Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

IVF vs INMD vs NTRA vs AEYE

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
IVF
INVO Fertility, Inc.

Medical - Devices

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3M
5Y Perf.-100.0%
INMD
InMode Ltd.

Medical - Devices

HealthcareNASDAQ • IL
Market Cap$882M
5Y Perf.-4.8%
NTRA
Natera, Inc.

Medical - Diagnostics & Research

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$31.16B
5Y Perf.+343.0%
AEYE
AudioEye, Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$100M
5Y Perf.-7.2%

IVF vs INMD vs NTRA vs AEYE — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
IVF logoIVF
INMD logoINMD
NTRA logoNTRA
AEYE logoAEYE
IndustryMedical - DevicesMedical - DevicesMedical - Diagnostics & ResearchSoftware - Application
Market Cap$3M$882M$31.16B$100M
Revenue (TTM)$7M$375M$2.31B$40M
Net Income (TTM)$-29M$87M$-208M$-3M
Gross Margin39.2%77.8%64.8%78.3%
Operating Margin-370.2%21.3%-13.4%-7.9%
Forward P/E10.3x
Total Debt$10M$13M$214M$721K
Cash & Equiv.$741K$303M$1.08B$5M

IVF vs INMD vs NTRA vs AEYELong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

IVF
INMD
NTRA
AEYE
StockMay 20May 26Return
INVO Fertility, Inc. (IVF)1000.0-100.0%
InMode Ltd. (INMD)10095.2-4.8%
Natera, Inc. (NTRA)100443.0+343.0%
AudioEye, Inc. (AEYE)10092.8-7.2%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: IVF vs INMD vs NTRA vs AEYE

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: INMD leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. INVO Fertility, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion. NTRA also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
IVF
INVO Fertility, Inc.
The Growth Play

IVF is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.

  • Rev growth 116.3%, EPS growth 55.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 16.2%
  • 116.3% revenue growth vs INMD's -6.2%
Best for: growth exposure
INMD
InMode Ltd.
The Income Pick

INMD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • beta 1.04
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.04, Low D/E 1.9%, current ratio 9.88x
  • Beta 1.04, current ratio 9.88x
  • Better valuation composite
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
NTRA
Natera, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

NTRA is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 20.9% 10Y total return vs INMD's 105.0%
  • +37.3% vs IVF's -99.3%
Best for: long-term compounding
AEYE
AudioEye, Inc.
The Secondary Option

AEYE lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: technology exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthIVF logoIVF116.3% revenue growth vs INMD's -6.2%
ValueINMD logoINMDBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsINMD logoINMD23.3% margin vs IVF's -417.0%
Stability / SafetyINMD logoINMDBeta 1.04 vs AEYE's 2.29, lower leverage
DividendsTieNone of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)NTRA logoNTRA+37.3% vs IVF's -99.3%
Efficiency (ROA)INMD logoINMD11.8% ROA vs IVF's -99.6%, ROIC 13.5% vs -42.2%

IVF vs INMD vs NTRA vs AEYE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

IVFINVO Fertility, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

INMDInMode Ltd.
FY 2025
Capital Equipment
100.0%$289M
NTRANatera, Inc.
FY 2025
Product
99.6%$2.3B
Licensing and other
0.4%$10M
AEYEAudioEye, Inc.
FY 2024
Enterprise
100.0%$15M

IVF vs INMD vs NTRA vs AEYE — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLINMDLAGGINGAEYE

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

INMD leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

NTRA is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.3B annually — 332.1x IVF's $7M. INMD is the more profitable business, keeping 23.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to IVF's -4.2%. On growth, NTRA holds the edge at +39.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricIVF logoIVFINVO Fertility, I…INMD logoINMDInMode Ltd.NTRA logoNTRANatera, Inc.AEYE logoAEYEAudioEye, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$7M$375M$2.3B$40M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$25M$81M-$310M-$504,000
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$29M$87M-$208M-$3M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$8M$91M$97M$2M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+39.2%+77.8%+64.8%+78.3%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-3.7%+21.3%-13.4%-7.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-4.2%+23.3%-9.0%-7.6%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-111.9%+24.2%+4.2%+5.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+22.6%+5.3%+39.8%+7.9%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+94.9%-30.8%+185.4%+29.0%
INMD leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

IVF leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
MetricIVF logoIVFINVO Fertility, I…INMD logoINMDInMode Ltd.NTRA logoNTRANatera, Inc.AEYE logoAEYEAudioEye, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$3M$882M$31.2B$100M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$12M$593M$30.3B$96M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.01x9.73x-144.62x-32.36x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.10.32x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.98x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple6.88x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.40x2.38x13.51x2.49x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.01x1.33x17.55x20.91x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF10.46x285.53x
IVF leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

