Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

ITT vs XYL vs FELE vs GTLS vs PNR

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
ITT
ITT Inc.

Industrial - Machinery

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$18.56B
5Y Perf.+259.9%
XYL
Xylem Inc.

Industrial - Machinery

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$27.49B
5Y Perf.+74.3%
FELE
Franklin Electric Co., Inc.

Industrial - Machinery

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$4.41B
5Y Perf.+97.0%
GTLS
Chart Industries, Inc.

Industrial - Machinery

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$9.93B
5Y Perf.+428.4%
PNR
Pentair plc

Industrial - Machinery

IndustrialsNYSE • GB
Market Cap$12.76B
5Y Perf.+101.8%

ITT vs XYL vs FELE vs GTLS vs PNR — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
ITT logoITT
XYL logoXYL
FELE logoFELE
GTLS logoGTLS
PNR logoPNR
IndustryIndustrial - MachineryIndustrial - MachineryIndustrial - MachineryIndustrial - MachineryIndustrial - Machinery
Market Cap$18.56B$27.49B$4.41B$9.93B$12.76B
Revenue (TTM)$4.24B$9.09B$2.18B$4.26B$4.20B
Net Income (TTM)$458M$973M$150M$40M$671M
Gross Margin35.5%38.6%35.2%32.6%40.9%
Operating Margin15.9%13.6%12.6%8.5%20.6%
Forward P/E27.1x20.9x21.8x16.4x14.8x
Total Debt$927M$1.94B$280M$3.74B$1.64B
Cash & Equiv.$1.74B$1.48B$100M$366M$102M

ITT vs XYL vs FELE vs GTLS vs PNRLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

ITT
XYL
FELE
GTLS
PNR
StockMay 20May 26Return
ITT Inc. (ITT)100359.9+259.9%
Xylem Inc. (XYL)100174.3+74.3%
Franklin Electric C… (FELE)100197.0+97.0%
Chart Industries, I… (GTLS)100528.4+428.4%
Pentair plc (PNR)100201.8+101.8%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: ITT vs XYL vs FELE vs GTLS vs PNR

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: PNR leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. ITT Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and recent price momentum and sentiment. XYL and GTLS also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
ITT
ITT Inc.
The Value Pick

ITT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if valuation efficiency is your priority.

  • PEG 0.55 vs FELE's 2.50
  • 8.5% revenue growth vs PNR's 2.3%
  • +47.8% vs PNR's -12.8%
Best for: valuation efficiency
XYL
Xylem Inc.
The Income Pick

XYL ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.92, yield 1.4%
  • Rev growth 5.5%, EPS growth 7.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 17.8%
  • 1.4% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs FELE's 1.1%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
FELE
Franklin Electric Co., Inc.
The Defensive Pick

FELE is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.92, Low D/E 21.1%, current ratio 2.79x
  • Beta 0.92, yield 1.1%, current ratio 2.79x
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
GTLS
Chart Industries, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

GTLS is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 7.7% 10Y total return vs ITT's 5.3%
  • Beta 0.56 vs ITT's 1.23
Best for: long-term compounding
PNR
Pentair plc
The Value Play

PNR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.

  • Lower P/E (14.8x vs 16.4x)
  • 16.0% margin vs GTLS's 0.9%
  • 9.9% ROA vs GTLS's 0.4%, ROIC 12.1% vs 7.4%
Best for: value and quality
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthITT logoITT8.5% revenue growth vs PNR's 2.3%
ValuePNR logoPNRLower P/E (14.8x vs 16.4x)
Quality / MarginsPNR logoPNR16.0% margin vs GTLS's 0.9%
Stability / SafetyGTLS logoGTLSBeta 0.56 vs ITT's 1.23
DividendsXYL logoXYL1.4% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs FELE's 1.1%
Momentum (1Y)ITT logoITT+47.8% vs PNR's -12.8%
Efficiency (ROA)PNR logoPNR9.9% ROA vs GTLS's 0.4%, ROIC 12.1% vs 7.4%

ITT vs XYL vs FELE vs GTLS vs PNR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

