Packaged Foods
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
JBS vs TSN vs HRL vs PPC vs ADM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Agricultural Farm Products
Packaged Foods
Packaged Foods
Agricultural Farm Products
JBS vs TSN vs HRL vs PPC vs ADM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Packaged Foods | Agricultural Farm Products | Packaged Foods | Packaged Foods | Agricultural Farm Products |
| Market Cap | $13.29B | $24.18B | $11.41B | $7.23B | $37.36B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $470.35B | $55.71B | $12.14B | $18.57B | $80.61B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $11.47B | $453M | $489M | $888M | $1.08B |
| Gross Margin | 13.7% | 6.6% | 15.5% | 11.6% | 5.8% |
| Operating Margin | 5.0% | 2.3% | 6.0% | 7.4% | 1.5% |
| Forward P/E | 10.5x | 17.5x | 14.1x | 8.1x | 18.6x |
| Total Debt | $134.93B | $8.83B | $2.86B | $3.35B | $8.41B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $34.76B | $1.23B | $671M | $640M | $1.01B |
JBS vs TSN vs HRL vs PPC vs ADM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| JBS N.V. (JBS) | 100 | 111.7 | +11.7% |
| Tyson Foods, Inc. (TSN) | 100 | 121.4 | +21.4% |
| Hormel Foods Corpor… (HRL) | 100 | 68.6 | -31.4% |
| Pilgrim's Pride Cor… (PPC) | 100 | 67.6 | -32.4% |
| Archer-Daniels-Midl… (ADM) | 100 | 146.9 | +46.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: JBS vs TSN vs HRL vs PPC vs ADM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
JBS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 14.6%, EPS growth 15.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.8%
- 14.6% revenue growth vs ADM's -6.2%
- 26.0% ROA vs TSN's 1.3%, ROIC 12.5% vs 4.1%
TSN lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
HRL is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 34 yrs, beta 0.15, yield 5.5%
PPC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 52.1% 10Y total return vs ADM's 147.4%
- PEG 0.13 vs JBS's 0.15
- Beta 0.02, yield 27.5%, current ratio 1.47x
- Lower P/E (8.1x vs 18.6x)
ADM ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.12, Low D/E 36.5%, current ratio 11.20x
- +66.2% vs PPC's -30.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 14.6% revenue growth vs ADM's -6.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.1x vs 18.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 4.8% margin vs TSN's 0.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.02 vs JBS's 0.47, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 27.5% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs HRL's 5.5% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +66.2% vs PPC's -30.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 26.0% ROA vs TSN's 1.3%, ROIC 12.5% vs 4.1% |
JBS vs TSN vs HRL vs PPC vs ADM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
JBS vs TSN vs HRL vs PPC vs ADM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PPC leads in 1 of 6 categories
JBS leads 1 • TSN leads 0 • HRL leads 0 • ADM leads 0 • 4 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PPC leads this category, winning 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JBS is the larger business by revenue, generating $470.4B annually — 38.7x HRL's $12.1B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 4.8% (PPC) to 0.8% (TSN). On growth, JBS holds the edge at +9.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $470.4B | $55.7B | $12.1B | $18.6B | $80.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $35.4B | $2.7B | $932M | $1.8B | $3.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $11.5B | $453M | $489M | $888M | $1.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $2.0B | $1.2B | $578M | $773M | $4.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +13.7% | +6.6% | +15.5% | +11.6% | +5.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +5.0% | +2.3% | +6.0% | +7.4% | +1.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +2.4% | +0.8% | +4.0% | +4.8% | +1.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +0.4% | +2.2% | +4.8% | +4.2% | +6.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.1% | +4.4% | +1.3% | +1.6% | +1.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +73.4% | +36.1% | +6.5% | -65.3% | +1.6% |
Valuation Metrics
JBS leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 2.6x trailing earnings, JBS trades at a 95% valuation discount to TSN's 49.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JBS offers better value at 0.04x vs PPC's 0.11x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $13.3B | $24.2B | $11.4B | $7.2B | $37.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $33.5B | $31.8B | $13.6B | $9.9B | $44.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 2.65x | 49.95x | 23.84x | 6.70x | 34.77x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.46x | 17.46x | 14.13x | 8.05x | 18.63x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.04x | — | — | 0.11x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 4.96x | 11.34x | 13.84x | 4.81x | 17.18x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.16x | 0.44x | 0.94x | 0.39x | 0.47x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.56x | 1.30x | 1.44x | 1.96x | 1.63x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 4.25x | 20.55x | 21.36x | 10.95x | 8.89x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — JBS and HRL and PPC each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
JBS delivers a 120.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $121 in annual profit, vs $2 for TSN. HRL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.36x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JBS's 2.68x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), JBS scores 6/9 vs PPC's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +120.6% | +2.5% | +4.3% | +24.1% | +4.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +26.0% | +1.3% | +3.7% | +8.7% | +2.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +12.5% | +4.1% | +5.3% | +20.0% | +3.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +14.1% | +4.6% | +6.0% | +20.8% | +4.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.68x | 0.48x | 0.36x | 0.91x | 0.37x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $100.2B | $7.6B | $2.2B | $2.7B | $7.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $34.8B | $1.2B | $671M | $640M | $1.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $134.9B | $8.8B | $2.9B | $3.4B | $8.