Telecommunications Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
IQST vs SHEN vs ATUS vs CSCO vs LUMN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Telecommunications Services
Telecommunications Services
Communication Equipment
Telecommunications Services
IQST vs SHEN vs ATUS vs CSCO vs LUMN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Telecommunications Services | Telecommunications Services | Telecommunications Services | Communication Equipment | Telecommunications Services |
| Market Cap | $7M | $898M | $539M | $364.95B | $8.71B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $332M | $266M | $8.59B | $59.05B | $12.12B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-8M | $-36M | $-1.87B | $11.08B | $-1.74B |
| Gross Margin | 2.7% | 37.9% | 51.6% | 64.4% | 35.2% |
| Operating Margin | -0.6% | -10.3% | -1.3% | 23.0% | -2.6% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | — | 22.2x | — |
| Total Debt | $8M | $642M | $250M | $29.64B | $17.71B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3M | $27M | $1.01B | $9.47B | $1.00B |
IQST vs SHEN vs ATUS vs CSCO vs LUMN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| iQSTEL Inc. (IQST) | 100 | 23.8 | -76.3% |
| Shenandoah Telecomm… (SHEN) | 100 | 29.9 | -70.1% |
| Altice USA, Inc. (ATUS) | 100 | 6.4 | -93.6% |
| Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO) | 100 | 201.9 | +101.9% |
| Lumen Technologies,… (LUMN) | 100 | 86.2 | -13.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: IQST vs SHEN vs ATUS vs CSCO vs LUMN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
IQST is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth is your priority.
- 96.0% revenue growth vs LUMN's -5.4%
SHEN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 9.1%, EPS growth -120.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.9%
- Beta 0.89 vs LUMN's 2.74
ATUS is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Better valuation composite
CSCO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.92, yield 1.7%
- 301.7% 10Y total return vs SHEN's 21.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.92, Low D/E 63.3%, current ratio 1.00x
- Beta 0.92, yield 1.7%, current ratio 1.00x
LUMN is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +100.0% vs IQST's -80.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 96.0% revenue growth vs LUMN's -5.4% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 18.8% margin vs ATUS's -21.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.89 vs LUMN's 2.74 | |
| Dividends | 1.7% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs SHEN's 0.7%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +100.0% vs IQST's -80.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.0% ROA vs ATUS's -156.2%, ROIC 13.0% vs -0.8% |
IQST vs SHEN vs ATUS vs CSCO vs LUMN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
IQST vs SHEN vs ATUS vs CSCO vs LUMN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CSCO leads in 3 of 6 categories
LUMN leads 1 • IQST leads 0 • SHEN leads 0 • ATUS leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CSCO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CSCO is the larger business by revenue, generating $59.1B annually — 221.8x SHEN's $266M. CSCO is the more profitable business, keeping 18.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ATUS's -21.8%. On growth, IQST holds the edge at +89.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $332M | $266M | $8.6B | $59.1B | $12.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$1M | $104M | $1.6B | $16.1B | $2.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$8M | -$36M | -$1.9B | $11.1B | -$1.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$3M | -$276M | $163M | $12.8B | $5.4B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +2.7% | +37.9% | +51.6% | +64.4% | +35.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -0.6% | -10.3% | -1.3% | +23.0% | -2.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.5% | -13.7% | -21.8% | +18.8% | -14.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -1.0% | -103.5% | +1.9% | +21.8% | +44.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +89.6% | -100.0% | -2.3% | +9.7% | -8.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -18.2% | -25.0% | +29.5% | 0.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — IQST and ATUS each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, ATUS's 7.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CSCO's 26.3x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $7M | $898M | $539M | $365.0B | $8.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $12M | $1.5B | $25.6B | $385.1B | $25.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -41.64x | -22.86x | -8.59x | 36.14x | -4.83x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | 22.18x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 13.80x | 7.70x | 26.34x | 9.91x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.02x | 2.51x | 0.06x | 6.44x | 0.70x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 20.98x | 0.92x | — | 7.87x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 3.61x | 27.46x | 23.49x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CSCO leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CSCO delivers a 23.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $23 in annual profit, vs $-79 for LUMN. CSCO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.63x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to IQST's 0.68x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CSCO scores 8/9 vs IQST's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -59.6% | -3.7% | — | +23.2% | -79.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -15.1% | -2.0% | -156.2% | +9.0% | -5.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -5.0% | -1.1% | -0.8% | +13.0% | -0.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -7.1% | -1.3% | -0.8% | +13.7% | -0.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.68x | 0.66x | — | 0.63x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $6M | $614M | -$762M | $20.2B | $16.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3M | $27M | $1.0B | $9.5B | $1.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $8M | $642M | $250M | $29.6B | $17.