or MPWR or ALGM?
In this comparison, MPWR (0.
4% yield) pays a dividend. INDI, SITM, ALGM do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is INDI or SITM or MPWR or ALGM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Allegro MicroSystems, Inc.
(ALGM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+170. 8% 10Y return). indie Semiconductor, Inc. (INDI) carries a higher beta of 2. 71 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ALGM: +170. 8%, INDI: -54. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between INDI and SITM and MPWR and ALGM?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: INDI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SITM is a mid-cap high-growth stock; MPWR is a mid-cap high-growth stock; ALGM is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.