IR
Ingersoll Rand Inc.
Industrial - Machinery
Market Cap$30.35B
5Y Perf.+174.8%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
IR vs HON
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
HON
Honeywell International Inc.
Conglomerates
Market Cap$136.91B
5Y Perf.+48.1%
IR vs HON — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | IR | HON |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial - Machinery | Conglomerates |
| Market Cap | $30.35B | $136.91B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $7.78B | $36.76B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $587M | $4.10B |
| Gross Margin | 38.2% | 36.9% |
| Operating Margin | 18.1% | 14.9% |
| Forward P/E | 22.0x | 20.5x |
| Total Debt | $4.78B | $34.58B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.25B | $12.49B |
IR vs HON — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
IR
HON
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ingersoll Rand Inc. (IR) | 100 | 274.8 | +174.8% |
| Honeywell Internati… (HON) | 100 | 148.1 | +48.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: IR vs HON
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: HON leads in 7 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
IR
Ingersoll Rand Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder
IR is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 299.5% 10Y total return vs HON's 135.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.48, Low D/E 47.1%, current ratio 2.06x
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
HON
Honeywell International Inc.
The Income Pick
HON carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.74, yield 2.1%
- Rev growth 7.8%, EPS growth -15.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 1.8%
- Beta 0.74, yield 2.1%, current ratio 1.32x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | HON | 7.8% revenue growth vs IR's 5.7% |
| Value | HON | Lower P/E (20.5x vs 22.0x) |
| Quality / Margins | HON | 11.2% margin vs IR's 7.5% |
| Stability / Safety | HON | Beta 0.74 vs IR's 1.48 |
| Dividends | HON | 2.1% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs IR's 0.1% |
| Momentum (1Y) | HON | +2.8% vs IR's -0.4% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | HON | 5.3% ROA vs IR's 3.2%, ROIC 12.6% vs 7.8% |
IR vs HON — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2025
IR vs HON — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLIRLAGGINGHON
HONHoneywell Internation…
2leads
IRIngersoll Rand Inc.
2leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs HONMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
IR5/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
Tied
—
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
Tied
—
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
IR4/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
HON2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
HON2/2
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HON is the larger business by revenue, generating $36.8B annually — 4.7x IR's $7.8B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 11.2% (HON) to 7.5% (IR). On growth, IR holds the edge at +7.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | IRIngersoll Rand In… | HONHoneywell Interna… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $7.8B | $36.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.9B | $6.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $587M | $4.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.2B | $4.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +38.2% | +36.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +18.1% | +14.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +7.5% | +11.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +14.9% | +11.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +7.6% | -6.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.5% | -41.9% |
IR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — IR and HON each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 29.4x trailing earnings, HON trades at a 45% valuation discount to IR's 53.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, IR's 17.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than HON's 20.0x.
| Metric | IRIngersoll Rand In… | HONHoneywell Interna… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $30.4B | $136.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $33.9B | $159.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 53.45x | 29.36x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 22.05x | 20.52x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 15.99x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 17.61x | 19.99x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.97x | 3.66x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.06x | 9.00x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 24.88x | 25.39x |
Evenly matched — IR and HON each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — IR and HON each lead in 4 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HON delivers a 23.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $23 in annual profit, vs $6 for IR. IR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.47x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HON's 2.24x.
| Metric | IRIngersoll Rand In… | HONHoneywell Interna… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.8% | +23.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.2% | +5.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.8% | +12.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.7% | +12.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.47x | 2.24x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3.5B | $22.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.2B | $12.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4.8B | $34.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4.53x | 3.92x |
Evenly matched — IR and HON each lead in 4 of 8 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
IR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IR five years ago would be worth $15,409 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,326 for HON. Over the past 12 months, HON leads with a +2.8% total return vs IR's -0.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IR at 9.7% vs HON's 5.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | IRIngersoll Rand In… | HONHoneywell Interna… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -2.8% | +10.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -0.4% | +2.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +31.9% | +16.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +54.1% | +3.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +299.5% | +135.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +9.7% | +5.1% |
IR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HON leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HON is the less volatile stock with a 0.74 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than IR's 1.48 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HON currently trades 87.1% from its 52-week high vs IR's 76.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | IRIngersoll Rand In… | HONHoneywell Interna… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.48x | 0.74x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $100.96 | $248.18 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $72.45 | $186.76 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +76.8% | +87.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 43.3 | 45.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.1M | 3.7M |
HON leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
HON leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates IR as "Buy" and HON as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 28.4% upside for IR (target: $100) vs 12.8% for HON (target: $244). For income investors, HON offers the higher dividend yield at 2.14% vs IR's 0.10%.
| Metric | IRIngersoll Rand In… | HONHoneywell Interna… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $99.50 | $243.83 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 15 | 28 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.1% | +2.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.08 | $4.63 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.4% | +2.8% |
HON leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
IR leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). HON leads in 2 (Risk & Volatility, Analyst Outlook). 2 tied.
Best OverallIngersoll Rand Inc. (IR)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
IR vs HON: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is IR or HON a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Honeywell International Inc.
(HON) is the stronger pick with 7. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 7% for Ingersoll Rand Inc. (IR). Honeywell International Inc. (HON) offers the better valuation at 29. 4x trailing P/E (20. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Ingersoll Rand Inc. (IR) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — IR or HON?
On trailing P/E, Honeywell International Inc.
(HON) is the cheapest at 29. 4x versus Ingersoll Rand Inc. at 53. 4x. On forward P/E, Honeywell International Inc. is actually cheaper at 20. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — IR or HON?
Over the past 5 years, Ingersoll Rand Inc.
(IR) delivered a total return of +54. 1%, compared to +3. 3% for Honeywell International Inc. (HON). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IR returned +299. 5% versus HON's +135. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — IR or HON?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Honeywell International Inc.
(HON) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 74β versus Ingersoll Rand Inc. 's 1. 48β — meaning IR is approximately 100% more volatile than HON relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Ingersoll Rand Inc. (IR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 47% versus 2% for Honeywell International Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — IR or HON?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Honeywell International Inc.
(HON) is pulling ahead at 7. 8% versus 5. 7% for Ingersoll Rand Inc. (IR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Honeywell International Inc. grew EPS -15. 5% year-over-year, compared to -29. 6% for Ingersoll Rand Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, IR leads at 8. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — IR or HON?
Honeywell International Inc.
(HON) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 6% net margin versus 7. 6% for Ingersoll Rand Inc. — meaning it keeps 12. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IR leads at 18. 5% versus 17. 5% for HON. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IR leads at 38. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is IR or HON more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Honeywell International Inc.
(HON) trades at 20. 5x forward P/E versus 22. 0x for Ingersoll Rand Inc. — 1. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IR: 28. 4% to $99. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — IR or HON?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Honeywell International Inc. (HON) offers the highest yield at 2. 1%, versus 0. 1% for Ingersoll Rand Inc. (IR).
09Is IR or HON better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Honeywell International Inc.
(HON) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 74), 2. 1% yield, +135. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (HON: +135. 1%, IR: +299. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between IR and HON?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
HON pays a dividend while IR does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(IR: 7.6% · HON: -6.9%)Net Margin>
%
(IR: 7.5% · HON: 11.2%)P/E Ratio<
x
(IR: 53.4x · HON: 29.4x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.