Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

IQST vs SHEN vs ATUS vs CSCO vs LUMN

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
IQST
iQSTEL Inc.

Telecommunications Services

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$7M
5Y Perf.-76.3%
SHEN
Shenandoah Telecommunications Company

Telecommunications Services

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$898M
5Y Perf.-70.1%
ATUS
Altice USA, Inc.

Telecommunications Services

Communication ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$539M
5Y Perf.-93.6%
CSCO
Cisco Systems, Inc.

Communication Equipment

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$364.95B
5Y Perf.+101.9%
LUMN
Lumen Technologies, Inc.

Telecommunications Services

Communication ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$8.71B
5Y Perf.-13.8%

IQST vs SHEN vs ATUS vs CSCO vs LUMN — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
IQST logoIQST
SHEN logoSHEN
ATUS logoATUS
CSCO logoCSCO
LUMN logoLUMN
IndustryTelecommunications ServicesTelecommunications ServicesTelecommunications ServicesCommunication EquipmentTelecommunications Services
Market Cap$7M$898M$539M$364.95B$8.71B
Revenue (TTM)$332M$266M$8.59B$59.05B$12.12B
Net Income (TTM)$-8M$-36M$-1.87B$11.08B$-1.74B
Gross Margin2.7%37.9%51.6%64.4%35.2%
Operating Margin-0.6%-10.3%-1.3%23.0%-2.6%
Forward P/E22.2x
Total Debt$8M$642M$250M$29.64B$17.71B
Cash & Equiv.$3M$27M$1.01B$9.47B$1.00B

IQST vs SHEN vs ATUS vs CSCO vs LUMNLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

IQST
SHEN
ATUS
CSCO
LUMN
StockMay 20May 26Return
iQSTEL Inc. (IQST)10023.8-76.3%
Shenandoah Telecomm… (SHEN)10029.9-70.1%
Altice USA, Inc. (ATUS)1006.4-93.6%
Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO)100201.9+101.9%
Lumen Technologies,… (LUMN)10086.2-13.8%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: IQST vs SHEN vs ATUS vs CSCO vs LUMN

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: CSCO leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and dividend income and shareholder returns. iQSTEL Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion. SHEN, ATUS, and LUMN also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
IQST
iQSTEL Inc.
The Growth Leader

IQST is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth is your priority.

  • 96.0% revenue growth vs LUMN's -5.4%
Best for: growth
SHEN
Shenandoah Telecommunications Company
The Growth Play

SHEN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 9.1%, EPS growth -120.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.9%
  • Beta 0.89 vs LUMN's 2.74
Best for: growth exposure
ATUS
Altice USA, Inc.
The Value Play

ATUS is the clearest fit if your priority is value.

  • Better valuation composite
Best for: value
CSCO
Cisco Systems, Inc.
The Income Pick

CSCO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.92, yield 1.7%
  • 301.7% 10Y total return vs SHEN's 21.6%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.92, Low D/E 63.3%, current ratio 1.00x
  • Beta 0.92, yield 1.7%, current ratio 1.00x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
LUMN
Lumen Technologies, Inc.
The Momentum Pick

LUMN is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.

  • +100.0% vs IQST's -80.8%
Best for: momentum
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthIQST logoIQST96.0% revenue growth vs LUMN's -5.4%
ValueATUS logoATUSBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsCSCO logoCSCO18.8% margin vs ATUS's -21.8%
Stability / SafetySHEN logoSHENBeta 0.89 vs LUMN's 2.74
DividendsCSCO logoCSCO1.7% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs SHEN's 0.7%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)LUMN logoLUMN+100.0% vs IQST's -80.8%
Efficiency (ROA)CSCO logoCSCO9.0% ROA vs ATUS's -156.2%, ROIC 13.0% vs -0.8%

IQST vs SHEN vs ATUS vs CSCO vs LUMN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

IQSTiQSTEL Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

SHENShenandoah Telecommunications Company
FY 2025
Service
100.0%$351M
ATUSAltice USA, Inc.
FY 2025
Broadband
41.2%$3.5B
Pay TV
30.2%$2.6B
Business Services and Wholesale
17.3%$1.5B
Advertising and News
5.5%$472M
Telephony
3.0%$254M
Mobile
1.9%$165M
Products And Services, Other
0.9%$78M
CSCOCisco Systems, Inc.
FY 2025
Networking
44.5%$28.3B
Service
34.5%$22.0B
Security
12.7%$8.1B
Collaboration
6.5%$4.2B
Observability
1.7%$1.1B
LUMNLumen Technologies, Inc.
FY 2025
Business Segment
79.8%$9.9B
Mass Market Segment
20.2%$2.5B

