Biotechnology
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
JBIO vs LLY vs ABBV vs REGN vs IQV
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Drug Manufacturers - General
Drug Manufacturers - General
Biotechnology
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
JBIO vs LLY vs ABBV vs REGN vs IQV — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Drug Manufacturers - General | Drug Manufacturers - General | Biotechnology | Medical - Diagnostics & Research |
| Market Cap | $500M | $1.07T | $402.80B | $63.60B | $30.79B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $72.25B | $61.16B | $14.92B | $16.63B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-130M | $25.27B | $4.23B | $4.42B | $1.39B |
| Gross Margin | — | 83.5% | 70.2% | 84.5% | 26.1% |
| Operating Margin | — | 45.9% | 26.7% | 24.3% | 13.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | 30.9x | 16.0x | 13.2x | 14.2x |
| Total Debt | $724K | $42.50B | $69.07B | $2.71B | $16.17B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $88M | $7.16B | $5.23B | $3.12B | $1.98B |
JBIO vs LLY vs ABBV vs REGN vs IQV — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 21 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jade Biosciences, I… (JBIO) | 100 | 1.9 | -98.1% |
| Eli Lilly and Compa… (LLY) | 100 | 493.6 | +393.6% |
| AbbVie Inc. (ABBV) | 100 | 202.2 | +102.2% |
| Regeneron Pharmaceu… (REGN) | 100 | 109.6 | +9.6% |
| IQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV) | 100 | 74.9 | -25.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: JBIO vs LLY vs ABBV vs REGN vs IQV
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
JBIO has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth and momentum.
- 141.8% revenue growth vs REGN's 1.0%
- +121.0% vs IQV's +14.0%
LLY is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 44.7%, EPS growth 96.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 31.7%
- 14.8% 10Y total return vs ABBV's 362.2%
- 35.0% margin vs JBIO's 2.2%
- 22.7% ROA vs JBIO's -47.3%, ROIC 41.8% vs -59.2%
ABBV ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 43 yrs, beta 0.14, yield 2.9%
- Beta 0.14 vs JBIO's 1.60
- 2.9% yield, 43-year raise streak, vs LLY's 0.5%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
REGN is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.51, Low D/E 8.7%, current ratio 4.13x
- Beta 0.51, yield 0.6%, current ratio 4.13x
IQV is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.35 vs REGN's 2.08
- Lower P/E (14.2x vs 16.0x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 141.8% revenue growth vs REGN's 1.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.2x vs 16.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 35.0% margin vs JBIO's 2.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.14 vs JBIO's 1.60 | |
| Dividends | 2.9% yield, 43-year raise streak, vs LLY's 0.5%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +121.0% vs IQV's +14.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 22.7% ROA vs JBIO's -47.3%, ROIC 41.8% vs -59.2% |
JBIO vs LLY vs ABBV vs REGN vs IQV — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
JBIO vs LLY vs ABBV vs REGN vs IQV — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
LLY leads in 3 of 6 categories
IQV leads 1 • ABBV leads 1 • JBIO leads 0 • REGN leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LLY leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LLY and JBIO operate at a comparable scale, with $72.2B and $0 in trailing revenue. LLY is the more profitable business, keeping 35.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ABBV's 6.9%. On growth, LLY holds the edge at +55.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $72.2B | $61.2B | $14.9B | $16.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$134M | $34.7B | $24.5B | $4.2B | $3.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$130M | $25.3B | $4.2B | $4.4B | $1.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$117M | $13.6B | $18.7B | $4.2B | $2.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +83.5% | +70.2% | +84.5% | +26.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +45.9% | +26.7% | +24.3% | +13.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +35.0% | +6.9% | +29.6% | +8.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +18.8% | +30.6% | +27.9% | +16.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +55.5% | +10.0% | +19.0% | +8.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +169.9% | +57.4% | -7.2% | +15.0% |
Valuation Metrics
IQV leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.8x trailing earnings, REGN trades at a 85% valuation discount to ABBV's 96.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), IQV offers better value at 0.57x vs REGN's 2.33x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $500M | $1.07T | $402.8B | $63.6B | $30.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $413M | $1.11T | $466.6B | $63.2B | $45.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -3.78x | 49.37x | 96.09x | 14.76x | 23.15x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 30.95x | 15.96x | 13.18x | 14.16x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.71x | — | 2.33x | 0.57x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 35.38x | 16.53x | 15.33x | 13.11x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 16.42x | 6.59x | 4.43x | 1.89x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.45x | 38.34x | — | 2.13x | 4.75x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 119.31x | 22.61x | 15.59x | 15.01x |
Profitability & Efficiency
LLY leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ABBV delivers a 62.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $62 in annual profit, vs $-51 for JBIO. JBIO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to IQV's 2.44x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LLY scores 8/9 vs JBIO's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -51.3% | +101.2% | +62.1% | +14.3% | +22.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -47.3% | +22.7% | +3.1% | +11.1% | +4.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -59.2% | +41.8% | +23.9% | +8.9% | +8.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -55.4% | +46.6% | +21.5% | +10.2% | +11.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 1.60x | — | 0.09x | 2.44x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$88M | $35.3B | $63.8B | -$412M | $14.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $88M | $7.2B | $5.2B | $3.1B | $2.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $724,000 | $42.5B | $69.1B | $2.7B | $16.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 35.68x | 3.28x | 108.44x | 3.10x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LLY leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LLY five years ago would be worth $51,207 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $222 for JBIO. Over the past 12 months, JBIO leads with a +121.0% total return vs IQV's +14.