Biotechnology
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
JBIO vs KRYS vs REGN vs ABBV
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Drug Manufacturers - General
JBIO vs KRYS vs REGN vs ABBV — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Drug Manufacturers - General |
| Market Cap | $525M | $9.48B | $63.53B | $397.56B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $417M | $14.92B | $61.16B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-130M | $225M | $4.42B | $4.23B |
| Gross Margin | — | 92.8% | 84.5% | 70.2% |
| Operating Margin | — | 42.8% | 24.3% | 26.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | 41.5x | 13.2x | 15.8x |
| Total Debt | $724K | $9M | $2.71B | $69.07B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $88M | $496M | $3.12B | $5.23B |
JBIO vs KRYS vs REGN vs ABBV — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 21 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jade Biosciences, I… (JBIO) | 100 | 1.9 | -98.1% |
| Krystal Biotech, In… (KRYS) | 100 | 454.5 | +354.5% |
| Regeneron Pharmaceu… (REGN) | 100 | 110.1 | +10.1% |
| AbbVie Inc. (ABBV) | 100 | 202.2 | +102.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: JBIO vs KRYS vs REGN vs ABBV
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
JBIO is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.61, Low D/E 0.2%, current ratio 20.33x
- 141.8% revenue growth vs REGN's 1.0%
KRYS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 33.9%, EPS growth 128.0%
- 29.2% 10Y total return vs ABBV's 357.3%
- 53.9% margin vs JBIO's 2.2%
- +130.3% vs REGN's +18.6%
REGN is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (13.2x vs 15.8x)
ABBV is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- Dividend streak 43 yrs, beta 0.15, yield 2.9%
- Beta 0.15, yield 2.9%, current ratio 0.67x
- Beta 0.15 vs JBIO's 1.61
- 2.9% yield, 43-year raise streak, vs REGN's 0.6%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 141.8% revenue growth vs REGN's 1.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.2x vs 15.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 53.9% margin vs JBIO's 2.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.15 vs JBIO's 1.61 | |
| Dividends | 2.9% yield, 43-year raise streak, vs REGN's 0.6%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +130.3% vs REGN's +18.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 17.6% ROA vs JBIO's -47.3%, ROIC 18.0% vs -59.2% |
JBIO vs KRYS vs REGN vs ABBV — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
JBIO vs KRYS vs REGN vs ABBV — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
KRYS leads in 2 of 6 categories
ABBV leads 2 • REGN leads 1 • JBIO leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KRYS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ABBV and JBIO operate at a comparable scale, with $61.2B and $0 in trailing revenue. KRYS is the more profitable business, keeping 53.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ABBV's 6.9%. On growth, KRYS holds the edge at +31.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $417M | $14.9B | $61.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$134M | $185M | $4.2B | $24.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$130M | $225M | $4.4B | $4.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$117M | $237M | $4.2B | $18.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +92.8% | +84.5% | +70.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +42.8% | +24.3% | +26.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +53.9% | +29.6% | +6.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +56.9% | +27.9% | +30.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +31.9% | +19.0% | +10.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +52.5% | -7.2% | +57.4% |
Valuation Metrics
REGN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.7x trailing earnings, REGN trades at a 84% valuation discount to ABBV's 94.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, REGN's 15.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than KRYS's 53.6x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $525M | $9.5B | $63.5B | $397.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $437M | $9.0B | $63.1B | $461.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -3.96x | 47.01x | 14.74x | 94.84x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 41.48x | 13.16x | 15.75x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 2.33x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 53.57x | 15.31x | 16.34x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 24.36x | 4.43x | 6.50x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.52x | 7.90x | 2.12x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 50.18x | 15.57x | 22.32x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ABBV leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ABBV delivers a 62.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $62 in annual profit, vs $-51 for JBIO. JBIO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to REGN's 0.09x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ABBV scores 6/9 vs JBIO's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -51.3% | +19.3% | +14.3% | +62.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -47.3% | +17.6% | +11.1% | +3.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -59.2% | +18.0% | +8.9% | +23.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -55.4% | +14.8% | +10.2% | +21.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 0.01x | 0.09x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$88M | -$487M | -$412M | $63.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $88M | $496M | $3.1B | $5.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $724,000 | $9M | $2.7B | $69.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | 108.44x | 3.28x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
