Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

IPGP vs LITE vs NPKI vs MKSI vs NOVT

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
IPGP
IPG Photonics Corporation

Semiconductors

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$4.31B
5Y Perf.+30.2%
LITE
Lumentum Holdings Inc.

Communication Equipment

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$63.74B
5Y Perf.+926.5%
NPKI
NPK International Inc.

Oil & Gas Equipment & Services

EnergyNYSE • US
Market Cap$1.30B
5Y Perf.+84.6%
MKSI
MKS Inc.

Hardware, Equipment & Parts

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$20.25B
5Y Perf.+164.7%
NOVT
Novanta Inc.

Hardware, Equipment & Parts

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$4.86B
5Y Perf.-18.4%

IPGP vs LITE vs NPKI vs MKSI vs NOVT — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
IPGP logoIPGP
LITE logoLITE
NPKI logoNPKI
MKSI logoMKSI
NOVT logoNOVT
IndustrySemiconductorsCommunication EquipmentOil & Gas Equipment & ServicesHardware, Equipment & PartsHardware, Equipment & Parts
Market Cap$4.31B$63.74B$1.30B$20.25B$4.86B
Revenue (TTM)$1.04B$2.49B$287M$4.07B$981M
Net Income (TTM)$29M$440M$36M$327M$54M
Gross Margin37.6%37.7%35.2%45.2%44.4%
Operating Margin0.3%9.5%11.4%14.8%11.9%
Forward P/E62.6x114.4x29.3x30.4x38.2x
Total Debt$0.00$2.61B$37M$4.69B$342M
Cash & Equiv.$404M$521M$5M$675M$381M

IPGP vs LITE vs NPKI vs MKSI vs NOVTLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

IPGP
LITE
NPKI
MKSI
NOVT
StockNov 24May 26Return
IPG Photonics Corpo… (IPGP)100130.2+30.2%
Lumentum Holdings I… (LITE)1001026.5+926.5%
NPK International I… (NPKI)100184.6+84.6%
MKS Inc. (MKSI)100264.7+164.7%
Novanta Inc. (NOVT)10081.6-18.4%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: IPGP vs LITE vs NPKI vs MKSI vs NOVT

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: LITE and NPKI are tied at the top with 3 categories each (5-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. NPK International Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. MKSI also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
IPGP
IPG Photonics Corporation
The Income Pick

IPGP is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.80
  • Beta 1.80, current ratio 6.08x
Best for: income & stability and defensive
LITE
Lumentum Holdings Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

LITE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.

  • 36.4% 10Y total return vs NOVT's 8.5%
  • 17.7% margin vs IPGP's 2.8%
  • +12.5% vs NOVT's +14.6%
  • 8.5% ROA vs IPGP's 1.2%, ROIC -4.3% vs 0.6%
Best for: long-term compounding
NPKI
NPK International Inc.
The Growth Play

NPKI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.

  • Rev growth 27.4%, EPS growth 124.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.8%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.47, Low D/E 10.4%, current ratio 1.43x
  • 27.4% revenue growth vs IPGP's 2.7%
  • Lower P/E (29.3x vs 38.2x)
Best for: growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night
MKSI
MKS Inc.
The Income Pick

MKSI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for dividends.

  • 0.3% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Best for: dividends
NOVT
Novanta Inc.
The Technology Pick

Among these 5 stocks, NOVT doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: technology exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthNPKI logoNPKI27.4% revenue growth vs IPGP's 2.7%
ValueNPKI logoNPKILower P/E (29.3x vs 38.2x)
Quality / MarginsLITE logoLITE17.7% margin vs IPGP's 2.8%
Stability / SafetyNPKI logoNPKIBeta 1.47 vs LITE's 2.69, lower leverage
DividendsMKSI logoMKSI0.3% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)LITE logoLITE+12.5% vs NOVT's +14.6%
Efficiency (ROA)LITE logoLITE8.5% ROA vs IPGP's 1.2%, ROIC -4.3% vs 0.6%

IPGP vs LITE vs NPKI vs MKSI vs NOVT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

IPGPIPG Photonics Corporation
FY 2025
High Power Continuous Wave CW Lasers
41.8%$309M
Laser And Non-Laser Systems
19.9%$147M
Pulsed Lasers
19.4%$143M
Medium And Low Power CW Lasers
11.9%$88M
Quasi-Continuous Wave QCW Lasers
7.0%$52M
LITELumentum Holdings Inc.
FY 2023
Lasers Segment
100.0%$209M
NPKINPK International Inc.
FY 2025
Rental and Service
66.3%$184M
Product
33.7%$93M
MKSIMKS Inc.
FY 2025
Product
87.4%$3.4B
Service
12.6%$495M
NOVTNovanta Inc.
FY 2025
Robotics and Automation
32.5%$319M
Advanced Surgery
24.7%$242M
Precision Medicine
24.2%$237M
Precision Manufacturing
18.6%$182M

