Packaged Foods
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
INGR vs ADM vs AVY vs RPM vs BG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Agricultural Farm Products
Business Equipment & Supplies
Chemicals - Specialty
Agricultural Farm Products
INGR vs ADM vs AVY vs RPM vs BG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Packaged Foods | Agricultural Farm Products | Business Equipment & Supplies | Chemicals - Specialty | Agricultural Farm Products |
| Market Cap | $6.77B | $37.36B | $12.73B | $12.99B | $24.02B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $7.22B | $80.61B | $9.01B | $7.58B | $80.54B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $729M | $1.08B | $690M | $667M | $686M |
| Gross Margin | 25.3% | 5.8% | 28.8% | 41.2% | 5.2% |
| Operating Margin | 14.1% | 1.5% | 12.4% | 12.0% | 2.4% |
| Forward P/E | 9.6x | 18.6x | 16.5x | 18.5x | 14.4x |
| Total Debt | $1.79B | $8.41B | $3.73B | $2.96B | $16.95B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.03B | $1.01B | $203M | $302M | $1.14B |
INGR vs ADM vs AVY vs RPM vs BG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ingredion Incorpora… (INGR) | 100 | 127.5 | +27.5% |
| Archer-Daniels-Midl… (ADM) | 100 | 197.2 | +97.2% |
| Avery Dennison Corp… (AVY) | 100 | 149.5 | +49.5% |
| RPM International I… (RPM) | 100 | 135.6 | +35.6% |
| Bunge Global S.A. (BG) | 100 | 317.3 | +217.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: INGR vs ADM vs AVY vs RPM vs BG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
INGR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.57 vs AVY's 2.82
- Lower P/E (9.6x vs 14.4x)
- 10.1% margin vs BG's 0.9%
- 3.0% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs ADM's 2.6%
ADM ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 31 yrs, beta 0.12, yield 2.6%
- 147.4% 10Y total return vs BG's 140.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.12, Low D/E 36.5%, current ratio 11.20x
- Beta 0.12, yield 2.6%, current ratio 11.20x
AVY lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
RPM is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 0.5%, EPS growth 17.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.2%
BG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth and momentum is your priority.
- 32.4% revenue growth vs ADM's -6.2%
- +66.8% vs INGR's -18.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 32.4% revenue growth vs ADM's -6.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.6x vs 14.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 10.1% margin vs BG's 0.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.12 vs RPM's 1.01, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.0% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs ADM's 2.6% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +66.8% vs INGR's -18.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.4% ROA vs BG's 1.6%, ROIC 15.5% vs 3.3% |
INGR vs ADM vs AVY vs RPM vs BG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
INGR vs ADM vs AVY vs RPM vs BG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
INGR leads in 3 of 6 categories
BG leads 1 • ADM leads 1 • AVY leads 0 • RPM leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
INGR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ADM is the larger business by revenue, generating $80.6B annually — 11.2x INGR's $7.2B. INGR is the more profitable business, keeping 10.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BG's 0.9%. On growth, BG holds the edge at +87.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $7.2B | $80.6B | $9.0B | $7.6B | $80.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.2B | $3.0B | $1.3B | $1.1B | $2.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $729M | $1.1B | $690M | $667M | $686M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $809M | $4.8B | $873M | $583M | $112M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +25.3% | +5.8% | +28.8% | +41.2% | +5.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +14.1% | +1.5% | +12.4% | +12.0% | +2.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +10.1% | +1.3% | +7.7% | +8.8% | +0.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +11.2% | +6.0% | +9.7% | +7.7% | +0.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.4% | +1.6% | +7.0% | +3.5% | +87.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +79.0% | +1.6% | +4.3% | -11.3% | -76.4% |
Valuation Metrics
INGR leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.6x trailing earnings, INGR trades at a 72% valuation discount to ADM's 34.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), INGR offers better value at 0.57x vs AVY's 3.23x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $6.8B | $37.4B | $12.7B | $13.0B | $24.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $7.5B | $44.8B | $16.3B | $15.6B | $39.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 9.61x | 34.77x | 18.85x | 18.95x | 25.16x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.56x | 18.63x | 16.46x | 18.48x | 14.38x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.57x | — | 3.23x | 1.05x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 5.98x | 17.18x | 12.07x | 14.22x | 22.60x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.94x | 0.47x | 1.44x | 1.76x | 0.34x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.60x | 1.63x | 5.71x | 4.50x | 1.18x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 13.25x | 8.89x | 17.87x | 24.13x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
INGR leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AVY delivers a 30.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $31 in annual profit, vs $4 for BG. ADM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.37x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AVY's 1.66x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), INGR scores 8/9 vs BG's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +17.1% | +4.7% | +30.8% | +21.3% | +4.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +9.4% | +2.2% | +7.8% | +8.5% | +1.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +15.5% | +3.3% | +15.2% | +13.3% | +3.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +16.3% | +4.2% | +18.9% | +15.9% | +4.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 7 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.41x | 0.37x | 1.66x | 1.03x | 0.97x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $760M | $7.4B | $3.5B | $2.7B | $15.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.0B | $1.0B | $203M | $302M | $1.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.8B | $8.4B | $3.7B | $3.0B | $17.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 27.32x | 3.03x | 7.70x | 8.51x | 3.10x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BG leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BG five years ago would be worth $14,937 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,205 for AVY. Over the past 12 months, BG leads with a +66.8% total return vs INGR's -18.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BG at 13.5% vs AVY's 0.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -0.7% | +32.2% | -8.8% | -1.2% | +34.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -18.4% | +66.2% | -1.4% | -5.3% | +66.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +7.9% | +10.7% | +2.4% | +33.3% | +46.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +28.8% | +29.2% | -17.9% | +13.4% | +49.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +13.5% | +147.4% | +155.3% | +134.7% | +140.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +2.6% | +3.4% | +0.8% | +10.0% | +13.5% |
