Communication Equipment
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
IOTR vs KORE vs SPOK vs CALX vs SHEN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Telecommunications Services
Medical - Healthcare Information Services
Software - Application
Telecommunications Services
IOTR vs KORE vs SPOK vs CALX vs SHEN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Communication Equipment | Telecommunications Services | Medical - Healthcare Information Services | Software - Application | Telecommunications Services |
| Market Cap | $6M | $156M | $226M | $2.79B | $894M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $10M | $285M | $103M | $1.06B | $266M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-231K | $-70M | $11M | $34M | $-36M |
| Gross Margin | 17.8% | 55.3% | 91.4% | 57.1% | 37.9% |
| Operating Margin | -1.9% | -4.0% | 13.2% | 3.8% | -10.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 16.5x | 24.3x | — |
| Total Debt | $724K | $307M | $7M | $26M | $642M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $443K | $19M | $25M | $143M | $27M |
IOTR vs KORE vs SPOK vs CALX vs SHEN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| iOThree Limited Ord… (IOTR) | 100 | 59.3 | -40.7% |
| KORE Group Holdings… (KORE) | 100 | 372.0 | +272.0% |
| Spok Holdings, Inc. (SPOK) | 100 | 75.9 | -24.1% |
| Calix, Inc. (CALX) | 100 | 105.7 | +5.7% |
| Shenandoah Telecomm… (SHEN) | 100 | 145.1 | +45.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: IOTR vs KORE vs SPOK vs CALX vs SHEN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
IOTR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth is your priority.
- 22.3% revenue growth vs SPOK's 1.5%
KORE ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +272.0% vs IOTR's -48.7%
SPOK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 0.40, yield 11.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.40, Low D/E 4.7%, current ratio 1.18x
- Beta 0.40, yield 11.9%, current ratio 1.18x
- Better valuation composite
CALX is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 20.3%, EPS growth 157.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.8%
- 5.1% 10Y total return vs SPOK's 13.6%
Among these 5 stocks, SHEN doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 22.3% revenue growth vs SPOK's 1.5% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 10.3% margin vs KORE's -24.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.40 vs IOTR's 1.48, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 11.9% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs SHEN's 0.7%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +272.0% vs IOTR's -48.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.2% ROA vs KORE's -16.5%, ROIC 11.3% vs -30.4% |
IOTR vs KORE vs SPOK vs CALX vs SHEN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
IOTR vs KORE vs SPOK vs CALX vs SHEN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SPOK leads in 4 of 6 categories
KORE leads 2 • IOTR leads 0 • CALX leads 0 • SHEN leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SPOK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CALX is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.1B annually — 101.1x IOTR's $10M. SPOK is the more profitable business, keeping 10.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KORE's -24.5%. On growth, CALX holds the edge at +27.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $10M | $285M | $103M | $1.1B | $266M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | $44M | $17M | $57M | $104M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | -$70M | $11M | $34M | -$36M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | $3M | $26M | $109M | -$276M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +17.8% | +55.3% | +91.4% | +57.1% | +37.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -1.9% | -4.0% | +13.2% | +3.8% | -10.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.2% | -24.5% | +10.3% | +3.2% | -13.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -0.9% | +1.0% | +24.7% | +10.3% | -103.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -0.3% | -100.0% | +27.1% | -100.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +36.0% | -64.0% | +3.3% | -18.2% |
Valuation Metrics
SPOK leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.5x trailing earnings, SPOK trades at a 91% valuation discount to CALX's 166.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SPOK's 9.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CALX's 69.2x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $6M | $156M | $226M | $2.8B | $894M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6M | $443M | $207M | $2.7B | $1.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | — | -1.21x | 14.52x | 166.31x | -22.76x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 16.50x | 24.33x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 17.85x | — | 8.96x | 69.15x | 13.77x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.56x | 0.54x | 1.62x | 2.79x | 2.50x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.39x | — | 1.57x | 3.54x | 0.92x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 8.96x | 24.18x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
SPOK leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SPOK delivers a 7.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $7 in annual profit, vs $-12 for IOTR. CALX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SHEN's 0.66x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SPOK scores 6/9 vs SHEN's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -12.4% | — | +7.3% | +4.2% | -3.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -4.0% | -16.5% | +5.2% | +3.5% | -2.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -7.9% | -30.4% | +11.3% | +2.1% | -1.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -9.3% | -22.7% | +12.1% | +2.5% | -1.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.41x | — | 0.05x | 0.03x | 0.66x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $280,935 | $288M | -$18M | -$118M | $614M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $443,117 | $19M | $25M | $143M | $27M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $724,052 | $307M | $7M | $26M | $642M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -5.84x | -1.96x | — | — | -0.65x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
