INTZ vs NTCT vs QLYS vs RDWR

For growth investors, Intrusion Inc.

(INTZ) is the stronger pick with 22. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 8% for NetScout Systems, Inc. (NTCT). Qualys, Inc. (QLYS) offers the better valuation at 17. 5x trailing P/E (12. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate NetScout Systems, Inc. (NTCT) a "Hold" — based on 21 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Qualys, Inc.

(QLYS) is the cheapest at 17. 5x versus Radware Ltd. at 63. 0x. On forward P/E, Qualys, Inc. is actually cheaper at 12. 9x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Qualys, Inc. wins at 0. 66x versus Radware Ltd. 's 1. 45x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, NetScout Systems, Inc.

(NTCT) delivered a total return of +42. 9%, compared to -99. 6% for Intrusion Inc. (INTZ). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: QLYS returned +267. 2% versus INTZ's -88. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Qualys, Inc.

(QLYS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 53β versus Intrusion Inc. 's 2. 65β — meaning INTZ is approximately 401% more volatile than QLYS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Radware Ltd. (RDWR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 24% for Intrusion Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Intrusion Inc.

(INTZ) is pulling ahead at 22. 9% versus -0. 8% for NetScout Systems, Inc. (NTCT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Radware Ltd. grew EPS 221. 4% year-over-year, compared to -144. 4% for NetScout Systems, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, QLYS leads at 11. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Qualys, Inc.

(QLYS) is the more profitable company, earning 29. 6% net margin versus -127. 7% for Intrusion Inc. — meaning it keeps 29. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: QLYS leads at 33. 2% versus -129. 2% for INTZ. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — QLYS leads at 82. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Qualys, Inc. (QLYS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 66x versus Radware Ltd. 's 1. 45x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Qualys, Inc. (QLYS) trades at 12. 9x forward P/E versus 25. 5x for Radware Ltd. — 12. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for QLYS: 41. 5% to $134. 30.

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Qualys, Inc.

(QLYS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 53), +267. 2% 10Y return). Intrusion Inc. (INTZ) carries a higher beta of 2. 65 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (QLYS: +267. 2%, INTZ: -88. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: INTZ is a small-cap high-growth stock; NTCT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; QLYS is a small-cap deep-value stock; RDWR is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.