Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
INSE vs CZR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
INSE vs CZR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos |
| Market Cap | $219M | $5.66B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $301M | $11.56B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-17M | $-485M |
| Gross Margin | 58.9% | 43.9% |
| Operating Margin | 12.9% | 17.8% |
| Forward P/E | 20.8x | — |
| Total Debt | $372M | $26.34B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $42M | $887M |
INSE vs CZR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Inspired Entertainm… (INSE) | 100 | 301.1 | +201.1% |
| Caesars Entertainme… (CZR) | 100 | 243.9 | +143.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: INSE vs CZR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
INSE is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 2.4%, EPS growth -126.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 2.2%
- 2.4% revenue growth vs CZR's 2.1%
- +8.4% vs CZR's +2.5%
CZR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.27
- 302.6% 10Y total return vs INSE's -17.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.27, current ratio 0.80x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 2.4% revenue growth vs CZR's 2.1% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | -4.2% margin vs INSE's -5.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.27 vs INSE's 1.77 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +8.4% vs CZR's +2.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -1.5% ROA vs INSE's -3.8%, ROIC 5.4% vs 8.8% |
INSE vs CZR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
INSE vs CZR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CZR leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CZR is the larger business by revenue, generating $11.6B annually — 38.4x INSE's $301M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -4.2% (CZR) to -5.8% (INSE). On growth, CZR holds the edge at +2.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $301M | $11.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $72M | $3.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$17M | -$485M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $23M | $538M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +58.9% | +43.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +12.9% | +17.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -5.8% | -4.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +7.6% | +4.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -5.3% | +2.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +11.1% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — INSE and CZR each lead in 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, INSE's 5.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CZR's 8.9x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $219M | $5.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $549M | $31.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -13.97x | -11.48x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 20.76x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 5.83x | 8.90x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.72x | 0.49x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 1.57x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 13.45x | 10.88x |
Profitability & Efficiency
INSE leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | -12.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -3.8% | -1.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.8% | +5.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +10.5% | +7.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 7.15x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $330M | $25.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $42M | $887M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $372M | $26.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.74x | 0.90x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
INSE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in INSE five years ago would be worth $9,552 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,627 for CZR. Over the past 12 months, INSE leads with a +8.4% total return vs CZR's +2.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors INSE at -13.2% vs CZR's -15.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -9.7% | +17.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +8.4% | +2.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -34.6% | -38.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -4.5% | -73.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -17.9% | +302.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -13.2% | -15.0% |
Risk & Volatility
CZR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CZR is the less volatile stock with a 1.27 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than INSE's 1.77 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CZR currently trades 88.0% from its 52-week high vs INSE's 81.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.77x | 1.27x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $9.95 | $31.58 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $6.10 | $17.95 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +81.4% | +88.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.9 | 54.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 127K | 4.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates INSE as "Buy" and CZR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 131.5% upside for INSE (target: $19) vs 10.0% for CZR (target: $31).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $18.75 | $30.57 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 30 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.2% | +4.0% |
CZR leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Risk & Volatility). INSE leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 1 tied.
INSE vs CZR: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is INSE or CZR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Inspired Entertainment, Inc.
(INSE) is the stronger pick with 2. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 1% for Caesars Entertainment, Inc. (CZR). Analysts rate Inspired Entertainment, Inc. (INSE) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — INSE or CZR?
Over the past 5 years, Inspired Entertainment, Inc.
(INSE) delivered a total return of -4. 5%, compared to -73. 7% for Caesars Entertainment, Inc. (CZR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CZR returned +302. 6% versus INSE's -17. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — INSE or CZR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Caesars Entertainment, Inc.
(CZR) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 27β versus Inspired Entertainment, Inc. 's 1. 77β — meaning INSE is approximately 40% more volatile than CZR relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — INSE or CZR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Inspired Entertainment, Inc.
(INSE) is pulling ahead at 2. 4% versus 2. 1% for Caesars Entertainment, Inc. (CZR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Caesars Entertainment, Inc. grew EPS -87. 6% year-over-year, compared to -126. 1% for Inspired Entertainment, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, INSE leads at 2. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — INSE or CZR?
Caesars Entertainment, Inc.
(CZR) is the more profitable company, earning -4. 4% net margin versus -5. 6% for Inspired Entertainment, Inc. — meaning it keeps -4. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CZR leads at 18. 1% versus 12. 2% for INSE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — INSE leads at 54. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is INSE or CZR more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for INSE: 131.
5% to $18. 75.
07Which pays a better dividend — INSE or CZR?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is INSE or CZR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Caesars Entertainment, Inc.
(CZR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 27), +302. 6% 10Y return). Inspired Entertainment, Inc. (INSE) carries a higher beta of 1. 77 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CZR: +302. 6%, INSE: -17. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between INSE and CZR?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.
Compare CZR vs MGM
MGM is one of the most direct listed alternatives to CZR.
Compare INSE vs LNW
LNW overlaps with INSE in an adjacent operating segment worth comparing.
Expand With MGM + PENN
MGM and PENN are the strongest missing peers across the current compare set.