Packaging & Containers
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
IP vs RKT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Mortgages
IP vs RKT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Packaging & Containers | Financial - Mortgages |
| Market Cap | $17.49B | $44.31B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $24.97B | $6.88B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-3.35B | $-68M |
| Gross Margin | 27.8% | 91.6% |
| Operating Margin | -10.5% | 8.7% |
| Forward P/E | 23.4x | 21.3x |
| Total Debt | $10.80B | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.15B | $2.70B |
IP vs RKT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Aug 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| International Paper… (IP) | 100 | 96.2 | -3.8% |
| Rocket Companies, I… (RKT) | 100 | 56.0 | -44.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: IP vs RKT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
IP is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.21, yield 5.6%
- Rev growth 33.7%, EPS growth -5.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.6%
- 29.1% 10Y total return vs RKT's -13.5%
RKT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.
- Lower P/E (21.3x vs 23.4x)
- -1.0% margin vs IP's -13.4%
- +34.7% vs IP's -21.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 33.7% revenue growth vs RKT's 27.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (21.3x vs 23.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | -1.0% margin vs IP's -13.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.21 vs RKT's 1.85 | |
| Dividends | 5.6% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +34.7% vs IP's -21.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -0.2% ROA vs IP's -8.5%, ROIC 2.0% vs -11.3% |
IP vs RKT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
IP vs RKT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RKT leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IP is the larger business by revenue, generating $25.0B annually — 3.6x RKT's $6.9B. RKT is the more profitable business, keeping -1.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to IP's -13.4%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $25.0B | $6.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $154M | $639M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$3.4B | -$68M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $553M | -$4.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +27.8% | +91.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -10.5% | +8.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -13.4% | -1.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.2% | -58.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +1.2% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +145.8% | -89.6% |
Valuation Metrics
RKT leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, RKT's 46.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than IP's 1292.7x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $17.5B | $44.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $27.1B | $41.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -4.92x | -313.80x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 23.45x | 21.30x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 1292.71x | 46.76x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.70x | 6.44x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.18x | 0.91x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
RKT leads this category, winning 7 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
RKT delivers a -0.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-1 in annual profit, vs $-20 for IP. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IP scores 3/9 vs RKT's 2/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -20.4% | -0.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -8.5% | -0.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -11.3% | +2.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -11.6% | +1.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.73x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $9.7B | -$2.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.1B | $2.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $10.8B | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -8.89x | 0.43x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
RKT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in RKT five years ago would be worth $9,909 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,280 for IP. Over the past 12 months, RKT leads with a +34.7% total return vs IP's -21.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RKT at 25.1% vs IP's 6.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -15.6% | -21.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -21.3% | +34.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +20.6% | +95.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -27.2% | -0.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +29.1% | -13.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +6.4% | +25.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — IP and RKT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
IP is the less volatile stock with a 1.21 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RKT's 1.85 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RKT currently trades 64.4% from its 52-week high vs IP's 58.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.21x | 1.85x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $56.13 | $24.36 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $29.45 | $11.08 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +58.8% | +64.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 44.5 | 41.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 6.7M | 25.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates IP as "Buy" and RKT as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 39.9% upside for IP (target: $46) vs 37.9% for RKT (target: $22). IP is the only dividend payer here at 5.60% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $46.20 | $21.63 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 29 | 25 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +5.6% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.85 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.4% | 0.0% |
RKT leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 1 category is tied.
IP vs RKT: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is IP or RKT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, International Paper Company (IP) is the stronger pick with 33.
7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 27. 4% for Rocket Companies, Inc. (RKT). Analysts rate International Paper Company (IP) a "Buy" — based on 29 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — IP or RKT?
Over the past 5 years, Rocket Companies, Inc.
(RKT) delivered a total return of -0. 9%, compared to -27. 2% for International Paper Company (IP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IP returned +29. 1% versus RKT's -13. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — IP or RKT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), International Paper Company (IP) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
21β versus Rocket Companies, Inc. 's 1. 85β — meaning RKT is approximately 53% more volatile than IP relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — IP or RKT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), International Paper Company (IP) is pulling ahead at 33.
7% versus 27. 4% for Rocket Companies, Inc. (RKT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Rocket Companies, Inc. grew EPS -123. 8% year-over-year, compared to -527. 4% for International Paper Company. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — IP or RKT?
Rocket Companies, Inc.
(RKT) is the more profitable company, earning -1. 0% net margin versus -14. 1% for International Paper Company — meaning it keeps -1. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RKT leads at 8. 7% versus -11. 3% for IP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RKT leads at 91. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is IP or RKT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Rocket Companies, Inc.
(RKT) trades at 21. 3x forward P/E versus 23. 4x for International Paper Company — 2. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IP: 39. 9% to $46. 20.
07Which pays a better dividend — IP or RKT?
In this comparison, IP (5.
6% yield) pays a dividend. RKT does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is IP or RKT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, International Paper Company (IP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
21), 5. 6% yield). Rocket Companies, Inc. (RKT) carries a higher beta of 1. 85 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (IP: +29. 1%, RKT: -13. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between IP and RKT?
These companies operate in different sectors (IP (Consumer Cyclical) and RKT (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
IP pays a dividend while RKT does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.