Packaged Foods
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
JBS vs TSN vs HRL vs PPC vs WH
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Agricultural Farm Products
Packaged Foods
Packaged Foods
Travel Lodging
JBS vs TSN vs HRL vs PPC vs WH — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Packaged Foods | Agricultural Farm Products | Packaged Foods | Packaged Foods | Travel Lodging |
| Market Cap | $13.29B | $24.18B | $11.41B | $7.23B | $6.30B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $470.35B | $55.71B | $12.14B | $18.57B | $1.44B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $11.47B | $453M | $489M | $888M | $193M |
| Gross Margin | 13.7% | 6.6% | 15.5% | 11.6% | 55.7% |
| Operating Margin | 5.0% | 2.3% | 6.0% | 7.4% | 28.8% |
| Forward P/E | 10.5x | 17.5x | 14.1x | 8.1x | 17.4x |
| Total Debt | $134.93B | $8.83B | $2.86B | $3.35B | $3.06B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $34.76B | $1.23B | $671M | $640M | $64M |
JBS vs TSN vs HRL vs PPC vs WH — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| JBS N.V. (JBS) | 100 | 111.7 | +11.7% |
| Tyson Foods, Inc. (TSN) | 100 | 121.4 | +21.4% |
| Hormel Foods Corpor… (HRL) | 100 | 68.6 | -31.4% |
| Pilgrim's Pride Cor… (PPC) | 100 | 67.6 | -32.4% |
| Wyndham Hotels & Re… (WH) | 100 | 103.2 | +3.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: JBS vs TSN vs HRL vs PPC vs WH
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
JBS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 14.6%, EPS growth 15.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.8%
- 14.6% revenue growth vs WH's 1.5%
- 26.0% ROA vs TSN's 1.3%, ROIC 12.5% vs 4.1%
TSN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +26.8% vs PPC's -30.5%
HRL is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 34 yrs, beta 0.15, yield 5.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.15, Low D/E 36.1%, current ratio 2.47x
- Beta 0.15, yield 5.5%, current ratio 2.47x
PPC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 52.1% 10Y total return vs JBS's 49.6%
- PEG 0.13 vs JBS's 0.15
- Lower P/E (8.1x vs 17.4x)
- Beta 0.02 vs WH's 0.81, lower leverage
WH is the clearest fit if your priority is quality.
- 13.4% margin vs TSN's 0.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 14.6% revenue growth vs WH's 1.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.1x vs 17.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 13.4% margin vs TSN's 0.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.02 vs WH's 0.81, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 27.5% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs HRL's 5.5% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +26.8% vs PPC's -30.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 26.0% ROA vs TSN's 1.3%, ROIC 12.5% vs 4.1% |
JBS vs TSN vs HRL vs PPC vs WH — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
JBS vs TSN vs HRL vs PPC vs WH — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
WH leads in 1 of 6 categories
JBS leads 1 • PPC leads 1 • TSN leads 0 • HRL leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WH leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JBS is the larger business by revenue, generating $470.4B annually — 326.6x WH's $1.4B. WH is the more profitable business, keeping 13.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TSN's 0.8%. On growth, JBS holds the edge at +9.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $470.4B | $55.7B | $12.1B | $18.6B | $1.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $35.4B | $2.7B | $932M | $1.8B | $478M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $11.5B | $453M | $489M | $888M | $193M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $2.0B | $1.2B | $578M | $773M | $304M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +13.7% | +6.6% | +15.5% | +11.6% | +55.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +5.0% | +2.3% | +6.0% | +7.4% | +28.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +2.4% | +0.8% | +4.0% | +4.8% | +13.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +0.4% | +2.2% | +4.8% | +4.2% | +21.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.1% | +4.4% | +1.3% | +1.6% | +3.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +73.4% | +36.1% | +6.5% | -65.3% | +2.6% |
Valuation Metrics
JBS leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 2.6x trailing earnings, JBS trades at a 95% valuation discount to TSN's 49.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JBS offers better value at 0.04x vs PPC's 0.11x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $13.3B | $24.2B | $11.4B | $7.2B | $6.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $33.5B | $31.8B | $13.6B | $9.9B | $9.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 2.65x | 49.95x | 23.84x | 6.70x | 33.94x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.46x | 17.46x | 14.13x | 8.05x | 17.38x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.04x | — | — | 0.11x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 4.96x | 11.34x | 13.84x | 4.81x | 19.86x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.16x | 0.44x | 0.94x | 0.39x | 4.41x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.56x | 1.30x | 1.44x | 1.96x | 13.56x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 4.25x | 20.55x | 21.36x | 10.95x | 19.63x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — JBS and HRL and PPC each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
JBS delivers a 120.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $121 in annual profit, vs $2 for TSN. HRL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.36x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WH's 6.53x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), JBS scores 6/9 vs WH's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +120.6% | +2.5% | +4.3% | +24.1% | +37.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +26.0% | +1.3% | +3.7% | +8.7% | +4.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +12.5% | +4.1% | +5.3% | +20.0% | +9.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +14.1% | +4.6% | +6.0% | +20.8% | +10.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.68x | 0.48x | 0.36x | 0.91x | 6.53x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $100.2B | $7.6B | $2.2B | $2.7B | $3.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $34.8B | $1.2B | $671M | $640M | $64M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $134.9B | $8.8B | $2.9B | $3.4B | $3.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4.81x | 2.73x | 6.44x | 8.87x | 3.00x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PPC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PPC five years ago would be worth $16,053 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,569 for HRL. Over the past 12 months, TSN leads with a +26.8% total return vs PPC's -30.