Oil & Gas Midstream
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
INSW vs TNK vs STNG vs DHT vs HAFN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Midstream
Oil & Gas Midstream
Oil & Gas Midstream
Marine Shipping
INSW vs TNK vs STNG vs DHT vs HAFN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Midstream | Oil & Gas Midstream | Oil & Gas Midstream | Oil & Gas Midstream | Marine Shipping |
| Market Cap | $4.46B | $2.83B | $4.38B | $3.06B | $4.40B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $676M | $952M | $1.04B | $566M | $2.28B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $546M | $351M | $502M | $331M | $340M |
| Gross Margin | 40.6% | 27.5% | 51.8% | 47.5% | 18.8% |
| Operating Margin | 44.4% | 27.5% | 38.8% | 50.1% | 15.5% |
| Forward P/E | 8.5x | 6.0x | 8.6x | 7.0x | 7.6x |
| Total Debt | $576M | $55M | $619M | $429M | $1.14B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $117M | $831M | $752M | $79M | $193M |
INSW vs TNK vs STNG vs DHT vs HAFN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| International Seawa… (INSW) | 100 | 163.1 | +63.1% |
| Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK) | 100 | 139.5 | +39.5% |
| Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG) | 100 | 120.4 | +20.4% |
| DHT Holdings, Inc. (DHT) | 100 | 166.5 | +66.5% |
| Hafnia Limited (HAFN) | 100 | 114.4 | +14.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: INSW vs TNK vs STNG vs DHT vs HAFN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
INSW carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 10.1% 10Y total return vs TNK's 187.7%
- -11.4% revenue growth vs STNG's -24.6%
- 80.8% margin vs HAFN's 14.9%
- +160.2% vs DHT's +79.6%
TNK ranks third and is worth considering specifically for valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.19 vs HAFN's 0.86
- Lower P/E (6.0x vs 7.6x), PEG 0.19 vs 0.86
STNG is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.28, Low D/E 19.4%, current ratio 9.33x
DHT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.27, yield 3.9%
- Rev growth -13.0%, EPS growth 17.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.1%
- Beta 0.27, yield 3.9%, current ratio 2.80x
- Beta 0.27 vs INSW's 0.43
HAFN is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.
- 4.6% yield, vs STNG's 2.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -11.4% revenue growth vs STNG's -24.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.0x vs 7.6x), PEG 0.19 vs 0.86 | |
| Quality / Margins | 80.8% margin vs HAFN's 14.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.27 vs INSW's 0.43 | |
| Dividends | 4.6% yield, vs STNG's 2.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +160.2% vs DHT's +79.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 21.3% ROA vs HAFN's 8.9%, ROIC 8.9% vs 7.9% |
INSW vs TNK vs STNG vs DHT vs HAFN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
INSW vs TNK vs STNG vs DHT vs HAFN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TNK leads in 2 of 6 categories
INSW leads 1 • STNG leads 0 • DHT leads 0 • HAFN leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — INSW and STNG and DHT each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HAFN is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.3B annually — 4.0x DHT's $566M. INSW is the more profitable business, keeping 80.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HAFN's 14.9%. On growth, DHT holds the edge at +57.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $676M | $952M | $1.0B | $566M | $2.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $465M | $348M | $580M | $388M | $555M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $546M | $351M | $502M | $331M | $340M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $193M | $113M | $389M | -$131M | $444M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +40.6% | +27.5% | +51.8% | +47.5% | +18.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +44.4% | +27.5% | +38.8% | +50.1% | +15.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +80.8% | +36.9% | +48.4% | +58.6% | +14.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +28.5% | +11.8% | +37.5% | -23.1% | +19.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -91.3% | -26.4% | +46.2% | +57.3% | +11.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.8% | +46.0% | +2.5% | +2.8% | +46.7% |
Valuation Metrics
TNK leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.0x trailing earnings, TNK trades at a 45% valuation discount to DHT's 14.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), TNK offers better value at 0.26x vs HAFN's 1.43x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.5B | $2.8B | $4.4B | $3.1B | $4.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.9B | $2.1B | $4.3B | $3.4B | $5.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 14.48x | 8.05x | 12.05x | 14.51x | 12.80x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 8.52x | 6.00x | 8.58x | 7.01x | 7.64x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.26x | 0.36x | — | 1.43x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.48x | 6.80x | 8.68x | 12.35x | 9.82x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 5.29x | 2.97x | 4.67x | 6.16x | 1.87x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.21x | 1.38x | 1.30x | 2.70x | 1.91x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 117.08x | 25.09x | 8.92x | — | 10.69x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TNK leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
DHT delivers a 29.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $29 in annual profit, vs $15 for HAFN. TNK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HAFN's 0.49x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DHT scores 7/9 vs TNK's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +27.1% | +17.2% | +15.9% | +29.1% | +14.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +20.1% | +15.7% | +12.6% | +21.3% | +8.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.4% | +12.5% | +7.2% | +8.9% | +7.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +12.1% | +10.9% | +8.4% | +11.7% | +10.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 4 | 6 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.29x | 0.03x | 0.19x | 0.38x | 0.49x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $459M | -$776M | -$133M | $350M | $946M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $117M | $831M | $752M | $79M | $193M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $576M | $55M | $619M | $429M | $1.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.90x | 109.95x | 6.82x | 25.61x | 7.15x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
