Insurance - Specialty
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
ITIC vs FNF vs FAF vs STC vs WD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Insurance - Specialty
Insurance - Specialty
Insurance - Property & Casualty
Financial - Mortgages
ITIC vs FNF vs FAF vs STC vs WD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Insurance - Specialty | Insurance - Specialty | Insurance - Specialty | Insurance - Property & Casualty | Financial - Mortgages |
| Market Cap | $456M | $13.53B | $7.14B | $2.13B | $1.88B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $273M | $14.26B | $6.01B | $2.92B | $1.23B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $35M | $602M | $673M | $116M | $72M |
| Gross Margin | 90.0% | 65.1% | 74.3% | 87.7% | 61.3% |
| Operating Margin | 16.3% | 9.8% | 14.8% | 5.7% | 17.3% |
| Forward P/E | 39.7x | 8.7x | 10.9x | 11.5x | 15.3x |
| Total Debt | $8M | $4.77B | $1.91B | $891M | $2.25B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $21M | $2.38B | $1.39B | $322M | $299M |
ITIC vs FNF vs FAF vs STC vs WD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Investors Title Com… (ITIC) | 100 | 191.5 | +91.5% |
| Fidelity National F… (FNF) | 100 | 164.0 | +64.0% |
| First American Fina… (FAF) | 100 | 138.2 | +38.2% |
| Stewart Information… (STC) | 100 | 226.5 | +126.5% |
| Walker & Dunlop, In… (WD) | 100 | 135.1 | +35.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ITIC vs FNF vs FAF vs STC vs WD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ITIC has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in long-term compounding and defensive.
- 257.8% 10Y total return vs FNF's 170.1%
- Beta 0.77, yield 4.4%, current ratio 2.93x
- 12.9% margin vs STC's 4.0%
- 10.0% ROA vs FNF's 0.6%, ROIC 13.7% vs 10.1%
FNF is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 10 yrs, beta 0.58, yield 4.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.58, Low D/E 53.1%, current ratio 2.44x
- Lower P/E (8.7x vs 11.5x)
- Beta 0.58 vs WD's 1.32, lower leverage
FAF ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 21.6%, EPS growth 376.2%, 3Y rev CAGR -0.7%
- 21.6% revenue growth vs ITIC's 5.6%
- +17.8% vs WD's -19.6%
Among these 5 stocks, STC doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
WD is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.
- 5.0% yield, 8-year raise streak, vs FAF's 3.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 21.6% revenue growth vs ITIC's 5.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.7x vs 11.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.9% margin vs STC's 4.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.58 vs WD's 1.32, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 5.0% yield, 8-year raise streak, vs FAF's 3.1% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +17.8% vs WD's -19.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 10.0% ROA vs FNF's 0.6%, ROIC 13.7% vs 10.1% |
ITIC vs FNF vs FAF vs STC vs WD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ITIC vs FNF vs FAF vs STC vs WD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ITIC leads in 2 of 6 categories
FNF leads 1 • FAF leads 0 • STC leads 0 • WD leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — ITIC and WD each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FNF is the larger business by revenue, generating $14.3B annually — 52.3x ITIC's $273M. ITIC is the more profitable business, keeping 12.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to STC's 4.0%. On growth, STC holds the edge at +18.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $273M | $14.3B | $6.0B | $2.9B | $1.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $49M | $2.2B | $1.1B | $227M | $418M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $35M | $602M | $673M | $116M | $72M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $25M | $6.0B | $824M | $132M | -$1.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +90.0% | +65.1% | +74.3% | +87.7% | +61.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +16.3% | +9.8% | +14.8% | +5.7% | +17.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +12.9% | +4.2% | +11.2% | +4.0% | +4.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +9.3% | +42.4% | +13.7% | +4.5% | -55.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -1.6% | +15.2% | -90.9% | +18.7% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -10.2% | -126.1% | +70.4% | +56.3% | +4.8% |
Valuation Metrics
FNF leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.6x trailing earnings, FAF trades at a 65% valuation discount to WD's 33.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, FNF's 7.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than STC's 11.9x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $456M | $13.5B | $7.1B | $2.1B | $1.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $443M | $15.9B | $7.7B | $2.7B | $3.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 13.00x | 22.75x | 11.63x | 17.28x | 33.37x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 39.69x | 8.69x | 10.87x | 11.50x | 15.28x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.05x | 7.00x | 7.34x | 11.91x | 8.47x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.67x | 0.93x | 0.96x | 0.73x | 1.52x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.71x | 1.52x | 1.32x | 1.23x | 1.05x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 17.96x | 2.12x | 9.36x | 16.10x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
ITIC leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ITIC delivers a 13.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $4 for WD. ITIC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WD's 1.29x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FAF scores 8/9 vs WD's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +13.2% | +6.7% | +12.5% | +7.7% | +4.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +10.0% | +0.6% | +4.0% | +4.0% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +13.7% | +10.1% | +10.7% | +6.2% | +4.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +15.0% | +1.8% | +5.3% | +5.5% | +6.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 | 8 | 4 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.03x | 0.53x | 0.35x | 0.54x | 1.29x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$13M | $2.4B | $519M | $569M | $2.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $21M | $2.4B | $1.4B | $322M | $299M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $8M | $4.8B | $1.9B | $891M | $2.