Communication Equipment
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
IOTR vs ALOT vs TRMB vs SOND
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Computer Hardware
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Travel Lodging
IOTR vs ALOT vs TRMB vs SOND — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Communication Equipment | Computer Hardware | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Travel Lodging |
| Market Cap | $6M | $111M | $14.40B | $3K |
| Revenue (TTM) | $10M | $150M | $3.69B | $589M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-231K | $-17M | $456M | $-249M |
| Gross Margin | 17.8% | 34.1% | 68.1% | 37.9% |
| Operating Margin | -1.9% | -7.3% | 17.8% | -22.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | 22.3x | 19.7x | — |
| Total Debt | $724K | $49M | $1.39B | $1.40B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $443K | $5M | $253M | $21M |
IOTR vs ALOT vs TRMB vs SOND — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| iOThree Limited Ord… (IOTR) | 100 | 59.3 | -40.7% |
| AstroNova, Inc. (ALOT) | 100 | 174.7 | +74.7% |
| Trimble Inc. (TRMB) | 100 | 97.8 | -2.2% |
| Sonder Holdings Inc. (SOND) | 100 | 0.5 | -99.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: IOTR vs ALOT vs TRMB vs SOND
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
IOTR is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 1.48
- 22.3% revenue growth vs TRMB's -2.6%
ALOT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.46, Low D/E 64.1%, current ratio 1.68x
- Beta 0.46, current ratio 1.68x
- Beta 0.46 vs IOTR's 1.48
- +58.2% vs SOND's -100.0%
TRMB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 162.2% 10Y total return vs ALOT's 4.0%
- Better valuation composite
- 12.4% margin vs SOND's -42.3%
- 5.0% ROA vs SOND's -24.8%, ROIC 6.8% vs -12.3%
SOND is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 3.2%, EPS growth 28.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 38.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 22.3% revenue growth vs TRMB's -2.6% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.4% margin vs SOND's -42.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.46 vs IOTR's 1.48 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +58.2% vs SOND's -100.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.0% ROA vs SOND's -24.8%, ROIC 6.8% vs -12.3% |
IOTR vs ALOT vs TRMB vs SOND — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
IOTR vs ALOT vs TRMB vs SOND — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TRMB leads in 2 of 6 categories
ALOT leads 1 • IOTR leads 1 • SOND leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TRMB leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TRMB is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.7B annually — 351.8x IOTR's $10M. TRMB is the more profitable business, keeping 12.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SOND's -42.3%. On growth, TRMB holds the edge at +11.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $10M | $150M | $3.7B | $589M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | -$6M | $843M | $25M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | -$17M | $456M | -$249M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | $10M | $253M | -$84M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +17.8% | +34.1% | +68.1% | +37.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -1.9% | -7.3% | +17.8% | -22.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.2% | -11.2% | +12.4% | -42.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -0.9% | +6.9% | +6.9% | -14.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -3.1% | +11.8% | -10.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +63.7% | +55.6% | -2.3% |
Valuation Metrics
ALOT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, IOTR's 17.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SOND's 252.9x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $6M | $111M | $14.4B | $2,662 |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6M | $154M | $15.5B | $1.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | — | -7.52x | 34.73x | 0.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 22.34x | 19.67x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 14.14x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 17.85x | — | 19.73x | 252.91x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.56x | 0.73x | 4.01x | 0.00x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.39x | 1.44x | 2.50x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 30.11x | 108.10x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
TRMB leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TRMB delivers a 8.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $-22 for ALOT. TRMB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.24x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ALOT's 0.64x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IOTR scores 5/9 vs ALOT's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -12.4% | -22.1% | +8.0% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -4.0% | -11.6% | +5.0% | -24.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -7.9% | -5.7% | +6.8% | -12.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -9.3% | -8.5% | +7.8% | -20.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 2 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.41x | 0.64x | 0.24x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $280,935 | $43M | $1.1B | $1.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $443,117 | $5M | $253M | $21M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $724,052 | $49M | $1.4B | $1.