Restaurants
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
JACK vs RRGB vs WEN vs TXRH
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Restaurants
Restaurants
Restaurants
JACK vs RRGB vs WEN vs TXRH — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Restaurants | Restaurants | Restaurants | Restaurants |
| Market Cap | $266M | $81M | $1.32B | $10.41B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.35B | $1.21B | $2.21B | $6.06B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-69M | $-23M | $186M | $415M |
| Gross Margin | 27.6% | 26.8% | 35.6% | 18.7% |
| Operating Margin | -2.8% | 0.2% | 16.8% | 8.2% |
| Forward P/E | 4.0x | — | 12.1x | 25.0x |
| Total Debt | $3.12B | $514M | $4.09B | $1.89B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $52M | $20M | $451M | $135M |
JACK vs RRGB vs WEN vs TXRH — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jack in the Box Inc. (JACK) | 100 | 20.7 | -79.3% |
| Red Robin Gourmet B… (RRGB) | 100 | 26.5 | -73.5% |
| The Wendy's Company (WEN) | 100 | 32.7 | -67.3% |
| Texas Roadhouse, In… (TXRH) | 100 | 304.6 | +204.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: JACK vs RRGB vs WEN vs TXRH
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
JACK is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (4.0x vs 25.0x)
RRGB is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +34.9% vs JACK's -47.8%
WEN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.52, yield 14.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.52, current ratio 1.85x
- PEG 1.16 vs TXRH's 1.17
- Beta 0.52, yield 14.3%, current ratio 1.85x
TXRH is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 9.4%, EPS growth -5.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 13.5%
- 288.0% 10Y total return vs WEN's 10.9%
- 9.4% revenue growth vs JACK's -6.7%
- 12.2% ROA vs RRGB's -4.1%, ROIC 14.5% vs 0.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 9.4% revenue growth vs JACK's -6.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (4.0x vs 25.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 8.4% margin vs JACK's -5.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.52 vs RRGB's 2.10 | |
| Dividends | 14.3% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs TXRH's 1.7%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +34.9% vs JACK's -47.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.2% ROA vs RRGB's -4.1%, ROIC 14.5% vs 0.5% |
JACK vs RRGB vs WEN vs TXRH — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
JACK vs RRGB vs WEN vs TXRH — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TXRH leads in 2 of 6 categories
WEN leads 1 • JACK leads 1 • RRGB leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WEN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TXRH is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.1B annually — 5.0x RRGB's $1.2B. WEN is the more profitable business, keeping 8.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to JACK's -5.2%. On growth, TXRH holds the edge at +12.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.3B | $1.2B | $2.2B | $6.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $16M | $54M | $530M | $709M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$69M | -$23M | $186M | $415M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$10M | $6M | $238M | $441M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +27.6% | +26.8% | +35.6% | +18.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.8% | +0.2% | +16.8% | +8.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -5.2% | -1.9% | +8.4% | +6.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -0.7% | +0.5% | +10.8% | +7.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -25.5% | -5.7% | -3.0% | +12.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +33.7% | +77.4% | -8.0% | +10.0% |
Valuation Metrics
JACK leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 7.3x trailing earnings, WEN trades at a 72% valuation discount to TXRH's 25.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), TXRH offers better value at 0.38x vs WEN's 0.71x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $266M | $81M | $1.3B | $10.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.3B | $575M | $5.0B | $12.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -3.29x | -2.80x | 7.32x | 25.89x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 4.03x | — | 12.07x | 25.05x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.71x | 0.38x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 82.92x | 10.66x | 9.38x | 17.15x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.18x | 0.07x | 0.59x | 1.77x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | — | 5.51x | 7.09x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 3.58x | 13.00x | 5.07x | 30.44x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TXRH leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WEN delivers a 170.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $170 in annual profit, vs $37 for TXRH. TXRH carries lower financial leverage with a 1.27x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WEN's 15.78x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RRGB scores 5/9 vs TXRH's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | — | +170.4% | +37.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.7% | -4.1% | +3.7% | +12.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.6% | +0.5% | +7.1% | +14.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.8% | +0.7% | +7.9% | +20.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | — | 15.78x | 1.27x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3.1B | $494M | $3.6B | $1.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $52M | $20M | $451M | $135M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3.1B | $514M | $4.1B | $1.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.51x | 0.26x | 2.86x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TXRH leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TXRH five years ago would be worth $16,160 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,032 for RRGB. Over the past 12 months, RRGB leads with a +34.9% total return vs JACK's -47.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TXRH at 15.4% vs JACK's -42.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -25.9% | -11.4% | -13.2% | -7.