JAKK vs FNKO

For growth investors, Funko, Inc.

(FNKO) is the stronger pick with -13. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -17. 4% for JAKKS Pacific, Inc. (JAKK). JAKKS Pacific, Inc. (JAKK) offers the better valuation at 27. 1x trailing P/E (7. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate JAKKS Pacific, Inc. (JAKK) a "Hold" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, JAKKS Pacific, Inc.

(JAKK) delivered a total return of +161. 5%, compared to -82. 5% for Funko, Inc. (FNKO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FNKO returned -36. 9% versus JAKK's -66. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), JAKKS Pacific, Inc.

(JAKK) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 79β versus Funko, Inc. 's 3. 15β — meaning FNKO is approximately 76% more volatile than JAKK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, JAKKS Pacific, Inc. (JAKK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 37% versus 157% for Funko, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Funko, Inc.

(FNKO) is pulling ahead at -13. 5% versus -17. 4% for JAKKS Pacific, Inc. (JAKK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: JAKKS Pacific, Inc. grew EPS -72. 6% year-over-year, compared to -342. 9% for Funko, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, JAKK leads at -10. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

JAKKS Pacific, Inc.

(JAKK) is the more profitable company, earning 1. 7% net margin versus -7. 4% for Funko, Inc. — meaning it keeps 1. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JAKK leads at 2. 5% versus -5. 0% for FNKO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FNKO leads at 38. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for JAKK: 79.

0% to $41. 67.

In this comparison, JAKK (4.

2% yield) pays a dividend. FNKO does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, JAKKS Pacific, Inc.

(JAKK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (4. 2% yield). Funko, Inc. (FNKO) carries a higher beta of 3. 15 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (JAKK: -66. 6%, FNKO: -36. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: JAKK is a small-cap income-oriented stock; FNKO is a small-cap quality compounder stock. JAKK pays a dividend while FNKO does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.