ITTITT Inc.
FY 2022
Motion Technologies
46.0%$1.4B
Industrial Process
32.5%$971M
Connect & Control Technologies
21.6%$646M
Segment Eliminations
-0.1%$-2,900,000
XYLXylem Inc.
FY 2025
Water Infrastructure
40.1%$2.6B
Measurement and Control Solutions
31.7%$2.1B
Applied Water
28.1%$1.8B
FELEFranklin Electric Co., Inc.
FY 2025
Water Systems
55.7%$1.3B
Distribution
31.1%$701M
Energy Systems
13.3%$299M
GTLSChart Industries, Inc.
FY 2025
Repair, Service And Leasing Segment
30.6%$1.3B
Heat Transfer Systems Segment
29.0%$1.2B
Specialty Products Segment
25.8%$1.1B
Cryo Tank Solutions Segment
14.6%$624M
PNRPentair plc
FY 2025
Pool
37.3%$1.6B
Industrial & Flow Technologies
37.2%$1.6B
Water Unit
25.4%$1.1B

ITT vs XYL vs FELE vs GTLS vs PNR — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLPNRLAGGINGFELE

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

PNR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

XYL is the larger business by revenue, generating $9.1B annually — 4.2x FELE's $2.2B. PNR is the more profitable business, keeping 16.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GTLS's 0.9%. On growth, ITT holds the edge at +32.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricITT logoITTITT Inc.XYL logoXYLXylem Inc.FELE logoFELEFranklin Electric…GTLS logoGTLSChart Industries,…PNR logoPNRPentair plc
RevenueTrailing 12 months$4.2B$9.1B$2.2B$4.3B$4.2B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$781M$1.8B$322M$644M$983M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$458M$973M$150M$40M$671M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$485M$966M$169M$203M$716M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+35.5%+38.6%+35.2%+32.6%+40.9%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+15.9%+13.6%+12.6%+8.5%+20.6%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+10.8%+10.7%+6.9%+0.9%+16.0%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+11.4%+10.6%+7.8%+4.8%+17.0%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+32.7%+2.7%+9.9%-2.5%+2.6%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-33.1%+14.5%+13.4%-36.1%+12.9%
PNR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

PNR leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 19.9x trailing earnings, PNR trades at a 97% valuation discount to GTLS's 628.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), ITT offers better value at 0.69x vs FELE's 3.53x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricITT logoITTITT Inc.XYL logoXYLXylem Inc.FELE logoFELEFranklin Electric…GTLS logoGTLSChart Industries,…PNR logoPNRPentair plc
Market CapShares × price$18.6B$27.5B$4.4B$9.9B$12.8B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$17.7B$27.9B$4.6B$13.3B$14.3B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS33.98x29.50x30.75x628.45x19.94x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.27.11x20.91x21.77x16.40x14.75x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.69x1.29x3.53x1.52x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple21.44x15.54x13.82x14.33x14.66x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue4.71x3.04x2.07x2.33x3.06x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share4.06x2.40x3.41x2.79x3.38x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF33.91x30.21x22.81x48.95x17.11x
PNR leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

PNR leads this category, winning 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

PNR delivers a 17.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $1 for GTLS. XYL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GTLS's 1.11x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PNR scores 8/9 vs GTLS's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricITT logoITTITT Inc.XYL logoXYLXylem Inc.FELE logoFELEFranklin Electric…GTLS logoGTLSChart Industries,…PNR logoPNRPentair plc
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+13.0%+8.5%+11.4%+1.2%+17.7%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+6.7%+5.6%+7.6%+0.4%+9.9%
ROICReturn on invested capital+16.1%+7.6%+14.7%+7.4%+12.1%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+16.3%+8.5%+18.1%+8.6%+15.0%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–976558
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.23x0.17x0.21x1.11x0.42x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$816M$463M$181M$3.4B$1.5B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$1.7B$1.5B$100M$366M$102M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$927M$1.9B$280M$3.7B$1.6B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense8.60x49.32x24.75x1.08x11.94x
PNR leads this category, winning 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

ITT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in ITT five years ago would be worth $21,583 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,262 for XYL. Over the past 12 months, ITT leads with a +47.8% total return vs PNR's -12.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ITT at 36.2% vs FELE's 3.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricITT logoITTITT Inc.XYL logoXYLXylem Inc.FELE logoFELEFranklin Electric…GTLS logoGTLSChart Industries,…PNR logoPNRPentair plc
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+19.4%-15.3%+3.6%+0.6%-24.6%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+47.8%-3.2%+17.7%+37.6%-12.8%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+152.5%+11.9%+10.0%+62.7%+39.8%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+115.8%+2.6%+20.3%+29.5%+23.0%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+531.3%+204.7%+231.4%+772.5%+126.9%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+36.2%+3.8%+3.2%+17.6%+11.8%
ITT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