IPGP vs LITE vs NPKI vs MKSI vs NOVT — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLNPKILAGGINGNOVT

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

LITE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

MKSI is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.1B annually — 14.2x NPKI's $287M. LITE is the more profitable business, keeping 17.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to IPGP's 2.8%. On growth, LITE holds the edge at +90.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricIPGP logoIPGPIPG Photonics Cor…LITE logoLITELumentum Holdings…NPKI logoNPKINPK International…MKSI logoMKSIMKS Inc.NOVT logoNOVTNovanta Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$1.0B$2.5B$287M$4.1B$981M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$55M$425M$53M$945M$179M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$29M$440M$36M$327M$54M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$8M$399M$32M$401M$48M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+37.6%+37.7%+35.2%+45.2%+44.4%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+0.3%+9.5%+11.4%+14.8%+11.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+2.8%+17.7%+12.4%+8.0%+5.5%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+0.8%+16.0%+11.1%+9.8%+4.9%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+16.6%+90.1%+15.9%+15.2%+8.5%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-54.4%+3.3%0.0%+53.2%-2.2%
LITE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

NPKI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 36.8x trailing earnings, NPKI trades at a 98% valuation discount to LITE's 2412.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, NPKI's 18.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than LITE's 859.4x.

MetricIPGP logoIPGPIPG Photonics Cor…LITE logoLITELumentum Holdings…NPKI logoNPKINPK International…MKSI logoMKSIMKS Inc.NOVT logoNOVTNovanta Inc.
Market CapShares × price$4.3B$63.7B$1.3B$20.2B$4.9B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$3.9B$65.8B$1.3B$24.3B$4.8B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS139.22x2412.94x36.75x68.83x92.71x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.62.62x114.43x29.34x30.36x38.25x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate28.13x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple48.90x859.43x18.49x26.70x27.00x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue4.30x38.75x4.71x5.15x4.96x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share2.04x54.76x3.77x7.49x3.81x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF49.58x40.74x100.38x
NPKI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

NPKI leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

LITE delivers a 30.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $31 in annual profit, vs $1 for IPGP. NPKI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.10x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LITE's 2.30x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LITE scores 7/9 vs NOVT's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricIPGP logoIPGPIPG Photonics Cor…LITE logoLITELumentum Holdings…NPKI logoNPKINPK International…MKSI logoMKSIMKS Inc.NOVT logoNOVTNovanta Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+1.4%+30.7%+10.3%+12.2%+4.1%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+1.2%+8.5%+8.5%+3.7%+3.0%
ROICReturn on invested capital+0.6%-4.3%+9.9%+6.5%+7.4%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+0.6%-4.8%+12.7%+7.2%+8.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–967765
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage2.30x0.10x1.73x0.26x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$404M$2.1B$31M$4.0B-$39M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$404M$521M$5M$675M$381M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$0$2.6B$37M$4.7B$342M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense9.62x77.08x2.84x4.89x
NPKI leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

LITE leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in LITE five years ago would be worth $107,656 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,151 for IPGP. Over the past 12 months, LITE leads with a +1247.8% total return vs NOVT's +14.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LITE at 165.2% vs NOVT's -5.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricIPGP logoIPGPIPG Photonics Cor…LITE logoLITELumentum Holdings…NPKI logoNPKINPK International…MKSI logoMKSIMKS Inc.NOVT logoNOVTNovanta Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+35.8%+131.2%+27.6%+78.8%+22.6%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+75.6%+1247.8%+94.9%+306.1%+14.6%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-12.7%+1764.2%+91.5%+266.0%-15.2%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-48.5%+976.6%+91.5%+66.5%+5.7%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+20.2%+3635.5%+91.5%+750.6%+853.7%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-4.4%+165.2%+24.2%+54.1%-5.3%
LITE leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

NPKI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

NPKI is the less volatile stock with a 1.47 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LITE's 2.69 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NPKI currently trades 93.5% from its 52-week high vs IPGP's 65.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricIPGP logoIPGPIPG Photonics Cor…LITE logoLITELumentum Holdings…NPKI logoNPKINPK International…MKSI logoMKSIMKS Inc.NOVT logoNOVTNovanta Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.80x2.69x1.47x2.64x2.02x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$155.82$1021.00$16.50$326.83$149.95
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$53.98$60.38$7.63$71.49$98.27
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+65.2%+87.4%+93.5%+92.0%+90.9%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10039.758.856.665.362.6
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded510K6.4M795K1.2M375K
NPKI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

