Biotechnology
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
JBIO vs ARQT vs DAWN vs REGN vs IQV
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
JBIO vs ARQT vs DAWN vs REGN vs IQV — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Medical - Diagnostics & Research |
| Market Cap | $500M | $3.05B | $2.22B | $63.60B | $30.79B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $416M | $158M | $14.92B | $16.63B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-130M | $-2M | $-107M | $4.42B | $1.39B |
| Gross Margin | — | 90.9% | 89.1% | 84.5% | 26.1% |
| Operating Margin | — | 0.8% | -80.8% | 24.3% | 13.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | 122.5x | — | 13.2x | 14.2x |
| Total Debt | $724K | $6M | $3M | $2.71B | $16.17B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $88M | $43M | $197M | $3.12B | $1.98B |
JBIO vs ARQT vs DAWN vs REGN vs IQV — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 21 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jade Biosciences, I… (JBIO) | 100 | 1.9 | -98.1% |
| Arcutis Biotherapeu… (ARQT) | 100 | 89.3 | -10.7% |
| Day One Biopharmace… (DAWN) | 100 | 94.2 | -5.8% |
| Regeneron Pharmaceu… (REGN) | 100 | 109.6 | +9.6% |
| IQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV) | 100 | 74.9 | -25.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: JBIO vs ARQT vs DAWN vs REGN vs IQV
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
JBIO ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth.
- 141.8% revenue growth vs REGN's 1.0%
ARQT is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 91.3%, EPS growth 88.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 367.3%
DAWN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.14, Low D/E 0.6%, current ratio 8.02x
- Beta 0.14, current ratio 8.02x
- Beta 0.14 vs JBIO's 1.60
- +221.8% vs IQV's +14.0%
REGN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 68.2% 10Y total return vs IQV's 177.5%
- 29.6% margin vs DAWN's -67.8%
- 0.6% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
- 11.1% ROA vs JBIO's -47.3%, ROIC 8.9% vs -59.2%
IQV is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and valuation efficiency.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.16
- PEG 0.35 vs REGN's 2.08
- Better valuation composite
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 141.8% revenue growth vs REGN's 1.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 29.6% margin vs DAWN's -67.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.14 vs JBIO's 1.60 | |
| Dividends | 0.6% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +221.8% vs IQV's +14.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.1% ROA vs JBIO's -47.3%, ROIC 8.9% vs -59.2% |
JBIO vs ARQT vs DAWN vs REGN vs IQV — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
JBIO vs ARQT vs DAWN vs REGN vs IQV — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
REGN leads in 2 of 6 categories
IQV leads 2 • DAWN leads 1 • JBIO leads 0 • ARQT leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
REGN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IQV and JBIO operate at a comparable scale, with $16.6B and $0 in trailing revenue. REGN is the more profitable business, keeping 29.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to DAWN's -67.8%. On growth, DAWN holds the edge at +83.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $416M | $158M | $14.9B | $16.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$134M | $6M | -$124M | $4.2B | $3.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$130M | -$2M | -$107M | $4.4B | $1.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$117M | $27M | -$108M | $4.2B | $2.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +90.9% | +89.1% | +84.5% | +26.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +0.8% | -80.8% | +24.3% | +13.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -0.6% | -67.8% | +29.6% | +8.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +6.5% | -68.0% | +27.9% | +16.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +60.1% | +83.9% | +19.0% | +8.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +55.0% | +70.0% | -7.2% | +15.0% |
Valuation Metrics
IQV leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.8x trailing earnings, REGN trades at a 36% valuation discount to IQV's 23.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), IQV offers better value at 0.57x vs REGN's 2.33x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $500M | $3.0B | $2.2B | $63.6B | $30.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $413M | $3.0B | $2.0B | $63.2B | $45.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -3.78x | -187.54x | -20.70x | 14.76x | 23.15x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 122.45x | — | 13.18x | 14.16x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 2.33x | 0.57x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | 15.33x | 13.11x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 8.11x | 14.06x | 4.43x | 1.89x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.45x | 16.37x | 5.05x | 2.13x | 4.75x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | 15.59x | 15.01x |
Profitability & Efficiency
REGN leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
IQV delivers a 22.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $22 in annual profit, vs $-51 for JBIO. JBIO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to IQV's 2.44x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), REGN scores 5/9 vs JBIO's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -51.3% | -1.4% | -23.4% | +14.3% | +22.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -47.3% | -0.6% | -20.7% | +11.1% | +4.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -59.2% | -5.2% | -30.5% | +8.9% | +8.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -55.4% | -4.3% | -26.7% | +10.2% | +11.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 0.03x | 0.01x | 0.09x | 2.44x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$88M | -$37M | -$194M | -$412M | $14.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $88M | $43M | $197M | $3.1B | $2.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $724,000 | $6M | $3M | $2.7B | $16.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 2.08x | — | 108.44x | 3.10x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — ARQT and DAWN each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in REGN five years ago would be worth $11,679 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $222 for JBIO. Over the past 12 months, DAWN leads with a +221.8% total return vs IQV's +14.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ARQT at 33.7% vs JBIO's -68.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +8.3% | -15.9% | +143.3% | -20.9% | -19.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +121.0% | +80.6% | +221.8% | +18.0% | +14.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.8% | +138.8% | +71.7% | -18.1% | -14.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.8% | -16.2% | +5.0% | +16.8% | -25.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.8% | +11.8% | -8.4% | +68.2% | +177.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -68.1% | +33.7% | +19.7% | -6.4% | -5.0% |
