Aerospace & Defense
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
ISSC vs SPIR vs BA vs RKLB vs RTX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Business Services
Aerospace & Defense
Aerospace & Defense
Aerospace & Defense
ISSC vs SPIR vs BA vs RKLB vs RTX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Aerospace & Defense | Specialty Business Services | Aerospace & Defense | Aerospace & Defense | Aerospace & Defense |
| Market Cap | $380M | $607.77B | $187.11B | $60.77B | $237.14B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $90M | $72M | $92.18B | $680M | $90.37B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $19M | $-25.02B | $2.27B | $-183M | $7.26B |
| Gross Margin | 50.8% | 40.8% | 4.8% | 36.6% | 20.2% |
| Operating Margin | 27.8% | -121.4% | -5.9% | -33.2% | 10.4% |
| Forward P/E | 27.1x | 11.5x | 95.7x | — | 25.4x |
| Total Debt | $24M | $8.76B | $54.43B | $254M | $39.51B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3M | $24.81B | $10.92B | $829M | $7.43B |
ISSC vs SPIR vs BA vs RKLB vs RTX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Innovative Solution… (ISSC) | 100 | 320.2 | +220.2% |
| Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) | 100 | 23.5 | -76.5% |
| The Boeing Company (BA) | 100 | 112.6 | +12.6% |
| Rocket Lab USA, Inc. (RKLB) | 100 | 1060.8 | +960.8% |
| RTX Corporation (RTX) | 100 | 245.5 | +145.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ISSC vs SPIR vs BA vs RKLB vs RTX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ISSC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 78.6%, EPS growth 120.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 44.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 2.36, Low D/E 37.4%, current ratio 3.04x
- 78.6% revenue growth vs SPIR's -35.2%
- 21.0% margin vs SPIR's -349.6%
SPIR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.
- Better valuation composite
Among these 5 stocks, BA doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
RKLB is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 9.8% 10Y total return vs ISSC's 7.1%
- +356.9% vs BA's +23.8%
RTX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.50, yield 1.5%
- Beta 0.50, yield 1.5%, current ratio 1.03x
- Beta 0.50 vs SPIR's 3.10
- 1.5% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs BA's 0.2%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 78.6% revenue growth vs SPIR's -35.2% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 21.0% margin vs SPIR's -349.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.50 vs SPIR's 3.10 | |
| Dividends | 1.5% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs BA's 0.2%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +356.9% vs BA's +23.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 17.2% ROA vs SPIR's -47.3%, ROIC 18.8% vs -0.1% |
ISSC vs SPIR vs BA vs RKLB vs RTX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ISSC vs SPIR vs BA vs RKLB vs RTX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ISSC leads in 2 of 6 categories
RTX leads 2 • RKLB leads 1 • SPIR leads 0 • BA leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ISSC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BA is the larger business by revenue, generating $92.2B annually — 1288.3x SPIR's $72M. ISSC is the more profitable business, keeping 21.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SPIR's -349.6%. On growth, RKLB holds the edge at +63.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $90M | $72M | $92.2B | $680M | $90.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $27M | -$74M | -$3.4B | -$191M | $13.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $19M | -$25.0B | $2.3B | -$183M | $7.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $12M | -$16.2B | -$1.0B | -$316M | $8.4B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +50.8% | +40.8% | +4.8% | +36.6% | +20.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +27.8% | -121.4% | -5.9% | -33.2% | +10.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +21.0% | -349.6% | +2.5% | -26.9% | +8.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +13.6% | -227.0% | -1.1% | -46.5% | +9.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +36.6% | -26.9% | +14.0% | +63.5% | +8.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.3% | +59.5% | +31.3% | +41.7% | +32.5% |
Valuation Metrics
RTX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.5x trailing earnings, SPIR trades at a 88% valuation discount to BA's 95.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ISSC's 16.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than RTX's 20.9x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $380M | $607.8B | $187.1B | $60.8B | $237.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $401M | $591.7B | $230.6B | $60.2B | $269.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 24.27x | 11.48x | 95.71x | -285.26x | 35.50x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 27.12x | — | — | — | 25.42x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.68x | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 16.85x | — | — | — | 20.89x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.50x | 8493.94x | 2.09x | 100.98x | 2.68x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 5.89x | 5.23x | 33.16x | 32.53x | 3.56x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 55.92x | — | — | — | 29.87x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ISSC leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BA delivers a 2.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $3 in annual profit, vs $-88 for SPIR. SPIR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.08x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BA's 9.97x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RTX scores 8/9 vs RKLB's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +27.6% | -88.4% | +2.9% | -12.3% | +10.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +17.2% | -47.3% | +1.4% | -8.2% | +4.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +18.8% | -0.1% | -9.5% | -19.9% | +6.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +24.6% | -0.1% | -9.1% | -16.1% | +7.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.37x | 0.08x | 9.97x | 0.15x | 0.59x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $21M | -$16.1B | $43.5B | -$575M | $32.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3M | $24.8B | $10.9B | $829M | $7.4B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $24M | $8.8B | $54.4B | $254M | $39.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 25.35x | 9.20x | 1.89x | -31.68x | 5.58x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
