Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

IPST vs MGPI vs KRUS vs SWKH vs WVVI

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
IPST
IP Strategy Holdings, Inc.

Beverages - Alcoholic

Consumer DefensiveNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$57M
5Y Perf.-99.6%
MGPI
MGP Ingredients, Inc.

Beverages - Wineries & Distilleries

Consumer DefensiveNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$408M
5Y Perf.-58.8%
KRUS
Kura Sushi USA, Inc.

Restaurants

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$671M
5Y Perf.-47.3%
SWKH
SWK Holdings Corporation

Asset Management

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$192M
5Y Perf.+34.9%
WVVI
Willamette Valley Vineyards, Inc.

Beverages - Wineries & Distilleries

Consumer DefensiveNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$14M
5Y Perf.-14.0%

IPST vs MGPI vs KRUS vs SWKH vs WVVI — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
IPST logoIPST
MGPI logoMGPI
KRUS logoKRUS
SWKH logoSWKH
WVVI logoWVVI
IndustryBeverages - AlcoholicBeverages - Wineries & DistilleriesRestaurantsAsset ManagementBeverages - Wineries & Distilleries
Market Cap$57M$408M$671M$192M$14M
Revenue (TTM)$10M$521M$292M$41M$37M
Net Income (TTM)$-138M$-240M$-4M$23M$-1M
Gross Margin50.8%36.4%11.0%60.5%
Operating Margin-122.1%-51.2%-2.4%48.9%-2.4%
Forward P/E12.1x7.6x
Total Debt$5M$267M$170M$32M$15.52B
Cash & Equiv.$245K$18M$47M$43M$411M

IPST vs MGPI vs KRUS vs SWKH vs WVVILong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

IPST
MGPI
KRUS
SWKH
WVVI
StockNov 24May 26Return
IP Strategy Holding… (IPST)1000.4-99.6%
MGP Ingredients, In… (MGPI)10041.2-58.8%
Kura Sushi USA, Inc. (KRUS)10052.7-47.3%
SWK Holdings Corpor… (SWKH)100134.9+34.9%
Willamette Valley V… (WVVI)10086.0-14.0%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: IPST vs MGPI vs KRUS vs SWKH vs WVVI

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: SWKH leads in 4 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. IP Strategy Holdings, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion. KRUS and WVVI also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
IPST
IP Strategy Holdings, Inc.
The Growth Leader

IPST is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth is your priority.

  • 20.4% revenue growth vs WVVI's -100.0%
Best for: growth
MGPI
MGP Ingredients, Inc.
The Income Angle

Among these 5 stocks, MGPI doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: consumer defensive exposure
KRUS
Kura Sushi USA, Inc.
The Growth Play

KRUS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 18.9%, EPS growth 79.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 26.1%
  • 187.1% 10Y total return vs SWKH's 164.3%
  • -1.4% margin vs IPST's -13.6%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
SWKH
SWK Holdings Corporation
The Banking Pick

SWKH carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.01, Low D/E 13.7%, current ratio 9.41x
  • Beta 0.01, current ratio 9.41x
  • Better valuation composite
  • Beta 0.01 vs IPST's 2.40
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
WVVI
Willamette Valley Vineyards, Inc.
The Income Pick

WVVI is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta -0.25, yield 100.0%
  • 100.0% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs MGPI's 2.5%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Best for: income & stability
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthIPST logoIPST20.4% revenue growth vs WVVI's -100.0%
ValueSWKH logoSWKHBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsKRUS logoKRUS-1.4% margin vs IPST's -13.6%
Stability / SafetySWKH logoSWKHBeta 0.01 vs IPST's 2.40
DividendsWVVI logoWVVI100.0% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs MGPI's 2.5%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)SWKH logoSWKH+15.4% vs IPST's -97.0%
Efficiency (ROA)SWKH logoSWKH7.3% ROA vs IPST's -85.4%, ROIC 5.1% vs -15.4%

IPST vs MGPI vs KRUS vs SWKH vs WVVI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

IPSTIP Strategy Holdings, Inc.
FY 2025
Product and Service
35.4%$5M
Product
29.2%$4M
Direct To Consumer
20.3%$3M
Wholesale
8.5%$1M
Service
6.6%$968,935
MGPIMGP Ingredients, Inc.
FY 2025
Branded Spirits
43.4%$233M
Distilling Solutions
33.8%$181M
Ingredient Solutions
22.8%$122M
KRUSKura Sushi USA, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

SWKHSWK Holdings Corporation

Segment breakdown not available.

