Packaged Foods
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
JBSS vs WMT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Retail
JBSS vs WMT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Packaged Foods | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $931M | $1.04T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.14B | $703.06B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $70M | $22.91B |
| Gross Margin | 19.1% | 24.9% |
| Operating Margin | 8.9% | 4.1% |
| Forward P/E | 10.9x | 44.7x |
| Total Debt | $102M | $67.09B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $585K | $10.73B |
JBSS vs WMT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| John B. Sanfilippo … (JBSS) | 100 | 91.6 | -8.4% |
| Walmart Inc. (WMT) | 100 | 314.6 | +214.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: JBSS vs WMT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
JBSS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.31, Low D/E 28.3%, current ratio 2.22x
- Beta 0.31, yield 2.6%, current ratio 2.22x
- Lower P/E (10.9x vs 44.7x)
WMT is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 37 yrs, beta 0.12, yield 0.7%
- Rev growth 4.7%, EPS growth 13.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.3%
- 5.0% 10Y total return vs JBSS's 107.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 4.7% revenue growth vs JBSS's 3.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.9x vs 44.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 6.2% margin vs WMT's 3.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.12 vs JBSS's 0.31 | |
| Dividends | 2.6% yield, vs WMT's 0.7% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +39.5% vs WMT's +33.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.7% ROA vs WMT's 7.9%, ROIC 15.2% vs 14.7% |
JBSS vs WMT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
JBSS vs WMT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — JBSS and WMT each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WMT is the larger business by revenue, generating $703.1B annually — 614.9x JBSS's $1.1B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 6.2% (JBSS) to 3.3% (WMT).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.1B | $703.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $127M | $42.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $70M | $22.9B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $33M | $15.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +19.1% | +24.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +8.9% | +4.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +6.2% | +3.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.9% | +2.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.6% | +5.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +31.9% | +35.1% |
Valuation Metrics
JBSS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.8x trailing earnings, JBSS trades at a 67% valuation discount to WMT's 47.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), WMT offers better value at 4.33x vs JBSS's 11.23x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $931M | $1.04T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.0B | $1.09T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 15.83x | 47.65x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.89x | 44.67x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 11.23x | 4.33x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.89x | 24.83x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.84x | 1.45x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.59x | 10.44x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 24.94x |
Profitability & Efficiency
JBSS leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WMT delivers a 22.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $22 in annual profit, vs $20 for JBSS. JBSS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.28x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WMT's 0.67x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WMT scores 6/9 vs JBSS's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +19.5% | +22.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +11.7% | +7.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +15.2% | +14.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +20.4% | +17.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.28x | 0.67x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $102M | $56.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $585,000 | $10.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $102M | $67.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 26.02x | 11.85x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WMT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WMT five years ago would be worth $28,531 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,592 for JBSS. Over the past 12 months, JBSS leads with a +39.5% total return vs WMT's +33.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WMT at 37.5% vs JBSS's -7.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +16.3% | +15.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +39.5% | +33.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -21.6% | +160.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +5.9% | +185.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +107.6% | +505.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -7.8% | +37.5% |
Risk & Volatility
WMT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WMT is the less volatile stock with a 0.12 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than JBSS's 0.31 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WMT currently trades 96.6% from its 52-week high vs JBSS's 93.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.31x | 0.12x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $85.15 | $134.69 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $58.47 | $91.89 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +93.5% | +96.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.4 | 58.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 79K | 17.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — JBSS and WMT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates JBSS as "Buy" and WMT as "Buy". For income investors, JBSS offers the higher dividend yield at 2.61% vs WMT's 0.72%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $137.04 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 64 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.6% | +0.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 37 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.08 | $0.94 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | +0.8% |
JBSS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). WMT leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). 2 tied.
JBSS vs WMT: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is JBSS or WMT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is the stronger pick with 4. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 8% for John B. Sanfilippo & Son, Inc. (JBSS). John B. Sanfilippo & Son, Inc. (JBSS) offers the better valuation at 15. 8x trailing P/E (10. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate John B. Sanfilippo & Son, Inc. (JBSS) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — JBSS or WMT?
On trailing P/E, John B.
Sanfilippo & Son, Inc. (JBSS) is the cheapest at 15. 8x versus Walmart Inc. at 47. 6x. On forward P/E, John B. Sanfilippo & Son, Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 9x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Walmart Inc. wins at 4. 06x versus John B. Sanfilippo & Son, Inc. 's 7. 73x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — JBSS or WMT?
Over the past 5 years, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) delivered a total return of +185. 3%, compared to +5. 9% for John B. Sanfilippo & Son, Inc. (JBSS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WMT returned +505. 0% versus JBSS's +107. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — JBSS or WMT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 12β versus John B. Sanfilippo & Son, Inc. 's 0. 31β — meaning JBSS is approximately 167% more volatile than WMT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, John B. Sanfilippo & Son, Inc. (JBSS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 28% versus 67% for Walmart Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — JBSS or WMT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is pulling ahead at 4. 7% versus 3. 8% for John B. Sanfilippo & Son, Inc. (JBSS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Walmart Inc. grew EPS 13. 3% year-over-year, compared to -2. 3% for John B. Sanfilippo & Son, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, WMT leads at 5. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — JBSS or WMT?
John B.
Sanfilippo & Son, Inc. (JBSS) is the more profitable company, earning 5. 3% net margin versus 3. 1% for Walmart Inc. — meaning it keeps 5. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JBSS leads at 7. 7% versus 4. 2% for WMT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WMT leads at 24. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is JBSS or WMT more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Walmart Inc. (WMT) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 4. 06x versus John B. Sanfilippo & Son, Inc. 's 7. 73x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, John B. Sanfilippo & Son, Inc. (JBSS) trades at 10. 9x forward P/E versus 44. 7x for Walmart Inc. — 33. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — JBSS or WMT?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
John B. Sanfilippo & Son, Inc. (JBSS) offers the highest yield at 2. 6%, versus 0. 7% for Walmart Inc. (WMT).
09Is JBSS or WMT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 12), 0. 7% yield, +505. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WMT: +505. 0%, JBSS: +107. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between JBSS and WMT?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: JBSS is a small-cap deep-value stock; WMT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.