RKLB leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in RKLB five years ago would be worth $106,611 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,337 for SPIR. Over the past 12 months, RKLB leads with a +356.9% total return vs BA's +23.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RKLB at 2.0% vs BA's 6.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +13.9% | +136.7% | +4.2% | +38.9% | -5.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +205.6% | +93.8% | +23.8% | +356.9% | +39.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +227.1% | +242.0% | +20.3% | +2641.4% | +92.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +252.2% | -76.6% | +1.9% | +966.1% | +121.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +712.7% | -75.7% | +99.4% | +983.2% | +233.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +48.4% | +50.7% | +6.4% | +2.0% | +24.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — RKLB and RTX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
RTX is the less volatile stock with a 0.50 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SPIR's 3.10 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RKLB currently trades 100.0% from its 52-week high vs ISSC's 69.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.36x | 3.10x | 0.99x | 3.08x | 0.50x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $30.94 | $23.59 | $254.35 | $105.56 | $214.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $6.82 | $6.60 | $176.77 | $20.23 | $126.03 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +69.0% | +78.4% | +93.3% | +100.0% | +82.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 45.6 | 47.7 | 57.8 | 50.8 | 37.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 611K | 1.6M | 6.6M | 23.0M | 5.3M |
Analyst Outlook
RTX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ISSC as "Buy", SPIR as "Buy", BA as "Buy", RKLB as "Buy", RTX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 27.7% upside for RTX (target: $225) vs -11.8% for RKLB (target: $93). For income investors, RTX offers the higher dividend yield at 1.50% vs BA's 0.18%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $23.00 | $17.25 | $267.36 | $93.14 | $224.89 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 12 | 54 | 18 | 26 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.2% | — | +1.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — | 0 | — | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.43 | — | $2.63 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.0% |
ISSC leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). RTX leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
ISSC vs SPIR vs BA vs RKLB vs RTX: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ISSC or SPIR or BA or RKLB or RTX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Innovative Solutions and Support, Inc.
(ISSC) is the stronger pick with 78. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -35. 2% for Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR). Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) offers the better valuation at 11. 5x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Innovative Solutions and Support, Inc. (ISSC) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ISSC or SPIR or BA or RKLB or RTX?
On trailing P/E, Spire Global, Inc.
(SPIR) is the cheapest at 11. 5x versus The Boeing Company at 95. 7x. On forward P/E, RTX Corporation is actually cheaper at 25. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ISSC or SPIR or BA or RKLB or RTX?
Over the past 5 years, Rocket Lab USA, Inc.
(RKLB) delivered a total return of +966. 1%, compared to -76. 6% for Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RKLB returned +983. 2% versus SPIR's -75. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ISSC or SPIR or BA or RKLB or RTX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), RTX Corporation (RTX) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
50β versus Spire Global, Inc. 's 3. 10β — meaning SPIR is approximately 521% more volatile than RTX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 8% versus 10% for The Boeing Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ISSC or SPIR or BA or RKLB or RTX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Innovative Solutions and Support, Inc.
(ISSC) is pulling ahead at 78. 6% versus -35. 2% for Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Spire Global, Inc. grew EPS 137. 8% year-over-year, compared to 2. 6% for Rocket Lab USA, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ISSC leads at 44. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ISSC or SPIR or BA or RKLB or RTX?
Spire Global, Inc.
(SPIR) is the more profitable company, earning 71. 7% net margin versus -32. 9% for Rocket Lab USA, Inc. — meaning it keeps 71. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ISSC leads at 23. 8% versus -121. 4% for SPIR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ISSC leads at 48. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ISSC or SPIR or BA or RKLB or RTX more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, RTX Corporation (RTX) trades at 25.
4x forward P/E versus 27. 1x for Innovative Solutions and Support, Inc. — 1. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RTX: 27. 7% to $224. 89.
08Which pays a better dividend — ISSC or SPIR or BA or RKLB or RTX?
In this comparison, RTX (1.
5% yield), BA (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. ISSC, SPIR, RKLB do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ISSC or SPIR or BA or RKLB or RTX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, RTX Corporation (RTX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
50), 1. 5% yield, +233. 5% 10Y return). Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) carries a higher beta of 3. 10 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (RTX: +233. 5%, SPIR: -75. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ISSC and SPIR and BA and RKLB and RTX?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ISSC is a small-cap high-growth stock; SPIR is a large-cap deep-value stock; BA is a mid-cap high-growth stock; RKLB is a mid-cap high-growth stock; RTX is a large-cap quality compounder stock. RTX pays a dividend while ISSC, SPIR, BA, RKLB do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.