Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
ISTR vs FFIN vs KO vs HFBL vs FIS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
Banks - Regional
Information Technology Services
ISTR vs FFIN vs KO vs HFBL vs FIS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic | Banks - Regional | Information Technology Services |
| Market Cap | $323M | $4.70B | $341.71B | $62M | $19.75B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $153M | $826M | $49.28B | $33M | $11.66B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $23M | $254M | $13.70B | $5M | $2.67B |
| Gross Margin | 61.0% | 71.8% | 61.7% | 66.7% | 37.6% |
| Operating Margin | 18.1% | 37.5% | 29.3% | 20.0% | 17.9% |
| Forward P/E | 9.6x | 16.1x | 24.3x | 16.1x | 6.1x |
| Total Debt | $153M | $22M | $45.49B | $4M | $4.01B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $27M | $1.08B | $10.27B | $16M | $599M |
ISTR vs FFIN vs KO vs HFBL vs FIS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Investar Holding Co… (ISTR) | 100 | 205.8 | +105.8% |
| First Financial Ban… (FFIN) | 100 | 113.5 | +13.5% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 177.7 | +77.7% |
| Home Federal Bancor… (HFBL) | 100 | 163.7 | +63.7% |
| Fidelity National I… (FIS) | 100 | 28.5 | -71.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ISTR vs FFIN vs KO vs HFBL vs FIS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ISTR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +65.8% vs FIS's -50.4%
FFIN has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in long-term compounding and bank quality.
- 138.8% 10Y total return vs KO's 115.0%
- NIM 3.3% vs ISTR's 2.9%
- 11.7% NII/revenue growth vs HFBL's -2.9%
- 30.7% margin vs ISTR's 14.9%
KO is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 1.9%, EPS growth 23.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.7%
- 13.1% ROA vs ISTR's 0.8%, ROIC 15.8% vs 5.2%
HFBL is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.39, yield 2.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.39, Low D/E 7.2%, current ratio 0.10x
- Beta 0.39 vs FFIN's 0.75
FIS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if valuation efficiency and defensive is your priority.
- PEG 0.25 vs HFBL's 4.85
- Beta 0.57, yield 4.3%, current ratio 0.59x
- Lower P/E (6.1x vs 16.1x), PEG 0.25 vs 4.85
- 4.3% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs KO's 2.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 11.7% NII/revenue growth vs HFBL's -2.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.1x vs 16.1x), PEG 0.25 vs 4.85 | |
| Quality / Margins | 30.7% margin vs ISTR's 14.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.39 vs FFIN's 0.75 | |
| Dividends | 4.3% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs KO's 2.6% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +65.8% vs FIS's -50.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.1% ROA vs ISTR's 0.8%, ROIC 15.8% vs 5.2% |
ISTR vs FFIN vs KO vs HFBL vs FIS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
ISTR vs FFIN vs KO vs HFBL vs FIS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FFIN leads in 1 of 6 categories
FIS leads 1 • KO leads 1 • ISTR leads 1 • HFBL leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FFIN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KO is the larger business by revenue, generating $49.3B annually — 1483.4x HFBL's $33M. FFIN is the more profitable business, keeping 30.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ISTR's 14.9%. On growth, FIS holds the edge at +30.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $153M | $826M | $49.3B | $33M | $11.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $31M | $320M | $15.5B | $8M | $4.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $23M | $254M | $13.7B | $5M | $2.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $17M | $283M | $12.6B | $8M | $2.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +61.0% | +71.8% | +61.7% | +66.7% | +37.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +18.1% | +37.5% | +29.3% | +20.0% | +17.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +14.9% | +30.7% | +27.8% | +15.7% | +22.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +11.0% | +34.3% | +25.5% | +22.9% | +23.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | +12.1% | — | +30.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -16.4% | -7.7% | +18.2% | +63.6% | +30.6% |
Valuation Metrics
FIS leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.3x trailing earnings, ISTR trades at a 72% valuation discount to FIS's 50.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), ISTR offers better value at 1.38x vs HFBL's 4.85x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $323M | $4.7B | $341.7B | $62M | $19.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $449M | $3.6B | $376.9B | $50M | $23.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 14.35x | 18.52x | 26.12x | 16.11x | 50.95x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.57x | 16.11x | 24.27x | — | 6.09x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.38x | 4.11x | 2.34x | 4.85x | 2.09x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 14.66x | 11.40x | 25.45x | 8.34x | 6.36x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.10x | 5.70x | 7.13x | 1.93x | 1.85x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.05x | 2.45x | 9.99x | 1.14x | 1.43x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 19.17x | 15.31x | 64.52x | 11.50x | 7.03x |
Profitability & Efficiency
KO leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $8 for ISTR. FFIN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KO's 1.33x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FFIN scores 8/9 vs ISTR's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.3% | +14.2% | +41.1% | +9.3% | +18.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.8% | +1.7% | +13.1% | +0.8% | +7.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.2% | +12.4% | +15.8% | +5.9% | +6.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.0% | +16.6% | +17.3% | +8.0% | +6.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.51x | 0.01x | 1.33x | 0.07x | 0.29x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $126M | -$1.1B | $35.2B | -$12M | $3.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $27M | $1.1B | $10.3B | $16M | $599M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $153M | $22M | $45.5B | $4M | $4.