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4.81x | 2.73x | 6.44x | 8.87x | 3.03x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — PPC and ADM each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PPC five years ago would be worth $16,053 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,569 for HRL. Over the past 12 months, ADM leads with a +66.2% total return vs PPC's -30.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PPC at 19.6% vs HRL's -15.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +15.1% | +17.9% | -8.8% | -23.8% | +32.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +20.3% | +26.8% | -24.7% | -30.5% | +66.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +35.5% | +45.6% | -40.5% | +71.1% | +10.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +45.9% | -1.6% | -44.3% | +60.5% | +29.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +49.6% | +23.1% | -23.9% | +52.1% | +147.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +10.7% | +13.3% | -15.9% | +19.6% | +3.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TSN and PPC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PPC is the less volatile stock with a 0.02 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than JBS's 0.47 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TSN currently trades 97.8% from its 52-week high vs PPC's 59.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.47x | 0.33x | 0.15x | 0.02x | 0.12x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $18.65 | $69.48 | $31.86 | $51.45 | $81.75 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $12.37 | $50.56 | $20.32 | $30.22 | $46.81 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +87.5% | +97.8% | +65.1% | +59.1% | +94.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.8 | 64.5 | 39.5 | 35.9 | 68.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4.6M | 2.7M | 4.2M | 1.1M | 3.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — HRL and PPC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: JBS as "Buy", TSN as "Buy", HRL as "Hold", PPC as "Hold", ADM as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 51.3% upside for PPC (target: $46) vs -22.6% for ADM (target: $60). For income investors, PPC offers the higher dividend yield at 27.51% vs JBS's 2.47%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $19.50 | $70.25 | $27.25 | $46.00 | $60.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 30 | 29 | 21 | 36 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.5% | +2.9% | +5.5% | +27.5% | +2.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 13 | 34 | 1 | 31 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.00 | $2.00 | $1.15 | $8.36 | $2.04 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | +0.8% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
PPC leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). JBS leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 4 tied.
JBS vs TSN vs HRL vs PPC vs ADM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is JBS or TSN or HRL or PPC or ADM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, JBS N.
V. (JBS) is the stronger pick with 14. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 2% for Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM). JBS N. V. (JBS) offers the better valuation at 2. 6x trailing P/E (10. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate JBS N. V. (JBS) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — JBS or TSN or HRL or PPC or ADM?
On trailing P/E, JBS N.
V. (JBS) is the cheapest at 2. 6x versus Tyson Foods, Inc. at 49. 9x. On forward P/E, Pilgrim's Pride Corporation is actually cheaper at 8. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Pilgrim's Pride Corporation wins at 0. 13x versus JBS N. V. 's 0. 15x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — JBS or TSN or HRL or PPC or ADM?
Over the past 5 years, Pilgrim's Pride Corporation (PPC) delivered a total return of +60.
5%, compared to -44. 3% for Hormel Foods Corporation (HRL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ADM returned +147. 4% versus HRL's -23. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — JBS or TSN or HRL or PPC or ADM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Pilgrim's Pride Corporation (PPC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
02β versus JBS N. V. 's 0. 47β — meaning JBS is approximately 1823% more volatile than PPC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Hormel Foods Corporation (HRL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 36% versus 3% for JBS N. V. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — JBS or TSN or HRL or PPC or ADM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), JBS N.
V. (JBS) is pulling ahead at 14. 6% versus -6. 2% for Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: JBS N. V. grew EPS 1514% year-over-year, compared to -40. 8% for Hormel Foods Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, JBS leads at 4. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — JBS or TSN or HRL or PPC or ADM?
Pilgrim's Pride Corporation (PPC) is the more profitable company, earning 5.
9% net margin versus 0. 9% for Tyson Foods, Inc. — meaning it keeps 5. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PPC leads at 8. 7% versus 1. 8% for ADM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HRL leads at 15. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is JBS or TSN or HRL or PPC or ADM more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Pilgrim's Pride Corporation (PPC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 13x versus JBS N. V. 's 0. 15x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Pilgrim's Pride Corporation (PPC) trades at 8. 1x forward P/E versus 18. 6x for Archer-Daniels-Midland Company — 10. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PPC: 51. 3% to $46. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — JBS or TSN or HRL or PPC or ADM?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Pilgrim's Pride Corporation (PPC) offers the highest yield at 27. 5%, versus 2. 5% for JBS N. V. (JBS).
09Is JBS or TSN or HRL or PPC or ADM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Pilgrim's Pride Corporation (PPC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
02), 27. 5% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (PPC: +52. 1%, JBS: +49. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between JBS and TSN and HRL and PPC and ADM?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: JBS is a mid-cap deep-value stock; TSN is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; HRL is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; PPC is a small-cap deep-value stock; ADM is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.