REIT - Hotel & Motel
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
INN vs SHO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Hotel & Motel
INN vs SHO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Hotel & Motel | REIT - Hotel & Motel |
| Market Cap | $588M | $1.93B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $730M | $986M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-16M | $38M |
| Gross Margin | -16.6% | 20.1% |
| Operating Margin | 7.6% | 8.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | 131.1x |
| Total Debt | $1.42B | $925M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $36M | $109M |
INN vs SHO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Summit Hotel Proper… (INN) | 100 | 86.4 | -13.6% |
| Sunstone Hotel Inve… (SHO) | 100 | 116.9 | +16.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: INN vs SHO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
INN is the clearest fit if your priority is value and momentum.
- Better valuation composite
- +38.5% vs SHO's +31.0%
SHO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 1.00, yield 4.3%
- Rev growth 6.0%, EPS growth -69.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 1.7%
- 11.5% 10Y total return vs INN's -28.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 6.0% FFO/revenue growth vs INN's -0.3% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.8% margin vs INN's -2.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.00 vs INN's 1.35, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.3% yield; 4-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +38.5% vs SHO's +31.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.3% ROA vs INN's -0.6%, ROIC 2.0% vs 1.7% |
INN vs SHO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
INN vs SHO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SHO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SHO and INN operate at a comparable scale, with $986M and $730M in trailing revenue. SHO is the more profitable business, keeping 3.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to INN's -2.2%. On growth, SHO holds the edge at +11.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $730M | $986M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $242M | $190M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$16M | $38M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $132M | $132M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -16.6% | +20.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +7.6% | +8.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.2% | +3.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +18.1% | +13.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +0.3% | +11.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -150.0% | +7.0% |
Valuation Metrics
INN leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, INN's 9.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SHO's 13.1x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $588M | $1.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.0B | $2.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -24.55x | 244.56x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 131.12x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.35x | 13.10x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.81x | 2.01x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.45x | 1.03x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 7.99x | 24.48x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SHO leads this category, winning 8 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SHO delivers a 1.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $2 in annual profit, vs $-1 for INN. SHO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.48x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to INN's 1.11x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -1.3% | +1.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.6% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.7% | +2.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.4% | +2.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.11x | 0.48x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.4B | $816M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $36M | $109M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.4B | $925M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.87x | 1.58x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SHO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SHO five years ago would be worth $9,054 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,387 for INN. Over the past 12 months, INN leads with a +38.5% total return vs SHO's +31.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SHO at 3.4% vs INN's -2.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +12.5% | +14.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +38.5% | +31.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -7.0% | +10.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -36.1% | -9.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -28.1% | +11.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -2.4% | +3.4% |
Risk & Volatility
SHO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SHO is the less volatile stock with a 1.00 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than INN's 1.35 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SHO currently trades 99.6% from its 52-week high vs INN's 90.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.35x | 1.00x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.00 | $10.39 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.98 | $8.14 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +90.0% | +99.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 68.7 | 70.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.4M | 1.6M |
Analyst Outlook
SHO leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates INN as "Buy" and SHO as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 1.5% upside for SHO (target: $11) vs -4.3% for INN (target: $5). SHO is the only dividend payer here at 4.30% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $5.17 | $10.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 14 | 28 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +4.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.44 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.0% | +5.6% |
SHO leads in 5 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). INN leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
INN vs SHO: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is INN or SHO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc.
(SHO) is the stronger pick with 6. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 3% for Summit Hotel Properties, Inc. (INN). Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc. (SHO) offers the better valuation at 244. 6x trailing P/E (131. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Summit Hotel Properties, Inc. (INN) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — INN or SHO?
Over the past 5 years, Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc.
(SHO) delivered a total return of -9. 5%, compared to -36. 1% for Summit Hotel Properties, Inc. (INN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SHO returned +11. 5% versus INN's -28. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — INN or SHO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc.
(SHO) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 00β versus Summit Hotel Properties, Inc. 's 1. 35β — meaning INN is approximately 35% more volatile than SHO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc. (SHO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 48% versus 111% for Summit Hotel Properties, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — INN or SHO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc.
(SHO) is pulling ahead at 6. 0% versus -0. 3% for Summit Hotel Properties, Inc. (INN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc. grew EPS -69. 8% year-over-year, compared to -215. 8% for Summit Hotel Properties, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, INN leads at 2. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — INN or SHO?
Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc.
(SHO) is the more profitable company, earning 2. 6% net margin versus -1. 1% for Summit Hotel Properties, Inc. — meaning it keeps 2. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: INN leads at 8. 4% versus 7. 8% for SHO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SHO leads at 4. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is INN or SHO more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SHO: 1.
5% to $10. 50.
07Which pays a better dividend — INN or SHO?
In this comparison, SHO (4.
3% yield) pays a dividend. INN does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is INN or SHO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc.
(SHO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 00), 4. 3% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SHO: +11. 5%, INN: -28. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between INN and SHO?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: INN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SHO is a small-cap income-oriented stock. SHO pays a dividend while INN does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.