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LLY at 37.2% vs JBIO's -68.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +8.3% | +5.2% | +0.8% | -20.9% | -19.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +121.0% | +40.3% | +21.9% | +18.0% | +14.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.8% | +158.2% | +79.3% | -18.1% | -14.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.8% | +412.1% | +123.7% | +16.8% | -25.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.8% | +1484.6% | +362.2% | +68.2% | +177.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -68.1% | +37.2% | +21.5% | -6.4% | -5.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — LLY and ABBV each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ABBV is the less volatile stock with a 0.14 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than JBIO's 1.60 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LLY currently trades 95.8% from its 52-week high vs JBIO's 54.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.60x | 0.53x | 0.14x | 0.51x | 1.16x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $27.96 | $1182.73 | $244.81 | $821.11 | $247.05 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $6.57 | $623.78 | $181.73 | $503.25 | $153.01 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +54.9% | +95.8% | +93.0% | +74.6% | +73.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 32.5 | 70.0 | 62.8 | 37.5 | 54.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 826K | 2.6M | 4.6M | 868K | 1.5M |
Analyst Outlook
ABBV leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: JBIO as "Buy", LLY as "Buy", ABBV as "Buy", REGN as "Buy", IQV as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 188.1% upside for JBIO (target: $44) vs 12.0% for LLY (target: $1269). For income investors, ABBV offers the higher dividend yield at 2.89% vs LLY's 0.53%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $44.20 | $1268.94 | $256.92 | $836.00 | $222.22 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 45 | 41 | 48 | 44 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.5% | +2.9% | +0.6% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 11 | 43 | 1 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $6.00 | $6.57 | $3.41 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.4% | +0.2% | +6.2% | +4.0% |
LLY leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). IQV leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
JBIO vs LLY vs ABBV vs REGN vs IQV: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is JBIO or LLY or ABBV or REGN or IQV a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) is the stronger pick with 44.
7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 0% for Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (REGN). Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (REGN) offers the better valuation at 14. 8x trailing P/E (13. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Jade Biosciences, Inc. (JBIO) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — JBIO or LLY or ABBV or REGN or IQV?
On trailing P/E, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(REGN) is the cheapest at 14. 8x versus AbbVie Inc. at 96. 1x. On forward P/E, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. is actually cheaper at 13. 2x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: IQVIA Holdings Inc. wins at 0. 35x versus Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 's 2. 08x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — JBIO or LLY or ABBV or REGN or IQV?
Over the past 5 years, Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) delivered a total return of +412.
1%, compared to -97. 8% for Jade Biosciences, Inc. (JBIO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LLY returned +1485% versus JBIO's -97. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — JBIO or LLY or ABBV or REGN or IQV?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), AbbVie Inc.
(ABBV) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 14β versus Jade Biosciences, Inc. 's 1. 60β — meaning JBIO is approximately 1073% more volatile than ABBV relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Jade Biosciences, Inc. (JBIO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 2% for IQVIA Holdings Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — JBIO or LLY or ABBV or REGN or IQV?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) is pulling ahead at 44.
7% versus 1. 0% for Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (REGN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Eli Lilly and Company grew EPS 96. 0% year-over-year, compared to -0. 8% for AbbVie Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, LLY leads at 31. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — JBIO or LLY or ABBV or REGN or IQV?
Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) is the more profitable company, earning 31.
7% net margin versus 0. 0% for Jade Biosciences, Inc. — meaning it keeps 31. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LLY leads at 45. 6% versus 0. 0% for JBIO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — REGN leads at 85. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is JBIO or LLY or ABBV or REGN or IQV more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, IQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 35x versus Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 's 2. 08x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (REGN) trades at 13. 2x forward P/E versus 30. 9x for Eli Lilly and Company — 17. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for JBIO: 188. 1% to $44. 20.
08Which pays a better dividend — JBIO or LLY or ABBV or REGN or IQV?
In this comparison, ABBV (2.
9% yield), REGN (0. 6% yield), LLY (0. 5% yield) pay a dividend. JBIO, IQV do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is JBIO or LLY or ABBV or REGN or IQV better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
53), 0. 5% yield, +1485% 10Y return). Jade Biosciences, Inc. (JBIO) carries a higher beta of 1. 60 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (LLY: +1485%, JBIO: -97. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between JBIO and LLY and ABBV and REGN and IQV?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: JBIO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LLY is a mega-cap high-growth stock; ABBV is a large-cap quality compounder stock; REGN is a mid-cap deep-value stock; IQV is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. LLY, ABBV, REGN pay a dividend while JBIO, IQV do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.