Conglomerates
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
IRS vs SUPV
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
IRS vs SUPV — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Conglomerates | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $1.13B | $751M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $502.69B | $2.33T |
| Net Income (TTM) | $374.35B | $-48.45B |
| Gross Margin | 61.2% | 39.5% |
| Operating Margin | 101.4% | -4.8% |
| Forward P/E | 0.0x | 0.0x |
| Total Debt | $455.48B | $1.05T |
| Cash & Equiv. | $36.66B | $1.60T |
IRS vs SUPV — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| IRSA Inversiones y … (IRS) | 100 | 449.4 | +349.4% |
| Grupo Supervielle S… (SUPV) | 100 | 435.5 | +335.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: IRS vs SUPV
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
IRS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.30, yield 6.2%
- 43.7% 10Y total return vs SUPV's -18.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.30, Low D/E 36.8%, current ratio 0.71x
SUPV is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 13.7%, EPS growth -145.9%
- 13.7% NII/revenue growth vs IRS's 7.1%
- Lower P/E (0.0x vs 0.0x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 13.7% NII/revenue growth vs IRS's 7.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (0.0x vs 0.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 74.5% margin vs SUPV's -2.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.30 vs SUPV's 2.51, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 6.2% yield, vs SUPV's 3.7% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +11.6% vs SUPV's -39.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.2% ROA vs SUPV's -0.7%, ROIC 1.5% vs -5.7% |
IRS vs SUPV — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IRS leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SUPV is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.33T annually — 4.6x IRS's $502.7B. IRS is the more profitable business, keeping 74.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SUPV's -2.4%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $502.7B | $2.33T |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $520.2B | -$73.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $374.4B | -$48.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $289.8B | -$725.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +61.2% | +39.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +101.4% | -4.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +74.5% | -2.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +57.6% | -48.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +0.9% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -4.8% | -157.4% |
Valuation Metrics
SUPV leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.1B | $751M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.4B | $356M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 1.10x | -18.25x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 0.01x | 0.01x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.01x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 47.21x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.21x | 0.45x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.26x | 1.03x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 5.61x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
IRS leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
IRS delivers a 25.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $26 in annual profit, vs $-5 for SUPV. IRS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.37x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SUPV's 1.04x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IRS scores 4/9 vs SUPV's 2/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +25.5% | -5.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +12.2% | -0.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.5% | -5.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.6% | -2.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.37x | 1.04x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $418.8B | -$549.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $36.7B | $1.60T |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $455.5B | $1.05T |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 10.01x | -0.11x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — IRS and SUPV each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SUPV five years ago would be worth $49,964 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $47,054 for IRS. Over the past 12 months, IRS leads with a +11.6% total return vs SUPV's -39.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SUPV at 57.8% vs IRS's 47.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -11.9% | -25.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +11.6% | -39.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +218.3% | +292.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +370.5% | +399.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +43.7% | -18.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +47.1% | +57.8% |
Risk & Volatility
IRS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
IRS is the less volatile stock with a 1.30 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SUPV's 2.51 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IRS currently trades 76.5% from its 52-week high vs SUPV's 50.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.30x | 2.51x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $19.14 | $16.90 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $10.87 | $4.54 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +76.5% | +50.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.1 | 46.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 184K | 834K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — IRS and SUPV each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates IRS as "Buy" and SUPV as "Sell". Consensus price targets imply -11.3% upside for IRS (target: $13) vs -18.4% for SUPV (target: $7). For income investors, IRS offers the higher dividend yield at 6.16% vs SUPV's 3.67%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Sell |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $13.00 | $7.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 8 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +6.2% | +3.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1253.80 | $437.61 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.5% | 0.0% |
IRS leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SUPV leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
IRS vs SUPV: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is IRS or SUPV a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Grupo Supervielle S.
A. (SUPV) is the stronger pick with 13. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 7. 1% for IRSA Inversiones y Representaciones Sociedad Anónima (IRS). IRSA Inversiones y Representaciones Sociedad Anónima (IRS) offers the better valuation at 1. 1x trailing P/E (0. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate IRSA Inversiones y Representaciones Sociedad Anónima (IRS) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — IRS or SUPV?
On forward P/E, Grupo Supervielle S.
A. is actually cheaper at 0. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — IRS or SUPV?
Over the past 5 years, Grupo Supervielle S.
A. (SUPV) delivered a total return of +399. 6%, compared to +370. 5% for IRSA Inversiones y Representaciones Sociedad Anónima (IRS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IRS returned +43. 7% versus SUPV's -18. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — IRS or SUPV?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), IRSA Inversiones y Representaciones Sociedad Anónima (IRS) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
30β versus Grupo Supervielle S. A. 's 2. 51β — meaning SUPV is approximately 94% more volatile than IRS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, IRSA Inversiones y Representaciones Sociedad Anónima (IRS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 37% versus 104% for Grupo Supervielle S. A. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — IRS or SUPV?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Grupo Supervielle S.
A. (SUPV) is pulling ahead at 13. 7% versus 7. 1% for IRSA Inversiones y Representaciones Sociedad Anónima (IRS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: IRSA Inversiones y Representaciones Sociedad Anónima grew EPS 48. 2% year-over-year, compared to -145. 9% for Grupo Supervielle S. A.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — IRS or SUPV?
IRSA Inversiones y Representaciones Sociedad Anónima (IRS) is the more profitable company, earning 22.
3% net margin versus -2. 4% for Grupo Supervielle S. A. — meaning it keeps 22. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IRS leads at 6. 6% versus -4. 8% for SUPV. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IRS leads at 60. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is IRS or SUPV more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Grupo Supervielle S.
A. (SUPV) trades at 0. 0x forward P/E versus 0. 0x for IRSA Inversiones y Representaciones Sociedad Anónima — 0. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IRS: -11. 3% to $13. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — IRS or SUPV?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
IRSA Inversiones y Representaciones Sociedad Anónima (IRS) offers the highest yield at 6. 2%, versus 3. 7% for Grupo Supervielle S. A. (SUPV).
09Is IRS or SUPV better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, IRSA Inversiones y Representaciones Sociedad Anónima (IRS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
30), 6. 2% yield). Grupo Supervielle S. A. (SUPV) carries a higher beta of 2. 51 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (IRS: +43. 7%, SUPV: -18. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between IRS and SUPV?
These companies operate in different sectors (IRS (Industrials) and SUPV (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: IRS is a small-cap deep-value stock; SUPV is a small-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.