IPGP leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: IPGP as "Buy", LITE as "Buy", NPKI as "Buy", MKSI as "Buy", NOVT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 49.2% upside for IPGP (target: $152) vs -28.0% for LITE (target: $643). MKSI is the only dividend payer here at 0.29% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricIPGP logoIPGPIPG Photonics Cor…LITE logoLITELumentum Holdings…NPKI logoNPKINPK International…MKSI logoMKSIMKS Inc.NOVT logoNOVTNovanta Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$151.67$643.18$272.86$150.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts27243293
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.3%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises1000
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.87
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+1.3%+0.1%+1.7%+0.2%+0.8%
IPGP leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

NPKI leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). LITE leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns).

Best OverallNPK International Inc. (NPKI)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

IPGP vs LITE vs NPKI vs MKSI vs NOVT: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is IPGP or LITE or NPKI or MKSI or NOVT a better buy right now?

For growth investors, NPK International Inc.

(NPKI) is the stronger pick with 27. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 7% for IPG Photonics Corporation (IPGP). NPK International Inc. (NPKI) offers the better valuation at 36. 8x trailing P/E (29. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate IPG Photonics Corporation (IPGP) a "Buy" — based on 27 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — IPGP or LITE or NPKI or MKSI or NOVT?

On trailing P/E, NPK International Inc.

(NPKI) is the cheapest at 36. 8x versus Lumentum Holdings Inc. at 2412. 9x. On forward P/E, NPK International Inc. is actually cheaper at 29. 3x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — IPGP or LITE or NPKI or MKSI or NOVT?

Over the past 5 years, Lumentum Holdings Inc.

(LITE) delivered a total return of +976. 6%, compared to -48. 5% for IPG Photonics Corporation (IPGP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LITE returned +36. 4% versus IPGP's +20. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — IPGP or LITE or NPKI or MKSI or NOVT?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), NPK International Inc.

(NPKI) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 47β versus Lumentum Holdings Inc. 's 2. 69β — meaning LITE is approximately 83% more volatile than NPKI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NPK International Inc. (NPKI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 10% versus 2% for Lumentum Holdings Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — IPGP or LITE or NPKI or MKSI or NOVT?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), NPK International Inc.

(NPKI) is pulling ahead at 27. 4% versus 2. 7% for IPG Photonics Corporation (IPGP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: NPK International Inc. grew EPS 124. 0% year-over-year, compared to -16. 9% for Novanta Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NPKI leads at 12. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — IPGP or LITE or NPKI or MKSI or NOVT?

NPK International Inc.

(NPKI) is the more profitable company, earning 13. 0% net margin versus 1. 6% for Lumentum Holdings Inc. — meaning it keeps 13. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NPKI leads at 16. 9% versus -10. 9% for LITE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NOVT leads at 44. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is IPGP or LITE or NPKI or MKSI or NOVT more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, NPK International Inc.

(NPKI) trades at 29. 3x forward P/E versus 114. 4x for Lumentum Holdings Inc. — 85. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IPGP: 49. 2% to $151. 67.

08

Which pays a better dividend — IPGP or LITE or NPKI or MKSI or NOVT?

In this comparison, MKSI (0.

3% yield) pays a dividend. IPGP, LITE, NPKI, NOVT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is IPGP or LITE or NPKI or MKSI or NOVT better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Novanta Inc.

(NOVT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+853. 7% 10Y return). Lumentum Holdings Inc. (LITE) carries a higher beta of 2. 69 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NOVT: +853. 7%, LITE: +36. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between IPGP and LITE and NPKI and MKSI and NOVT?

These companies operate in different sectors (IPGP (Technology) and LITE (Technology) and NPKI (Energy) and MKSI (Technology) and NOVT (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: IPGP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LITE is a mid-cap high-growth stock; NPKI is a small-cap high-growth stock; MKSI is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; NOVT is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

IPGP

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 8%
  • Gross Margin > 22%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

LITE

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 45%
  • Net Margin > 10%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NPKI

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 7%
  • Net Margin > 7%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MKSI

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 7%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NOVT

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform IPGP and LITE and NPKI and MKSI and NOVT on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(IPGP: 16.6% · LITE: 90.1%)
Net Margin>
%
(IPGP: 2.8% · LITE: 17.7%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(IPGP: 139.2x · LITE: 2412.9x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.