Technology Distributors
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
IZM vs LIQT vs POWI vs CDZI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Industrial - Pollution & Treatment Controls
Semiconductors
Regulated Water
IZM vs LIQT vs POWI vs CDZI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Technology Distributors | Industrial - Pollution & Treatment Controls | Semiconductors | Regulated Water |
| Market Cap | $1M | $22M | $4.00B | $361M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $362M | $17M | $446M | $16M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-667K | $-9M | $17M | $-33M |
| Gross Margin | 2.8% | 4.9% | 53.9% | 32.5% |
| Operating Margin | -0.2% | -50.0% | 4.6% | -155.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 58.7x | — |
| Total Debt | $12M | $12M | $0.00 | $86M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2M | — | $59M | $17M |
IZM vs LIQT vs POWI vs CDZI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| ICZOOM Group Inc. (IZM) | 100 | 21.9 | -78.1% |
| LiqTech Internation… (LIQT) | 100 | 60.4 | -39.6% |
| Power Integrations,… (POWI) | 100 | 86.6 | -13.4% |
| Cadiz Inc. (CDZI) | 100 | 117.6 | +17.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: IZM vs LIQT vs POWI vs CDZI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
IZM is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Better valuation composite
LIQT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.52
- Beta 0.52 vs POWI's 2.08
- +64.8% vs IZM's -81.6%
POWI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 232.7% 10Y total return vs CDZI's -27.0%
- 3.7% margin vs CDZI's -206.6%
- 1.2% yield, 18-year raise streak, vs CDZI's 1.5%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
- 2.1% ROA vs LIQT's -29.5%, ROIC 2.4% vs -31.1%
CDZI is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.53, yield 1.5%
- Rev growth 382.6%, EPS growth 5.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 157.3%
- Beta 1.53, yield 1.5%, current ratio 1.79x
- 382.6% revenue growth vs IZM's -17.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 382.6% revenue growth vs IZM's -17.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.7% margin vs CDZI's -206.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.52 vs POWI's 2.08 | |
| Dividends | 1.2% yield, 18-year raise streak, vs CDZI's 1.5%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +64.8% vs IZM's -81.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.1% ROA vs LIQT's -29.5%, ROIC 2.4% vs -31.1% |
IZM vs LIQT vs POWI vs CDZI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
IZM vs LIQT vs POWI vs CDZI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
POWI leads in 3 of 6 categories
IZM leads 1 • LIQT leads 0 • CDZI leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
POWI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
POWI is the larger business by revenue, generating $446M annually — 27.9x CDZI's $16M. POWI is the more profitable business, keeping 3.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CDZI's -2.1%. On growth, LIQT holds the edge at +53.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $362M | $17M | $446M | $16M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $184,236 | -$6M | $41M | -$23M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$666,903 | -$9M | $17M | -$33M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $2M | -$7M | $85M | -$30M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +2.8% | +4.9% | +53.9% | +32.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -0.2% | -50.0% | +4.6% | -155.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -0.2% | -53.3% | +3.7% | -2.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +0.4% | -39.3% | +18.9% | -188.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.0% | +53.6% | +2.6% | +28.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.0% | +69.4% | -60.0% | +16.7% |
Valuation Metrics
IZM leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1M | $22M | $4.0B | $361M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $11M | $34M | $3.9B | $430M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.74x | -2.59x | 184.18x | -9.04x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 58.74x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 79.69x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.01x | 1.35x | 9.02x | 37.57x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.26x | 2.14x | 6.01x | 9.71x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 0.76x | — | 45.93x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
POWI leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
POWI delivers a 2.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $2 in annual profit, vs $-119 for CDZI. IZM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.79x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CDZI's 2.53x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), POWI scores 6/9 vs LIQT's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -4.3% | -70.0% | +2.4% | -119.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -1.5% | -29.5% | +2.1% | -25.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -4.1% | -31.1% | +2.4% | -17.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -8.6% | — | +2.9% | -21.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 2 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.79x | 1.17x | — | 2.53x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $10M | $12M | -$59M | $69M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2M | — | $59M | $17M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $12M | $12M | $0 | $86M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.31x | -13.46x | — | -2.90x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