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PPC at 19.6% vs HRL's -15.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +15.1% | +17.9% | -8.8% | -23.8% | +12.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +20.3% | +26.8% | -24.7% | -30.5% | +2.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +35.5% | +45.6% | -40.5% | +71.1% | +30.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +45.9% | -1.6% | -44.3% | +60.5% | +21.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +49.6% | +23.1% | -23.9% | +52.1% | +43.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +10.7% | +13.3% | -15.9% | +19.6% | +9.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TSN and PPC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PPC is the less volatile stock with a 0.02 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WH's 0.81 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TSN currently trades 97.8% from its 52-week high vs PPC's 59.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.47x | 0.33x | 0.15x | 0.02x | 0.81x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $18.65 | $69.48 | $31.86 | $51.45 | $92.69 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $12.37 | $50.56 | $20.32 | $30.22 | $69.21 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +87.5% | +97.8% | +65.1% | +59.1% | +90.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.8 | 64.5 | 39.5 | 35.9 | 50.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4.6M | 2.7M | 4.2M | 1.1M | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — HRL and PPC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: JBS as "Buy", TSN as "Buy", HRL as "Hold", PPC as "Hold", WH as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 51.3% upside for PPC (target: $46) vs 3.4% for TSN (target: $70). For income investors, PPC offers the higher dividend yield at 27.51% vs WH's 2.00%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $19.50 | $70.25 | $27.25 | $46.00 | $98.13 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 30 | 29 | 21 | 22 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.5% | +2.9% | +5.5% | +27.5% | +2.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 13 | 34 | 1 | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.00 | $2.00 | $1.15 | $8.36 | $1.68 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | +0.8% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +4.6% |
WH leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). JBS leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
JBS vs TSN vs HRL vs PPC vs WH: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is JBS or TSN or HRL or PPC or WH a better buy right now?
For growth investors, JBS N.
V. (JBS) is the stronger pick with 14. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 5% for Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (WH). JBS N. V. (JBS) offers the better valuation at 2. 6x trailing P/E (10. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate JBS N. V. (JBS) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — JBS or TSN or HRL or PPC or WH?
On trailing P/E, JBS N.
V. (JBS) is the cheapest at 2. 6x versus Tyson Foods, Inc. at 49. 9x. On forward P/E, Pilgrim's Pride Corporation is actually cheaper at 8. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Pilgrim's Pride Corporation wins at 0. 13x versus JBS N. V. 's 0. 15x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — JBS or TSN or HRL or PPC or WH?
Over the past 5 years, Pilgrim's Pride Corporation (PPC) delivered a total return of +60.
5%, compared to -44. 3% for Hormel Foods Corporation (HRL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PPC returned +52. 1% versus HRL's -23. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — JBS or TSN or HRL or PPC or WH?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Pilgrim's Pride Corporation (PPC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
02β versus Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc. 's 0. 81β — meaning WH is approximately 3234% more volatile than PPC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Hormel Foods Corporation (HRL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 36% versus 7% for Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — JBS or TSN or HRL or PPC or WH?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), JBS N.
V. (JBS) is pulling ahead at 14. 6% versus 1. 5% for Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (WH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: JBS N. V. grew EPS 1514% year-over-year, compared to -40. 8% for Hormel Foods Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, JBS leads at 4. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — JBS or TSN or HRL or PPC or WH?
Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc.
(WH) is the more profitable company, earning 13. 5% net margin versus 0. 9% for Tyson Foods, Inc. — meaning it keeps 13. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WH leads at 28. 4% versus 2. 6% for TSN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WH leads at 58. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is JBS or TSN or HRL or PPC or WH more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Pilgrim's Pride Corporation (PPC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 13x versus JBS N. V. 's 0. 15x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Pilgrim's Pride Corporation (PPC) trades at 8. 1x forward P/E versus 17. 5x for Tyson Foods, Inc. — 9. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PPC: 51. 3% to $46. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — JBS or TSN or HRL or PPC or WH?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Pilgrim's Pride Corporation (PPC) offers the highest yield at 27. 5%, versus 2. 0% for Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (WH).
09Is JBS or TSN or HRL or PPC or WH better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Pilgrim's Pride Corporation (PPC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
02), 27. 5% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (PPC: +52. 1%, WH: +43. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between JBS and TSN and HRL and PPC and WH?
These companies operate in different sectors (JBS (Consumer Defensive) and TSN (Consumer Defensive) and HRL (Consumer Defensive) and PPC (Consumer Defensive) and WH (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: JBS is a mid-cap deep-value stock; TSN is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; HRL is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; PPC is a small-cap deep-value stock; WH is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.