KRYS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in KRYS five years ago would be worth $49,430 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $231 for JBIO. Over the past 12 months, KRYS leads with a +130.3% total return vs REGN's +18.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KRYS at 35.5% vs JBIO's -67.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +13.6% | +30.2% | -21.0% | -0.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +128.7% | +130.3% | +18.6% | +20.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.6% | +148.8% | -18.2% | +77.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.7% | +394.3% | +17.4% | +121.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.7% | +2922.0% | +68.0% | +357.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -67.7% | +35.5% | -6.5% | +21.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — KRYS and ABBV each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ABBV is the less volatile stock with a 0.15 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than JBIO's 1.61 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KRYS currently trades 98.6% from its 52-week high vs JBIO's 57.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.61x | 0.98x | 0.50x | 0.15x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $27.96 | $325.95 | $821.11 | $244.81 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $6.57 | $127.99 | $503.25 | $181.73 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +57.5% | +98.6% | +74.5% | +91.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 26.8 | 59.9 | 33.3 | 63.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 813K | 261K | 874K | 4.6M |
Analyst Outlook
ABBV leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: JBIO as "Buy", KRYS as "Buy", REGN as "Buy", ABBV as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 174.9% upside for JBIO (target: $44) vs 1.4% for KRYS (target: $326). For income investors, ABBV offers the higher dividend yield at 2.92% vs REGN's 0.56%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $44.20 | $326.20 | $843.84 | $257.54 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 17 | 48 | 41 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.6% | +2.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — | 1 | 43 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $3.41 | $6.57 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +6.2% | +0.2% |
KRYS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). ABBV leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
JBIO vs KRYS vs REGN vs ABBV: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is JBIO or KRYS or REGN or ABBV a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Krystal Biotech, Inc.
(KRYS) is the stronger pick with 33. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 0% for Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (REGN). Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (REGN) offers the better valuation at 14. 7x trailing P/E (13. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Jade Biosciences, Inc. (JBIO) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — JBIO or KRYS or REGN or ABBV?
On trailing P/E, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(REGN) is the cheapest at 14. 7x versus AbbVie Inc. at 94. 8x. On forward P/E, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. is actually cheaper at 13. 2x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — JBIO or KRYS or REGN or ABBV?
Over the past 5 years, Krystal Biotech, Inc.
(KRYS) delivered a total return of +394. 3%, compared to -97. 7% for Jade Biosciences, Inc. (JBIO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KRYS returned +29. 2% versus JBIO's -97. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — JBIO or KRYS or REGN or ABBV?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), AbbVie Inc.
(ABBV) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 15β versus Jade Biosciences, Inc. 's 1. 61β — meaning JBIO is approximately 1009% more volatile than ABBV relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Jade Biosciences, Inc. (JBIO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 9% for Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — JBIO or KRYS or REGN or ABBV?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Krystal Biotech, Inc.
(KRYS) is pulling ahead at 33. 9% versus 1. 0% for Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (REGN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Krystal Biotech, Inc. grew EPS 128. 0% year-over-year, compared to -0. 8% for AbbVie Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, REGN leads at 5. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — JBIO or KRYS or REGN or ABBV?
Krystal Biotech, Inc.
(KRYS) is the more profitable company, earning 52. 6% net margin versus 0. 0% for Jade Biosciences, Inc. — meaning it keeps 52. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KRYS leads at 41. 5% versus 0. 0% for JBIO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KRYS leads at 92. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is JBIO or KRYS or REGN or ABBV more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(REGN) trades at 13. 2x forward P/E versus 41. 5x for Krystal Biotech, Inc. — 28. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for JBIO: 174. 9% to $44. 20.
08Which pays a better dividend — JBIO or KRYS or REGN or ABBV?
In this comparison, ABBV (2.
9% yield), REGN (0. 6% yield) pay a dividend. JBIO, KRYS do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is JBIO or KRYS or REGN or ABBV better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, AbbVie Inc.
(ABBV) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 15), 2. 9% yield, +357. 3% 10Y return). Jade Biosciences, Inc. (JBIO) carries a higher beta of 1. 61 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ABBV: +357. 3%, JBIO: -97. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between JBIO and KRYS and REGN and ABBV?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: JBIO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KRYS is a small-cap high-growth stock; REGN is a mid-cap deep-value stock; ABBV is a large-cap quality compounder stock. REGN, ABBV pay a dividend while JBIO, KRYS do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.