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -5.84x | -6.21x | 8.03x | -7.37x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — ALOT and TRMB each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ALOT five years ago would be worth $9,641 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $0 for SOND. Over the past 12 months, ALOT leads with a +58.2% total return vs SOND's -100.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TRMB at 8.5% vs SOND's -97.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -10.0% | +63.1% | -22.4% | -98.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -48.7% | +58.2% | -9.8% | -100.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.5% | -1.4% | +27.8% | -100.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.5% | -3.6% | -21.8% | -100.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.5% | +4.0% | +162.2% | -100.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -59.8% | -0.5% | +8.5% | -97.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ALOT and SOND each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SOND is the less volatile stock with a -0.46 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than IOTR's 1.48 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ALOT currently trades 96.3% from its 52-week high vs SOND's 0.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.48x | 0.46x | 1.35x | -0.46x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $7.47 | $15.08 | $87.50 | $3.44 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.51 | $6.96 | $59.84 | $0.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +30.9% | +96.3% | +69.5% | +0.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.0 | 72.6 | 33.0 | 25.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 194K | 41K | 1.8M | 10K |
Analyst Outlook
IOTR leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ALOT as "Buy", TRMB as "Buy".
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $93.50 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 1 | 28 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | 0 | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +6.0% | 0.0% |
TRMB leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ALOT leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
IOTR vs ALOT vs TRMB vs SOND: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is IOTR or ALOT or TRMB or SOND a better buy right now?
For growth investors, iOThree Limited Ordinary Shares (IOTR) is the stronger pick with 22.
3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 6% for Trimble Inc. (TRMB). Trimble Inc. (TRMB) offers the better valuation at 34. 7x trailing P/E (19. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate AstroNova, Inc. (ALOT) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — IOTR or ALOT or TRMB or SOND?
On forward P/E, Trimble Inc.
is actually cheaper at 19. 7x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — IOTR or ALOT or TRMB or SOND?
Over the past 5 years, AstroNova, Inc.
(ALOT) delivered a total return of -3. 6%, compared to -100. 0% for Sonder Holdings Inc. (SOND). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TRMB returned +162. 2% versus SOND's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — IOTR or ALOT or TRMB or SOND?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Sonder Holdings Inc.
(SOND) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 46β versus iOThree Limited Ordinary Shares's 1. 48β — meaning IOTR is approximately -423% more volatile than SOND relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Trimble Inc. (TRMB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 24% versus 64% for AstroNova, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — IOTR or ALOT or TRMB or SOND?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), iOThree Limited Ordinary Shares (IOTR) is pulling ahead at 22.
3% versus -2. 6% for Trimble Inc. (TRMB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Sonder Holdings Inc. grew EPS 28. 1% year-over-year, compared to -406. 3% for AstroNova, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, IOTR leads at 39. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — IOTR or ALOT or TRMB or SOND?
Trimble Inc.
(TRMB) is the more profitable company, earning 11. 8% net margin versus -36. 1% for Sonder Holdings Inc. — meaning it keeps 11. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TRMB leads at 16. 9% versus -29. 4% for SOND. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TRMB leads at 68. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is IOTR or ALOT or TRMB or SOND more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Trimble Inc.
(TRMB) trades at 19. 7x forward P/E versus 22. 3x for AstroNova, Inc. — 2. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — IOTR or ALOT or TRMB or SOND?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is IOTR or ALOT or TRMB or SOND better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Sonder Holdings Inc.
(SOND) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 46)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SOND: -100. 0%, IOTR: -93. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between IOTR and ALOT and TRMB and SOND?
These companies operate in different sectors (IOTR (Technology) and ALOT (Technology) and TRMB (Technology) and SOND (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: IOTR is a small-cap high-growth stock; ALOT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TRMB is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; SOND is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.