KORE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SPOK five years ago would be worth $16,173 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $649 for IOTR. Over the past 12 months, KORE leads with a +272.0% total return vs IOTR's -48.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KORE at 16.4% vs IOTR's -59.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -10.0% | +105.6% | -13.8% | -19.3% | +42.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -48.7% | +272.0% | -26.6% | +1.4% | +38.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.5% | +57.8% | +13.8% | +1.5% | -14.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.5% | -7.6% | +61.7% | -0.1% | -28.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.5% | -9.9% | +13.6% | +509.0% | +21.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -59.8% | +16.4% | +4.4% | +0.5% | -4.9% |
Risk & Volatility
KORE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KORE is the less volatile stock with a -0.07 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than IOTR's 1.48 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KORE currently trades 99.3% from its 52-week high vs IOTR's 30.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.48x | -0.07x | 0.40x | 0.98x | 0.87x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $7.47 | $9.21 | $19.31 | $71.22 | $17.34 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.51 | $2.00 | $9.96 | $40.75 | $9.66 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +30.9% | +99.3% | +56.4% | +60.7% | +93.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.0 | 74.2 | 42.5 | 41.0 | 55.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 194K | 137K | 170K | 907K | 297K |
Analyst Outlook
SPOK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: KORE as "Buy", SPOK as "Hold", CALX as "Buy", SHEN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 79.5% upside for SHEN (target: $29) vs 37.7% for SPOK (target: $15). For income investors, SPOK offers the higher dividend yield at 11.88% vs SHEN's 0.72%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $15.00 | $61.00 | $29.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 9 | 1 | 21 | 8 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +11.9% | — | +0.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | — | 5 | 1 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $1.29 | — | $0.12 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.3% | +1.3% | +3.4% | 0.0% |
SPOK leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). KORE leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility).
IOTR vs KORE vs SPOK vs CALX vs SHEN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is IOTR or KORE or SPOK or CALX or SHEN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, iOThree Limited Ordinary Shares (IOTR) is the stronger pick with 22.
3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 5% for Spok Holdings, Inc. (SPOK). Spok Holdings, Inc. (SPOK) offers the better valuation at 14. 5x trailing P/E (16. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate KORE Group Holdings, Inc. (KORE) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — IOTR or KORE or SPOK or CALX or SHEN?
On trailing P/E, Spok Holdings, Inc.
(SPOK) is the cheapest at 14. 5x versus Calix, Inc. at 166. 3x. On forward P/E, Spok Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 16. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — IOTR or KORE or SPOK or CALX or SHEN?
Over the past 5 years, Spok Holdings, Inc.
(SPOK) delivered a total return of +61. 7%, compared to -93. 5% for iOThree Limited Ordinary Shares (IOTR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CALX returned +509. 0% versus IOTR's -93. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — IOTR or KORE or SPOK or CALX or SHEN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), KORE Group Holdings, Inc.
(KORE) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 07β versus iOThree Limited Ordinary Shares's 1. 48β — meaning IOTR is approximately -2094% more volatile than KORE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Calix, Inc. (CALX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 66% for Shenandoah Telecommunications Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — IOTR or KORE or SPOK or CALX or SHEN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), iOThree Limited Ordinary Shares (IOTR) is pulling ahead at 22.
3% versus 1. 5% for Spok Holdings, Inc. (SPOK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Calix, Inc. grew EPS 157. 8% year-over-year, compared to -120. 1% for Shenandoah Telecommunications Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, IOTR leads at 39. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — IOTR or KORE or SPOK or CALX or SHEN?
Spok Holdings, Inc.
(SPOK) is the more profitable company, earning 11. 4% net margin versus -51. 1% for KORE Group Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 11. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SPOK leads at 14. 1% versus -35. 9% for KORE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SPOK leads at 78. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is IOTR or KORE or SPOK or CALX or SHEN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Spok Holdings, Inc.
(SPOK) trades at 16. 5x forward P/E versus 24. 3x for Calix, Inc. — 7. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SHEN: 79. 5% to $29. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — IOTR or KORE or SPOK or CALX or SHEN?
In this comparison, SPOK (11.
9% yield), SHEN (0. 7% yield) pay a dividend. IOTR, KORE, CALX do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is IOTR or KORE or SPOK or CALX or SHEN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Spok Holdings, Inc.
(SPOK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 40), 11. 9% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SPOK: +13. 6%, IOTR: -93. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between IOTR and KORE and SPOK and CALX and SHEN?
These companies operate in different sectors (IOTR (Technology) and KORE (Communication Services) and SPOK (Healthcare) and CALX (Technology) and SHEN (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: IOTR is a small-cap high-growth stock; KORE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SPOK is a small-cap deep-value stock; CALX is a small-cap high-growth stock; SHEN is a small-cap quality compounder stock. SPOK, SHEN pay a dividend while IOTR, KORE, CALX do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Gross Margin > 22%
- Dividend Yield > 0.5%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.