Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

IZM vs ACMR vs ICHR vs LIQT vs MKSI

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
IZM
ICZOOM Group Inc.

Technology Distributors

TechnologyNASDAQ • CN
Market Cap$1M
5Y Perf.-77.8%
ACMR
ACM Research, Inc.

Semiconductors

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.92B
5Y Perf.+341.8%
ICHR
Ichor Holdings, Ltd.

Semiconductors

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.47B
5Y Perf.+117.6%
LIQT
LiqTech International, Inc.

Industrial - Pollution & Treatment Controls

IndustrialsNASDAQ • DK
Market Cap$22M
5Y Perf.-38.6%
MKSI
MKS Inc.

Hardware, Equipment & Parts

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$20.25B
5Y Perf.+239.4%

IZM vs ACMR vs ICHR vs LIQT vs MKSI — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
IZM logoIZM
ACMR logoACMR
ICHR logoICHR
LIQT logoLIQT
MKSI logoMKSI
IndustryTechnology DistributorsSemiconductorsSemiconductorsIndustrial - Pollution & Treatment ControlsHardware, Equipment & Parts
Market Cap$1M$3.92B$2.47B$22M$20.25B
Revenue (TTM)$362M$901M$959M$17M$4.07B
Net Income (TTM)$-667K$94M$-51M$-9M$327M
Gross Margin2.8%44.4%11.3%4.9%45.2%
Operating Margin-0.2%12.1%-3.8%-50.0%14.8%
Forward P/E29.7x62.2x30.4x
Total Debt$12M$303M$186M$12M$4.69B
Cash & Equiv.$2M$766M$98M$675M

IZM vs ACMR vs ICHR vs LIQT vs MKSILong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

IZM
ACMR
ICHR
LIQT
MKSI
StockMar 23May 26Return
ICZOOM Group Inc. (IZM)10022.2-77.8%
ACM Research, Inc. (ACMR)100441.8+341.8%
Ichor Holdings, Ltd. (ICHR)100217.6+117.6%
LiqTech Internation… (LIQT)10061.4-38.6%
MKS Inc. (MKSI)100339.4+239.4%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: IZM vs ACMR vs ICHR vs LIQT vs MKSI

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: ACMR leads in 4 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Ichor Holdings, Ltd. is the stronger pick specifically for recent price momentum and sentiment. LIQT and MKSI also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
IZM
ICZOOM Group Inc.
The Lower-Volatility Pick

Among these 5 stocks, IZM doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: technology exposure
ACMR
ACM Research, Inc.
The Growth Play

ACMR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 15.2%, EPS growth -10.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 32.3%
  • 30.7% 10Y total return vs MKSI's 7.5%
  • Lower volatility, beta 3.24, Low D/E 15.7%, current ratio 3.27x
  • 15.2% revenue growth vs IZM's -17.0%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
ICHR
Ichor Holdings, Ltd.
The Momentum Pick

ICHR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.

  • +329.1% vs IZM's -81.6%
Best for: momentum
LIQT
LiqTech International, Inc.
The Defensive Choice

LIQT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for stability.

  • Beta 0.52 vs ICHR's 3.93
Best for: stability
MKSI
MKS Inc.
The Income Pick

MKSI is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 2.64, yield 0.3%
  • Beta 2.64, yield 0.3%, current ratio 2.71x
  • 0.3% yield, vs ACMR's 0.2%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Best for: income & stability and defensive
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthACMR logoACMR15.2% revenue growth vs IZM's -17.0%
ValueACMR logoACMRLower P/E (29.7x vs 30.4x)
Quality / MarginsACMR logoACMR10.4% margin vs LIQT's -53.3%
Stability / SafetyLIQT logoLIQTBeta 0.52 vs ICHR's 3.93
DividendsMKSI logoMKSI0.3% yield, vs ACMR's 0.2%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)ICHR logoICHR+329.1% vs IZM's -81.6%
Efficiency (ROA)ACMR logoACMR3.9% ROA vs LIQT's -29.5%, ROIC 7.0% vs -31.1%

IZM vs ACMR vs ICHR vs LIQT vs MKSI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

IZMICZOOM Group Inc.
FY 2024
Shipping and Handling
100.0%$452,885
ACMRACM Research, Inc.
FY 2025
Total Single Wafer and Semi-Critical Cleaning Equipment
69.5%$626M
ECP Front End And Packaging Furnace And Other Technologies
22.1%$200M
Advanced Packaging (exclude ECP), Services & Spares
8.4%$76M
ICHRIchor Holdings, Ltd.

