Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
INFU vs ACLX vs LEGN vs BRT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
REIT - Residential
INFU vs ACLX vs LEGN vs BRT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | REIT - Residential |
| Market Cap | $181M | $6.73B | $5.28B | $277M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $142M | $22M | $1.03B | $98M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $8M | $-229M | $-297M | $-12M |
| Gross Margin | 56.7% | -64.8% | 60.3% | 12.6% |
| Operating Margin | 9.1% | -11.4% | -13.2% | 6.1% |
| Forward P/E | 19.8x | — | 116.2x | — |
| Total Debt | $3M | $96M | $414M | $508M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3M | $80M | $902M | $25M |
INFU vs ACLX vs LEGN vs BRT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Feb 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| InfuSystem Holdings… (INFU) | 100 | 73.2 | -26.8% |
| Arcellx, Inc. (ACLX) | 100 | 599.9 | +499.9% |
| Legend Biotech Corp… (LEGN) | 100 | 71.0 | -29.0% |
| BRT Apartments Corp. (BRT) | 100 | 66.6 | -33.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: INFU vs ACLX vs LEGN vs BRT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
INFU carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.
- Better valuation composite
- 5.6% margin vs ACLX's -10.3%
- 7.9% ROA vs ACLX's -36.2%, ROIC 12.5% vs -46.2%
ACLX is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 5.8% 10Y total return vs BRT's 217.9%
- +117.4% vs LEGN's -9.2%
LEGN is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 64.5%, EPS growth -66.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 106.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.77, Low D/E 41.3%, current ratio 1.96x
- Beta 0.77, current ratio 1.96x
- 64.5% revenue growth vs ACLX's -79.4%
BRT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.65, yield 7.1%
- Beta 0.65 vs INFU's 1.50
- 7.1% yield; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 64.5% revenue growth vs ACLX's -79.4% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 5.6% margin vs ACLX's -10.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.65 vs INFU's 1.50 | |
| Dividends | 7.1% yield; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +117.4% vs LEGN's -9.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.9% ROA vs ACLX's -36.2%, ROIC 12.5% vs -46.2% |
INFU vs ACLX vs LEGN vs BRT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
INFU vs ACLX vs LEGN vs BRT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
INFU leads in 3 of 6 categories
ACLX leads 2 • LEGN leads 0 • BRT leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
INFU leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LEGN is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.0B annually — 46.2x ACLX's $22M. INFU is the more profitable business, keeping 5.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ACLX's -10.3%. On growth, LEGN holds the edge at +64.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $142M | $22M | $1.0B | $98M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $23M | -$246M | -$107M | $33M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $8M | -$229M | -$297M | -$12M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $22M | -$213M | -$231M | $16M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +56.7% | -64.8% | +60.3% | +12.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +9.1% | -11.4% | -13.2% | +6.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +5.6% | -10.3% | -28.8% | -12.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +15.4% | -9.5% | -22.4% | +16.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.0% | -89.2% | +64.9% | +4.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.0% | -13.6% | -2.2% | -16.7% |
Valuation Metrics
INFU leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, INFU's 7.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BRT's 20.3x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $181M | $6.7B | $5.3B | $277M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $181M | $6.7B | $4.8B | $760M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 28.90x | -28.27x | -8.87x | -22.31x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 19.79x | — | 116.25x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.19x | — | — | 20.32x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.26x | 302.09x | 5.11x | 2.86x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.30x | 16.10x | 2.63x | 1.50x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 7.59x | — | — | 25.60x |
Profitability & Efficiency
INFU leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
INFU delivers a 14.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $-55 for ACLX. INFU carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BRT's 2.87x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), INFU scores 8/9 vs ACLX's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +14.0% | -55.4% | -29.2% | -6.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +7.9% | -36.2% | -17.6% | -1.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +12.5% | -46.2% | -12.7% | +1.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +14.3% | -46.6% | -11.0% | +1.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.06x | 0.24x | 0.41x | 2.87x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $241,000 | $16M | -$488M | $483M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3M | $80M | $902M | $25M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3M | $96M | $414M | $508M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 13.65x | -8.45x | -12.69x | 0.51x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ACLX leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ACLX five years ago would be worth $68,494 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,297 for INFU. Over the past 12 months, ACLX leads with a +117.4% total return vs LEGN's -9.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ACLX at 38.6% vs LEGN's -25.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +6.8% | +81.7% | +32.8% | +3.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +88.6% | +117.4% | -9.2% | +2.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +2.8% | +166.2% | -58.4% | +1.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -57.0% | +584.9% | -0.0% | +7.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +159.0% | +584.9% | -22.8% | +217.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +0.9% | +38.6% | -25.4% | +0.3% |