INSW leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TNK five years ago would be worth $61,384 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $18,739 for HAFN. Over the past 12 months, INSW leads with a +160.2% total return vs DHT's +79.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors INSW at 40.9% vs HAFN's 20.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +96.5% | +58.3% | +71.3% | +65.4% | +76.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +160.2% | +80.3% | +115.3% | +79.6% | +98.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +179.7% | +136.5% | +92.7% | +167.8% | +76.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +438.1% | +513.8% | +359.0% | +282.2% | +87.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1014.5% | +187.7% | +62.8% | +318.3% | +91.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +40.9% | +33.2% | +24.4% | +38.9% | +20.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — INSW and DHT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DHT is the less volatile stock with a 0.27 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than INSW's 0.43 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. INSW currently trades 98.5% from its 52-week high vs DHT's 92.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.43x | 0.35x | 0.28x | 0.27x | 0.29x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $91.58 | $83.54 | $87.39 | $20.55 | $9.54 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $35.60 | $41.05 | $37.96 | $10.61 | $4.88 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.5% | +97.3% | +96.9% | +92.5% | +92.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 67.3 | 57.9 | 60.5 | 58.8 | 59.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 597K | 542K | 1.2M | 4.7M | 2.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — STNG and HAFN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: INSW as "Buy", TNK as "Buy", STNG as "Buy", DHT as "Buy", HAFN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 13.3% upside for HAFN (target: $10) vs -7.6% for INSW (target: $83). For income investors, HAFN offers the higher dividend yield at 4.59% vs STNG's 1.99%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $83.33 | $90.00 | $85.33 | $18.00 | $10.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 13 | 23 | 31 | 16 | 1 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.2% | +2.4% | +2.0% | +3.9% | +4.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.92 | $1.98 | $1.69 | $0.74 | $0.41 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.0% | 0.0% | +0.6% |
TNK leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). INSW leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
INSW vs TNK vs STNG vs DHT vs HAFN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is INSW or TNK or STNG or DHT or HAFN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, International Seaways, Inc.
(INSW) is the stronger pick with -11. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -24. 6% for Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG). Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK) offers the better valuation at 8. 0x trailing P/E (6. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate International Seaways, Inc. (INSW) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — INSW or TNK or STNG or DHT or HAFN?
On trailing P/E, Teekay Tankers Ltd.
(TNK) is the cheapest at 8. 0x versus DHT Holdings, Inc. at 14. 5x. On forward P/E, Teekay Tankers Ltd. is actually cheaper at 6. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Teekay Tankers Ltd. wins at 0. 19x versus Hafnia Limited's 0. 86x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — INSW or TNK or STNG or DHT or HAFN?
Over the past 5 years, Teekay Tankers Ltd.
(TNK) delivered a total return of +513. 8%, compared to +87. 4% for Hafnia Limited (HAFN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: INSW returned +1015% versus STNG's +62. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — INSW or TNK or STNG or DHT or HAFN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), DHT Holdings, Inc.
(DHT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 27β versus International Seaways, Inc. 's 0. 43β — meaning INSW is approximately 58% more volatile than DHT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 49% for Hafnia Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — INSW or TNK or STNG or DHT or HAFN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), International Seaways, Inc.
(INSW) is pulling ahead at -11. 4% versus -24. 6% for Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: DHT Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 17. 0% year-over-year, compared to -54. 0% for Hafnia Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, HAFN leads at 6. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — INSW or TNK or STNG or DHT or HAFN?
DHT Holdings, Inc.
(DHT) is the more profitable company, earning 42. 5% net margin versus 14. 9% for Hafnia Limited — meaning it keeps 42. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: INSW leads at 36. 3% versus 14. 3% for HAFN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — STNG leads at 46. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is INSW or TNK or STNG or DHT or HAFN more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 19x versus Hafnia Limited's 0. 86x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK) trades at 6. 0x forward P/E versus 8. 6x for Scorpio Tankers Inc. — 2. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HAFN: 13. 3% to $10. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — INSW or TNK or STNG or DHT or HAFN?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Hafnia Limited (HAFN) offers the highest yield at 4. 6%, versus 2. 0% for Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG).
09Is INSW or TNK or STNG or DHT or HAFN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, International Seaways, Inc.
(INSW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 43), 3. 2% yield, +1015% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (INSW: +1015%, STNG: +62. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between INSW and TNK and STNG and DHT and HAFN?
These companies operate in different sectors (INSW (Energy) and TNK (Energy) and STNG (Energy) and DHT (Energy) and HAFN (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.