INM vs YCBD

For growth investors, InMed Pharmaceuticals Inc.

(INM) is the stronger pick with 7. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 5% for cbdMD, Inc. (YCBD). The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, cbdMD, Inc.

(YCBD) delivered a total return of -99. 9%, compared to -100. 0% for InMed Pharmaceuticals Inc. (INM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: INM returned -99. 9% versus YCBD's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), cbdMD, Inc.

(YCBD) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 66β versus InMed Pharmaceuticals Inc. 's 1. 75β — meaning INM is approximately 165% more volatile than YCBD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, InMed Pharmaceuticals Inc. (INM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 108% for cbdMD, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), InMed Pharmaceuticals Inc.

(INM) is pulling ahead at 7. 5% versus -1. 5% for cbdMD, Inc. (YCBD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: InMed Pharmaceuticals Inc. grew EPS 58. 5% year-over-year, compared to 39. 1% for cbdMD, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, INM leads at 65. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

cbdMD, Inc.

(YCBD) is the more profitable company, earning -10. 6% net margin versus -165. 1% for InMed Pharmaceuticals Inc. — meaning it keeps -10. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: YCBD leads at -11. 3% versus -160. 2% for INM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — YCBD leads at 56. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, cbdMD, Inc.

(YCBD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 66)). InMed Pharmaceuticals Inc. (INM) carries a higher beta of 1. 75 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (YCBD: -100. 0%, INM: -99. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.