Industrial - Machinery
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
ITT vs XYL vs FELE vs GTLS vs PNR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Industrial - Machinery
Industrial - Machinery
Industrial - Machinery
Industrial - Machinery
ITT vs XYL vs FELE vs GTLS vs PNR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial - Machinery | Industrial - Machinery | Industrial - Machinery | Industrial - Machinery | Industrial - Machinery |
| Market Cap | $18.56B | $27.49B | $4.41B | $9.93B | $12.76B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4.24B | $9.09B | $2.18B | $4.26B | $4.20B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $458M | $973M | $150M | $40M | $671M |
| Gross Margin | 35.5% | 38.6% | 35.2% | 32.6% | 40.9% |
| Operating Margin | 15.9% | 13.6% | 12.6% | 8.5% | 20.6% |
| Forward P/E | 27.1x | 20.9x | 21.8x | 16.4x | 14.8x |
| Total Debt | $927M | $1.94B | $280M | $3.74B | $1.64B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.74B | $1.48B | $100M | $366M | $102M |
ITT vs XYL vs FELE vs GTLS vs PNR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| ITT Inc. (ITT) | 100 | 359.9 | +259.9% |
| Xylem Inc. (XYL) | 100 | 174.3 | +74.3% |
| Franklin Electric C… (FELE) | 100 | 197.0 | +97.0% |
| Chart Industries, I… (GTLS) | 100 | 528.4 | +428.4% |
| Pentair plc (PNR) | 100 | 201.8 | +101.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ITT vs XYL vs FELE vs GTLS vs PNR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ITT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if valuation efficiency is your priority.
- PEG 0.55 vs FELE's 2.50
- 8.5% revenue growth vs PNR's 2.3%
- +47.8% vs PNR's -12.8%
XYL ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.92, yield 1.4%
- Rev growth 5.5%, EPS growth 7.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 17.8%
- 1.4% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs FELE's 1.1%
FELE is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.92, Low D/E 21.1%, current ratio 2.79x
- Beta 0.92, yield 1.1%, current ratio 2.79x
GTLS is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 7.7% 10Y total return vs ITT's 5.3%
- Beta 0.56 vs ITT's 1.23
PNR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.
- Lower P/E (14.8x vs 16.4x)
- 16.0% margin vs GTLS's 0.9%
- 9.9% ROA vs GTLS's 0.4%, ROIC 12.1% vs 7.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 8.5% revenue growth vs PNR's 2.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.8x vs 16.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 16.0% margin vs GTLS's 0.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.56 vs ITT's 1.23 | |
| Dividends | 1.4% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs FELE's 1.1% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +47.8% vs PNR's -12.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.9% ROA vs GTLS's 0.4%, ROIC 12.1% vs 7.4% |
ITT vs XYL vs FELE vs GTLS vs PNR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ITT vs XYL vs FELE vs GTLS vs PNR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PNR leads in 3 of 6 categories
ITT leads 1 • GTLS leads 1 • XYL leads 0 • FELE leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PNR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
XYL is the larger business by revenue, generating $9.1B annually — 4.2x FELE's $2.2B. PNR is the more profitable business, keeping 16.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GTLS's 0.9%. On growth, ITT holds the edge at +32.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4.2B | $9.1B | $2.2B | $4.3B | $4.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $781M | $1.8B | $322M | $644M | $983M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $458M | $973M | $150M | $40M | $671M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $485M | $966M | $169M | $203M | $716M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +35.5% | +38.6% | +35.2% | +32.6% | +40.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +15.9% | +13.6% | +12.6% | +8.5% | +20.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +10.8% | +10.7% | +6.9% | +0.9% | +16.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +11.4% | +10.6% | +7.8% | +4.8% | +17.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +32.7% | +2.7% | +9.9% | -2.5% | +2.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -33.1% | +14.5% | +13.4% | -36.1% | +12.9% |
Valuation Metrics
PNR leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 19.9x trailing earnings, PNR trades at a 97% valuation discount to GTLS's 628.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), ITT offers better value at 0.69x vs FELE's 3.53x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $18.6B | $27.5B | $4.4B | $9.9B | $12.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $17.7B | $27.9B | $4.6B | $13.3B | $14.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 33.98x | 29.50x | 30.75x | 628.45x | 19.94x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 27.11x | 20.91x | 21.77x | 16.40x | 14.75x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.69x | 1.29x | 3.53x | — | 1.52x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 21.44x | 15.54x | 13.82x | 14.33x | 14.66x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.71x | 3.04x | 2.07x | 2.33x | 3.06x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.06x | 2.40x | 3.41x | 2.79x | 3.38x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 33.91x | 30.21x | 22.81x | 48.95x | 17.11x |
Profitability & Efficiency
PNR leads this category, winning 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PNR delivers a 17.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $1 for GTLS. XYL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GTLS's 1.11x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PNR scores 8/9 vs GTLS's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +13.0% | +8.5% | +11.4% | +1.2% | +17.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.7% | +5.6% | +7.6% | +0.4% | +9.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +16.1% | +7.6% | +14.7% | +7.4% | +12.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +16.3% | +8.5% | +18.1% | +8.6% | +15.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.23x | 0.17x | 0.21x | 1.11x | 0.42x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$816M | $463M | $181M | $3.4B | $1.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.7B | $1.5B | $100M | $366M | $102M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $927M | $1.9B | $280M | $3.7B | $1.