Auto - Parts
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
INVZ vs AMZN vs GOOGL vs QCOM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Retail
Internet Content & Information
Semiconductors
INVZ vs AMZN vs GOOGL vs QCOM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Auto - Parts | Specialty Retail | Internet Content & Information | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $117M | $2.92T | $4.81T | $213.51B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $55M | $742.78B | $422.57B | $44.49B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-68M | $90.80B | $160.21B | $9.92B |
| Gross Margin | 23.4% | 50.6% | 60.4% | 54.8% |
| Operating Margin | -123.0% | 11.5% | 32.7% | 25.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | 34.8x | 29.6x | 18.8x |
| Total Debt | $65M | $152.99B | $59.29B | $16.37B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $9M | $86.81B | $30.71B | $7.84B |
INVZ vs AMZN vs GOOGL vs QCOM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Innoviz Technologie… (INVZ) | 100 | 7.1 | -92.9% |
| Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) | 100 | 196.6 | +96.6% |
| Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) | 100 | 561.3 | +461.3% |
| QUALCOMM Incorporat… (QCOM) | 100 | 222.1 | +122.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: INVZ vs AMZN vs GOOGL vs QCOM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
INVZ is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 127.0%, EPS growth 40.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 109.1%
- 127.0% revenue growth vs AMZN's 12.4%
AMZN lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
GOOGL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 10.0% 10Y total return vs AMZN's 7.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.26, Low D/E 14.3%, current ratio 2.01x
- PEG 0.99 vs QCOM's 9.06
- 37.9% margin vs INVZ's -123.1%
QCOM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- Dividend streak 23 yrs, beta 1.55, yield 1.7%
- Beta 1.55, yield 1.7%, current ratio 2.82x
- Lower P/E (18.8x vs 34.8x)
- 1.7% yield, 23-year raise streak, vs GOOGL's 0.2%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 127.0% revenue growth vs AMZN's 12.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (18.8x vs 34.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 37.9% margin vs INVZ's -123.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.26 vs INVZ's 2.69, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.7% yield, 23-year raise streak, vs GOOGL's 0.2%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +163.5% vs INVZ's -3.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 27.4% ROA vs INVZ's -49.0%, ROIC 25.1% vs -46.9% |
INVZ vs AMZN vs GOOGL vs QCOM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
INVZ vs AMZN vs GOOGL vs QCOM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
GOOGL leads in 4 of 6 categories
QCOM leads 1 • INVZ leads 0 • AMZN leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GOOGL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMZN is the larger business by revenue, generating $742.8B annually — 13483.2x INVZ's $55M. GOOGL is the more profitable business, keeping 37.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to INVZ's -123.1%. On growth, INVZ holds the edge at +110.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $55M | $742.8B | $422.6B | $44.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$62M | $155.9B | $161.3B | $12.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$68M | $90.8B | $160.2B | $9.9B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$52M | -$2.5B | $73.3B | $12.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +23.4% | +50.6% | +60.4% | +54.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -123.0% | +11.5% | +32.7% | +25.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -123.1% | +12.2% | +37.9% | +22.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -94.4% | -0.3% | +17.3% | +28.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +110.3% | +16.6% | +21.8% | -3.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.1% | +74.8% | +81.9% | +173.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — INVZ and QCOM each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 36.8x trailing earnings, GOOGL trades at a 9% valuation discount to QCOM's 40.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), GOOGL offers better value at 1.23x vs QCOM's 19.44x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $117M | $2.92T | $4.81T | $213.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $173M | $2.98T | $4.84T | $222.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.04x | 37.82x | 36.82x | 40.43x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 34.77x | 29.61x | 18.84x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.35x | 1.23x | 19.44x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 20.47x | 32.22x | 15.91x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.13x | 4.07x | 11.95x | 4.82x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.78x | 7.14x | 11.72x | 10.56x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 378.98x | 65.72x | 16.65x |
Profitability & Efficiency
GOOGL leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
QCOM delivers a 40.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $40 in annual profit, vs $-87 for INVZ. GOOGL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.14x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to INVZ's 0.83x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GOOGL scores 7/9 vs INVZ's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -87.2% | +23.3% | +39.0% | +40.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -49.0% | +11.5% | +27.4% | +18.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -46.9% | +14.7% | +25.1% | +29.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -64.1% | +15.3% | +30.3% | +28.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.83x | 0.37x | 0.14x | 0.77x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $56M | $66.2B | $28.6B | $8.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $9M | $86.8B | $30.7B | $7.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $65M | $153.0B | $59.3B | $16.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -39.12x | 39.96x | 392.15x | 17.60x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GOOGL leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GOOGL five years ago would be worth $33,982 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $699 for INVZ. Over the past 12 months, GOOGL leads with a +163.5% total return vs INVZ's -3.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GOOGL at 54.8% vs INVZ's -35.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -28.1% | +19.7% | +26.4% | +17.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -3.9% | +43.7% | +163.5% | +42.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -72.8% | +156.2% | +270.8% | +96.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.0% | +64.8% | +239.8% | +58.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -92.9% | +697.8% | +996.1% | +350.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -35.2% | +36.8% | +54.8% | +25.2% |