Segment breakdown not available.

LIQTLiqTech International, Inc.
FY 2024
Ceramics Segment
38.6%$6M
Water Segment
37.9%$6M
Plastics Segment
23.2%$3M
Corporate Segment
0.3%$49,496
MKSIMKS Inc.
FY 2025
Product
87.4%$3.4B
Service
12.6%$495M

IZM vs ACMR vs ICHR vs LIQT vs MKSI — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLACMRLAGGINGLIQT

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

MKSI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

MKSI is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.1B annually — 242.5x LIQT's $17M. ACMR is the more profitable business, keeping 10.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LIQT's -53.3%. On growth, LIQT holds the edge at +53.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricIZM logoIZMICZOOM Group Inc.ACMR logoACMRACM Research, Inc.ICHR logoICHRIchor Holdings, L…LIQT logoLIQTLiqTech Internati…MKSI logoMKSIMKS Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$362M$901M$959M$17M$4.1B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$184,236$126M-$11M-$6M$945M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$666,903$94M-$51M-$9M$327M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$2M-$69M-$17M-$7M$401M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+2.8%+44.4%+11.3%+4.9%+45.2%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-0.2%+12.1%-3.8%-50.0%+14.8%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-0.2%+10.4%-5.3%-53.3%+8.0%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+0.4%-7.6%-1.7%-39.3%+9.8%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+3.0%+9.4%+4.7%+53.6%+15.2%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+2.0%-76.1%+46.2%+69.4%+53.2%
MKSI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

IZM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 43.2x trailing earnings, ACMR trades at a 37% valuation discount to MKSI's 68.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MKSI's 26.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ACMR's 27.5x.

MetricIZM logoIZMICZOOM Group Inc.ACMR logoACMRACM Research, Inc.ICHR logoICHRIchor Holdings, L…LIQT logoLIQTLiqTech Internati…MKSI logoMKSIMKS Inc.
Market CapShares × price$1M$3.9B$2.5B$22M$20.2B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$11M$3.5B$2.6B$34M$24.3B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-1.74x43.21x-46.25x-2.59x68.83x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.29.68x62.25x30.36x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.22x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple27.49x26.70x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.01x4.35x2.61x1.35x5.15x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.26x2.06x3.67x2.14x7.49x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF0.76x40.74x
IZM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

ACMR leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

MKSI delivers a 12.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $-70 for LIQT. ACMR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.16x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MKSI's 1.73x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MKSI scores 6/9 vs LIQT's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricIZM logoIZMICZOOM Group Inc.ACMR logoACMRACM Research, Inc.ICHR logoICHRIchor Holdings, L…LIQT logoLIQTLiqTech Internati…MKSI logoMKSIMKS Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-4.3%+6.1%-7.5%-70.0%+12.2%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-1.5%+3.9%-5.2%-29.5%+3.7%
ROICReturn on invested capital-4.1%+7.0%-3.9%-31.1%+6.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-8.6%+6.6%-4.7%+7.2%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–952326
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.79x0.16x0.28x1.17x1.73x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$10M-$463M$87M$12M$4.0B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$2M$766M$98M$675M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$12M$303M$186M$12M$4.7B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-0.31x20.44x-5.97x-13.46x2.84x
ACMR leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

ACMR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in ACMR five years ago would be worth $23,344 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $391 for LIQT. Over the past 12 months, ICHR leads with a +329.1% total return vs IZM's -81.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ACMR at 80.5% vs IZM's -47.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricIZM logoIZMICZOOM Group Inc.ACMR logoACMRACM Research, Inc.ICHR logoICHRIchor Holdings, L…LIQT logoLIQTLiqTech Internati…MKSI logoMKSIMKS Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-85.1%+31.9%+249.0%+54.9%+78.8%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-81.6%+195.6%+329.1%+64.8%+306.1%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-85.9%+487.9%+151.1%-31.3%+266.0%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-88.4%+133.4%+28.9%-96.1%+66.5%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-88.4%+3065.8%+629.1%-90.9%+750.6%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-47.9%+80.5%+35.9%-11.8%+54.1%
ACMR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — IZM and ICHR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

IZM is the less volatile stock with a -0.74 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ICHR's 3.93 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ICHR currently trades 97.7% from its 52-week high vs IZM's 14.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricIZM logoIZMICZOOM Group Inc.ACMR logoACMRACM Research, Inc.ICHR logoICHRIchor Holdings, L…LIQT logoLIQTLiqTech Internati…MKSI logoMKSIMKS Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500-0.74x3.24x3.93x0.52x2.64x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$2.74$71.65$72.87$3.35$326.83
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.34$19.26$13.12$1.30$71.49
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+14.0%+82.6%+97.7%+68.9%+92.0%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10041.460.766.957.065.3
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded2.0M1.2M795K50K1.2M
Evenly matched — IZM and ICHR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — ACMR and MKSI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: ACMR as "Buy", ICHR as "Buy", MKSI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply -9.3% upside for MKSI (target: $273) vs -32.4% for ACMR (target: $40). For income investors, MKSI offers the higher dividend yield at 0.29% vs ACMR's 0.19%.