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 8.60x | 49.32x | 24.75x | 1.08x | 11.94x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ITT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ITT five years ago would be worth $21,583 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,262 for XYL. Over the past 12 months, ITT leads with a +47.8% total return vs PNR's -12.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ITT at 36.2% vs FELE's 3.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +19.4% | -15.3% | +3.6% | +0.6% | -24.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +47.8% | -3.2% | +17.7% | +37.6% | -12.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +152.5% | +11.9% | +10.0% | +62.7% | +39.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +115.8% | +2.6% | +20.3% | +29.5% | +23.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +531.3% | +204.7% | +231.4% | +772.5% | +126.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +36.2% | +3.8% | +3.2% | +17.6% | +11.8% |
Risk & Volatility
GTLS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GTLS is the less volatile stock with a 0.56 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ITT's 1.23 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GTLS currently trades 99.5% from its 52-week high vs PNR's 69.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.23x | 0.92x | 0.92x | 0.56x | 1.22x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $225.26 | $154.27 | $111.53 | $208.51 | $113.95 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $140.43 | $114.15 | $83.42 | $140.50 | $77.02 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +92.2% | +75.0% | +89.6% | +99.5% | +69.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.7 | 45.4 | 54.8 | 51.2 | 35.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 879K | 2.1M | 281K | 1.6M | 1.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — XYL and FELE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ITT as "Buy", XYL as "Hold", FELE as "Hold", GTLS as "Buy", PNR as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 43.8% upside for PNR (target: $114) vs -6.5% for GTLS (target: $194). For income investors, XYL offers the higher dividend yield at 1.39% vs GTLS's 0.29%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $229.67 | $151.57 | $100.00 | $193.81 | $113.56 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 22 | 40 | 11 | 37 | 41 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.7% | +1.4% | +1.1% | +0.3% | +1.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 13 | 15 | 32 | 1 | 6 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.39 | $1.60 | $1.11 | $0.60 | $0.99 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.8% | +0.1% | +3.8% | 0.0% | +1.8% |
PNR leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). ITT leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
ITT vs XYL vs FELE vs GTLS vs PNR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ITT or XYL or FELE or GTLS or PNR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, ITT Inc.
(ITT) is the stronger pick with 8. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 3% for Pentair plc (PNR). Pentair plc (PNR) offers the better valuation at 19. 9x trailing P/E (14. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate ITT Inc. (ITT) a "Buy" — based on 22 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ITT or XYL or FELE or GTLS or PNR?
On trailing P/E, Pentair plc (PNR) is the cheapest at 19.
9x versus Chart Industries, Inc. at 628. 5x. On forward P/E, Pentair plc is actually cheaper at 14. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: ITT Inc. wins at 0. 55x versus Franklin Electric Co. , Inc. 's 2. 50x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ITT or XYL or FELE or GTLS or PNR?
Over the past 5 years, ITT Inc.
(ITT) delivered a total return of +115. 8%, compared to +2. 6% for Xylem Inc. (XYL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GTLS returned +772. 5% versus PNR's +126. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ITT or XYL or FELE or GTLS or PNR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Chart Industries, Inc.
(GTLS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 56β versus ITT Inc. 's 1. 23β — meaning ITT is approximately 120% more volatile than GTLS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Xylem Inc. (XYL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 111% for Chart Industries, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ITT or XYL or FELE or GTLS or PNR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), ITT Inc.
(ITT) is pulling ahead at 8. 5% versus 2. 3% for Pentair plc (PNR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Xylem Inc. grew EPS 7. 4% year-over-year, compared to -92. 0% for Chart Industries, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GTLS leads at 38. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ITT or XYL or FELE or GTLS or PNR?
Pentair plc (PNR) is the more profitable company, earning 15.
7% net margin versus 1. 0% for Chart Industries, Inc. — meaning it keeps 15. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PNR leads at 20. 5% versus 12. 7% for FELE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PNR leads at 40. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ITT or XYL or FELE or GTLS or PNR more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, ITT Inc. (ITT) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 55x versus Franklin Electric Co. , Inc. 's 2. 50x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Pentair plc (PNR) trades at 14. 8x forward P/E versus 27. 1x for ITT Inc. — 12. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PNR: 43. 8% to $113. 56.
08Which pays a better dividend — ITT or XYL or FELE or GTLS or PNR?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Xylem Inc. (XYL) offers the highest yield at 1. 4%, versus 0. 3% for Chart Industries, Inc. (GTLS).
09Is ITT or XYL or FELE or GTLS or PNR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Chart Industries, Inc.
(GTLS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 56), +772. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (GTLS: +772. 5%, PNR: +126. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ITT and XYL and FELE and GTLS and PNR?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
ITT, XYL, FELE, PNR pay a dividend while GTLS does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.