INMD leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

INMD delivers a 13.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $-5 for IVF. INMD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to IVF's 0.78x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NTRA scores 5/9 vs INMD's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricIVF logoIVFINVO Fertility, I…INMD logoINMDInMode Ltd.NTRA logoNTRANatera, Inc.AEYE logoAEYEAudioEye, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-4.7%+13.3%-15.3%-47.8%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-99.6%+11.8%-10.6%-9.5%
ROICReturn on invested capital-42.2%+13.5%-36.1%-42.4%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-41.6%+12.1%-18.3%-17.7%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–94354
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.78x0.02x0.13x0.15x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$9M-$289M-$862M-$5M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$741,396$303M$1.1B$5M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$10M$13M$214M$721,000
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-27.64x-25.21x-2.79x
INMD leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

NTRA leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in NTRA five years ago would be worth $21,587 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $0 for IVF. Over the past 12 months, NTRA leads with a +37.3% total return vs IVF's -99.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NTRA at 60.6% vs IVF's -94.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricIVF logoIVFINVO Fertility, I…INMD logoINMDInMode Ltd.NTRA logoNTRANatera, Inc.AEYE logoAEYEAudioEye, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-59.6%-5.9%-3.9%-18.7%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-99.3%-2.1%+37.3%-27.9%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-100.0%-60.2%+314.0%+20.6%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-100.0%-63.9%+115.9%-60.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-100.0%+105.0%+2089.4%+102.2%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-94.3%-26.4%+60.6%+6.4%
NTRA leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — INMD and NTRA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

INMD is the less volatile stock with a 1.04 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AEYE's 2.29 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NTRA currently trades 85.7% from its 52-week high vs IVF's 0.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricIVF logoIVFINVO Fertility, I…INMD logoINMDInMode Ltd.NTRA logoNTRANatera, Inc.AEYE logoAEYEAudioEye, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.29x1.00x1.17x2.18x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$297.60$16.74$256.36$16.39
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$1.61$12.72$131.81$5.31
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+0.6%+83.2%+85.7%+49.4%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10028.439.857.161.3
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded51K804K1.3M194K
Evenly matched — INMD and NTRA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: INMD as "Hold", NTRA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 22.1% upside for INMD (target: $17) vs 20.8% for NTRA (target: $266).

MetricIVF logoIVFINVO Fertility, I…INMD logoINMDInMode Ltd.NTRA logoNTRANatera, Inc.AEYE logoAEYEAudioEye, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$17.00$265.63
# AnalystsCovering analysts1127
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises1
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+14.5%0.0%0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

INMD leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). IVF leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.

Best OverallInMode Ltd. (INMD)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

IVF vs INMD vs NTRA vs AEYE: Key Questions Answered

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is IVF or INMD or NTRA or AEYE a better buy right now?

For growth investors, INVO Fertility, Inc.

(IVF) is the stronger pick with 116. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 2% for InMode Ltd. (INMD). InMode Ltd. (INMD) offers the better valuation at 9. 7x trailing P/E (10. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Natera, Inc. (NTRA) a "Buy" — based on 27 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — IVF or INMD or NTRA or AEYE?

Over the past 5 years, Natera, Inc.

(NTRA) delivered a total return of +115. 9%, compared to -100. 0% for INVO Fertility, Inc. (IVF). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NTRA returned +1835% versus IVF's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — IVF or INMD or NTRA or AEYE?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), InMode Ltd.

(INMD) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 00β versus AudioEye, Inc. 's 2. 18β — meaning AEYE is approximately 118% more volatile than INMD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, InMode Ltd. (INMD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 78% for INVO Fertility, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — IVF or INMD or NTRA or AEYE?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), INVO Fertility, Inc.

(IVF) is pulling ahead at 116. 3% versus -6. 2% for InMode Ltd. (INMD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: INVO Fertility, Inc. grew EPS 55. 2% year-over-year, compared to -36. 4% for InMode Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NTRA leads at 41. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — IVF or INMD or NTRA or AEYE?

InMode Ltd.

(INMD) is the more profitable company, earning 25. 3% net margin versus -139. 3% for INVO Fertility, Inc. — meaning it keeps 25. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: INMD leads at 23. 0% versus -124. 4% for IVF. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — INMD leads at 78. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Is IVF or INMD or NTRA or AEYE more undervalued right now?

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for INMD: 22.

1% to $17. 00.

07

Which pays a better dividend — IVF or INMD or NTRA or AEYE?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

08

Is IVF or INMD or NTRA or AEYE better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Natera, Inc.

(NTRA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 17), +1835% 10Y return). AudioEye, Inc. (AEYE) carries a higher beta of 2. 18 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NTRA: +1835%, AEYE: +96. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between IVF and INMD and NTRA and AEYE?

These companies operate in different sectors (IVF (Healthcare) and INMD (Healthcare) and NTRA (Healthcare) and AEYE (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: IVF is a small-cap high-growth stock; INMD is a small-cap deep-value stock; NTRA is a mid-cap high-growth stock; AEYE is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

IVF

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 11%
  • Gross Margin > 23%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

INMD

Quality Mega-Cap Compounder

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 13%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NTRA

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 19%
  • Gross Margin > 38%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

AEYE

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 46%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform IVF and INMD and NTRA and AEYE on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(IVF: 22.6% · INMD: 5.3%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.