Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

IPST vs DEO vs STZ vs MGPI vs SAM

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
IPST
IP Strategy Holdings, Inc.

Beverages - Alcoholic

Consumer DefensiveNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$57M
5Y Perf.-99.6%
DEO
Diageo plc

Beverages - Wineries & Distilleries

Consumer DefensiveNYSE • GB
Market Cap$46.38B
5Y Perf.-30.1%
STZ
Constellation Brands, Inc.

Beverages - Wineries & Distilleries

Consumer DefensiveNYSE • US
Market Cap$26.05B
5Y Perf.-37.6%
MGPI
MGP Ingredients, Inc.

Beverages - Wineries & Distilleries

Consumer DefensiveNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$408M
5Y Perf.-58.8%
SAM
The Boston Beer Company, Inc.

Beverages - Alcoholic

Consumer DefensiveNYSE • US
Market Cap$2.18B
5Y Perf.-35.9%

IPST vs DEO vs STZ vs MGPI vs SAM — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
IPST logoIPST
DEO logoDEO
STZ logoSTZ
MGPI logoMGPI
SAM logoSAM
IndustryBeverages - AlcoholicBeverages - Wineries & DistilleriesBeverages - Wineries & DistilleriesBeverages - Wineries & DistilleriesBeverages - Alcoholic
Market Cap$57M$46.38B$26.05B$408M$2.18B
Revenue (TTM)$10M$37.37B$9.38B$521M$2.09B
Net Income (TTM)$-138M$5.49B$1.11B$-240M$-61M
Gross Margin50.8%60.0%52.0%36.4%45.2%
Operating Margin-122.1%27.9%34.5%-51.2%-3.8%
Forward P/E17.8x12.7x12.1x20.6x
Total Debt$5M$24.40B$12.11B$267M$38M
Cash & Equiv.$245K$2.20B$68M$18M$223M

IPST vs DEO vs STZ vs MGPI vs SAMLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

IPST
DEO
STZ
MGPI
SAM
StockNov 24May 26Return
IP Strategy Holding… (IPST)1000.4-99.6%
Diageo plc (DEO)10069.9-30.1%
Constellation Brand… (STZ)10062.4-37.6%
MGP Ingredients, In… (MGPI)10041.2-58.8%
The Boston Beer Com… (SAM)10064.1-35.9%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: IPST vs DEO vs STZ vs MGPI vs SAM

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: DEO leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and dividend income and shareholder returns. IP Strategy Holdings, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion. STZ, MGPI, and SAM also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
IPST
IP Strategy Holdings, Inc.
The Growth Play

IPST is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.

  • Rev growth 20.4%, EPS growth 69.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.8%
  • 20.4% revenue growth vs MGPI's -23.8%
Best for: growth exposure
DEO
Diageo plc
The Income Pick

DEO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.

  • Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.37, yield 4.9%
  • Beta 0.37, yield 4.9%, current ratio 1.63x
  • 14.7% margin vs IPST's -13.6%
  • 4.9% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs STZ's 2.7%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Best for: income & stability and defensive
STZ
Constellation Brands, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

STZ ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.

  • 12.6% 10Y total return vs SAM's 32.0%
  • Beta 0.26 vs IPST's 2.40
Best for: long-term compounding
MGPI
MGP Ingredients, Inc.
The Value Play

MGPI is the clearest fit if your priority is value.

  • Lower P/E (12.1x vs 20.6x)
Best for: value
SAM
The Boston Beer Company, Inc.
The Defensive Pick

SAM is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.29, Low D/E 4.5%, current ratio 1.65x
  • -15.9% vs IPST's -97.0%
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthIPST logoIPST20.4% revenue growth vs MGPI's -23.8%
ValueMGPI logoMGPILower P/E (12.1x vs 20.6x)
Quality / MarginsDEO logoDEO14.7% margin vs IPST's -13.6%
Stability / SafetySTZ logoSTZBeta 0.26 vs IPST's 2.40
DividendsDEO logoDEO4.9% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs STZ's 2.7%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)SAM logoSAM-15.9% vs IPST's -97.0%
Efficiency (ROA)DEO logoDEO14.7% ROA vs IPST's -85.4%, ROIC 9.6% vs -15.4%

IPST vs DEO vs STZ vs MGPI vs SAM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