Risk & Volatility
ACLX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ACLX is the less volatile stock with a -0.34 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than INFU's 1.50 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ACLX currently trades 99.9% from its 52-week high vs LEGN's 63.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.38x | -0.49x | 0.76x | 0.60x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $11.04 | $115.13 | $45.30 | $16.69 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.70 | $47.86 | $16.24 | $13.18 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +81.2% | +99.9% | +63.1% | +88.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.5 | 79.9 | 77.4 | 56.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 121K | 1.6M | 1.9M | 54K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: INFU as "Buy", ACLX as "Hold", LEGN as "Buy", BRT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 102.6% upside for LEGN (target: $58) vs -2.3% for ACLX (target: $112). BRT is the only dividend payer here at 7.13% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $15.00 | $112.45 | $57.89 | $21.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 18 | 19 | 5 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +7.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $1.05 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +6.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +1.8% |
INFU leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). ACLX leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility).
INFU vs ACLX vs LEGN vs BRT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is INFU or ACLX or LEGN or BRT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Legend Biotech Corporation (LEGN) is the stronger pick with 64.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -79. 4% for Arcellx, Inc. (ACLX). InfuSystem Holdings, Inc. (INFU) offers the better valuation at 28. 9x trailing P/E (19. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate InfuSystem Holdings, Inc. (INFU) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — INFU or ACLX or LEGN or BRT?
On forward P/E, InfuSystem Holdings, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 19. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — INFU or ACLX or LEGN or BRT?
Over the past 5 years, Arcellx, Inc.
(ACLX) delivered a total return of +584. 9%, compared to -57. 0% for InfuSystem Holdings, Inc. (INFU). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ACLX returned +584. 9% versus LEGN's -24. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — INFU or ACLX or LEGN or BRT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Arcellx, Inc.
(ACLX) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 49β versus InfuSystem Holdings, Inc. 's 1. 38β — meaning INFU is approximately -383% more volatile than ACLX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, InfuSystem Holdings, Inc. (INFU) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 3% for BRT Apartments Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — INFU or ACLX or LEGN or BRT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Legend Biotech Corporation (LEGN) is pulling ahead at 64.
5% versus -79. 4% for Arcellx, Inc. (ACLX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: InfuSystem Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 181. 8% year-over-year, compared to -103. 5% for Arcellx, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, LEGN leads at 106. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — INFU or ACLX or LEGN or BRT?
InfuSystem Holdings, Inc.
(INFU) is the more profitable company, earning 4. 6% net margin versus -1027. 3% for Arcellx, Inc. — meaning it keeps 4. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BRT leads at 11. 4% versus -1135. 6% for ACLX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ACLX leads at 70. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is INFU or ACLX or LEGN or BRT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, InfuSystem Holdings, Inc.
(INFU) trades at 19. 8x forward P/E versus 116. 2x for Legend Biotech Corporation — 96. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LEGN: 102. 6% to $57. 89.
08Which pays a better dividend — INFU or ACLX or LEGN or BRT?
In this comparison, BRT (7.
1% yield) pays a dividend. INFU, ACLX, LEGN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is INFU or ACLX or LEGN or BRT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Arcellx, Inc.
(ACLX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 49), +584. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ACLX: +584. 9%, INFU: +143. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between INFU and ACLX and LEGN and BRT?
These companies operate in different sectors (INFU (Healthcare) and ACLX (Healthcare) and LEGN (Healthcare) and BRT (Real Estate)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: INFU is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ACLX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LEGN is a small-cap high-growth stock; BRT is a small-cap income-oriented stock. BRT pays a dividend while INFU, ACLX, LEGN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.