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.39x | -0.65x | — | 9.64x | -1.12x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LUMN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CSCO five years ago would be worth $18,718 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $294 for IQST. Over the past 12 months, LUMN leads with a +100.0% total return vs IQST's -80.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LUMN at 54.4% vs IQST's -46.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -55.1% | +43.5% | +9.9% | +22.3% | +10.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -80.8% | +41.3% | -28.7% | +57.5% | +100.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -84.4% | -13.6% | -37.0% | +109.3% | +267.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.1% | -27.9% | -94.9% | +87.2% | -28.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.3% | +21.6% | -88.0% | +301.7% | -35.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -46.2% | -4.8% | -14.3% | +27.9% | +54.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SHEN and CSCO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SHEN is the less volatile stock with a 0.89 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LUMN's 2.74 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CSCO currently trades 97.3% from its 52-week high vs IQST's 7.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.49x | 0.89x | 1.80x | 0.90x | 2.83x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $19.00 | $17.34 | $2.98 | $94.72 | $11.95 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.28 | $9.66 | $1.59 | $59.07 | $3.37 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +7.2% | +93.6% | +63.4% | +97.3% | +70.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 42.9 | 55.2 | 57.9 | 63.9 | 73.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 358K | 300K | 956K | 18.9M | 12.5M |
Analyst Outlook
CSCO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: IQST as "Buy", SHEN as "Buy", ATUS as "Buy", CSCO as "Buy", LUMN as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 78.7% upside for SHEN (target: $29) vs -16.3% for LUMN (target: $7). For income investors, CSCO offers the higher dividend yield at 1.75% vs SHEN's 0.72%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $29.00 | $2.50 | $96.50 | $7.08 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 8 | 36 | 73 | 28 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.7% | — | +1.7% | +0.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 3 | 3 | 15 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.12 | — | $1.61 | $0.00 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +2.0% | 0.0% |
CSCO leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). LUMN leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
IQST vs SHEN vs ATUS vs CSCO vs LUMN: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is IQST or SHEN or ATUS or CSCO or LUMN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, iQSTEL Inc.
(IQST) is the stronger pick with 96. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 4% for Lumen Technologies, Inc. (LUMN). Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO) offers the better valuation at 36. 1x trailing P/E (22. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate iQSTEL Inc. (IQST) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — IQST or SHEN or ATUS or CSCO or LUMN?
Over the past 5 years, Cisco Systems, Inc.
(CSCO) delivered a total return of +87. 2%, compared to -97. 1% for iQSTEL Inc. (IQST). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CSCO returned +318. 3% versus IQST's -99. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — IQST or SHEN or ATUS or CSCO or LUMN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Shenandoah Telecommunications Company (SHEN) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
89β versus Lumen Technologies, Inc. 's 2. 83β — meaning LUMN is approximately 220% more volatile than SHEN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 63% versus 68% for iQSTEL Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — IQST or SHEN or ATUS or CSCO or LUMN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), iQSTEL Inc.
(IQST) is pulling ahead at 96. 0% versus -5. 4% for Lumen Technologies, Inc. (LUMN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Cisco Systems, Inc. grew EPS 0. 4% year-over-year, compared to -30. 4% for Lumen Technologies, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, IQST leads at 63. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — IQST or SHEN or ATUS or CSCO or LUMN?
Cisco Systems, Inc.
(CSCO) is the more profitable company, earning 18. 0% net margin versus -21. 8% for Altice USA, Inc. — meaning it keeps 18. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CSCO leads at 20. 8% versus -6. 2% for SHEN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CSCO leads at 64. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is IQST or SHEN or ATUS or CSCO or LUMN more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SHEN: 78.
7% to $29. 00.
07Which pays a better dividend — IQST or SHEN or ATUS or CSCO or LUMN?
In this comparison, CSCO (1.
7% yield), SHEN (0. 7% yield) pay a dividend. IQST, ATUS, LUMN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is IQST or SHEN or ATUS or CSCO or LUMN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Cisco Systems, Inc.
(CSCO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 90), 1. 7% yield, +318. 3% 10Y return). Lumen Technologies, Inc. (LUMN) carries a higher beta of 2. 83 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CSCO: +318. 3%, LUMN: -35. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between IQST and SHEN and ATUS and CSCO and LUMN?
These companies operate in different sectors (IQST (Communication Services) and SHEN (Communication Services) and ATUS (Communication Services) and CSCO (Technology) and LUMN (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: IQST is a small-cap high-growth stock; SHEN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ATUS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CSCO is a large-cap quality compounder stock; LUMN is a small-cap quality compounder stock. SHEN, CSCO pay a dividend while IQST, ATUS, LUMN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Gross Margin > 22%
- Dividend Yield > 0.5%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.