WVVIWillamette Valley Vineyards, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

IPST vs MGPI vs KRUS vs SWKH vs WVVI — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLSWKHLAGGINGKRUS

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

SWKH leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

MGPI is the larger business by revenue, generating $521M annually — 51.5x IPST's $10M. KRUS is the more profitable business, keeping -1.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to IPST's -13.6%. On growth, IPST holds the edge at +52.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricIPST logoIPSTIP Strategy Holdi…MGPI logoMGPIMGP Ingredients, …KRUS logoKRUSKura Sushi USA, I…SWKH logoSWKHSWK Holdings Corp…WVVI logoWVVIWillamette Valley…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$10M$521M$292M$41M$37M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$11M-$249M$8M$25M$2M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$138M-$240M-$4M$23M-$1M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$15M$54M-$28M$23M-$3M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+50.8%+36.4%+11.0%+60.5%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-122.1%-51.2%-2.4%+48.9%-2.4%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-13.6%-46.0%-1.4%-6.1%-3.3%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-152.4%+10.4%-9.5%+65.8%-8.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+52.5%-12.5%+14.0%-10.9%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+54.6%-44.0%-196.9%+157.1%-94.1%
SWKH leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — MGPI and SWKH each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

On an enterprise value basis, SWKH's 8.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than KRUS's 85.4x.

MetricIPST logoIPSTIP Strategy Holdi…MGPI logoMGPIMGP Ingredients, …KRUS logoKRUSKura Sushi USA, I…SWKH logoSWKHSWK Holdings Corp…WVVI logoWVVIWillamette Valley…
Market CapShares × price$57M$408M$671M$192M$14M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$61M$656M$793M$182M$15.1B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.37x-3.83x-351.88x-75.71x-4.53x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.12.10x7.58x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple85.45x8.94x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue5.61x0.76x2.37x4.64x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.52x0.57x2.90x0.82x0.00x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF5.37x7.05x
Evenly matched — MGPI and SWKH each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

SWKH leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

SWKH delivers a 8.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $-107 for IPST. IPST carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KRUS's 0.74x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SWKH scores 5/9 vs WVVI's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricIPST logoIPSTIP Strategy Holdi…MGPI logoMGPIMGP Ingredients, …KRUS logoKRUSKura Sushi USA, I…SWKH logoSWKHSWK Holdings Corp…WVVI logoWVVIWillamette Valley…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-106.9%-32.1%-1.7%+8.4%-1.8%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-85.4%-19.1%-0.9%+7.3%-1.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital-15.4%-6.7%-1.2%+5.1%-2.6%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-21.7%-8.1%-1.4%+6.8%-3.1%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–944451
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.05x0.37x0.74x0.14x0.23x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$4M$248M$123M-$11M$15.1B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$245,282$18M$47M$43M$411M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$5M$267M$170M$32M$15.5B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense143.02x-40.23x-50.08x7.40x-0.69x
SWKH leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

SWKH leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in SWKH five years ago would be worth $15,781 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $43 for IPST. Over the past 12 months, SWKH leads with a +15.4% total return vs IPST's -97.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SWKH at 13.8% vs IPST's -83.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricIPST logoIPSTIP Strategy Holdi…MGPI logoMGPIMGP Ingredients, …KRUS logoKRUSKura Sushi USA, I…SWKH logoSWKHSWK Holdings Corp…WVVI logoWVVIWillamette Valley…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-82.7%-20.3%+3.8%-7.2%-8.6%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-97.0%-38.0%-6.9%+15.4%-49.3%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.6%-79.8%-12.2%+47.5%-51.0%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.6%-66.0%+57.8%+57.8%-80.8%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.6%-17.3%+187.1%+164.3%-59.3%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-83.7%-41.3%-4.2%+13.8%-21.2%
SWKH leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — SWKH and WVVI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

WVVI is the less volatile stock with a -0.25 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than IPST's 2.40 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SWKH currently trades 88.8% from its 52-week high vs IPST's 1.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricIPST logoIPSTIP Strategy Holdi…MGPI logoMGPIMGP Ingredients, …KRUS logoKRUSKura Sushi USA, I…SWKH logoSWKHSWK Holdings Corp…WVVI logoWVVIWillamette Valley…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.40x0.63x1.36x0.01x-0.25x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$532.00$34.99$95.98$17.90$7.18
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$1.41$16.45$42.62$13.32$2.49
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+1.1%+54.6%+58.7%+88.8%+40.3%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10042.147.643.533.453.5
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded224K279K308K17K3K
Evenly matched — SWKH and WVVI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

WVVI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: MGPI as "Buy", KRUS as "Buy", SWKH as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 51.9% upside for MGPI (target: $29) vs 30.4% for KRUS (target: $73). For income investors, WVVI offers the higher dividend yield at 100.00% vs MGPI's 2.53%.

