Paper, Lumber & Forest Products
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
ITP vs SLVM vs JPM vs KO vs SEE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Paper, Lumber & Forest Products
Banks - Diversified
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
Packaging & Containers
ITP vs SLVM vs JPM vs KO vs SEE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Paper, Lumber & Forest Products | Paper, Lumber & Forest Products | Banks - Diversified | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic | Packaging & Containers |
| Market Cap | $3M | $1.58B | $908.57B | $341.71B | $6.21B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $79M | $3.29B | $280.33B | $49.28B | $5.36B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-11M | $102M | $57.05B | $13.70B | $506M |
| Gross Margin | 5.7% | 19.8% | 60.0% | 61.7% | 29.8% |
| Operating Margin | -12.6% | 6.4% | 25.9% | 29.3% | 13.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | 17.2x | 14.6x | 24.3x | 12.4x |
| Total Debt | $10M | $853M | $942.38B | $45.49B | $4.10B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $6M | $135M | $343.34B | $10.27B | $344M |
ITP vs SLVM vs JPM vs KO vs SEE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 21 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| IT Tech Packaging, … (ITP) | 100 | 4.9 | -95.1% |
| Sylvamo Corporation (SLVM) | 100 | 121.4 | +21.4% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 198.7 | +98.7% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 151.3 | +51.3% |
| Sealed Air Corporat… (SEE) | 100 | 76.7 | -23.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ITP vs SLVM vs JPM vs KO vs SEE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Among these 5 stocks, ITP doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
SLVM is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.73, yield 4.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.73, Low D/E 88.3%, current ratio 1.50x
- Beta 0.73, yield 4.5%, current ratio 1.50x
- 4.5% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs KO's 2.6%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
JPM has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 481.2% 10Y total return vs KO's 115.0%
- PEG 0.83 vs SEE's 9.73
- 3.3% NII/revenue growth vs ITP's -12.4%
- Lower P/E (14.6x vs 24.3x), PEG 0.83 vs 2.17
KO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 1.9%, EPS growth 23.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.7%
- 27.8% margin vs ITP's -13.9%
- 13.1% ROA vs ITP's -6.2%, ROIC 15.8% vs -3.7%
SEE ranks third and is worth considering specifically for stability and momentum.
- Beta 0.07 vs JPM's 0.87
- +40.3% vs SLVM's -17.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 3.3% NII/revenue growth vs ITP's -12.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.6x vs 24.3x), PEG 0.83 vs 2.17 | |
| Quality / Margins | 27.8% margin vs ITP's -13.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.07 vs JPM's 0.87 | |
| Dividends | 4.5% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs KO's 2.6%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +40.3% vs SLVM's -17.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.1% ROA vs ITP's -6.2%, ROIC 15.8% vs -3.7% |
ITP vs SLVM vs JPM vs KO vs SEE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ITP vs SLVM vs JPM vs KO vs SEE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
KO leads in 2 of 6 categories
ITP leads 1 • JPM leads 1 • SLVM leads 0 • SEE leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 3551.4x ITP's $79M. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ITP's -13.9%. On growth, KO holds the edge at +12.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $79M | $3.3B | $280.3B | $49.3B | $5.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $5M | $389M | $81.4B | $15.5B | $965M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$11M | $102M | $57.0B | $13.7B | $506M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $4M | $10M | $100.9B | $12.6B | $459M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +5.7% | +19.8% | +60.0% | +61.7% | +29.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -12.6% | +6.4% | +25.9% | +29.3% | +13.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -13.9% | +3.1% | +20.4% | +27.8% | +9.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +4.8% | +0.3% | +36.0% | +25.5% | +8.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.1% | -8.0% | — | +12.1% | +2.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +40.0% | -111.7% | +16.0% | +18.2% | +16.4% |
Valuation Metrics
ITP leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.3x trailing earnings, SEE trades at a 53% valuation discount to KO's 26.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JPM offers better value at 0.92x vs SEE's 9.66x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3M | $1.6B | $908.6B | $341.7B | $6.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $7M | $2.3B | $1.51T | $376.9B | $10.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.19x | 12.32x | 16.22x | 26.12x | 12.29x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 17.21x | 14.60x | 24.27x | 12.38x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.92x | 2.34x | 9.66x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 1.15x | 5.36x | 18.52x | 25.45x | 14.33x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.04x | 0.47x | 3.25x | 7.13x | 1.16x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.01x | 1.68x | 2.51x | 9.99x | 5.02x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 0.54x | 35.82x | 9.01x | 64.52x | 13.54x |
Profitability & Efficiency