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.44x | 1.54x | 10.70x | 0.61x | 21.16x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ISTR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in KO five years ago would be worth $16,528 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,259 for FIS. Over the past 12 months, ISTR leads with a +65.8% total return vs FIS's -50.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ISTR at 39.4% vs FIS's -7.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +14.3% | +10.6% | +16.4% | +15.6% | -40.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +65.8% | -4.4% | +17.7% | +59.7% | -50.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +170.6% | +18.6% | +39.3% | +58.3% | -21.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +43.5% | -22.0% | +65.3% | +26.6% | -67.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +100.3% | +138.8% | +115.0% | +121.4% | -26.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +39.4% | +5.8% | +11.7% | +16.5% | -7.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — KO and HFBL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.23 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FFIN's 0.75 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HFBL currently trades 98.0% from its 52-week high vs FIS's 46.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.75x | 0.75x | -0.23x | 0.39x | 0.57x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $31.77 | $38.74 | $84.04 | $20.71 | $82.74 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $17.89 | $28.11 | $65.35 | $12.32 | $37.85 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +93.9% | +84.6% | +94.5% | +98.0% | +46.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.4 | 50.1 | 49.2 | 50.1 | 35.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 156K | 718K | 13.6M | 2K | 5.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — KO and FIS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ISTR as "Buy", FFIN as "Hold", KO as "Buy", FIS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 64.6% upside for FIS (target: $63) vs 5.6% for ISTR (target: $32). For income investors, FIS offers the higher dividend yield at 4.27% vs ISTR's 1.34%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $31.50 | $39.25 | $86.13 | — | $62.88 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 15 | 48 | — | 37 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.3% | +2.3% | +2.6% | +2.6% | +4.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 12 | 15 | 56 | 12 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.40 | $0.74 | $2.04 | $0.53 | $1.63 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.7% | 0.0% | +0.2% | +1.7% | +7.2% |
FFIN leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). FIS leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
ISTR vs FFIN vs KO vs HFBL vs FIS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ISTR or FFIN or KO or HFBL or FIS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, First Financial Bankshares, Inc.
(FFIN) is the stronger pick with 11. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 9% for Home Federal Bancorp, Inc. of Louisiana (HFBL). Investar Holding Corporation (ISTR) offers the better valuation at 14. 3x trailing P/E (9. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Investar Holding Corporation (ISTR) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ISTR or FFIN or KO or HFBL or FIS?
On trailing P/E, Investar Holding Corporation (ISTR) is the cheapest at 14.
3x versus Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. at 50. 9x. On forward P/E, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. wins at 0. 25x versus First Financial Bankshares, Inc. 's 3. 58x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ISTR or FFIN or KO or HFBL or FIS?
Over the past 5 years, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) delivered a total return of +65.
3%, compared to -67. 4% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FFIN returned +138. 8% versus FIS's -26. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ISTR or FFIN or KO or HFBL or FIS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
23β versus First Financial Bankshares, Inc. 's 0. 75β — meaning FFIN is approximately -421% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, First Financial Bankshares, Inc. (FFIN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 133% for The Coca-Cola Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ISTR or FFIN or KO or HFBL or FIS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), First Financial Bankshares, Inc.
(FFIN) is pulling ahead at 11. 7% versus -2. 9% for Home Federal Bancorp, Inc. of Louisiana (HFBL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Coca-Cola Company grew EPS 23. 6% year-over-year, compared to -47. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, KO leads at 3. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ISTR or FFIN or KO or HFBL or FIS?
First Financial Bankshares, Inc.
(FFIN) is the more profitable company, earning 30. 7% net margin versus 3. 6% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 30. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FFIN leads at 37. 5% versus 14. 4% for HFBL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FFIN leads at 71. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ISTR or FFIN or KO or HFBL or FIS more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 25x versus First Financial Bankshares, Inc. 's 3. 58x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) trades at 6. 1x forward P/E versus 24. 3x for The Coca-Cola Company — 18. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FIS: 64. 6% to $62. 88.
08Which pays a better dividend — ISTR or FFIN or KO or HFBL or FIS?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) offers the highest yield at 4. 3%, versus 1. 3% for Investar Holding Corporation (ISTR).
09Is ISTR or FFIN or KO or HFBL or FIS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
23), 2. 6% yield, +115. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +115. 0%, ISTR: +100. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ISTR and FFIN and KO and HFBL and FIS?
These companies operate in different sectors (ISTR (Financial Services) and FFIN (Financial Services) and KO (Consumer Defensive) and HFBL (Financial Services) and FIS (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ISTR is a small-cap deep-value stock; FFIN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock; HFBL is a small-cap deep-value stock; FIS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.