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -47.8% | +34.9% | -36.1% | -6.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -81.2% | -70.5% | -58.4% | +53.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -82.8% | -89.7% | -53.5% | +61.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -59.5% | -94.4% | +10.9% | +288.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -42.7% | -33.4% | -25.3% | +15.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — WEN and TXRH each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WEN is the less volatile stock with a 0.52 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RRGB's 2.10 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TXRH currently trades 79.0% from its 52-week high vs RRGB's 46.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.69x | 2.10x | 0.52x | 0.70x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $29.40 | $7.89 | $12.52 | $199.99 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $8.91 | $2.46 | $6.37 | $153.82 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +47.2% | +46.5% | +55.5% | +79.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.4 | 51.6 | 42.4 | 45.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 837K | 384K | 7.8M | 983K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — WEN and TXRH each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: JACK as "Hold", RRGB as "Hold", WEN as "Hold", TXRH as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 90.7% upside for RRGB (target: $7) vs 11.2% for WEN (target: $8). For income investors, WEN offers the higher dividend yield at 14.31% vs TXRH's 1.72%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $19.92 | $7.00 | $7.73 | $191.64 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 41 | 38 | 51 | 43 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +6.3% | — | +14.3% | +1.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — | 4 | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.87 | — | $0.99 | $2.71 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.9% | 0.0% | +5.8% | +1.4% |
TXRH leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). WEN leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
JACK vs RRGB vs WEN vs TXRH: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is JACK or RRGB or WEN or TXRH a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Texas Roadhouse, Inc.
(TXRH) is the stronger pick with 9. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 7% for Jack in the Box Inc. (JACK). The Wendy's Company (WEN) offers the better valuation at 7. 3x trailing P/E (12. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Jack in the Box Inc. (JACK) a "Hold" — based on 41 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — JACK or RRGB or WEN or TXRH?
On trailing P/E, The Wendy's Company (WEN) is the cheapest at 7.
3x versus Texas Roadhouse, Inc. at 25. 9x. On forward P/E, Jack in the Box Inc. is actually cheaper at 4. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: The Wendy's Company wins at 1. 16x versus Texas Roadhouse, Inc. 's 1. 17x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — JACK or RRGB or WEN or TXRH?
Over the past 5 years, Texas Roadhouse, Inc.
(TXRH) delivered a total return of +61. 6%, compared to -89. 7% for Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc. (RRGB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TXRH returned +288. 0% versus RRGB's -94. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — JACK or RRGB or WEN or TXRH?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Wendy's Company (WEN) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
52β versus Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc. 's 2. 10β — meaning RRGB is approximately 301% more volatile than WEN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Texas Roadhouse, Inc. (TXRH) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 127% versus 16% for The Wendy's Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — JACK or RRGB or WEN or TXRH?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Texas Roadhouse, Inc.
(TXRH) is pulling ahead at 9. 4% versus -6. 7% for Jack in the Box Inc. (JACK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc. grew EPS 73. 4% year-over-year, compared to -127. 6% for Jack in the Box Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TXRH leads at 13. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — JACK or RRGB or WEN or TXRH?
The Wendy's Company (WEN) is the more profitable company, earning 8.
7% net margin versus -5. 5% for Jack in the Box Inc. — meaning it keeps 8. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WEN leads at 16. 5% versus -1. 2% for JACK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RRGB leads at 68. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is JACK or RRGB or WEN or TXRH more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, The Wendy's Company (WEN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 16x versus Texas Roadhouse, Inc. 's 1. 17x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Jack in the Box Inc. (JACK) trades at 4. 0x forward P/E versus 25. 0x for Texas Roadhouse, Inc. — 21. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RRGB: 90. 7% to $7. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — JACK or RRGB or WEN or TXRH?
In this comparison, WEN (14.
3% yield), JACK (6. 3% yield), TXRH (1. 7% yield) pay a dividend. RRGB does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is JACK or RRGB or WEN or TXRH better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Texas Roadhouse, Inc.
(TXRH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 70), 1. 7% yield, +288. 0% 10Y return). Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc. (RRGB) carries a higher beta of 2. 10 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TXRH: +288. 0%, RRGB: -94. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between JACK and RRGB and WEN and TXRH?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: JACK is a small-cap income-oriented stock; RRGB is a small-cap quality compounder stock; WEN is a small-cap deep-value stock; TXRH is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. JACK, WEN, TXRH pay a dividend while RRGB does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.