IPSTIP Strategy Holdings, Inc.
FY 2025
Product and Service
35.4%$5M
Product
29.2%$4M
Direct To Consumer
20.3%$3M
Wholesale
8.5%$1M
Service
6.6%$968,935
DEODiageo plc
FY 2025
Spirits
79.3%$22.2B
Beer
16.1%$4.5B
Ready To Drink
3.5%$989M
Other Product
1.1%$316M
STZConstellation Brands, Inc.
FY 2025
Beer
83.7%$8.5B
ConstellationWinesAndSpirits
16.3%$1.7B
MGPIMGP Ingredients, Inc.
FY 2025
Branded Spirits
43.4%$233M
Distilling Solutions
33.8%$181M
Ingredient Solutions
22.8%$122M
SAMThe Boston Beer Company, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

IPST vs DEO vs STZ vs MGPI vs SAM — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLDEOLAGGINGIPST

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

DEO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

DEO is the larger business by revenue, generating $37.4B annually — 3692.5x IPST's $10M. DEO is the more profitable business, keeping 14.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to IPST's -13.6%. On growth, IPST holds the edge at +52.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricIPST logoIPSTIP Strategy Holdi…DEO logoDEODiageo plcSTZ logoSTZConstellation Bra…MGPI logoMGPIMGP Ingredients, …SAM logoSAMThe Boston Beer C…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$10M$37.4B$9.4B$521M$2.1B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$11M$11.6B$3.7B-$249M$14M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$138M$5.5B$1.1B-$240M-$61M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$15M$7.7B$1.8B$54M$191M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+50.8%+60.0%+52.0%+36.4%+45.2%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-122.1%+27.9%+34.5%-51.2%-3.8%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-13.6%+14.7%+11.8%-46.0%-2.9%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-152.4%+20.6%+18.8%+10.4%+9.1%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+52.5%-29.1%-9.8%-12.5%+1.7%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+54.6%-24.1%-15.0%-44.0%-7.4%
DEO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

MGPI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 19.7x trailing earnings, DEO trades at a 4% valuation discount to SAM's 20.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SAM's 8.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than DEO's 11.3x.

MetricIPST logoIPSTIP Strategy Holdi…DEO logoDEODiageo plcSTZ logoSTZConstellation Bra…MGPI logoMGPIMGP Ingredients, …SAM logoSAMThe Boston Beer C…
Market CapShares × price$57M$46.4B$26.1B$408M$2.2B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$61M$68.6B$38.1B$656M$2.0B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.37x19.68x-333.89x-3.83x20.50x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.17.82x12.70x12.10x20.56x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate2.64x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple11.33x9.37x8.45x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue5.61x2.29x2.55x0.76x1.04x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.52x3.53x3.82x0.57x2.54x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF17.27x13.44x5.37x10.09x
MGPI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

SAM leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

DEO delivers a 54.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $54 in annual profit, vs $-107 for IPST. SAM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to DEO's 1.85x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SAM scores 7/9 vs MGPI's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricIPST logoIPSTIP Strategy Holdi…DEO logoDEODiageo plcSTZ logoSTZConstellation Bra…MGPI logoMGPIMGP Ingredients, …SAM logoSAMThe Boston Beer C…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-106.9%+54.0%+13.9%-32.1%-7.3%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-85.4%+14.7%+5.1%-19.1%-5.0%
ROICReturn on invested capital-15.4%+9.6%+13.0%-6.7%+15.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-21.7%+11.7%+18.0%-8.1%+14.8%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–945547
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.05x1.85x1.70x0.37x0.04x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$4M$22.2B$12.0B$248M-$186M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$245,282$2.2B$68M$18M$223M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$5M$24.4B$12.1B$267M$38M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense143.02x5.71x5.47x-40.23x
SAM leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

STZ leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in STZ five years ago would be worth $6,992 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $43 for IPST. Over the past 12 months, SAM leads with a -15.9% total return vs IPST's -97.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors STZ at -10.8% vs IPST's -83.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricIPST logoIPSTIP Strategy Holdi…DEO logoDEODiageo plcSTZ logoSTZConstellation Bra…MGPI logoMGPIMGP Ingredients, …SAM logoSAMThe Boston Beer C…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-82.7%-3.3%+7.9%-20.3%+1.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-97.0%-25.1%-18.7%-38.0%-15.9%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.6%-49.3%-29.0%-79.8%-35.0%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.6%-43.9%-30.1%-66.0%-81.8%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.6%+10.0%+12.6%-17.3%+32.0%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-83.7%-20.3%-10.8%-41.3%-13.4%
STZ leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — STZ and SAM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

STZ is the less volatile stock with a 0.26 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than IPST's 2.40 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SAM currently trades 76.7% from its 52-week high vs IPST's 1.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricIPST logoIPSTIP Strategy Holdi…DEO logoDEODiageo plcSTZ logoSTZConstellation Bra…MGPI logoMGPIMGP Ingredients, …SAM logoSAMThe Boston Beer C…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.40x0.37x0.26x0.63x0.29x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$532.00$116.69$196.91$34.99$264.46
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$1.41$72.46$126.45$16.45$185.34
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+1.1%+71.5%+76.3%+54.6%+76.7%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10042.163.545.947.628.7
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded224K1.8M1.8M279K199K
Evenly matched — STZ and SAM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

DEO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: DEO as "Hold", STZ as "Buy", MGPI as "Buy", SAM as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 51.9% upside for MGPI (target: $29) vs 16.9% for STZ (target: $176). For income investors, DEO offers the higher dividend yield at 4.95% vs MGPI's 2.53%.

