Medical - Devices
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
IVF vs INMD vs NTRA vs AEYE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Devices
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
Software - Application
IVF vs INMD vs NTRA vs AEYE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Devices | Medical - Devices | Medical - Diagnostics & Research | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $3M | $882M | $31.16B | $100M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $7M | $375M | $2.31B | $40M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-29M | $87M | $-208M | $-3M |
| Gross Margin | 39.2% | 77.8% | 64.8% | 78.3% |
| Operating Margin | -370.2% | 21.3% | -13.4% | -7.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | 10.3x | — | — |
| Total Debt | $10M | $13M | $214M | $721K |
| Cash & Equiv. | $741K | $303M | $1.08B | $5M |
IVF vs INMD vs NTRA vs AEYE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| INVO Fertility, Inc. (IVF) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| InMode Ltd. (INMD) | 100 | 95.2 | -4.8% |
| Natera, Inc. (NTRA) | 100 | 443.0 | +343.0% |
| AudioEye, Inc. (AEYE) | 100 | 92.8 | -7.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: IVF vs INMD vs NTRA vs AEYE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
IVF is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 116.3%, EPS growth 55.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 16.2%
- 116.3% revenue growth vs INMD's -6.2%
INMD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 1.04
- Lower volatility, beta 1.04, Low D/E 1.9%, current ratio 9.88x
- Beta 1.04, current ratio 9.88x
- Better valuation composite
NTRA is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 20.9% 10Y total return vs INMD's 105.0%
- +37.3% vs IVF's -99.3%
AEYE lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 116.3% revenue growth vs INMD's -6.2% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 23.3% margin vs IVF's -417.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.04 vs AEYE's 2.29, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +37.3% vs IVF's -99.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.8% ROA vs IVF's -99.6%, ROIC 13.5% vs -42.2% |
IVF vs INMD vs NTRA vs AEYE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
IVF vs INMD vs NTRA vs AEYE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
INMD leads in 2 of 6 categories
IVF leads 1 • NTRA leads 1 • AEYE leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
INMD leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NTRA is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.3B annually — 332.1x IVF's $7M. INMD is the more profitable business, keeping 23.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to IVF's -4.2%. On growth, NTRA holds the edge at +39.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $7M | $375M | $2.3B | $40M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$25M | $81M | -$310M | -$504,000 |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$29M | $87M | -$208M | -$3M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$8M | $91M | $97M | $2M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +39.2% | +77.8% | +64.8% | +78.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -3.7% | +21.3% | -13.4% | -7.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -4.2% | +23.3% | -9.0% | -7.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -111.9% | +24.2% | +4.2% | +5.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +22.6% | +5.3% | +39.8% | +7.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +94.9% | -30.8% | +185.4% | +29.0% |
Valuation Metrics
IVF leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3M | $882M | $31.2B | $100M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $12M | $593M | $30.3B | $96M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.01x | 9.73x | -144.62x | -32.36x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 10.32x | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.98x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 6.88x | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.40x | 2.38x | 13.51x | 2.49x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.01x | 1.33x | 17.55x | 20.91x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 10.46x | 285.53x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
INMD leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
INMD delivers a 13.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $-5 for IVF. INMD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to IVF's 0.78x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NTRA scores 5/9 vs INMD's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -4.7% | +13.3% | -15.3% | -47.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -99.6% | +11.8% | -10.6% | -9.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -42.2% | +13.5% | -36.1% | -42.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -41.6% | +12.1% | -18.3% | -17.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.78x | 0.02x | 0.13x | 0.15x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $9M | -$289M | -$862M | -$5M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $741,396 | $303M | $1.1B | $5M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $10M | $13M | $214M | $721,000 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -27.64x | — | -25.21x | -2.79x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NTRA leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NTRA five years ago would be worth $21,587 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $0 for IVF. Over the past 12 months, NTRA leads with a +37.3% total return vs IVF's -99.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NTRA at 60.6% vs IVF's -94.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -59.6% | -5.9% | -3.9% | -18.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -99.3% | -2.1% | +37.3% | -27.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -60.2% | +314.0% | +20.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -63.9% | +115.9% | -60.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +105.0% | +2089.4% | +102.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -94.3% | -26.4% | +60.6% | +6.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — INMD and NTRA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
INMD is the less volatile stock with a 1.04 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AEYE's 2.29 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NTRA currently trades 85.7% from its 52-week high vs IVF's 0.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.29x | 1.00x | 1.17x | 2.18x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $297.60 | $16.74 | $256.36 | $16.39 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.61 | $12.72 | $131.81 | $5.31 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +0.6% | +83.2% | +85.7% | +49.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 28.4 | 39.8 | 57.1 | 61.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 51K | 804K | 1.3M | 194K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: INMD as "Hold", NTRA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 22.1% upside for INMD (target: $17) vs 20.8% for NTRA (target: $266).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $17.00 | $265.63 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 11 | 27 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +14.5% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
INMD leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). IVF leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
IVF vs INMD vs NTRA vs AEYE: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is IVF or INMD or NTRA or AEYE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, INVO Fertility, Inc.
(IVF) is the stronger pick with 116. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 2% for InMode Ltd. (INMD). InMode Ltd. (INMD) offers the better valuation at 9. 7x trailing P/E (10. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Natera, Inc. (NTRA) a "Buy" — based on 27 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — IVF or INMD or NTRA or AEYE?
Over the past 5 years, Natera, Inc.
(NTRA) delivered a total return of +115. 9%, compared to -100. 0% for INVO Fertility, Inc. (IVF). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NTRA returned +1835% versus IVF's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — IVF or INMD or NTRA or AEYE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), InMode Ltd.
(INMD) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 00β versus AudioEye, Inc. 's 2. 18β — meaning AEYE is approximately 118% more volatile than INMD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, InMode Ltd. (INMD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 78% for INVO Fertility, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — IVF or INMD or NTRA or AEYE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), INVO Fertility, Inc.
(IVF) is pulling ahead at 116. 3% versus -6. 2% for InMode Ltd. (INMD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: INVO Fertility, Inc. grew EPS 55. 2% year-over-year, compared to -36. 4% for InMode Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NTRA leads at 41. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — IVF or INMD or NTRA or AEYE?
InMode Ltd.
(INMD) is the more profitable company, earning 25. 3% net margin versus -139. 3% for INVO Fertility, Inc. — meaning it keeps 25. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: INMD leads at 23. 0% versus -124. 4% for IVF. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — INMD leads at 78. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is IVF or INMD or NTRA or AEYE more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for INMD: 22.
1% to $17. 00.
07Which pays a better dividend — IVF or INMD or NTRA or AEYE?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is IVF or INMD or NTRA or AEYE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Natera, Inc.
(NTRA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 17), +1835% 10Y return). AudioEye, Inc. (AEYE) carries a higher beta of 2. 18 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NTRA: +1835%, AEYE: +96. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between IVF and INMD and NTRA and AEYE?
These companies operate in different sectors (IVF (Healthcare) and INMD (Healthcare) and NTRA (Healthcare) and AEYE (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: IVF is a small-cap high-growth stock; INMD is a small-cap deep-value stock; NTRA is a mid-cap high-growth stock; AEYE is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.