Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

INTA vs MANH

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
INTA
Intapp, Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.93B
5Y Perf.-14.4%
MANH
Manhattan Associates, Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$8.50B
5Y Perf.-0.9%

INTA vs MANH — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
INTA logoINTA
MANH logoMANH
IndustrySoftware - ApplicationSoftware - Application
Market Cap$1.93B$8.50B
Revenue (TTM)$554M$1.10B
Net Income (TTM)$-39M$217M
Gross Margin75.0%55.6%
Operating Margin-7.5%25.6%
Forward P/E19.7x26.8x
Total Debt$16M$112M
Cash & Equiv.$313M$329M

INTA vs MANHLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

INTA
MANH
StockJun 21May 26Return
Intapp, Inc. (INTA)10085.6-14.4%
Manhattan Associate… (MANH)10099.1-0.9%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: INTA vs MANH

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: INTA and MANH are tied at the top with 3 categories each — the right choice depends on your priorities. Manhattan Associates, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and recent price momentum and sentiment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
INTA
Intapp, Inc.
The Income Pick

INTA has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and growth exposure.

  • beta 0.95
  • Rev growth 17.1%, EPS growth 48.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 22.8%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.95, Low D/E 3.1%, current ratio 1.30x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
MANH
Manhattan Associates, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

MANH is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 145.1% 10Y total return vs INTA's -14.4%
  • 19.7% margin vs INTA's -7.0%
  • -21.9% vs INTA's -55.1%
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthINTA logoINTA17.1% revenue growth vs MANH's 3.7%
ValueINTA logoINTALower P/E (19.7x vs 26.8x)
Quality / MarginsMANH logoMANH19.7% margin vs INTA's -7.0%
Stability / SafetyINTA logoINTABeta 0.95 vs MANH's 1.10, lower leverage
DividendsTieNeither stock pays a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)MANH logoMANH-21.9% vs INTA's -55.1%
Efficiency (ROA)MANH logoMANH28.0% ROA vs INTA's -4.8%, ROIC 236.8% vs -9.2%

INTA vs MANH — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

INTAIntapp, Inc.
FY 2025
SaaS
65.8%$332M
License
23.8%$120M
Professional Services
10.3%$52M
MANHManhattan Associates, Inc.
FY 2025
Service, Other
46.5%$503M
Cloud Subscriptions
37.7%$408M
Maintenance
12.0%$130M
Hardware
2.4%$25M
License and Maintenance
1.4%$15M

INTA vs MANH — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLMANHLAGGINGINTA

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

MANH leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

MANH is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.1B annually — 2.0x INTA's $554M. MANH is the more profitable business, keeping 19.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to INTA's -7.0%. On growth, INTA holds the edge at +13.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricINTA logoINTAIntapp, Inc.MANH logoMANHManhattan Associa…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$554M$1.1B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$30M$288M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$39M$217M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$123M$380M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+75.0%+55.6%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-7.5%+25.6%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-7.0%+19.7%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+22.2%+34.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+13.1%+7.4%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-4.4%-3.5%
MANH leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

INTA leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
MetricINTA logoINTAIntapp, Inc.MANH logoMANHManhattan Associa…
Market CapShares × price$1.9B$8.5B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$1.6B$8.3B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-104.26x39.88x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.19.66x26.79x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.86x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple28.67x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue3.82x7.86x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share3.63x27.85x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF15.82x22.74x
INTA leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

MANH leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.

MANH delivers a 78.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $78 in annual profit, vs $-9 for INTA. INTA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MANH's 0.36x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MANH scores 6/9 vs INTA's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricINTA logoINTAIntapp, Inc.MANH logoMANHManhattan Associa…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-8.9%+78.2%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-4.8%+28.0%
ROICReturn on invested capital-9.2%+2.4%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-5.0%+76.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–956
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.03x0.36x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$297M-$216M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$313M$329M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$16M$112M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-23.77x
MANH leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

MANH leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in MANH five years ago would be worth $10,805 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,564 for INTA. Over the past 12 months, MANH leads with a -21.9% total return vs INTA's -55.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MANH at -5.4% vs INTA's -14.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricINTA logoINTAIntapp, Inc.MANH logoMANHManhattan Associa…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-45.3%-14.2%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-55.1%-21.9%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-36.8%-15.3%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-14.4%+8.1%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-14.4%+145.1%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-14.2%-5.4%
MANH leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — INTA and MANH each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

INTA is the less volatile stock with a 0.95 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MANH's 1.10 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MANH currently trades 58.1% from its 52-week high vs INTA's 40.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricINTA logoINTAIntapp, Inc.MANH logoMANHManhattan Associa…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.95x1.10x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$58.84$247.22
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$19.24$119.06
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+40.8%+58.1%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10048.350.6
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded930K678K
Evenly matched — INTA and MANH each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Wall Street rates INTA as "Buy" and MANH as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 53.5% upside for INTA (target: $37) vs 37.4% for MANH (target: $197).

MetricINTA logoINTAIntapp, Inc.MANH logoMANHManhattan Associa…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$36.80$197.25
# AnalystsCovering analysts1215
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises2
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+3.7%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

MANH leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). INTA leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.

Best OverallManhattan Associates, Inc. (MANH)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

INTA vs MANH: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is INTA or MANH a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Intapp, Inc.

(INTA) is the stronger pick with 17. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 7% for Manhattan Associates, Inc. (MANH). Manhattan Associates, Inc. (MANH) offers the better valuation at 39. 9x trailing P/E (26. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Intapp, Inc. (INTA) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — INTA or MANH?

On forward P/E, Intapp, Inc.

is actually cheaper at 19. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — INTA or MANH?

Over the past 5 years, Manhattan Associates, Inc.

(MANH) delivered a total return of +8. 1%, compared to -14. 4% for Intapp, Inc. (INTA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MANH returned +145. 1% versus INTA's -14. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — INTA or MANH?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Intapp, Inc.

(INTA) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 95β versus Manhattan Associates, Inc. 's 1. 10β — meaning MANH is approximately 16% more volatile than INTA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Intapp, Inc. (INTA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 36% for Manhattan Associates, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — INTA or MANH?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Intapp, Inc.

(INTA) is pulling ahead at 17. 1% versus 3. 7% for Manhattan Associates, Inc. (MANH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Intapp, Inc. grew EPS 48. 9% year-over-year, compared to 2. 6% for Manhattan Associates, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, INTA leads at 22. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — INTA or MANH?

Manhattan Associates, Inc.

(MANH) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 3% net margin versus -3. 6% for Intapp, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MANH leads at 26. 1% versus -5. 4% for INTA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — INTA leads at 74. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is INTA or MANH more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Intapp, Inc.

(INTA) trades at 19. 7x forward P/E versus 26. 8x for Manhattan Associates, Inc. — 7. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for INTA: 53. 5% to $36. 80.

08

Which pays a better dividend — INTA or MANH?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is INTA or MANH better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Intapp, Inc.

(INTA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 95)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (INTA: -14. 4%, MANH: +145. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between INTA and MANH?

Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: INTA is a small-cap high-growth stock; MANH is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

INTA

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 6%
  • Gross Margin > 45%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MANH

Steady Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 11%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform INTA and MANH on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(INTA: 13.1% · MANH: 7.4%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.