KO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SEE delivers a 48.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $48 in annual profit, vs $-7 for ITP. ITP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SEE's 3.31x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KO scores 7/9 vs SEE's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -7.1% | +10.5% | +15.9% | +41.1% | +48.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -6.2% | +3.7% | +1.3% | +13.1% | +7.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -3.7% | +11.9% | +4.5% | +15.8% | +11.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -5.0% | +12.5% | +8.9% | +17.3% | +14.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.06x | 0.88x | 2.60x | 1.33x | 3.31x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $4M | $718M | $599.0B | $35.2B | $3.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $6M | $135M | $343.3B | $10.3B | $344M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $10M | $853M | $942.4B | $45.5B | $4.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -16.46x | 4.79x | 0.74x | 10.70x | 1.95x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $23,548 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $417 for ITP. Over the past 12 months, SEE leads with a +40.3% total return vs SLVM's -17.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.7% vs ITP's -25.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -20.8% | -15.1% | +0.8% | +16.4% | +2.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -3.3% | -17.4% | +20.9% | +17.7% | +40.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -58.7% | +3.1% | +138.8% | +39.3% | +11.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -95.8% | +81.7% | +135.5% | +65.3% | -20.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.2% | +81.7% | +481.2% | +115.0% | +4.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -25.5% | +1.0% | +33.7% | +11.7% | +3.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — JPM and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.23 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than JPM's 0.87 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. JPM currently trades 96.2% from its 52-week high vs ITP's 48.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.86x | 0.73x | 0.87x | -0.23x | 0.07x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $0.39 | $56.80 | $338.09 | $84.04 | $44.27 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.16 | $35.66 | $269.72 | $65.35 | $28.15 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +48.7% | +69.8% | +96.2% | +94.5% | +95.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.7 | 47.9 | 72.1 | 49.2 | 64.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.9M | 323K | 7.4M | 13.6M | 3.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — SLVM and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SLVM as "Buy", JPM as "Buy", KO as "Buy", SEE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 26.1% upside for SLVM (target: $50) vs 4.5% for JPM (target: $340). For income investors, SLVM offers the higher dividend yield at 4.49% vs JPM's 1.83%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $50.00 | $339.75 | $86.13 | $49.92 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 2 | 61 | 48 | 27 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +4.5% | +1.8% | +2.6% | +1.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 4 | 15 | 56 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.78 | $5.95 | $2.04 | $0.81 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +5.2% | +3.8% | +0.2% | 0.0% |
KO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ITP leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
ITP vs SLVM vs JPM vs KO vs SEE: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ITP or SLVM or JPM or KO or SEE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the stronger pick with 3. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -12. 4% for IT Tech Packaging, Inc. (ITP). Sealed Air Corporation (SEE) offers the better valuation at 12. 3x trailing P/E (12. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Sylvamo Corporation (SLVM) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ITP or SLVM or JPM or KO or SEE?
On trailing P/E, Sealed Air Corporation (SEE) is the cheapest at 12.
3x versus The Coca-Cola Company at 26. 1x. On forward P/E, Sealed Air Corporation is actually cheaper at 12. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: JPMorgan Chase & Co. wins at 0. 83x versus Sealed Air Corporation's 9. 73x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ITP or SLVM or JPM or KO or SEE?
Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) delivered a total return of +135. 5%, compared to -95. 8% for IT Tech Packaging, Inc. (ITP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +481. 2% versus ITP's -98. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ITP or SLVM or JPM or KO or SEE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
23β versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. 's 0. 87β — meaning JPM is approximately -472% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, IT Tech Packaging, Inc. (ITP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 3% for Sealed Air Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ITP or SLVM or JPM or KO or SEE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is pulling ahead at 3. 3% versus -12. 4% for IT Tech Packaging, Inc. (ITP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Sealed Air Corporation grew EPS 89. 5% year-over-year, compared to -55. 2% for Sylvamo Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, KO leads at 3. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ITP or SLVM or JPM or KO or SEE?
The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.
3% net margin versus -13. 0% for IT Tech Packaging, Inc. — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KO leads at 28. 7% versus -10. 8% for ITP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KO leads at 61. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ITP or SLVM or JPM or KO or SEE more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 83x versus Sealed Air Corporation's 9. 73x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Sealed Air Corporation (SEE) trades at 12. 4x forward P/E versus 24. 3x for The Coca-Cola Company — 11. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SLVM: 26. 1% to $50. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — ITP or SLVM or JPM or KO or SEE?
In this comparison, SLVM (4.
5% yield), KO (2. 6% yield), SEE (1. 9% yield), JPM (1. 8% yield) pay a dividend. ITP does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ITP or SLVM or JPM or KO or SEE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
23), 2. 6% yield, +115. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +115. 0%, ITP: -98. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ITP and SLVM and JPM and KO and SEE?
These companies operate in different sectors (ITP (Basic Materials) and SLVM (Basic Materials) and JPM (Financial Services) and KO (Consumer Defensive) and SEE (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ITP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SLVM is a small-cap deep-value stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock; SEE is a small-cap deep-value stock. SLVM, JPM, KO, SEE pay a dividend while ITP does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.