POWI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in POWI five years ago would be worth $9,165 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $391 for LIQT. Over the past 12 months, LIQT leads with a +64.8% total return vs IZM's -81.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CDZI at 0.8% vs IZM's -47.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -85.1% | +54.9% | +93.2% | -17.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -81.6% | +64.8% | +44.4% | +60.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -85.9% | -31.3% | -6.3% | +2.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -88.4% | -96.1% | -8.3% | -60.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -88.4% | -90.9% | +232.7% | -27.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -47.9% | -11.8% | -2.2% | +0.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — IZM and POWI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
IZM is the less volatile stock with a -0.74 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than POWI's 2.08 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. POWI currently trades 91.0% from its 52-week high vs IZM's 14.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.75x | 0.54x | 2.11x | 1.56x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.74 | $3.35 | $78.94 | $6.96 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.34 | $1.30 | $30.86 | $2.58 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +14.0% | +68.9% | +91.0% | +68.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 41.4 | 57.0 | 76.1 | 50.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.0M | 50K | 967K | 638K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — POWI and CDZI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: POWI as "Buy", CDZI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 108.8% upside for CDZI (target: $10) vs 10.0% for POWI (target: $79). For income investors, CDZI offers the higher dividend yield at 1.55% vs POWI's 1.17%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $79.00 | $10.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | 16 | 2 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +1.2% | +1.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 18 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.84 | $0.07 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +2.5% | 0.0% |
POWI leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). IZM leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
IZM vs LIQT vs POWI vs CDZI: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is IZM or LIQT or POWI or CDZI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Cadiz Inc.
(CDZI) is the stronger pick with 382. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -17. 0% for ICZOOM Group Inc. (IZM). Power Integrations, Inc. (POWI) offers the better valuation at 184. 2x trailing P/E (58. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Power Integrations, Inc. (POWI) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — IZM or LIQT or POWI or CDZI?
Over the past 5 years, Power Integrations, Inc.
(POWI) delivered a total return of -8. 3%, compared to -96. 1% for LiqTech International, Inc. (LIQT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: POWI returned +239. 0% versus LIQT's -91. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — IZM or LIQT or POWI or CDZI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), ICZOOM Group Inc.
(IZM) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 75β versus Power Integrations, Inc. 's 2. 11β — meaning POWI is approximately -382% more volatile than IZM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, ICZOOM Group Inc. (IZM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 79% versus 3% for Cadiz Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — IZM or LIQT or POWI or CDZI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Cadiz Inc.
(CDZI) is pulling ahead at 382. 6% versus -17. 0% for ICZOOM Group Inc. (IZM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: LiqTech International, Inc. grew EPS 45. 7% year-over-year, compared to -229. 4% for ICZOOM Group Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CDZI leads at 157. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — IZM or LIQT or POWI or CDZI?
Power Integrations, Inc.
(POWI) is the more profitable company, earning 5. 0% net margin versus -324. 1% for Cadiz Inc. — meaning it keeps 5. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: POWI leads at 4. 8% versus -242. 0% for CDZI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — POWI leads at 54. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is IZM or LIQT or POWI or CDZI more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CDZI: 108.
8% to $10. 00.
07Which pays a better dividend — IZM or LIQT or POWI or CDZI?
In this comparison, CDZI (1.
5% yield), POWI (1. 2% yield) pay a dividend. IZM, LIQT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is IZM or LIQT or POWI or CDZI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, ICZOOM Group Inc.
(IZM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 75)). Power Integrations, Inc. (POWI) carries a higher beta of 2. 11 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (IZM: -88. 6%, POWI: +239. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between IZM and LIQT and POWI and CDZI?
These companies operate in different sectors (IZM (Technology) and LIQT (Industrials) and POWI (Technology) and CDZI (Utilities)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: IZM is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LIQT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; POWI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CDZI is a small-cap high-growth stock. POWI, CDZI pay a dividend while IZM, LIQT do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.