MetricIZM logoIZMICZOOM Group Inc.ACMR logoACMRACM Research, Inc.ICHR logoICHRIchor Holdings, L…LIQT logoLIQTLiqTech Internati…MKSI logoMKSIMKS Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$40.00$49.80$272.86
# AnalystsCovering analysts101429
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.2%+0.3%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises310
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.11$0.87
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+0.2%0.0%0.0%+0.2%
Evenly matched — ACMR and MKSI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

ACMR leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). MKSI leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.

Best OverallACM Research, Inc. (ACMR)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

IZM vs ACMR vs ICHR vs LIQT vs MKSI: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is IZM or ACMR or ICHR or LIQT or MKSI a better buy right now?

For growth investors, ACM Research, Inc.

(ACMR) is the stronger pick with 15. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -17. 0% for ICZOOM Group Inc. (IZM). ACM Research, Inc. (ACMR) offers the better valuation at 43. 2x trailing P/E (29. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate ACM Research, Inc. (ACMR) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — IZM or ACMR or ICHR or LIQT or MKSI?

On trailing P/E, ACM Research, Inc.

(ACMR) is the cheapest at 43. 2x versus MKS Inc. at 68. 8x. On forward P/E, ACM Research, Inc. is actually cheaper at 29. 7x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — IZM or ACMR or ICHR or LIQT or MKSI?

Over the past 5 years, ACM Research, Inc.

(ACMR) delivered a total return of +133. 4%, compared to -96. 1% for LiqTech International, Inc. (LIQT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ACMR returned +30. 7% versus LIQT's -90. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — IZM or ACMR or ICHR or LIQT or MKSI?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), ICZOOM Group Inc.

(IZM) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 74β versus Ichor Holdings, Ltd. 's 3. 93β — meaning ICHR is approximately -634% more volatile than IZM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, ACM Research, Inc. (ACMR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 16% versus 173% for MKS Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — IZM or ACMR or ICHR or LIQT or MKSI?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), ACM Research, Inc.

(ACMR) is pulling ahead at 15. 2% versus -17. 0% for ICZOOM Group Inc. (IZM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: MKS Inc. grew EPS 55. 5% year-over-year, compared to -229. 4% for ICZOOM Group Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ACMR leads at 32. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — IZM or ACMR or ICHR or LIQT or MKSI?

ACM Research, Inc.

(ACMR) is the more profitable company, earning 10. 4% net margin versus -51. 7% for LiqTech International, Inc. — meaning it keeps 10. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MKSI leads at 14. 4% versus -50. 3% for LIQT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ACMR leads at 44. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is IZM or ACMR or ICHR or LIQT or MKSI more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, ACM Research, Inc.

(ACMR) trades at 29. 7x forward P/E versus 62. 2x for Ichor Holdings, Ltd. — 32. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MKSI: -9. 3% to $272. 86.

08

Which pays a better dividend — IZM or ACMR or ICHR or LIQT or MKSI?

In this comparison, MKSI (0.

3% yield), ACMR (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. IZM, ICHR, LIQT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is IZM or ACMR or ICHR or LIQT or MKSI better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, ICZOOM Group Inc.

(IZM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 74)). ACM Research, Inc. (ACMR) carries a higher beta of 3. 24 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (IZM: -88. 4%, ACMR: +30. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between IZM and ACMR and ICHR and LIQT and MKSI?

These companies operate in different sectors (IZM (Technology) and ACMR (Technology) and ICHR (Technology) and LIQT (Industrials) and MKSI (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: IZM is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ACMR is a small-cap high-growth stock; ICHR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LIQT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MKSI is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

IZM

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ACMR

Steady Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 6%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ICHR

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

LIQT

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 26%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MKSI

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 7%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform IZM and ACMR and ICHR and LIQT and MKSI on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(IZM: 3.0% · ACMR: 9.4%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.