Packaged Foods
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
JBS vs WH
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Travel Lodging
JBS vs WH — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Packaged Foods | Travel Lodging |
| Market Cap | $13.29B | $6.30B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $470.35B | $1.44B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $11.47B | $193M |
| Gross Margin | 13.7% | 55.7% |
| Operating Margin | 5.0% | 28.8% |
| Forward P/E | 10.5x | 17.4x |
| Total Debt | $134.93B | $3.06B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $34.76B | $64M |
JBS vs WH — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| JBS N.V. (JBS) | 100 | 111.7 | +11.7% |
| Wyndham Hotels & Re… (WH) | 100 | 103.2 | +3.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: JBS vs WH
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
JBS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.47, yield 2.5%
- Rev growth 14.6%, EPS growth 15.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.8%
- 49.6% 10Y total return vs WH's 43.8%
WH is the clearest fit if your priority is quality.
- 13.4% margin vs JBS's 2.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 14.6% revenue growth vs WH's 1.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.5x vs 17.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 13.4% margin vs JBS's 2.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.47 vs WH's 0.81, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.5% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs WH's 2.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +20.3% vs WH's +2.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 26.0% ROA vs WH's 4.5%, ROIC 12.5% vs 9.4% |
JBS vs WH — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
JBS vs WH — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WH leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JBS is the larger business by revenue, generating $470.4B annually — 326.6x WH's $1.4B. WH is the more profitable business, keeping 13.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to JBS's 2.4%. On growth, JBS holds the edge at +9.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $470.4B | $1.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $35.4B | $478M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $11.5B | $193M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $2.0B | $304M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +13.7% | +55.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +5.0% | +28.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +2.4% | +13.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +0.4% | +21.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.1% | +3.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +73.4% | +2.6% |
Valuation Metrics
JBS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 2.6x trailing earnings, JBS trades at a 92% valuation discount to WH's 33.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, JBS's 5.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than WH's 19.9x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $13.3B | $6.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $33.5B | $9.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 2.65x | 33.94x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.46x | 17.38x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.04x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 4.96x | 19.86x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.16x | 4.41x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.56x | 13.56x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 4.25x | 19.63x |
Profitability & Efficiency
JBS leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
JBS delivers a 120.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $121 in annual profit, vs $37 for WH. JBS carries lower financial leverage with a 2.68x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WH's 6.53x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), JBS scores 6/9 vs WH's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +120.6% | +37.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +26.0% | +4.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +12.5% | +9.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +14.1% | +10.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.68x | 6.53x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $100.2B | $3.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $34.8B | $64M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $134.9B | $3.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4.81x | 3.00x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
JBS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in JBS five years ago would be worth $14,589 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,182 for WH. Over the past 12 months, JBS leads with a +20.3% total return vs WH's +2.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JBS at 10.7% vs WH's 9.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +15.1% | +12.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +20.3% | +2.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +35.5% | +30.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +45.9% | +21.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +49.6% | +43.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +10.7% | +9.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — JBS and WH each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
JBS is the less volatile stock with a 0.47 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WH's 0.81 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.47x | 0.81x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $18.65 | $92.69 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $12.37 | $69.21 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +87.5% | +90.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.8 | 50.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4.6M | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — JBS and WH each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates JBS as "Buy" and WH as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 19.4% upside for JBS (target: $20) vs 17.0% for WH (target: $98). For income investors, JBS offers the higher dividend yield at 2.47% vs WH's 2.00%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $19.50 | $98.13 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 22 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.5% | +2.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.00 | $1.68 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | +4.6% |
JBS leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). WH leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
JBS vs WH: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is JBS or WH a better buy right now?
For growth investors, JBS N.
V. (JBS) is the stronger pick with 14. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 5% for Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (WH). JBS N. V. (JBS) offers the better valuation at 2. 6x trailing P/E (10. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate JBS N. V. (JBS) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — JBS or WH?
On trailing P/E, JBS N.
V. (JBS) is the cheapest at 2. 6x versus Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc. at 33. 9x. On forward P/E, JBS N. V. is actually cheaper at 10. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — JBS or WH?
Over the past 5 years, JBS N.
V. (JBS) delivered a total return of +45. 9%, compared to +21. 8% for Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (WH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JBS returned +49. 6% versus WH's +43. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — JBS or WH?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), JBS N.
V. (JBS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 47β versus Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc. 's 0. 81β — meaning WH is approximately 73% more volatile than JBS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, JBS N. V. (JBS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 7% for Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — JBS or WH?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), JBS N.
V. (JBS) is pulling ahead at 14. 6% versus 1. 5% for Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (WH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: JBS N. V. grew EPS 1514% year-over-year, compared to -31. 6% for Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, JBS leads at 4. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — JBS or WH?
Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc.
(WH) is the more profitable company, earning 13. 5% net margin versus 2. 3% for JBS N. V. — meaning it keeps 13. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WH leads at 28. 4% versus 5. 7% for JBS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WH leads at 58. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is JBS or WH more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, JBS N.
V. (JBS) trades at 10. 5x forward P/E versus 17. 4x for Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc. — 6. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for JBS: 19. 4% to $19. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — JBS or WH?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
JBS N. V. (JBS) offers the highest yield at 2. 5%, versus 2. 0% for Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (WH).
09Is JBS or WH better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, JBS N.
V. (JBS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 47), 2. 5% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (JBS: +49. 6%, WH: +43. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between JBS and WH?
These companies operate in different sectors (JBS (Consumer Defensive) and WH (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: JBS is a mid-cap deep-value stock; WH is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.