GTLS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

GTLS is the less volatile stock with a 0.56 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ITT's 1.23 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GTLS currently trades 99.5% from its 52-week high vs PNR's 69.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricITT logoITTITT Inc.XYL logoXYLXylem Inc.FELE logoFELEFranklin Electric…GTLS logoGTLSChart Industries,…PNR logoPNRPentair plc
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.23x0.92x0.92x0.56x1.22x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$225.26$154.27$111.53$208.51$113.95
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$140.43$114.15$83.42$140.50$77.02
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+92.2%+75.0%+89.6%+99.5%+69.3%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10058.745.454.851.235.3
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded879K2.1M281K1.6M1.6M
GTLS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — XYL and FELE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: ITT as "Buy", XYL as "Hold", FELE as "Hold", GTLS as "Buy", PNR as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 43.8% upside for PNR (target: $114) vs -6.5% for GTLS (target: $194). For income investors, XYL offers the higher dividend yield at 1.39% vs GTLS's 0.29%.

MetricITT logoITTITT Inc.XYL logoXYLXylem Inc.FELE logoFELEFranklin Electric…GTLS logoGTLSChart Industries,…PNR logoPNRPentair plc
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHoldHoldBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$229.67$151.57$100.00$193.81$113.56
# AnalystsCovering analysts2240113741
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.7%+1.4%+1.1%+0.3%+1.3%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises13153216
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.39$1.60$1.11$0.60$0.99
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+2.8%+0.1%+3.8%0.0%+1.8%
Evenly matched — XYL and FELE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

PNR leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). ITT leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.

Best OverallPentair plc (PNR)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

ITT vs XYL vs FELE vs GTLS vs PNR: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is ITT or XYL or FELE or GTLS or PNR a better buy right now?

For growth investors, ITT Inc.

(ITT) is the stronger pick with 8. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 3% for Pentair plc (PNR). Pentair plc (PNR) offers the better valuation at 19. 9x trailing P/E (14. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate ITT Inc. (ITT) a "Buy" — based on 22 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — ITT or XYL or FELE or GTLS or PNR?

On trailing P/E, Pentair plc (PNR) is the cheapest at 19.

9x versus Chart Industries, Inc. at 628. 5x. On forward P/E, Pentair plc is actually cheaper at 14. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: ITT Inc. wins at 0. 55x versus Franklin Electric Co. , Inc. 's 2. 50x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — ITT or XYL or FELE or GTLS or PNR?

Over the past 5 years, ITT Inc.

(ITT) delivered a total return of +115. 8%, compared to +2. 6% for Xylem Inc. (XYL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GTLS returned +772. 5% versus PNR's +126. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — ITT or XYL or FELE or GTLS or PNR?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Chart Industries, Inc.

(GTLS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 56β versus ITT Inc. 's 1. 23β — meaning ITT is approximately 120% more volatile than GTLS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Xylem Inc. (XYL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 111% for Chart Industries, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — ITT or XYL or FELE or GTLS or PNR?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), ITT Inc.

(ITT) is pulling ahead at 8. 5% versus 2. 3% for Pentair plc (PNR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Xylem Inc. grew EPS 7. 4% year-over-year, compared to -92. 0% for Chart Industries, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GTLS leads at 38. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — ITT or XYL or FELE or GTLS or PNR?

Pentair plc (PNR) is the more profitable company, earning 15.

7% net margin versus 1. 0% for Chart Industries, Inc. — meaning it keeps 15. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PNR leads at 20. 5% versus 12. 7% for FELE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PNR leads at 40. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is ITT or XYL or FELE or GTLS or PNR more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, ITT Inc. (ITT) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 55x versus Franklin Electric Co. , Inc. 's 2. 50x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Pentair plc (PNR) trades at 14. 8x forward P/E versus 27. 1x for ITT Inc. — 12. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PNR: 43. 8% to $113. 56.

08

Which pays a better dividend — ITT or XYL or FELE or GTLS or PNR?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Xylem Inc. (XYL) offers the highest yield at 1. 4%, versus 0. 3% for Chart Industries, Inc. (GTLS).

09

Is ITT or XYL or FELE or GTLS or PNR better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Chart Industries, Inc.

(GTLS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 56), +772. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (GTLS: +772. 5%, PNR: +126. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between ITT and XYL and FELE and GTLS and PNR?

Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

ITT, XYL, FELE, PNR pay a dividend while GTLS does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

ITT

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 16%
  • Net Margin > 6%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

XYL

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 6%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

FELE

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

GTLS

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 19%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

PNR

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 9%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform ITT and XYL and FELE and GTLS and PNR on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(ITT: 32.7% · XYL: 2.7%)
Net Margin>
%
(ITT: 10.8% · XYL: 10.7%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(ITT: 34.0x · XYL: 29.5x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.