Risk & Volatility
ADM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ADM is the less volatile stock with a 0.12 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RPM's 1.01 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ADM currently trades 94.8% from its 52-week high vs INGR's 75.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.25x | 0.12x | 0.72x | 1.01x | 0.25x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $141.78 | $81.75 | $199.54 | $129.12 | $133.93 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $100.71 | $46.81 | $156.23 | $92.92 | $71.60 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +75.8% | +94.8% | +82.9% | +78.5% | +92.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 27.3 | 68.4 | 48.0 | 47.7 | 51.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 585K | 3.8M | 603K | 932K | 1.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — INGR and ADM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: INGR as "Hold", ADM as "Hold", AVY as "Buy", RPM as "Buy", BG as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 29.8% upside for AVY (target: $215) vs -22.6% for ADM (target: $60). For income investors, INGR offers the higher dividend yield at 3.01% vs RPM's 1.97%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $124.25 | $60.00 | $214.75 | $122.67 | $133.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 21 | 36 | 18 | 22 | 25 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.0% | +2.6% | +2.3% | +2.0% | +2.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | 31 | 15 | 30 | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $3.24 | $2.04 | $3.73 | $1.99 | $2.76 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.3% | 0.0% | +4.5% | +0.7% | +2.3% |
INGR leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). BG leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
INGR vs ADM vs AVY vs RPM vs BG: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is INGR or ADM or AVY or RPM or BG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Bunge Global S.
A. (BG) is the stronger pick with 32. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 2% for Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM). Ingredion Incorporated (INGR) offers the better valuation at 9. 6x trailing P/E (9. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Avery Dennison Corporation (AVY) a "Buy" — based on 18 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — INGR or ADM or AVY or RPM or BG?
On trailing P/E, Ingredion Incorporated (INGR) is the cheapest at 9.
6x versus Archer-Daniels-Midland Company at 34. 8x. On forward P/E, Ingredion Incorporated is actually cheaper at 9. 6x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Ingredion Incorporated wins at 0. 57x versus Avery Dennison Corporation's 2. 82x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — INGR or ADM or AVY or RPM or BG?
Over the past 5 years, Bunge Global S.
A. (BG) delivered a total return of +49. 4%, compared to -17. 9% for Avery Dennison Corporation (AVY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AVY returned +155. 3% versus INGR's +13. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — INGR or ADM or AVY or RPM or BG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
12β versus RPM International Inc. 's 1. 01β — meaning RPM is approximately 775% more volatile than ADM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 37% versus 166% for Avery Dennison Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — INGR or ADM or AVY or RPM or BG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Bunge Global S.
A. (BG) is pulling ahead at 32. 4% versus -6. 2% for Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: RPM International Inc. grew EPS 17. 3% year-over-year, compared to -38. 9% for Archer-Daniels-Midland Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, RPM leads at 3. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — INGR or ADM or AVY or RPM or BG?
Ingredion Incorporated (INGR) is the more profitable company, earning 10.
1% net margin versus 1. 2% for Bunge Global S. A. — meaning it keeps 10. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: INGR leads at 14. 4% versus 1. 5% for BG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RPM leads at 41. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is INGR or ADM or AVY or RPM or BG more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Ingredion Incorporated (INGR) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 57x versus Avery Dennison Corporation's 2. 82x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Ingredion Incorporated (INGR) trades at 9. 6x forward P/E versus 18. 6x for Archer-Daniels-Midland Company — 9. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AVY: 29. 8% to $214. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — INGR or ADM or AVY or RPM or BG?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Ingredion Incorporated (INGR) offers the highest yield at 3. 0%, versus 2. 0% for RPM International Inc. (RPM).
09Is INGR or ADM or AVY or RPM or BG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
12), 2. 6% yield, +147. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ADM: +147. 4%, RPM: +134. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between INGR and ADM and AVY and RPM and BG?
These companies operate in different sectors (INGR (Consumer Defensive) and ADM (Consumer Defensive) and AVY (Industrials) and RPM (Basic Materials) and BG (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: INGR is a small-cap deep-value stock; ADM is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; AVY is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; RPM is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; BG is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Consumer Defensive
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 43%
- Dividend Yield > 0.8%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.