IQST vs SHEN vs ATUS vs CSCO vs LUMN — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLCSCOLAGGINGATUS

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

CSCO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

CSCO is the larger business by revenue, generating $59.1B annually — 221.8x SHEN's $266M. CSCO is the more profitable business, keeping 18.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ATUS's -21.8%. On growth, IQST holds the edge at +89.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricIQST logoIQSTiQSTEL Inc.SHEN logoSHENShenandoah Teleco…ATUS logoATUSAltice USA, Inc.CSCO logoCSCOCisco Systems, In…LUMN logoLUMNLumen Technologie…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$332M$266M$8.6B$59.1B$12.1B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$1M$104M$1.6B$16.1B$2.4B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$8M-$36M-$1.9B$11.1B-$1.7B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$3M-$276M$163M$12.8B$5.4B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+2.7%+37.9%+51.6%+64.4%+35.2%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-0.6%-10.3%-1.3%+23.0%-2.6%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-2.5%-13.7%-21.8%+18.8%-14.3%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-1.0%-103.5%+1.9%+21.8%+44.9%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+89.6%-100.0%-2.3%+9.7%-8.9%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-18.2%-25.0%+29.5%0.0%
CSCO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — IQST and ATUS each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

On an enterprise value basis, ATUS's 7.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CSCO's 26.3x.

MetricIQST logoIQSTiQSTEL Inc.SHEN logoSHENShenandoah Teleco…ATUS logoATUSAltice USA, Inc.CSCO logoCSCOCisco Systems, In…LUMN logoLUMNLumen Technologie…
Market CapShares × price$7M$898M$539M$365.0B$8.7B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$12M$1.5B$25.6B$385.1B$25.4B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-41.64x-22.86x-8.59x36.14x-4.83x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.22.18x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple13.80x7.70x26.34x9.91x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.02x2.51x0.06x6.44x0.70x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share20.98x0.92x7.87x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF3.61x27.46x23.49x
Evenly matched — IQST and ATUS each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

CSCO leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

CSCO delivers a 23.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $23 in annual profit, vs $-79 for LUMN. CSCO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.63x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to IQST's 0.68x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CSCO scores 8/9 vs IQST's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricIQST logoIQSTiQSTEL Inc.SHEN logoSHENShenandoah Teleco…ATUS logoATUSAltice USA, Inc.CSCO logoCSCOCisco Systems, In…LUMN logoLUMNLumen Technologie…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-59.6%-3.7%+23.2%-79.4%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-15.1%-2.0%-156.2%+9.0%-5.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital-5.0%-1.1%-0.8%+13.0%-0.8%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-7.1%-1.3%-0.8%+13.7%-0.6%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–913584
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.68x0.66x0.63x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$6M$614M-$762M$20.2B$16.7B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$3M$27M$1.0B$9.5B$1.0B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$8M$642M$250M$29.6B$17.7B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-0.39x-0.65x9.64x-1.12x
CSCO leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

LUMN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in CSCO five years ago would be worth $18,718 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $294 for IQST. Over the past 12 months, LUMN leads with a +100.0% total return vs IQST's -80.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LUMN at 54.4% vs IQST's -46.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricIQST logoIQSTiQSTEL Inc.SHEN logoSHENShenandoah Teleco…ATUS logoATUSAltice USA, Inc.CSCO logoCSCOCisco Systems, In…LUMN logoLUMNLumen Technologie…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-55.1%+43.5%+9.9%+22.3%+10.0%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-80.8%+41.3%-28.7%+57.5%+100.0%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-84.4%-13.6%-37.0%+109.3%+267.8%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-97.1%-27.9%-94.9%+87.2%-28.8%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.3%+21.6%-88.0%+301.7%-35.7%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-46.2%-4.8%-14.3%+27.9%+54.4%
LUMN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — SHEN and CSCO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