MetricIPST logoIPSTIP Strategy Holdi…MGPI logoMGPIMGP Ingredients, …KRUS logoKRUSKura Sushi USA, I…SWKH logoSWKHSWK Holdings Corp…WVVI logoWVVIWillamette Valley…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$29.00$73.40
# AnalystsCovering analysts14131
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.5%+100.0%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises24
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.48$194.20
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.0%+0.3%0.0%0.0%0.0%
WVVI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

SWKH leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). WVVI leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 2 tied.

Best OverallSWK Holdings Corporation (SWKH)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

IPST vs MGPI vs KRUS vs SWKH vs WVVI: Key Questions Answered

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is IPST or MGPI or KRUS or SWKH or WVVI a better buy right now?

For growth investors, IP Strategy Holdings, Inc.

(IPST) is the stronger pick with 20. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Willamette Valley Vineyards, Inc. (WVVI). Analysts rate MGP Ingredients, Inc. (MGPI) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — IPST or MGPI or KRUS or SWKH or WVVI?

Over the past 5 years, SWK Holdings Corporation (SWKH) delivered a total return of +57.

8%, compared to -99. 6% for IP Strategy Holdings, Inc. (IPST). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KRUS returned +187. 1% versus IPST's -99. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — IPST or MGPI or KRUS or SWKH or WVVI?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Willamette Valley Vineyards, Inc.

(WVVI) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 25β versus IP Strategy Holdings, Inc. 's 2. 40β — meaning IPST is approximately -1054% more volatile than WVVI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, IP Strategy Holdings, Inc. (IPST) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 74% for Kura Sushi USA, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — IPST or MGPI or KRUS or SWKH or WVVI?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), IP Strategy Holdings, Inc.

(IPST) is pulling ahead at 20. 4% versus -100. 0% for Willamette Valley Vineyards, Inc. (WVVI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Kura Sushi USA, Inc. grew EPS 79. 7% year-over-year, compared to -419. 9% for MGP Ingredients, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, KRUS leads at 26. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — IPST or MGPI or KRUS or SWKH or WVVI?

Kura Sushi USA, Inc.

(KRUS) is the more profitable company, earning -0. 7% net margin versus -1360. 9% for IP Strategy Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps -0. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SWKH leads at 48. 9% versus -122. 1% for IPST. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WVVI leads at 60. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Is IPST or MGPI or KRUS or SWKH or WVVI more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, SWK Holdings Corporation (SWKH) trades at 7.

6x forward P/E versus 12. 1x for MGP Ingredients, Inc. — 4. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MGPI: 51. 9% to $29. 00.

07

Which pays a better dividend — IPST or MGPI or KRUS or SWKH or WVVI?

In this comparison, WVVI (100.

0% yield), MGPI (2. 5% yield) pay a dividend. IPST, KRUS, SWKH do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

08

Is IPST or MGPI or KRUS or SWKH or WVVI better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Willamette Valley Vineyards, Inc.

(WVVI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 25), 100. 0% yield). IP Strategy Holdings, Inc. (IPST) carries a higher beta of 2. 40 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (WVVI: -59. 3%, IPST: -99. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between IPST and MGPI and KRUS and SWKH and WVVI?

These companies operate in different sectors (IPST (Consumer Defensive) and MGPI (Consumer Defensive) and KRUS (Consumer Cyclical) and SWKH (Financial Services) and WVVI (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: IPST is a small-cap high-growth stock; MGPI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KRUS is a small-cap high-growth stock; SWKH is a small-cap quality compounder stock; WVVI is a small-cap income-oriented stock. MGPI, WVVI pay a dividend while IPST, KRUS, SWKH do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

IPST

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Consumer Defensive
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 26%
  • Gross Margin > 30%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MGPI

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Consumer Defensive
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 21%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.0%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

KRUS

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 6%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SWKH

Quality Business

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

WVVI

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Consumer Defensive
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 36%
  • Dividend Yield > 40.0%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform IPST and MGPI and KRUS and SWKH and WVVI on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(IPST: 52.5% · MGPI: -12.5%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.