MetricIPST logoIPSTIP Strategy Holdi…DEO logoDEODiageo plcSTZ logoSTZConstellation Bra…MGPI logoMGPIMGP Ingredients, …SAM logoSAMThe Boston Beer C…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$124.00$175.70$29.00$246.86
# AnalystsCovering analysts35461431
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+4.9%+2.7%+2.5%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises12420
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$4.13$4.03$0.48
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.0%0.0%+4.3%+0.3%+9.4%
DEO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

DEO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Analyst Outlook). MGPI leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.

Best OverallDiageo plc (DEO)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

IPST vs DEO vs STZ vs MGPI vs SAM: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is IPST or DEO or STZ or MGPI or SAM a better buy right now?

For growth investors, IP Strategy Holdings, Inc.

(IPST) is the stronger pick with 20. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -23. 8% for MGP Ingredients, Inc. (MGPI). Diageo plc (DEO) offers the better valuation at 19. 7x trailing P/E (17. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ) a "Buy" — based on 46 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — IPST or DEO or STZ or MGPI or SAM?

On trailing P/E, Diageo plc (DEO) is the cheapest at 19.

7x versus The Boston Beer Company, Inc. at 20. 5x. On forward P/E, MGP Ingredients, Inc. is actually cheaper at 12. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — IPST or DEO or STZ or MGPI or SAM?

Over the past 5 years, Constellation Brands, Inc.

(STZ) delivered a total return of -30. 1%, compared to -99. 6% for IP Strategy Holdings, Inc. (IPST). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SAM returned +32. 0% versus IPST's -99. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — IPST or DEO or STZ or MGPI or SAM?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Constellation Brands, Inc.

(STZ) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 26β versus IP Strategy Holdings, Inc. 's 2. 40β — meaning IPST is approximately 816% more volatile than STZ relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, The Boston Beer Company, Inc. (SAM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 185% for Diageo plc — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — IPST or DEO or STZ or MGPI or SAM?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), IP Strategy Holdings, Inc.

(IPST) is pulling ahead at 20. 4% versus -23. 8% for MGP Ingredients, Inc. (MGPI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Boston Beer Company, Inc. grew EPS 95. 5% year-over-year, compared to -419. 9% for MGP Ingredients, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, DEO leads at 9. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — IPST or DEO or STZ or MGPI or SAM?

Diageo plc (DEO) is the more profitable company, earning 11.

6% net margin versus -1360. 9% for IP Strategy Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 11. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: STZ leads at 35. 5% versus -122. 1% for IPST. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DEO leads at 60. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is IPST or DEO or STZ or MGPI or SAM more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, MGP Ingredients, Inc.

(MGPI) trades at 12. 1x forward P/E versus 20. 6x for The Boston Beer Company, Inc. — 8. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MGPI: 51. 9% to $29. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — IPST or DEO or STZ or MGPI or SAM?

In this comparison, DEO (4.

9% yield), STZ (2. 7% yield), MGPI (2. 5% yield) pay a dividend. IPST, SAM do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is IPST or DEO or STZ or MGPI or SAM better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Constellation Brands, Inc.

(STZ) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 26), 2. 7% yield). IP Strategy Holdings, Inc. (IPST) carries a higher beta of 2. 40 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (STZ: +12. 6%, IPST: -99. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between IPST and DEO and STZ and MGPI and SAM?

Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: IPST is a small-cap high-growth stock; DEO is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; STZ is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; MGPI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SAM is a small-cap quality compounder stock. DEO, STZ, MGPI pay a dividend while IPST, SAM do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

IPST

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Consumer Defensive
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 26%
  • Gross Margin > 30%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

DEO

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Consumer Defensive
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 8%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.9%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

STZ

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Consumer Defensive
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 7%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.0%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MGPI

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Consumer Defensive
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 21%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.0%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SAM

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Defensive
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 27%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform IPST and DEO and STZ and MGPI and SAM on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(IPST: 52.5% · DEO: -29.1%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.