Risk & Volatility
DAWN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DAWN is the less volatile stock with a 0.14 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than JBIO's 1.60 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DAWN currently trades 100.0% from its 52-week high vs JBIO's 54.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.60x | 1.45x | 0.14x | 0.51x | 1.16x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $27.96 | $31.77 | $21.53 | $821.11 | $247.05 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $6.57 | $12.72 | $5.64 | $503.25 | $153.01 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +54.9% | +76.7% | +100.0% | +74.6% | +73.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 32.5 | 66.4 | 80.3 | 37.5 | 54.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 826K | 1.5M | 1.4M | 868K | 1.5M |
Analyst Outlook
IQV leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: JBIO as "Buy", ARQT as "Buy", DAWN as "Buy", REGN as "Buy", IQV as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 188.1% upside for JBIO (target: $44) vs -0.1% for DAWN (target: $22). REGN is the only dividend payer here at 0.56% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $44.20 | $34.00 | $21.50 | $836.00 | $222.22 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 12 | 12 | 48 | 44 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +0.6% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — | — | 1 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $3.41 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +6.2% | +4.0% |
REGN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). IQV leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
JBIO vs ARQT vs DAWN vs REGN vs IQV: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is JBIO or ARQT or DAWN or REGN or IQV a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc.
(ARQT) is the stronger pick with 91. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 0% for Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (REGN). Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (REGN) offers the better valuation at 14. 8x trailing P/E (13. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Jade Biosciences, Inc. (JBIO) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — JBIO or ARQT or DAWN or REGN or IQV?
On trailing P/E, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(REGN) is the cheapest at 14. 8x versus IQVIA Holdings Inc. at 23. 1x. On forward P/E, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. is actually cheaper at 13. 2x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: IQVIA Holdings Inc. wins at 0. 35x versus Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 's 2. 08x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — JBIO or ARQT or DAWN or REGN or IQV?
Over the past 5 years, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(REGN) delivered a total return of +16. 8%, compared to -97. 8% for Jade Biosciences, Inc. (JBIO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IQV returned +177. 5% versus JBIO's -97. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — JBIO or ARQT or DAWN or REGN or IQV?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Day One Biopharmaceuticals, Inc.
(DAWN) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 14β versus Jade Biosciences, Inc. 's 1. 60β — meaning JBIO is approximately 1020% more volatile than DAWN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Jade Biosciences, Inc. (JBIO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 2% for IQVIA Holdings Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — JBIO or ARQT or DAWN or REGN or IQV?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc.
(ARQT) is pulling ahead at 91. 3% versus 1. 0% for Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (REGN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Jade Biosciences, Inc. grew EPS 95. 2% year-over-year, compared to -2. 0% for Day One Biopharmaceuticals, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ARQT leads at 367. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — JBIO or ARQT or DAWN or REGN or IQV?
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(REGN) is the more profitable company, earning 31. 4% net margin versus -67. 8% for Day One Biopharmaceuticals, Inc. — meaning it keeps 31. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: REGN leads at 24. 9% versus -80. 8% for DAWN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ARQT leads at 90. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is JBIO or ARQT or DAWN or REGN or IQV more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, IQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 35x versus Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 's 2. 08x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (REGN) trades at 13. 2x forward P/E versus 122. 5x for Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc. — 109. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for JBIO: 188. 1% to $44. 20.
08Which pays a better dividend — JBIO or ARQT or DAWN or REGN or IQV?
In this comparison, REGN (0.
6% yield) pays a dividend. JBIO, ARQT, DAWN, IQV do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is JBIO or ARQT or DAWN or REGN or IQV better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(REGN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 51), 0. 6% yield). Jade Biosciences, Inc. (JBIO) carries a higher beta of 1. 60 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (REGN: +68. 2%, JBIO: -97. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between JBIO and ARQT and DAWN and REGN and IQV?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: JBIO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ARQT is a small-cap high-growth stock; DAWN is a small-cap high-growth stock; REGN is a mid-cap deep-value stock; IQV is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. REGN pays a dividend while JBIO, ARQT, DAWN, IQV do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.