Risk & Volatility
GOOGL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GOOGL is the less volatile stock with a 1.26 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than INVZ's 2.69 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GOOGL currently trades 99.5% from its 52-week high vs INVZ's 27.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.69x | 1.51x | 1.26x | 1.55x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.54 | $278.56 | $400.10 | $223.66 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.58 | $185.01 | $147.84 | $121.99 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +27.3% | +97.3% | +99.5% | +90.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 59.9 | 81.1 | 83.4 | 80.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.4M | 45.5M | 28.3M | 15.1M |
Analyst Outlook
QCOM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: INVZ as "Buy", AMZN as "Buy", GOOGL as "Buy", QCOM as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 188.6% upside for INVZ (target: $2) vs -13.6% for QCOM (target: $175). For income investors, QCOM offers the higher dividend yield at 1.70% vs GOOGL's 0.21%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $2.00 | $306.77 | $406.28 | $175.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 94 | 82 | 69 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.2% | +1.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 2 | 23 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.82 | $3.44 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.9% | +4.1% |
GOOGL leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). QCOM leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
INVZ vs AMZN vs GOOGL vs QCOM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is INVZ or AMZN or GOOGL or QCOM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Innoviz Technologies Ltd.
(INVZ) is the stronger pick with 127. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 12. 4% for Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN). Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) offers the better valuation at 36. 8x trailing P/E (29. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Innoviz Technologies Ltd. (INVZ) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — INVZ or AMZN or GOOGL or QCOM?
On trailing P/E, Alphabet Inc.
(GOOGL) is the cheapest at 36. 8x versus QUALCOMM Incorporated at 40. 4x. On forward P/E, QUALCOMM Incorporated is actually cheaper at 18. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Alphabet Inc. wins at 0. 99x versus QUALCOMM Incorporated's 9. 06x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — INVZ or AMZN or GOOGL or QCOM?
Over the past 5 years, Alphabet Inc.
(GOOGL) delivered a total return of +239. 8%, compared to -93. 0% for Innoviz Technologies Ltd. (INVZ). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GOOGL returned +996. 1% versus INVZ's -92. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — INVZ or AMZN or GOOGL or QCOM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Alphabet Inc.
(GOOGL) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 26β versus Innoviz Technologies Ltd. 's 2. 69β — meaning INVZ is approximately 114% more volatile than GOOGL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 14% versus 83% for Innoviz Technologies Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — INVZ or AMZN or GOOGL or QCOM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Innoviz Technologies Ltd.
(INVZ) is pulling ahead at 127. 0% versus 12. 4% for Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Innoviz Technologies Ltd. grew EPS 40. 4% year-over-year, compared to -44. 2% for QUALCOMM Incorporated. Over a 3-year CAGR, INVZ leads at 109. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — INVZ or AMZN or GOOGL or QCOM?
Alphabet Inc.
(GOOGL) is the more profitable company, earning 32. 8% net margin versus -123. 1% for Innoviz Technologies Ltd. — meaning it keeps 32. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GOOGL leads at 32. 1% versus -123. 0% for INVZ. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GOOGL leads at 59. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is INVZ or AMZN or GOOGL or QCOM more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 99x versus QUALCOMM Incorporated's 9. 06x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) trades at 18. 8x forward P/E versus 34. 8x for Amazon. com, Inc. — 15. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for INVZ: 188. 6% to $2. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — INVZ or AMZN or GOOGL or QCOM?
In this comparison, QCOM (1.
7% yield), GOOGL (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. INVZ, AMZN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is INVZ or AMZN or GOOGL or QCOM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Alphabet Inc.
(GOOGL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 26), +996. 1% 10Y return). Innoviz Technologies Ltd. (INVZ) carries a higher beta of 2. 69 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GOOGL: +996. 1%, INVZ: -92. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between INVZ and AMZN and GOOGL and QCOM?
These companies operate in different sectors (INVZ (Consumer Cyclical) and AMZN (Consumer Cyclical) and GOOGL (Communication Services) and QCOM (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: INVZ is a small-cap high-growth stock; AMZN is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; GOOGL is a mega-cap high-growth stock; QCOM is a large-cap quality compounder stock. QCOM pays a dividend while INVZ, AMZN, GOOGL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.