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 6.77x | 6.45x | 8.82x | 4.11x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ITIC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ITIC five years ago would be worth $15,874 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,424 for WD. Over the past 12 months, FAF leads with a +17.8% total return vs WD's -19.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ITIC at 23.9% vs WD's -0.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -1.9% | -6.4% | +15.1% | +0.5% | -5.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +5.5% | -18.7% | +17.8% | +11.5% | -19.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +90.4% | +63.6% | +30.7% | +79.3% | -0.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +58.7% | +33.8% | +20.7% | +28.1% | -35.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +257.8% | +170.1% | +138.4% | +133.4% | +200.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +23.9% | +17.8% | +9.3% | +21.5% | -0.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FNF and FAF each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FNF is the less volatile stock with a 0.58 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WD's 1.32 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FAF currently trades 97.6% from its 52-week high vs WD's 60.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.77x | 0.58x | 0.59x | 0.78x | 1.32x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $288.98 | $64.98 | $71.47 | $78.61 | $90.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $190.20 | $42.78 | $53.09 | $56.39 | $42.12 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +83.6% | +77.4% | +97.6% | +88.8% | +60.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.7 | 58.5 | 62.4 | 57.6 | 66.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 18K | 1.9M | 945K | 204K | 363K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — FAF and STC and WD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FNF as "Buy", FAF as "Buy", STC as "Buy", WD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 33.3% upside for FNF (target: $67) vs 15.3% for STC (target: $81). For income investors, WD offers the higher dividend yield at 5.03% vs STC's 2.88%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $67.00 | $83.00 | $80.50 | $72.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 17 | 15 | 8 | 15 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.4% | +4.0% | +3.1% | +2.9% | +5.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 10 | 15 | 15 | 8 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $10.52 | $2.01 | $2.15 | $2.01 | $2.75 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.1% | +1.7% | +0.2% | +0.6% |
ITIC leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). FNF leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
ITIC vs FNF vs FAF vs STC vs WD: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ITIC or FNF or FAF or STC or WD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, First American Financial Corporation (FAF) is the stronger pick with 21.
6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 6% for Investors Title Company (ITIC). First American Financial Corporation (FAF) offers the better valuation at 11. 6x trailing P/E (10. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Fidelity National Financial, Inc. (FNF) a "Buy" — based on 17 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ITIC or FNF or FAF or STC or WD?
On trailing P/E, First American Financial Corporation (FAF) is the cheapest at 11.
6x versus Walker & Dunlop, Inc. at 33. 4x. On forward P/E, Fidelity National Financial, Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ITIC or FNF or FAF or STC or WD?
Over the past 5 years, Investors Title Company (ITIC) delivered a total return of +58.
7%, compared to -35. 8% for Walker & Dunlop, Inc. (WD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ITIC returned +257. 8% versus STC's +133. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ITIC or FNF or FAF or STC or WD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Fidelity National Financial, Inc.
(FNF) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 58β versus Walker & Dunlop, Inc. 's 1. 32β — meaning WD is approximately 130% more volatile than FNF relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Investors Title Company (ITIC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 129% for Walker & Dunlop, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ITIC or FNF or FAF or STC or WD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), First American Financial Corporation (FAF) is pulling ahead at 21.
6% versus 5. 6% for Investors Title Company (ITIC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: First American Financial Corporation grew EPS 376. 2% year-over-year, compared to -52. 5% for Fidelity National Financial, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FNF leads at 8. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ITIC or FNF or FAF or STC or WD?
Investors Title Company (ITIC) is the more profitable company, earning 12.
9% net margin versus 4. 0% for Stewart Information Services Corporation — meaning it keeps 12. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WD leads at 17. 3% versus 5. 7% for STC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ITIC leads at 98. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ITIC or FNF or FAF or STC or WD more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Fidelity National Financial, Inc.
(FNF) trades at 8. 7x forward P/E versus 39. 7x for Investors Title Company — 31. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FNF: 33. 3% to $67. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — ITIC or FNF or FAF or STC or WD?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Walker & Dunlop, Inc. (WD) offers the highest yield at 5. 0%, versus 2. 9% for Stewart Information Services Corporation (STC).
09Is ITIC or FNF or FAF or STC or WD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Fidelity National Financial, Inc.
(FNF) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 58), 4. 0% yield, +170. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FNF: +170. 1%, WD: +200. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ITIC and FNF and FAF and STC and WD?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ITIC is a small-cap deep-value stock; FNF is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; FAF is a small-cap high-growth stock; STC is a small-cap high-growth stock; WD is a small-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.