SHEN is the less volatile stock with a 0.89 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LUMN's 2.74 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CSCO currently trades 97.3% from its 52-week high vs IQST's 7.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricIQST logoIQSTiQSTEL Inc.SHEN logoSHENShenandoah Teleco…ATUS logoATUSAltice USA, Inc.CSCO logoCSCOCisco Systems, In…LUMN logoLUMNLumen Technologie…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.49x0.89x1.80x0.90x2.83x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$19.00$17.34$2.98$94.72$11.95
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$1.28$9.66$1.59$59.07$3.37
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+7.2%+93.6%+63.4%+97.3%+70.8%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10042.955.257.963.973.4
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded358K300K956K18.9M12.5M
Evenly matched — SHEN and CSCO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

CSCO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: IQST as "Buy", SHEN as "Buy", ATUS as "Buy", CSCO as "Buy", LUMN as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 78.7% upside for SHEN (target: $29) vs -16.3% for LUMN (target: $7). For income investors, CSCO offers the higher dividend yield at 1.75% vs SHEN's 0.72%.

MetricIQST logoIQSTiQSTEL Inc.SHEN logoSHENShenandoah Teleco…ATUS logoATUSAltice USA, Inc.CSCO logoCSCOCisco Systems, In…LUMN logoLUMNLumen Technologie…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$29.00$2.50$96.50$7.08
# AnalystsCovering analysts18367328
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.7%+1.7%+0.0%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises33150
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.12$1.61$0.00
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%0.0%+2.0%0.0%
CSCO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

CSCO leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). LUMN leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.

Best OverallCisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

IQST vs SHEN vs ATUS vs CSCO vs LUMN: Key Questions Answered

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is IQST or SHEN or ATUS or CSCO or LUMN a better buy right now?

For growth investors, iQSTEL Inc.

(IQST) is the stronger pick with 96. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 4% for Lumen Technologies, Inc. (LUMN). Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO) offers the better valuation at 36. 1x trailing P/E (22. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate iQSTEL Inc. (IQST) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — IQST or SHEN or ATUS or CSCO or LUMN?

Over the past 5 years, Cisco Systems, Inc.

(CSCO) delivered a total return of +87. 2%, compared to -97. 1% for iQSTEL Inc. (IQST). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CSCO returned +318. 3% versus IQST's -99. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — IQST or SHEN or ATUS or CSCO or LUMN?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Shenandoah Telecommunications Company (SHEN) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

89β versus Lumen Technologies, Inc. 's 2. 83β — meaning LUMN is approximately 220% more volatile than SHEN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 63% versus 68% for iQSTEL Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — IQST or SHEN or ATUS or CSCO or LUMN?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), iQSTEL Inc.

(IQST) is pulling ahead at 96. 0% versus -5. 4% for Lumen Technologies, Inc. (LUMN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Cisco Systems, Inc. grew EPS 0. 4% year-over-year, compared to -30. 4% for Lumen Technologies, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, IQST leads at 63. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — IQST or SHEN or ATUS or CSCO or LUMN?

Cisco Systems, Inc.

(CSCO) is the more profitable company, earning 18. 0% net margin versus -21. 8% for Altice USA, Inc. — meaning it keeps 18. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CSCO leads at 20. 8% versus -6. 2% for SHEN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CSCO leads at 64. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Is IQST or SHEN or ATUS or CSCO or LUMN more undervalued right now?

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SHEN: 78.

7% to $29. 00.

07

Which pays a better dividend — IQST or SHEN or ATUS or CSCO or LUMN?

In this comparison, CSCO (1.

7% yield), SHEN (0. 7% yield) pay a dividend. IQST, ATUS, LUMN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

08

Is IQST or SHEN or ATUS or CSCO or LUMN better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Cisco Systems, Inc.

(CSCO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 90), 1. 7% yield, +318. 3% 10Y return). Lumen Technologies, Inc. (LUMN) carries a higher beta of 2. 83 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CSCO: +318. 3%, LUMN: -35. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between IQST and SHEN and ATUS and CSCO and LUMN?

These companies operate in different sectors (IQST (Communication Services) and SHEN (Communication Services) and ATUS (Communication Services) and CSCO (Technology) and LUMN (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: IQST is a small-cap high-growth stock; SHEN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ATUS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CSCO is a large-cap quality compounder stock; LUMN is a small-cap quality compounder stock. SHEN, CSCO pay a dividend while IQST, ATUS, LUMN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

IQST

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 44%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SHEN

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 22%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ATUS

Quality Business

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 30%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CSCO

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 11%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

LUMN

Quality Business

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 21%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform IQST and SHEN and ATUS and CSCO and LUMN on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(IQST: 89.6% · SHEN: -100.0%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.